4,066 research outputs found
Normalisation Control in Deep Inference via Atomic Flows
We introduce `atomic flows': they are graphs obtained from derivations by
tracing atom occurrences and forgetting the logical structure. We study simple
manipulations of atomic flows that correspond to complex reductions on
derivations. This allows us to prove, for propositional logic, a new and very
general normalisation theorem, which contains cut elimination as a special
case. We operate in deep inference, which is more general than other syntactic
paradigms, and where normalisation is more difficult to control. We argue that
atomic flows are a significant technical advance for normalisation theory,
because 1) the technique they support is largely independent of syntax; 2)
indeed, it is largely independent of logical inference rules; 3) they
constitute a powerful geometric formalism, which is more intuitive than syntax
A System of Interaction and Structure
This paper introduces a logical system, called BV, which extends
multiplicative linear logic by a non-commutative self-dual logical operator.
This extension is particularly challenging for the sequent calculus, and so far
it is not achieved therein. It becomes very natural in a new formalism, called
the calculus of structures, which is the main contribution of this work.
Structures are formulae submitted to certain equational laws typical of
sequents. The calculus of structures is obtained by generalising the sequent
calculus in such a way that a new top-down symmetry of derivations is observed,
and it employs inference rules that rewrite inside structures at any depth.
These properties, in addition to allow the design of BV, yield a modular proof
of cut elimination.Comment: This is the authoritative version of the article, with readable
pictures, in colour, also available at
. (The published version contains
errors introduced by the editorial processing.) Web site for Deep Inference
and the Calculus of Structures at <http://alessio.guglielmi.name/res/cos
A Sequent Calculus for Modelling Interferences
A logic calculus is presented that is a conservative extension of linear
logic. The motivation beneath this work concerns lazy evaluation, true
concurrency and interferences in proof search. The calculus includes two new
connectives to deal with multisequent structures and has the cut-elimination
property. Extensions are proposed that give first results concerning our
objectives
Expansion Trees with Cut
Herbrand's theorem is one of the most fundamental insights in logic. From the
syntactic point of view it suggests a compact representation of proofs in
classical first- and higher-order logic by recording the information which
instances have been chosen for which quantifiers, known in the literature as
expansion trees.
Such a representation is inherently analytic and hence corresponds to a
cut-free sequent calculus proof. Recently several extensions of such proof
representations to proofs with cut have been proposed. These extensions are
based on graphical formalisms similar to proof nets and are limited to prenex
formulas.
In this paper we present a new approach that directly extends expansion trees
by cuts and covers also non-prenex formulas. We describe a cut-elimination
procedure for our expansion trees with cut that is based on the natural
reduction steps. We prove that it is weakly normalizing using methods from the
epsilon-calculus
Canonical Proof nets for Classical Logic
Proof nets provide abstract counterparts to sequent proofs modulo rule
permutations; the idea being that if two proofs have the same underlying
proof-net, they are in essence the same proof. Providing a convincing proof-net
counterpart to proofs in the classical sequent calculus is thus an important
step in understanding classical sequent calculus proofs. By convincing, we mean
that (a) there should be a canonical function from sequent proofs to proof
nets, (b) it should be possible to check the correctness of a net in polynomial
time, (c) every correct net should be obtainable from a sequent calculus proof,
and (d) there should be a cut-elimination procedure which preserves
correctness. Previous attempts to give proof-net-like objects for propositional
classical logic have failed at least one of the above conditions. In [23], the
author presented a calculus of proof nets (expansion nets) satisfying (a) and
(b); the paper defined a sequent calculus corresponding to expansion nets but
gave no explicit demonstration of (c). That sequent calculus, called LK\ast in
this paper, is a novel one-sided sequent calculus with both additively and
multiplicatively formulated disjunction rules. In this paper (a self-contained
extended version of [23]), we give a full proof of (c) for expansion nets with
respect to LK\ast, and in addition give a cut-elimination procedure internal to
expansion nets - this makes expansion nets the first notion of proof-net for
classical logic satisfying all four criteria.Comment: Accepted for publication in APAL (Special issue, Classical Logic and
Computation
A System of Interaction and Structure II: The Need for Deep Inference
This paper studies properties of the logic BV, which is an extension of
multiplicative linear logic (MLL) with a self-dual non-commutative operator. BV
is presented in the calculus of structures, a proof theoretic formalism that
supports deep inference, in which inference rules can be applied anywhere
inside logical expressions. The use of deep inference results in a simple
logical system for MLL extended with the self-dual non-commutative operator,
which has been to date not known to be expressible in sequent calculus. In this
paper, deep inference is shown to be crucial for the logic BV, that is, any
restriction on the ``depth'' of the inference rules of BV would result in a
strictly less expressive logical system
- …