Fault Tolerant Gradient Clock Synchronization

Synchronizing clocks in distributed systems is well-understood, both in terms of fault-tolerance in fully connected systems and the dependence of local and global worst-case skews (i.e., maximum clock difference between neighbors and arbitrary pairs of nodes, respectively) on the diameter of fault-free systems. However, so far nothing non-trivial is known about the local skew that can be achieved in topologies that are not fully connected even under a single Byzantine fault. Put simply, in this work we show that the most powerful known techniques for fault-tolerant and gradient clock synchronization are compatible, in the sense that the best of both worlds can be achieved simultaneously. Concretely, we combine the Lynch-Welch algorithm [Welch1988] for synchronizing a clique of $n$ nodes despite up to $f<n/3$ Byzantine faults with the gradient clock synchronization (GCS) algorithm by Lenzen et al. [Lenzen2010] in order to render the latter resilient to faults. As this is not possible on general graphs, we augment an input graph $\mathcal{G}$ by replacing each node by $3f+1$ fully connected copies, which execute an instance of the Lynch-Welch algorithm. We then interpret these clusters as supernodes executing the GCS algorithm, where for each cluster its correct nodes' Lynch-Welch clocks provide estimates of the logical clock of the supernode in the GCS algorithm. By connecting clusters corresponding to neighbors in $\mathcal{G}$ in a fully bipartite manner, supernodes can inform each other about (estimates of) their logical clock values. This way, we achieve asymptotically optimal local skew, granted that no cluster contains more than $f$ faulty nodes, at factor $O(f)$ and $O(f^2)$ overheads in terms of nodes and edges, respectively. Note that tolerating $f$ faulty neighbors trivially requires degree larger than $f$, so this is asymptotically optimal as well

Hazard-free clock synchronization

The growing complexity of microprocessors makes it infeasible to distribute a single clock source over the whole processor with a small clock skew. Hence, chips are split into multiple clock regions, each covered by a single clock source. This poses a problem for communication between these clock regions. Clock synchronization algorithms promise an advantage over state-of-the-art solutions, such as GALS systems. When clock regions are synchronous the communication latency improves significantly over handshake-based solutions. We focus on the implementation of clock synchronization algorithms. A major obstacle when implementing circuits on clock domain crossings are hazardous signals. We can formally define hazards by extending the Boolean logic by a third value u. In this thesis, we describe a theory for designing and analyzing hazard-free circuits. We develop strategies for hazard-free encoding and construction of hazard-free circuits from finite state machines. Furthermore, we discuss clock synchronization algorithms and a possible combination of them. In the end, we present two implementations of the GCS algorithm by Lenzen, Locher, and Wattenhofer (JACM 2010). We prove by rigorous analysis that the systems implement the algorithm. The theory described above is used to prove that our clock synchronization circuits are hazard-free (in the sense that they compute the most precise output possible). Simulation of our GCS system shows that it achieves a skew between neighboring clock regions that is smaller than a few inverter delays.Aufgrund der zunehmenden Komplexität von Mikroprozessoren ist es unmöglich, mit einer einzigen Taktquelle den gesamten Prozessor ohne großen Versatz zu takten. Daher werden Chips in mehrere Regionen aufgeteilt, die jeweils von einer einzelnen Taktquelle abgedeckt werden. Dies stellt ein Problem für die Kommunikation zwischen diesen Taktregionen dar. Algorithmen zur Taktsynchronisation bieten einen Vorteil gegenüber aktuellen Lösungen, wie z.B. GALS-Systemen. Synchronisiert man die Taktregionen, so verbessert sich die Latenz der Kommunikation erheblich. In Schaltkreisen zwischen zwei Taktregionen können undefinierte Signale, sogenannte Hazards auftreten. Indem wir die boolesche Algebra um einen dritten Wert u erweitern, können wir diese Hazards formal definieren. In dieser Arbeit zeigen wir eine Methode zum Entwurf und zur Analyse von hazard-freien Schaltungen. Wir entwickeln Strategien für Kodierungen die Hazards vermeiden und zur Konstruktion von hazard-freien Schaltungen. Darüber hinaus stellen wir Algorithmen Taktsynchronisation vor und wie diese kombiniert werden können. Zum Schluss stellen wir zwei Implementierungen des GCS-Algorithmus von Lenzen, Locher und Wattenhofer (JACM 2010) vor. Oben genannte Mechanismen werden verwendet, um formal zu beweisen, dass diese Implementierungen korrekt sind. Die Implementierung hat keine Hazards, das heißt sie berechnet die bestmo ̈gliche Ausgabe. Anschließende Simulation der GCS Implementierung erzielt einen Versatz zwischen benachbarten Taktregionen, der kleiner als ein paar Gatter-Laufzeiten ist

Fault Tolerant Gradient Clock Synchronization

Synchronizing clocks in distributed systems is well-understood, both in terms of fault-tolerance in fully connected systems and the dependence of local and global worst-case skews (i.e., maximum clock difference between neighbors and arbitrary pairs of nodes, respectively) on the diameter of fault-free systems. However, so far nothing non-trivial is known about the local skew that can be achieved in topologies that are not fully connected even under a single Byzantine fault. Put simply, in this work we show that the most powerful known techniques for fault-tolerant and gradient clock synchronization are compatible, in the sense that the best of both worlds can be achieved simultaneously. Concretely, we combine the Lynch-Welch algorithm [Welch1988] for synchronizing a clique of $n$ nodes despite up to $f<n/3$ Byzantine faults with the gradient clock synchronization (GCS) algorithm by Lenzen et al. [Lenzen2010] in order to render the latter resilient to faults. As this is not possible on general graphs, we augment an input graph $\mathcal{G}$ by replacing each node by $3f+1$ fully connected copies, which execute an instance of the Lynch-Welch algorithm. We then interpret these clusters as supernodes executing the GCS algorithm, where for each cluster its correct nodes' Lynch-Welch clocks provide estimates of the logical clock of the supernode in the GCS algorithm. By connecting clusters corresponding to neighbors in $\mathcal{G}$ in a fully bipartite manner, supernodes can inform each other about (estimates of) their logical clock values. This way, we achieve asymptotically optimal local skew, granted that no cluster contains more than $f$ faulty nodes, at factor $O(f)$ and $O(f^2)$ overheads in terms of nodes and edges, respectively. Note that tolerating $f$ faulty neighbors trivially requires degree larger than $f$, so this is asymptotically optimal as well