Francisella tularensis novicida proteomic and transcriptomic data integration and annotation based on semantic web technologies

This paper summarises the lessons and experiences gained from a case study of the application of semantic web technologies to the integration of data from the bacterial species Francisella tularensis novicida (Fn). Fn data sources are disparate and heterogeneous, as multiple laboratories across the world, using multiple technologies, perform experiments to understand the mechanism of virulence. It is hard to integrate these data sources in a flexible manner that allows new experimental data to be added and compared when required

Biomedical data integration in computational drug design and bioinformatics

[Abstract In recent years, in the post genomic era, more and more data is being generated by biological high throughput technologies, such as proteomics and transcriptomics. This omics data can be very useful, but the real challenge is to analyze all this data, as a whole, after integrating it. Biomedical data integration enables making queries to different, heterogeneous and distributed biomedical data sources. Data integration solutions can be very useful not only in the context of drug design, but also in biomedical information retrieval, clinical diagnosis, system biology, etc. In this review, we analyze the most common approaches to biomedical data integration, such as federated databases, data warehousing, multi-agent systems and semantic technology, as well as the solutions developed using these approaches in the past few years.Red Gallega de Investigación sobre Cáncer Colorrectal; Ref. 2009/58Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo; 209RT- 0366Instituto de Salud Carlos III; PIO52048Instituto de Salud Carlos III; RD07/0067/0005Ministerio de Industria, Turismo y Comercio; TSI-020110-2009-

The evaluation and harmonisation of disparate information metamodels in support of epidemiological and public health research

BACKGROUND: Descriptions of data, metadata, provide researchers with the contextual information they need to achieve research goals. Metadata enable data discovery, sharing and reuse, and are fundamental to managing data across the research data lifecycle. However, challenges associated with data discoverability negatively impact on the extent to which these data are known by the wider research community. This, when combined with a lack of quality assessment frameworks and limited awareness of the implications associated with poor quality metadata, are hampering the way in which epidemiological and public health research data are documented and repurposed. Furthermore, the absence of enduring metadata management models to capture consent for record linkage metadata in longitudinal studies can hinder researchers from establishing standardised descriptions of consent. AIM: To examine how metadata management models can be applied to ameliorate the use of research data within the context of epidemiological and public health research. METHODS: A combination of systematic literature reviews, online surveys and qualitative data analyses were used to investigate the current state of the art, identify current perceived challenges and inform creation and evaluation of the models. RESULTS: There are three components to this thesis: a) enhancing data discoverability; b) improving metadata quality assessment; and c) improving the capture of consent for record linkage metadata. First, three models were examined to enhance research data discoverability: data publications, linked data on the World Wide Web and development of an online public health portal. Second, a novel framework to assess epidemiological and public health metadata quality framework was created and evaluated. Third, a novel metadata management model to improve capture of consent for record linkage metadata was created and evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from these studies have contributed to a set of recommendations for change in research data management policy and practice to enhance stakeholders’ research environment