11,960 research outputs found

    Automorphic orbits in free groups

    Get PDF
    Let FnF_n be the free group of a finite rank nn. We study orbits Orbϕ(u)Orb_{\phi}(u), where uu is an element of the group FnF_n, under the action of an automorphism ϕ\phi. If an orbit like that is finite, we determine precisely what its cardinality can be if uu runs through the whole group FnF_n, and ϕ\phi runs through the whole group Aut(Fn)Aut(F_n). Another problem that we address here is related to Whitehead's algorithm that determines whether or not a given element of a free group of finite rank is an automorphic image of another given element. It is known that the first part of this algorithm (reducing a given free word to a free word of minimum possible length by elementary Whitehead automorphisms) is fast (of quadratic time with respect to the length of the word). On the other hand, the second part of the algorithm (applied to two words of the same minimum length) was always considered very slow. We give here an improved algorithm for the second part, and we believe this algorithm always terminates in polynomial time with respect to the length of the words. We prove that this is indeed the case if the free group has rank 2.Comment: 10 page

    Algebraic extensions in free groups

    Full text link
    The aim of this paper is to unify the points of view of three recent and independent papers (Ventura 1997, Margolis, Sapir and Weil 2001 and Kapovich and Miasnikov 2002), where similar modern versions of a 1951 theorem of Takahasi were given. We develop a theory of algebraic extensions for free groups, highlighting the analogies and differences with respect to the corresponding classical field-theoretic notions, and we discuss in detail the notion of algebraic closure. We apply that theory to the study and the computation of certain algebraic properties of subgroups (e.g. being malnormal, pure, inert or compressed, being closed in certain profinite topologies) and the corresponding closure operators. We also analyze the closure of a subgroup under the addition of solutions of certain sets of equations.Comment: 35 page

    Isometric endomorphisms of free groups

    Get PDF
    An arbitrary homomorphism between groups is nonincreasing for stable commutator length, and there are infinitely many (injective) homomorphisms between free groups which strictly decrease the stable commutator length of some elements. However, we show in this paper that a random homomorphism between free groups is almost surely an isometry for stable commutator length for every element; in particular, the unit ball in the scl norm of a free group admits an enormous number of exotic isometries. Using similar methods, we show that a random fatgraph in a free group is extremal (i.e. is an absolute minimizer for relative Gromov norm) for its boundary; this implies, for instance, that a random element of a free group with commutator length at most n has commutator length exactly n and stable commutator length exactly n-1/2. Our methods also let us construct explicit (and computable) quasimorphisms which certify these facts.Comment: 26 pages, 6 figures; minor typographical edits for final published versio

    Dual automorphisms of free groups

    Full text link
    For any choice of a basis A\cal A the free group FNF_N of finite rank N≥2N \geq 2 can be canonically identified with the set F(A)F(\cal A) of reduced words in A∪A−1\cal A\cup \cal A^{-1}. However, such a word w∈F(A)w \in F(\cal A) admits a second interpretation, namely as cylinder Cw1⊂∂FNC^1_w \subset \partial F_N. The subset of ∂FN\partial F_N defined by Cw1C^1_w depends not only on the element of FNF_N given by the word ww, but also on the chosen basis A\cal A. In particular one has in general, for \Phi \in \Aut(F_N): Φ(Cw1)≠CΦ(w)1\Phi(C^1_w) \neq C^1_{\Phi(w)} Indeed, the image of a cylinder under an automorphism \Phi \in \Aut(F_N) is in general not a cylinder, but a finite union of cylinders: Φ(Cw1)=CU1:=⋃ui∈UCui1\Phi (C^1_w)=C^{1}_U := \bigcup_{u_i \in U} C^1_{u_i} In his thesis the first author has given an efficient algorithm and a formula how to determine such a (uniquely determined) finite {\em reduced} set U=U(w)⊂FNU = U(w) \subset F_N. We use those to define the dual automorphism ΦA∗\Phi_{\cal A}^* by setting ΦA∗(w)=U(w)\Phi_{\cal A}^*(w) = U(w). \smallskip \noindent {\bf Theorem:} {\it For any \Phi \in \Aut(F_N) there are at most 2N distinct finite subsets Ui⊂FNU_i \subset F_N such that for any w=y1...yr∈FAw = y_1 ... y_r \in F_A there is one of them, say Ui(w)U_{i(w)}, with ΦA∗(w)=Φ(w)Ui(w) ,\Phi_{\cal A}^*(w) = \Phi(w) U_{i(w)}\, , and Ui(w)U_{i(w)} depends only on the last letter y_r \in \CA \cup \CA^{-1}. Furthermore, the seize of each UiU_{i} is bounded by 2t2^t, where t≥0t \geq 0 is the number of Nielsen automorphisms in any decomposition of Φ\Phi as product of basis permutations, basis inversions and elementary Nielsen automorphisms.

    Subset currents on free groups

    Full text link
    We introduce and study the space of \emph{subset currents} on the free group FNF_N. A subset current on FNF_N is a positive FNF_N-invariant locally finite Borel measure on the space CN\mathfrak C_N of all closed subsets of ∂FN\partial F_N consisting of at least two points. While ordinary geodesic currents generalize conjugacy classes of nontrivial group elements, a subset current is a measure-theoretic generalization of the conjugacy class of a nontrivial finitely generated subgroup in FNF_N, and, more generally, in a word-hyperbolic group. The concept of a subset current is related to the notion of an "invariant random subgroup" with respect to some conjugacy-invariant probability measure on the space of closed subgroups of a topological group. If we fix a free basis AA of FNF_N, a subset current may also be viewed as an FNF_N-invariant measure on a "branching" analog of the geodesic flow space for FNF_N, whose elements are infinite subtrees (rather than just geodesic lines) of the Cayley graph of FNF_N with respect to AA.Comment: updated version; to appear in Geometriae Dedicat
    • …
    corecore