Sorting permutations by cut-circularize-linearize-and-paste operations

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Genome rearrangements are studied on the basis of genome-wide analysis of gene orders and important in the evolution of species. In the last two decades, a variety of rearrangement operations, such as reversals, transpositions, block-interchanges, translocations, fusions and fissions, have been proposed to evaluate the differences between gene orders in two or more genomes. Usually, the computational studies of genome rearrangements are formulated as problems of sorting permutations by rearrangement operations.</p> <p>Result</p> <p>In this article, we study a sorting problem by cut-circularize-linearize-and-paste (CCLP) operations, which aims to find a minimum number of CCLP operations to sort a signed permutation representing a chromosome. The CCLP is a genome rearrangement operation that cuts a segment out of a chromosome, circularizes the segment into a temporary circle, linearizes the temporary circle as a linear segment, and possibly inverts the linearized segment and pastes it into the remaining chromosome. The CCLP operation can model many well-known rearrangements, such as reversals, transpositions and block-interchanges, and others not reported in the biological literature. In addition, it really occurs in the immune response of higher animals. To distinguish those CCLP operations from the reversal, we call them as non-reversal CCLP operations. In this study, we use permutation groups in algebra to design an <it>O</it>(<it>δn</it>) time algorithm for solving the weighted sorting problem by CCLP operations when the weight ratio between reversals and non-reversal CCLP operations is 1:2, where <it>n</it> is the number of genes in the given chromosome and <it>δ</it> is the number of needed CCLP operations.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The algorithm we propose in this study is very simple so that it can be easily implemented with 1-dimensional arrays and useful in the studies of phylogenetic tree reconstruction and human immune response to tumors.</p

Sobre modelos de rearranjo de genomas

Orientador: João MeidanisTese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de ComputaçãoResumo: Rearranjo de genomas é o nome dado a eventos onde grandes blocos de DNA trocam de posição durante o processo evolutivo. Com a crescente disponibilidade de sequências completas de DNA, a análise desse tipo de eventos pode ser uma importante ferramenta para o entendimento da genômica evolutiva. Vários modelos matemáticos de rearranjo de genomas foram propostos ao longo dos últimos vinte anos. Nesta tese, desenvolvemos dois novos modelos. O primeiro foi proposto como uma definição alternativa ao conceito de distância de breakpoint. Essa distância é uma das mais simples medidas de rearranjo, mas ainda não há um consenso quanto à sua definição para o caso de genomas multi-cromossomais. Pevzner e Tesler deram uma definição em 2003 e Tannier et al. a definiram de forma diferente em 2008. Nesta tese, nós desenvolvemos uma outra alternativa, chamada de single-cut-or-join (SCJ). Nós mostramos que, no modelo SCJ, além da distância, vários problemas clássicos de rearranjo, como a mediana de rearranjo, genome halving e pequena parcimônia são fáceis, e apresentamos algoritmos polinomiais para eles. O segundo modelo que apresentamos é o formalismo algébrico por adjacências, uma extensão do formalismo algébrico proposto por Meidanis e Dias, que permite a modelagem de cromossomos lineares. Esta era a principal limitação do formalismo original, que só tratava de cromossomos circulares. Apresentamos algoritmos polinomiais para o cálculo da distância algébrica e também para encontrar cenários de rearranjo entre dois genomas. Também mostramos como calcular a distância algébrica através do grafo de adjacências, para facilitar a comparação com outras distâncias de rearranjo. Por fim, mostramos como modelar todas as operações clássicas de rearranjo de genomas utilizando o formalismo algébricoAbstract: Genome rearrangements are events where large blocks of DNA exchange places during evolution. With the growing availability of whole genome data, the analysis of these events can be a very important and promising tool for understanding evolutionary genomics. Several mathematical models of genome rearrangement have been proposed in the last 20 years. In this thesis, we propose two new rearrangement models. The first was introduced as an alternative definition of the breakpoint distance. The breakpoint distance is one of the most straightforward genome comparison measures, but when it comes to defining it precisely for multichromosomal genomes, there is more than one way to go about it. Pevzner and Tesler gave a definition in a 2003 paper, and Tannier et al. defined it differently in 2008. In this thesis we provide yet another alternative, calling it single-cut-or-join (SCJ). We show that several genome rearrangement problems, such as genome median, genome halving and small parsimony, become easy for SCJ, and provide polynomial time algorithms for them. The second model we introduce is the Adjacency Algebraic Theory, an extension of the Algebraic Formalism proposed by Meidanis and Dias that allows the modeling of linear chromosomes, the main limitation of the original formalism, which could deal with circular chromosomes only. We believe that the algebraic formalism is an interesting alternative for solving rearrangement problems, with a different perspective that could complement the more commonly used combinatorial graph-theoretic approach. We present polynomial time algorithms to compute the algebraic distance and find rearrangement scenarios between two genomes. We show how to compute the rearrangement distance from the adjacency graph, for an easier comparison with other rearrangement distances. Finally, we show how all classic rearrangement operations can be modeled using the algebraic theoryDoutoradoCiência da ComputaçãoDoutor em Ciência da Computaçã

Rearranjo de genomas : algoritmos e complexidade

This thesis discusses events of genome rearrangements problems: transposition, breakpoint, block interchange, short block move, and the restricted multi break. We consider problems of sorting, closest permutation, and the diameter. We develop approximation algorithms, NP-completeness and properties about these problems. Regarding the sorting by transpositions, which is an NP-complete problem, several approximation algorithms were proposed based on the graph called the reality and desire diagram. Through a case analyses of the cycles of this graph, we propose a new one which achieves so far the best 1.375 ratio and O(n log n) running time complexity. Although sorting by transpositions is NP-complete, there are several metrics whose sorting problems are polynomial or are open. In such cases, an interesting problem arises to find a permutation with maximum distance of an input permutation set at most some value, this is the closest permutation problem. We show that with respect to the polynomial distance problems of breakpoint and of block interchange, both problems are NP-complete. In order to explore properties on operations that are restriction or generalization of others, we deal with the operation of short block move and we propose the operation of restricted multi break. Regarding the short block move, we show tractable classes of permutations, properties on the permutation graph, and we show that the closest permutation problem is NP-complete. Regarding the restricted multi break, we study two versions: one where the number of non reversible blocks is bounded by a constant, and another one whose number of non reversible blocks is arbitrary. We prove tight bounds on the distance and the diameter problems for both versions.Esta tese trata de rearranjo de genomas nos eventos de: transposição, pontos de quebra, movimento de blocos, movimento de blocos curtos, e de multi corte restritos. Abordamos os problemas de ordenação, permutação mais próxima, e de diâmetro. Apresentamos algoritmos aproximativos, NP-completudes e propriedades. Sobre o problema de ordenação por transposições, provado ser NP-completo, alguns algoritmos aproximativos foram propostos baseados no grafo chamado diagrama de realidade e desejo. Através da análise dos ciclos deste grafo, propomos um novo algoritmo que atinge melhores resultados correntes, tanto de razão de aproximação de 1,375 quanto de complexidade de tempo de O(n log n). Embora ordenação por transposições seja NP-completo, há outros problemas polinomiais ou em aberto. Nestes casos, surge o desafio de encontrar uma permutação que esteja a uma distância máxima limitada por algum valor em relação a um conjunto de permutações dadas de entrada. Este é o problema de encontrar a permutação mais próxima. Mostramos que, em relação `as operações de pontos de quebra e de movimento de blocos, tais problemas são NP-completos. Com o objetivo de obter propriedades sobre operações que restingem ou generalizam outras, tratamos da operação de movimento de blocos curtos e propomos a operação de multi corte restritos. Sobre movimento de blocos curtos, mostramos classes com distâncias exatas, propriedades sobre o grafo de permutação, e mostramos que o problema de permutação mais próxima é NP-completo. Sobre multi corte restritos, tratamos de duas variações: uma cujo número de blocos não reversíveis é limitado por constante, e outra cujo número de blocos não reversíveis é arbitrário. Mostramos limites justos de distância e de diâmetro para ambas as versões

Gene order rearrangement methods for the reconstruction of phylogeny

The study of phylogeny, i.e. the evolutionary history of species, is a central problem in biology and a key for understanding characteristics of contemporary species. Many problems in this area can be formulated as combinatorial optimisation problems which makes it particularly interesting for computer scientists. The reconstruction of the phylogeny of species can be based on various kinds of data, e.g. morphological properties or characteristics of the genetic information of the species. Maximum parsimony is a popular and widely used method for phylogenetic reconstruction aiming for an explanation of the observed data requiring the least evolutionary changes. A certain property of the genetic information gained much interest for the reconstruction of phylogeny in recent time: the organisation of the genomes of species, i.e. the arrangement of the genes on the chromosomes. But the idea to reconstruct phylogenetic information from gene arrangements has a long history. In Dobzhansky and Sturtevant (1938) it was already pointed out that “a comparison of the different gene arrangements in the same chromosome may, in certain cases, throw light on the historical relationships of these structures, and consequently on the history of the species as a whole”. This kind of data is promising for the study of deep evolutionary relationships because gene arrangements are believed to evolve slowly (Rokas and Holland, 2000). This seems to be the case especially for mitochondrial genomes which are available for a wide range of species (Boore, 1999). The development of methods for the reconstruction of phylogeny from gene arrangement data has made considerable progress during the last years. Prominent examples are the computation of parsimonious evolutionary scenarios, i.e. a shortest sequence of rearrangements transforming one arrangement of genes into another or the length of such a minimal scenario (Hannenhalli and Pevzner, 1995b; Sankoff, 1992; Watterson et al., 1982); the reconstruction of parsimonious phylogenetic trees from gene arrangement data (Bader et al., 2008; Bernt et al., 2007b; Bourque and Pevzner, 2002; Moret et al., 2002a); or the computation of the similarities of gene arrangements (Bergeron et al., 2008a; Heber et al., 2009). 1 1 Introduction The central theme of this work is to provide efficient algorithms for modified versions of fundamental genome rearrangement problems using more plausible rearrangement models. Two types of modified rearrangement models are explored. The first type is to restrict the set of allowed rearrangements as follows. It can be observed that certain groups of genes are preserved during evolution. This may be caused by functional constraints which prevented the destruction (Lathe et al., 2000; Sémon and Duret, 2006; Xie et al., 2003), certain properties of the rearrangements which shaped the gene orders (Eisen et al., 2000; Sankoff, 2002; Tillier and Collins, 2000), or just because no destructive rearrangement happened since the speciation of the gene orders. It can be assumed that gene groups, found in all studied gene orders, are not acquired independently. Accordingly, these gene groups should be preserved in plausible reconstructions of the course of evolution, in particular the gene groups should be present in the reconstructed putative ancestral gene orders. This can be achieved by restricting the set of rearrangements, which are allowed for the reconstruction, to those which preserve the gene groups of the given gene orders. Since it is difficult to determine functionally what a gene group is, it has been proposed to consider common combinatorial structures of the gene orders as gene groups (Marcotte et al., 1999; Overbeek et al., 1999). The second considered modification of the rearrangement model is extending the set of allowed rearrangement types. Different types of rearrangement operations have shuffled the gene orders during evolution. It should be attempted to use the same set of rearrangement operations for the reconstruction otherwise distorted or even wrong phylogenetic conclusions may be obtained in the worst case. Both possibilities have been considered for certain rearrangement problems before. Restricted sets of allowed rearrangements have been used successfully for the computation of parsimonious rearrangement scenarios consisting of inversions only where the gene groups are identified as common intervals (Bérard et al., 2007; Figeac and Varré, 2004). Extending the set of allowed rearrangement operations is a delicate task. On the one hand it is unknown which rearrangements have to be regarded because this is part of the phylogeny to be discovered. On the other hand, efficient exact rearrangement methods including several operations are still rare, in particular when transpositions should be included. For example, the problem to compute shortest rearrangement scenarios including transpositions is still of unknown computational complexity. Currently, only efficient approximation algorithms are known (e.g. Bader and Ohlebusch, 2007; Elias and Hartman, 2006). Two problems have been studied with respect to one or even both of these possibilities in the scope of this work. The first one is the inversion median problem. Given the gene orders of some taxa, this problem asks for potential ancestral gene orders such that the corresponding inversion scenario is parsimonious, i.e. has a minimum length. Solving this problem is an essential component 2 of algorithms for computing phylogenetic trees from gene arrangements (Bourque and Pevzner, 2002; Moret et al., 2002a, 2001). The unconstrained inversion median problem is NP-hard (Caprara, 2003). In Chapter 3 the inversion median problem is studied under the additional constraint to preserve gene groups of the input gene orders. Common intervals, i.e. sets of genes that appear consecutively in the gene orders, are used for modelling gene groups. The problem of finding such ancestral gene orders is called the preserving inversion median problem. Already the problem of finding a shortest inversion scenario for two gene orders is NP-hard (Figeac and Varré, 2004). Mitochondrial gene orders are a rich source for phylogenetic investigations because they are known for more than 1 000 species. Four rearrangement operations are reported at least in the literature to be relevant for the study of mitochondrial gene order evolution (Boore, 1999): That is inversions, transpositions, inverse transpositions, and tandem duplication random loss (TDRL). Efficient methods for a plausible reconstruction of genome rearrangements for mitochondrial gene orders using all four operations are presented in Chapter 4. An important rearrangement operation, in particular for the study of mitochondrial gene orders, is the tandem duplication random loss operation (e.g. Boore, 2000; Mauro et al., 2006). This rearrangement duplicates a part of a gene order followed by the random loss of one of the redundant copies of each gene. The gene order is rearranged depending on which copy is lost. This rearrangement should be regarded for reconstructing phylogeny from gene order data. But the properties of this rearrangement operation have rarely been studied (Bouvel and Rossin, 2009; Chaudhuri et al., 2006). The combinatorial properties of the TDRL operation are studied in Chapter 5. The enumeration and counting of sorting TDRLs, that is TDRL operations reducing the distance, is studied in particular. Closed formulas for computing the number of sorting TDRLs and methods for the enumeration are presented. Furthermore, TDRLs are one of the operations considered in Chapter 4. An interesting property of this rearrangement, distinguishing it from other rearrangements, is its asymmetry. That is the effects of a single TDRL can (in the most cases) not be reversed with a single TDRL. The use of this property for phylogeny reconstruction is studied in Section 4.3. This thesis is structured as follows. The existing approaches obeying similar types of modified rearrangement models as well as important concepts and computational methods to related problems are reviewed in Chapter 2. The combinatorial structures of gene orders that have been proposed for identifying gene groups, in particular common intervals, as well as the computational approaches for their computation are reviewed in Section 2.2. Approaches for computing parsimonious pairwise rearrangement scenarios are outlined in Section 2.3. Methods for the computation genome rearrangement scenarios obeying biologically motivated constraints, as introduced above, are detailed in Section 2.4. The approaches for the inversion median problem are covered in Section 2.5. Methods for the reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from gene arrangement data are briefly outlined in Section 2.6.3 1 Introduction Chapter 3 introduces the new algorithms CIP, ECIP, and TCIP for solving the preserving inversion median problem. The efficiency of the algorithm is empirically studied for simulated as well as mitochondrial data. The description of algorithms CIP and ECIP is based on Bernt et al. (2006b). TCIP has been described in Bernt et al. (2007a, 2008b). But the theoretical foundation of TCIP is extended significantly within this work in order to allow for more than three input permutations. Gene order rearrangement methods that have been developed for the reconstruction of the phylogeny of mitochondrial gene orders are presented in the fourth chapter. The presented algorithm CREx computes rearrangement scenarios for pairs of gene orders. CREx regards the four types of rearrangement operations which are important for mitochondrial gene orders. Based on CREx the algorithm TreeREx for assigning rearrangement events to a given tree is developed. The quality of the CREx reconstructions is analysed in a large empirical study for simulated gene orders. The results of TreeREx are analysed for several mitochondrial data sets. Algorithms CREx and TreeREx have been published in Bernt et al. (2008a, 2007c). The analysis of the mitochondrial gene orders of Echinodermata was included in Perseke et al. (2008). Additionally, a new and simple method is presented to explore the potential of the CREx method. The new method is applied to the complete mitochondrial data set. The problem of enumerating and counting sorting TDRLs is studied in Chapter 5. The theoretical results are covered to a large extent by Bernt et al. (2009b). The missing combinatorial explanation for some of the presented formulas is given here for the first time. Therefor, a new method for the enumeration and counting of sorting TDRLs has been developed (Bernt et al., 2009a)