A perspective on architectural re-engineering

Continuous evolution towards very large, heterogeneous, highly dynamic computing systems entails the need for sound and flexible approaches to deal with system modification and re-engineering. The approach proposed in this paper combines an analysis stage, to identify concrete patterns of interaction in legacy code, with an iterative re-engineering process at a higher level of abstraction. Both stages are supported by the tools CoordPat and Archery, respectively. Bi-directional model transformations connecting code level and design level architectural models are defined. The approach is demonstrated in a (fragment of a) case study.This work is funded by the ERDF through the Programme COMPETE and by FCT, the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, under contract FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-028923

Fully-automated Runtime Enforcement of Component-based Systems with Formal and Sound Recovery

International audienceWe introduce runtime enforcement of specifications on component-based systems (CBS) modeled in the BIP (Behavior, Interaction and Priority) framework. Runtime enforcement is an increasingly popular and effective dynamic validation technique aiming to ensure the correct runtime behavior (w.r.t. a formal specification) of a system using a so-called enforcement monitor. BIP is a powerful and expressive component-based framework for the formal construction of heterogeneous systems. Because of BIP expressiveness however , it is difficult to enforce complex behavioral properties at design-time. We first introduce a theoretical runtime enforcement framework for component-based systems where we delineate a hierarchy of enforceable properties (i.e., properties that can be enforced) according to the number of observational steps a system is allowed to deviate from the property (i.e., the notion of k-step enforceability). To ensure the observational equivalence between the correct executions of the initial system and the monitored system, we show that i) only stutter-invariant properties should be enforced on CBS with our monitors, and ii) safety properties are 1-step enforceable. Second, given an abstract enforcement monitor for some 1-step enforceable property, we define a series of formal transformations to instrument (at relevant locations) a CBS described in the BIP framework to integrate the monitor. At runtime, the monitor observes and automatically avoids any error in the behavior of the system w.r.t. the property. Third, our approach is fully implemented in RE-BIP, an available tool integrated in the BIP tool suite. Fourth, to validate our approach, we use RE-BIP to i) enforce deadlock-freedom on a dining philosophers benchmark, and ii) ensure the correct placement of robots on a map

Fully-automated Runtime Enforcement of Component-based Systems with Formal and Sound Recovery

International audienceWe introduce runtime enforcement of specifications on component-based systems (CBS) modeled in the BIP (Behavior, Interaction and Priority) framework. Runtime enforcement is an increasingly popular and effective dynamic validation technique aiming to ensure the correct runtime behavior (w.r.t. a formal specification) of a system using a so-called enforcement monitor. BIP is a powerful and expressive component-based framework for the formal construction of heterogeneous systems. Because of BIP expressiveness however , it is difficult to enforce complex behavioral properties at design-time. We first introduce a theoretical runtime enforcement framework for component-based systems where we delineate a hierarchy of enforceable properties (i.e., properties that can be enforced) according to the number of observational steps a system is allowed to deviate from the property (i.e., the notion of k-step enforceability). To ensure the observational equivalence between the correct executions of the initial system and the monitored system, we show that i) only stutter-invariant properties should be enforced on CBS with our monitors, and ii) safety properties are 1-step enforceable. Second, given an abstract enforcement monitor for some 1-step enforceable property, we define a series of formal transformations to instrument (at relevant locations) a CBS described in the BIP framework to integrate the monitor. At runtime, the monitor observes and automatically avoids any error in the behavior of the system w.r.t. the property. Third, our approach is fully implemented in RE-BIP, an available tool integrated in the BIP tool suite. Fourth, to validate our approach, we use RE-BIP to i) enforce deadlock-freedom on a dining philosophers benchmark, and ii) ensure the correct placement of robots on a map

Programming and symbolic computation in Maude

[EN] Rewriting logic is both a flexible semantic framework within which widely different concurrent systems can be naturally specified and a logical framework in which widely different logics can be specified. Maude programs are exactly rewrite theories. Maude has also a formal environment of verification tools. Symbolic computation is a powerful technique for reasoning about the correctness of concurrent systems and for increasing the power of formal tools. We present several new symbolic features of Maude that enhance formal reasoning about Maude programs and the effectiveness of formal tools. They include: (i) very general unification modulo user-definable equational theories, and (ii) symbolic reachability analysis of concurrent systems using narrowing. The paper does not focus just on symbolic features: it also describes several other new Maude features, including: (iii) Maude's strategy language for controlling rewriting, and (iv) external objects that allow flexible interaction of Maude object-based concurrent systems with the external world. In particular, meta-interpreters are external objects encapsulating Maude interpreters that can interact with many other objects. To make the paper self-contained and give a reasonably complete language overview, we also review the basic Maude features for equational rewriting and rewriting with rules, Maude programming of concurrent object systems, and reflection. Furthermore, we include many examples illustrating all the Maude notions and features described in the paper.Duran has been partially supported by MINECO/FEDER project TIN2014-52034-R. Escobar has been partially supported by the EU (FEDER) and the MCIU under grant RTI2018-094403-B-C32, by the Spanish Generalitat Valenciana under grant PROMETE0/2019/098, and by the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research under award number FA9550-17-1-0286. MartiOliet and Rubio have been partially supported by MCIU Spanish project TRACES (TIN2015-67522-C3-3-R). Rubio has also been partially supported by a MCIU grant FPU17/02319. Meseguer and Talcott have been partially supported by NRL Grant N00173 -17-1-G002. Talcott has also been partially supported by ONR Grant N00014-15-1-2202.Durán, F.; Eker, S.; Escobar Román, S.; NARCISO MARTÍ OLIET; José Meseguer; Rubén Rubio; Talcott, C. (2020). Programming and symbolic computation in Maude. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming. 110:1-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlamp.2019.100497S158110Alpuente, M., Escobar, S., Espert, J., & Meseguer, J. (2014). A modular order-sorted equational generalization algorithm. Information and Computation, 235, 98-136. doi:10.1016/j.ic.2014.01.006K. Bae, J. Meseguer, Predicate abstraction of rewrite theories, in: [36], 2014, pp. 61–76.Bae, K., & Meseguer, J. (2015). Model checking linear temporal logic of rewriting formulas under localized fairness. Science of Computer Programming, 99, 193-234. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.02.006Bae, K., Meseguer, J., & Ölveczky, P. C. (2014). Formal patterns for multirate distributed real-time systems. Science of Computer Programming, 91, 3-44. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2013.09.010P. Borovanský, C. Kirchner, H. Kirchner, P.E. Moreau, C. Ringeissen, An overview of ELAN, in: [77], 1998, pp. 55–70.Bouhoula, A., Jouannaud, J.-P., & Meseguer, J. (2000). Specification and proof in membership equational logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 236(1-2), 35-132. doi:10.1016/s0304-3975(99)00206-6Bravenboer, M., Kalleberg, K. T., Vermaas, R., & Visser, E. (2008). Stratego/XT 0.17. A language and toolset for program transformation. Science of Computer Programming, 72(1-2), 52-70. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2007.11.003Bruni, R., & Meseguer, J. (2006). Semantic foundations for generalized rewrite theories. Theoretical Computer Science, 360(1-3), 386-414. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2006.04.012M. Clavel, F. Durán, S. Eker, S. Escobar, P. Lincoln, N. Martí-Oliet, C.L. Talcott, Two decades of Maude, in: [86], 2015, pp. 232–254.Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martı́-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., & Quesada, J. F. (2002). Maude: specification and programming in rewriting logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 285(2), 187-243. doi:10.1016/s0304-3975(01)00359-0Clavel, M., & Meseguer, J. (2002). Reflection in conditional rewriting logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 285(2), 245-288. doi:10.1016/s0304-3975(01)00360-7F. Durán, S. Eker, S. Escobar, N. Martí-Oliet, J. Meseguer, C.L. Talcott, Associative unification and symbolic reasoning modulo associativity in Maude, in: [121], 2018, pp. 98–114.Durán, F., Lucas, S., Marché, C., Meseguer, J., & Urbain, X. (2008). Proving operational termination of membership equational programs. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 21(1-2), 59-88. doi:10.1007/s10990-008-9028-2F. Durán, J. Meseguer, An extensible module algebra for Maude, in: [77], 1998, pp. 174–195.Durán, F., & Meseguer, J. (2003). Structured theories and institutions. Theoretical Computer Science, 309(1-3), 357-380. doi:10.1016/s0304-3975(03)00312-8Durán, F., & Meseguer, J. (2007). Maude’s module algebra. Science of Computer Programming, 66(2), 125-153. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2006.07.002Durán, F., & Meseguer, J. (2012). On the Church-Rosser and coherence properties of conditional order-sorted rewrite theories. The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 81(7-8), 816-850. doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2011.12.004F. Durán, P.C. Ölveczky, A guide to extending Full Maude illustrated with the implementation of Real-Time Maude, in: [116], 2009, pp. 83–102.S. Escobar, Multi-paradigm programming in Maude, in: [121], 2018, pp. 26–44.Escobar, S., Meadows, C., Meseguer, J., & Santiago, S. (2014). State space reduction in the Maude-NRL Protocol Analyzer. Information and Computation, 238, 157-186. doi:10.1016/j.ic.2014.07.007Escobar, S., Sasse, R., & Meseguer, J. (2012). Folding variant narrowing and optimal variant termination. The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 81(7-8), 898-928. doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2012.01.002H. Garavel, M. Tabikh, I. Arrada, Benchmarking implementations of term rewriting and pattern matching in algebraic, functional, and object-oriented languages – the 4th rewrite engines competition, in: [121], 2018, pp. 1–25.Goguen, J. A., & Burstall, R. M. (1992). Institutions: abstract model theory for specification and programming. Journal of the ACM, 39(1), 95-146. doi:10.1145/147508.147524Goguen, J. A., & Meseguer, J. (1984). Equality, types, modules, and (why not?) generics for logic programming. The Journal of Logic Programming, 1(2), 179-210. doi:10.1016/0743-1066(84)90004-9Goguen, J. A., & Meseguer, J. (1992). Order-sorted algebra I: equational deduction for multiple inheritance, overloading, exceptions and partial operations. Theoretical Computer Science, 105(2), 217-273. doi:10.1016/0304-3975(92)90302-vR. Gutiérrez, J. Meseguer, Variant-based decidable satisfiability in initial algebras with predicates, in: [61], 2018, pp. 306–322.Gutiérrez, R., Meseguer, J., & Rocha, C. (2015). Order-sorted equality enrichments modulo axioms. Science of Computer Programming, 99, 235-261. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.07.003Horn, A. (1951). On sentences which are true of direct unions of algebras. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 16(1), 14-21. doi:10.2307/2268661Katelman, M., Keller, S., & Meseguer, J. (2012). Rewriting semantics of production rule sets. The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 81(7-8), 929-956. doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2012.06.002Kowalski, R. (1979). Algorithm = logic + control. Communications of the ACM, 22(7), 424-436. doi:10.1145/359131.359136Lucanu, D., Rusu, V., & Arusoaie, A. (2017). A generic framework for symbolic execution: A coinductive approach. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 80, 125-163. doi:10.1016/j.jsc.2016.07.012D. Lucanu, V. Rusu, A. Arusoaie, D. Nowak, Verifying reachability-logic properties on rewriting-logic specifications, in: [86], 2015, pp. 451–474.Lucas, S., & Meseguer, J. (2016). Normal forms and normal theories in conditional rewriting. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, 85(1), 67-97. doi:10.1016/j.jlamp.2015.06.001N. Martí-Oliet, J. Meseguer, A. Verdejo, A rewriting semantics for Maude strategies, in: [116], 2009, pp. 227–247.Martí-Oliet, N., Palomino, M., & Verdejo, A. (2007). Strategies and simulations in a semantic framework. Journal of Algorithms, 62(3-4), 95-116. doi:10.1016/j.jalgor.2007.04.002Meseguer, J. (1992). Conditional rewriting logic as a unified model of concurrency. Theoretical Computer Science, 96(1), 73-155. doi:10.1016/0304-3975(92)90182-fMeseguer, J. (2012). Twenty years of rewriting logic. The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 81(7-8), 721-781. doi:10.1016/j.jlap.2012.06.003Meseguer, J. (2017). Strict coherence of conditional rewriting modulo axioms. Theoretical Computer Science, 672, 1-35. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2016.12.026J. Meseguer, Generalized rewrite theories and coherence completion, in: [121], 2018, pp. 164–183.Meseguer, J. (2018). Variant-based satisfiability in initial algebras. Science of Computer Programming, 154, 3-41. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2017.09.001Meseguer, J., Goguen, J. A., & Smolka, G. (1989). Order-sorted unification. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 8(4), 383-413. doi:10.1016/s0747-7171(89)80036-7Meseguer, J., & Ölveczky, P. C. (2012). Formalization and correctness of the PALS architectural pattern for distributed real-time systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 451, 1-37. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2012.05.040Meseguer, J., Palomino, M., & Martí-Oliet, N. (2008). Equational abstractions. Theoretical Computer Science, 403(2-3), 239-264. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2008.04.040Meseguer, J., & Roşu, G. (2007). The rewriting logic semantics project. Theoretical Computer Science, 373(3), 213-237. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2006.12.018Meseguer, J., & Roşu, G. (2013). The rewriting logic semantics project: A progress report. Information and Computation, 231, 38-69. doi:10.1016/j.ic.2013.08.004Meseguer, J., & Skeirik, S. (2017). Equational formulas and pattern operations in initial order-sorted algebras. Formal Aspects of Computing, 29(3), 423-452. doi:10.1007/s00165-017-0415-5Meseguer, J., & Thati, P. (2007). Symbolic reachability analysis using narrowing and its application to verification of cryptographic protocols. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 20(1-2), 123-160. doi:10.1007/s10990-007-9000-6C. Olarte, E. Pimentel, C. Rocha, Proving structural properties of sequent systems in rewriting logic, in: [121], 2018, pp. 115–135.Ölveczky, P. C., & Meseguer, J. (2007). Semantics and pragmatics of Real-Time Maude. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 20(1-2), 161-196. doi:10.1007/s10990-007-9001-5Ölveczky, P. C., & Thorvaldsen, S. (2009). Formal modeling, performance estimation, and model checking of wireless sensor network algorithms in Real-Time Maude. Theoretical Computer Science, 410(2-3), 254-280. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2008.09.022Rocha, C., Meseguer, J., & Muñoz, C. (2017). Rewriting modulo SMT and open system analysis. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, 86(1), 269-297. doi:10.1016/j.jlamp.2016.10.001Şerbănuţă, T. F., Roşu, G., & Meseguer, J. (2009). A rewriting logic approach to operational semantics. Information and Computation, 207(2), 305-340. doi:10.1016/j.ic.2008.03.026Skeirik, S., & Meseguer, J. (2018). Metalevel algorithms for variant satisfiability. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, 96, 81-110. doi:10.1016/j.jlamp.2017.12.006S. Skeirik, A. Ştefănescu, J. Meseguer, A constructor-based reachability logic for rewrite theories, in: [61], 2018, pp. 201–217.Strachey, C. (2000). Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 13(1/2), 11-49. doi:10.1023/a:1010000313106A. Ştefănescu, S. Ciobâcă, R. Mereuta, B.M. Moore, T. Serbanuta, G. Roşu, All-path reachability logic, in: [36], 2014, pp. 425–440.Tushkanova, E., Giorgetti, A., Ringeissen, C., & Kouchnarenko, O. (2015). A rule-based system for automatic decidability and combinability. Science of Computer Programming, 99, 3-23. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.02.00

Proceedings: Cornell Symposium: Hospitality, Health & Design HHDS2016 In Search of a Healthy Future

[Excerpt] The purpose of this conference therefore is to bring together academic scholars and industry leaders who have interest in exploring the rapidly evolving dynamics of hospitality and healthcare industries. Furthermore, we believe that design thinking provides an effective approach for exploring this exciting topic from both academic and practitioners’ perspectives

TTSS'11 - 5th International Workshop on Harnessing Theories for Tool Support in Software

The aim of the workshop is to bring together practitioners and researchers from academia, industry and government to present and discuss ideas about: • How to deal with the complexity of software projects by multi-view modeling and separation of concerns about the design of functionality, interaction, concurrency, scheduling, and nonfunctional requirements, and • How to ensure correctness and dependability of software by integrating formal methods and tools for modeling, design, verification and validation into design and development processes and environments. • Case studies and experience reports about harnessing static analysis tools such as model checking, theorem proving, testing, as well as runtime monitoring