11,184 research outputs found
The Ethiopian Human Rights commission and its contribution to the protection of Human Rights and building of good governance: challenges and prospectp
The nature of the environment in which national human rights institutions (NHRIs) operate determines their effectiveness in building a human rights culture. NHRIs operating in a non-democratic tradition reflect the system itself since the nature of the social, political and legal environment in such system contains informal constraints affecting their overall activities. The Ethiopian Human Rights Commission (Commission) was set up as part of democratic institutions following regime change in the early 1990s. It embarked on discharging functions vested in it in a framework that is not favorable for such institution to be effective. Lack of democratic tradition and good governance, poor culture of respect for human rights, weak institutions, and financial constraints are among the major hurdles limiting the effectiveness of the Commission. Against the prevailing environment, the article examines the effectiveness of the Commission in meeting its objectives on the basis of the evaluation of the practice of the Commission since it started its operation in 2004. Specifically, the performance of the Commission so far in the areas of promotion (sensitization and education) and protection (complaint-handling), and monitoring of human rights are reviewed to see if the institution is effective in defending human rights and thereby building good governance. After highlighting its success story, the major worrying trends and setbacks in developing a culture of respect for human rights and building good governance are explored. Before doing so, the article offers an overview of the establishment, structure, mandate and power of the Commission. Also, a concise statement on the linkage between the overall objectives of NHRIs in general and of the Commission in particular and good governance is offered to indicate that the institution is meant to serve as one of the institutional mechanisms to bring about good governance in the nation
Implementing Public Health Regulations in Developing Countries: Lessons from the OECD Countries
The enforcement of public health standards is a common problem in many developing countries. Public health agencies lack sufficient resources and, too often, enforcement mechanisms rely on slow and erratic judicial systems. These limitations can make traditional public health regulations difficult to implement. In this article, we examine innovative approaches to the implementation of public health regulations that have emerged in recent years within OECD countries. These approaches aim to improve compliance with health standards, while reducing dependence on both the legal system and the administrative resources of public health agencies.
This article begins by discussing some traditional forms of public health regulations; these regulations include administrative searches and inspections as well as licensing measures. Within these traditional forms of public health regulation, there are several ways of improving compliance without substantially increasing administrative costs. These measures include public disclosure and several types of sanctions, which may escalate in severity as an actor continues to flout the public health regulation.
In addition to such traditional measures, we discuss more creative approaches to reducing dependence on the judiciary and reducing administrative costs. Dependence on the judiciary can be reduced through increased reliance on alternative dispute resolution methods, such as mediation and arbitrations, as well as through the use of a public health Ombudsman. Administrative costs could also potentially be reduced through the creative use of public-private cooperation measures, such as negotiated rulemaking and self-regulating codes of conduct. Developing countries may find some useful lessons in the innovative approaches described; however, these approaches will likely need to be adapted to fit each countryβs particular institutional setting
National human rights institutions and access to justice: the role and practice of the human rights commission of Ethiopia in advancing access to justice
National human rights institutions (NHRIs) are quasi-judicial bodies set up specifically for the purpose of promoting and protecting human rights. Among their core functions included are the sensitization of and research and debate on human rights, and investigation of complaints involving human rights issues.
As part of their mandate, NHRIs should promote and facilitate complainantβs access to rights and remedies, including the ones offered by themselves and remedies that exist elsewhere, such as courts of law. Provision of free legal assistance and dissemination of information on human rights by NHRIs helps the poor to access justice, removing financial and information obstacles hampering them from doing so.
Set up in 2000 pursuant to the FDRE Constitution, the Human Rights Commission of Ethiopia has been trying to promote and protect human rights. One of its modest achievements is its attempt to promote human rights through sensitization campaigns and to reach out to the poor via legal aid centres so that such people could access justice. In that regard, the Commission has been undertaking various training and education activities. Also, it has been providing legal counsel and aid to poor litigants despite the fact that the enabling statute makes no explicit mention of such scheme. In the protection realm, the Commission has been investigating complaints lodged to it, helping citizens to get remedies in rather limited cases.
In this piece attempt is made to review the Commissionβs endeavour in promoting and protecting human rights and thereby cast light on its contribution in advancing access to justice. It examines the Commissionβs practice based on promotional as well as protection activities undertaken by the institution since it commenced discharging its function in 2005.
Among questions to be investigated in the study included are the following. In the face of the bulk of population that are unaware of the existence and/or the nature of laws and the means to vindicate them and given the fact that there are few effective methods to create and build awareness, or to provide legal services, what measures have been taken by the Commission, as a complementary body, to fill the void? Given the wide-spread problems facing vulnerable groups to access justice in the nation, has the institution tried to reach out to such group? Does it manage to put in place effective strategies that streamline vulnerable group in its operational procedures?
The examination of these questions relies on the review of the Commissionβs promotional strategies and tools and documents produced for such purpose, investigation of enabling legislation, relevant literature, and interview. Before delving into examining the Commissionβs role to enhance access to justice, it is important to offer background information on the establishment process, structure, mandate, and enforcement powers of the institution
Live Query - Visualized Process Analysis
Business process management (BPM) becomes continuously challenging through a steadily increasing number and even more complex processes. For enabling an effective and efficient control of business processes, (semi-)automatic approaches are necessary as a supporting means. However, these approaches are often hardly applicable in practice since they lack a broad applicability or an acceptable ease of use. This work aims to close this gap by providing an approach that supports a widely applicable, (semi-)automatic analysis of business process models and makes the analysis comprehensible using a graphical visualization
Juridical Analysis of Tax Criminal Law Enforcement: an Overview of Legal Regulations and its Implementation in Indonesia
The purpose of this research is to conduct a juridical analysis of criminal law enforcement in the field of taxation in Indonesia. The focus of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of legislation and its implementation in combating tax crimes. The research method used is a normative juridical approach by examining legislation related to tax crimes, including tax laws, government regulations, and relevant policies. Additionally, an analysis of the legal practices and enforcement of tax crimes in Indonesia is conducted. The research findings indicate that the legislation in the field of taxation has a strong foundation to address tax crimes. However, there are several challenges in its implementation, such as the complexity of tax regulations, lack of adequate human resources and technology, and corruption issues that can affect tax law enforcement. In this context, the research provides recommendations to strengthen the system of criminal law enforcement in tax matters. The recommendations include improving coordination among relevant institutions, enhancing the capacity of human resources in the field of taxation, utilizing information technology to support supervision and tax law enforcement, and increasing transparency and accountability in the process of tax law enforcement. This research is expected to provide a better understanding of the regulation of tax crimes and contribute to the policy and the legislative reforms related to tax law enforcement in Indonesia
ΠΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Ρ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ
ΠΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΊ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ, Π²ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
. Π ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π² Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌ Π°Π΄ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π΄Π»Ρ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ² ΠΏΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΌ, ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ. ΠΠΎ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π°Ρ
Π½Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π² ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ. ΠΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠ² ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅Π³Π΄Π° ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ½Π° ΠΈΠ·-Π·Π° ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΉ Π² Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π¨ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΎ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ½Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ
ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎΠ². ΠΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎ ΠΈΠ³Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π΄ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ: ΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ ΠΎ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ², Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠ± ΠΈΠ½ΡΡ
, Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ°ΡΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π°. ΠΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π΅Ρ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°, ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π²Π·ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ². ΠΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ² Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠ² Π² Π΄ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ
ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ
, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ³ΡΠΎΠ·Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ· Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ΅Π½ Π±ΡΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ². ΠΠ·Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ½Ρ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ°ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ Π½Π° Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠΎΠ² Β«Π»ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈΒ», ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π΅ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠ΅. ΠΡΠ΄Π°Π²Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΌ, ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Π² Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ Π΄Π»Ρ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Ρ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ, ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΠΎ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΌ Π±ΡΠ΄Π΅Ρ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ. Π ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠ° ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ
Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π»ΡΠ±ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π°Ρ
Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ². Π Π΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Π° Π±ΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ, ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ, Π² ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ², ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΠ², Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π»ΡΠ³ΠΎΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΉ Π²ΠΎ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΌΠΈ, ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ±ΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ.Generally, standard theoretical approaches to reforming national economy are quite usable for goals of managing changes of taxation systems and their components. In particular, of most problematic issue for tax administration is all-round provision of implementing principles of horizontal justice, as well as introducing the approaches which allow the execution of commitments on making payments by taxpayers to be more profitable than evasion. In many developing countries, due to political reasons the governmentβs inability to implement their declared programs is frequently the main obstacle to improving the socio-economic progress. Implementation of many reform initiatives is not always successful due to absence of clear strategies in governmental policy of structural transformations. There are wide known models of applying new approaches in systems of public finance management (PFM), particularly, in regard of formation and dynamics of revenues, expenses, debts. The standard analysis of tax systems ignores, as a rule, the efficiency of tax administration connected with transaction costs and shadow economy influence: the issue is about the expenses, on one hand, for payers of obligatory payments and levies, and on the other hand, for taxation authorities, as well as about the other taxation components, non-subject to quantitative assessment, including motivation of breaching legislation. Of great significance is tax behavior, prevention of opportunism, regulation of not only tax rates and taxation basis but also of ways of public information accessibility, application of systemic toolkits of tax collection. While developing detailed plans of reforming, it is necessary to strain after maximum efficiency of continuous cycles of financial resource movements in terms of revenues and expenditures, as well as to consider challenges for interruption of the budget processes. At that, one of the main issue is, obviously, selection of targets and priorities. There are known cases, when the donor community and international organizations insist on βthe best practicesβ introduction, especially if the reforming is carried out with their financial support. In justice to numerous positive examples, it should be borne in mind that each taxation system of every country is characterized by their specific traits, so the efficiency of its reforming will at large depend on considering local features. On the whole, the task of managing changes in the public finance systems is getting more complicated in the context of external and internal factors of uncertainty. Thus, in any circumstances it is vital to ensure continuity of the budget process, as well as execution by the state of its constitutional obligations. The regulatory potential of economy should be focused on implementing sustainable economic development goals. Accordingly, in the taxation system framework, as a strategic tool for governmental regulation, there must function efficient mechanisms of taxes and levies, as well as benefits and preferences in coordination with expenditure items, transfers and subsidies
Measuring progress towards the application of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights: A tabular presentation of the findings of the ILO supervisory system
This document is part of a digital collection provided by the Martin P. Catherwood Library, ILR School, Cornell University, pertaining to the effects of globalization on the workplace worldwide. Special emphasis is placed on labor rights, working conditions, labor market changes, and union organizing.ILO_MeasuringProgressTowardApplicationofFreedomofAssociation_CollectiveBargainingRights.pdf: 636 downloads, before Oct. 1, 2020
- β¦