Formal Availability Analysis using Theorem Proving

Availability analysis is used to assess the possible failures and their restoration process for a given system. This analysis involves the calculation of instantaneous and steady-state availabilities of the individual system components and the usage of this information along with the commonly used availability modeling techniques, such as Availability Block Diagrams (ABD) and Fault Trees (FTs) to determine the system-level availability. Traditionally, availability analyses are conducted using paper-and-pencil methods and simulation tools but they cannot ascertain absolute correctness due to their inaccuracy limitations. As a complementary approach, we propose to use the higher-order-logic theorem prover HOL4 to conduct the availability analysis of safety-critical systems. For this purpose, we present a higher-order-logic formalization of instantaneous and steady-state availability, ABD configurations and generic unavailability FT gates. For illustration purposes, these formalizations are utilized to conduct formal availability analysis of a satellite solar array, which is used as the main source of power for the Dong Fang Hong-3 (DFH-3) satellite.Comment: 16 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1505.0264

Dynamic Dependability Analysis using HOL Theorem Proving with Application in Multiprocessor Systems

Dynamic dependability analysis has become an essential step in the design process of safety-critical systems to ensure the delivery of a trusted service without failures. Dependability usually encompasses several attributes, such as reliability and availability. A dynamic dependability model is created using one of the dependability modeling techniques, such as Dynamic Fault Trees (DFTs) and Dynamic Reliability Block Diagrams (DRBDs). Several analysis methods, including paper-and-pencil or simulation, exist for analyzing these models to ascertain various dependability related parameters. However, their results cannot be always trusted since they may involve some approximations, truncations or even errors. Formal methods, such as model checking and theorem proving, can be used to overcome these inaccuracy limitations due to their inherent soundness and completeness. However, model checking suffers from state-space explosion if the state space is large. While, theorem proving was used only for the static dependability analysis without considering the system dynamics. In order to conduct the formal dependability analysis of systems that exhibit dynamic failure behaviors within a theorem prover, these models need to be captured formally, where their structures, operators and properties are properly formalized. In this thesis, we provide a complete framework for the formal dependability analysis of systems modeled as DFTs and DRBDs in the HOL4 higher-order logic theorem prover. We provide the formalization of DFT gates and verify important simplification theorems based on well-known DFT algebra. In addition, our framework allows both qualitative and quantitative DFT analyses to be conducted using theorem proving. We use this formalization to formally verify the DFT rewrite rules, that are used by automated DFT analysis tools, to ascertain their correctness. Due to the lack of a DRBD algebra that allows the analysis using a theorem prover, in this thesis, we develop and formalize a novel algebra that includes operators and simplification theorems to formalize traditional RBD structures, such as the series and parallel, besides the DRBD spare construct. We formally verify their reliability expressions, which allows conducting both the qualitative and quantitative analyses of a given system. Leveraging upon the complementary nature of DFTs and DRBDs, our proposed framework provides the possibility of formally converting one model to the other, which allows reasoning about both the success and failure of a given system. Our framework provides generic expressions of probability of failure and reliability that are independent of the failure distribution of an arbitrary number of system components, which cannot be obtained using other formal tools, such as model checking. In order to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed framework, we formally model and analyze the dependability of the terminal, broadcast and network reliability of shuffle-exchange networks, which are multistage interconnections networks that are used to connect the elements of multiprocessor systems. Conducting a sound analysis with generic expressions is essential in these systems, where it is required to accurately capture and analyze the failure behavior

Holistic analysis of mix protocols

Security protocols are often analysed in isolation as academic challenges. However, the real world can require various combinations of them, such as a certified email protocol executed over a resilient channel, or the key registration protocol to precede the purchase protocols of Secure Electronic Transactions (SET). We develop what appears to be the first scalable approach to specifying and analysing mix protocols. It expands on the Inductive Method by exploiting the simplicity with which inductive definitions can refer to each other. This lets the human analyst study each protocol separately first, and then derive holistic properties about the mix. The approach, which is demonstrated on the sequential composition of a certification protocol with an authentication one, is not limited by the features of the protocols, which can, for example, share message components such as cryptographic keys and nonces. It bears potential for the analysis of complex protocols constructed by general composition of others

Robust Computer Algebra, Theorem Proving, and Oracle AI

In the context of superintelligent AI systems, the term "oracle" has two meanings. One refers to modular systems queried for domain-specific tasks. Another usage, referring to a class of systems which may be useful for addressing the value alignment and AI control problems, is a superintelligent AI system that only answers questions. The aim of this manuscript is to survey contemporary research problems related to oracles which align with long-term research goals of AI safety. We examine existing question answering systems and argue that their high degree of architectural heterogeneity makes them poor candidates for rigorous analysis as oracles. On the other hand, we identify computer algebra systems (CASs) as being primitive examples of domain-specific oracles for mathematics and argue that efforts to integrate computer algebra systems with theorem provers, systems which have largely been developed independent of one another, provide a concrete set of problems related to the notion of provable safety that has emerged in the AI safety community. We review approaches to interfacing CASs with theorem provers, describe well-defined architectural deficiencies that have been identified with CASs, and suggest possible lines of research and practical software projects for scientists interested in AI safety.Comment: 15 pages, 3 figure

Formalization of Transform Methods using HOL Light

Transform methods, like Laplace and Fourier, are frequently used for analyzing the dynamical behaviour of engineering and physical systems, based on their transfer function, and frequency response or the solutions of their corresponding differential equations. In this paper, we present an ongoing project, which focuses on the higher-order logic formalization of transform methods using HOL Light theorem prover. In particular, we present the motivation of the formalization, which is followed by the related work. Next, we present the task completed so far while highlighting some of the challenges faced during the formalization. Finally, we present a roadmap to achieve our objectives, the current status and the future goals for this project.Comment: 15 Pages, CICM 201

Formalization of Complex Vectors in Higher-Order Logic

Complex vector analysis is widely used to analyze continuous systems in many disciplines, including physics and engineering. In this paper, we present a higher-order-logic formalization of the complex vector space to facilitate conducting this analysis within the sound core of a theorem prover: HOL Light. Our definition of complex vector builds upon the definitions of complex numbers and real vectors. This extension allows us to extensively benefit from the already verified theorems based on complex analysis and real vector analysis. To show the practical usefulness of our library we adopt it to formalize electromagnetic fields and to prove the law of reflection for the planar waves.Comment: 15 pages, 1 figur

Towards the Formalization of Fractional Calculus in Higher-Order Logic

Fractional calculus is a generalization of classical theories of integration and differentiation to arbitrary order (i.e., real or complex numbers). In the last two decades, this new mathematical modeling approach has been widely used to analyze a wide class of physical systems in various fields of science and engineering. In this paper, we describe an ongoing project which aims at formalizing the basic theories of fractional calculus in the HOL Light theorem prover. Mainly, we present the motivation and application of such formalization efforts, a roadmap to achieve our goals, current status of the project and future milestones.Comment: 9 page