Fast k-means algorithm clustering

k-means has recently been recognized as one of the best algorithms for clustering unsupervised data. Since k-means depends mainly on distance calculation between all data points and the centers, the time cost will be high when the size of the dataset is large (for example more than 500millions of points). We propose a two stage algorithm to reduce the time cost of distance calculation for huge datasets. The first stage is a fast distance calculation using only a small portion of the data to produce the best possible location of the centers. The second stage is a slow distance calculation in which the initial centers used are taken from the first stage. The fast and slow stages represent the speed of the movement of the centers. In the slow stage, the whole dataset can be used to get the exact location of the centers. The time cost of the distance calculation for the fast stage is very low due to the small size of the training data chosen. The time cost of the distance calculation for the slow stage is also minimized due to small number of iterations. Different initial locations of the clusters have been used during the test of the proposed algorithms. For large datasets, experiments show that the 2-stage clustering method achieves better speed-up (1-9 times).Comment: 16 pages, Wimo2011; International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications (IJCNC) Vol.3, No.4, July 201

Clustering Performance Comparison in K-Mean Clustering Variations: A Fraud Detection Study

K-means clustering is a common clustering approach that is based on data partitioning. However, the k-means clustering has significant drawbacks, such as it is sensitive to deciding the initial condition. Several ways to improve the algorithm have been offered. To assess the algorithm's efficiency and correctness, the performance comparison should be evaluated. In this paper, several k-means algorithms, including random k-means, global k-means, and fast global k-means, were evaluated for their efficiency when applied to a fraud detection data set. The accuracy of each method and the Davies-Bouldin index was investigated for each algorithm to compare the clustering performance. The findings demonstrated that when a small number of groups was used, random k-means, global k-means, and fast global k-means gave similar clustering, but fast global k-means offered better errors when a big number of groups was used. Furthermore, global k-means took longer to execute than others

Randomized Dimensionality Reduction for k-means Clustering

We study the topic of dimensionality reduction for $k$-means clustering. Dimensionality reduction encompasses the union of two approaches: \emph{feature selection} and \emph{feature extraction}. A feature selection based algorithm for $k$-means clustering selects a small subset of the input features and then applies $k$-means clustering on the selected features. A feature extraction based algorithm for $k$-means clustering constructs a small set of new artificial features and then applies $k$-means clustering on the constructed features. Despite the significance of $k$-means clustering as well as the wealth of heuristic methods addressing it, provably accurate feature selection methods for $k$-means clustering are not known. On the other hand, two provably accurate feature extraction methods for $k$-means clustering are known in the literature; one is based on random projections and the other is based on the singular value decomposition (SVD). This paper makes further progress towards a better understanding of dimensionality reduction for $k$-means clustering. Namely, we present the first provably accurate feature selection method for $k$-means clustering and, in addition, we present two feature extraction methods. The first feature extraction method is based on random projections and it improves upon the existing results in terms of time complexity and number of features needed to be extracted. The second feature extraction method is based on fast approximate SVD factorizations and it also improves upon the existing results in terms of time complexity. The proposed algorithms are randomized and provide constant-factor approximation guarantees with respect to the optimal $k$-means objective value.Comment: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, to appea

A fast version of the k-means classification algorithm for astronomical applications

Context. K-means is a clustering algorithm that has been used to classify large datasets in astronomical databases. It is an unsupervised method, able to cope very different types of problems. Aims. We check whether a variant of the algorithm called single-pass k-means can be used as a fast alternative to the traditional k-means. Methods. The execution time of the two algorithms are compared when classifying subsets drawn from the SDSS-DR7 catalog of galaxy spectra. Results. Single-pass k-means turn out to be between 20 % and 40 % faster than k-means and provide statistically equivalent classifications. This conclusion can be scaled up to other larger databases because the execution time of both algorithms increases linearly with the number of objects. Conclusions. Single-pass k-means can be safely used as a fast alternative to k-means

Fast Color Quantization Using Weighted Sort-Means Clustering

Color quantization is an important operation with numerous applications in graphics and image processing. Most quantization methods are essentially based on data clustering algorithms. However, despite its popularity as a general purpose clustering algorithm, k-means has not received much respect in the color quantization literature because of its high computational requirements and sensitivity to initialization. In this paper, a fast color quantization method based on k-means is presented. The method involves several modifications to the conventional (batch) k-means algorithm including data reduction, sample weighting, and the use of triangle inequality to speed up the nearest neighbor search. Experiments on a diverse set of images demonstrate that, with the proposed modifications, k-means becomes very competitive with state-of-the-art color quantization methods in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency.Comment: 30 pages, 2 figures, 4 table

Fast k-means based on KNN Graph

In the era of big data, k-means clustering has been widely adopted as a basic processing tool in various contexts. However, its computational cost could be prohibitively high as the data size and the cluster number are large. It is well known that the processing bottleneck of k-means lies in the operation of seeking closest centroid in each iteration. In this paper, a novel solution towards the scalability issue of k-means is presented. In the proposal, k-means is supported by an approximate k-nearest neighbors graph. In the k-means iteration, each data sample is only compared to clusters that its nearest neighbors reside. Since the number of nearest neighbors we consider is much less than k, the processing cost in this step becomes minor and irrelevant to k. The processing bottleneck is therefore overcome. The most interesting thing is that k-nearest neighbor graph is constructed by iteratively calling the fast $k$-means itself. Comparing with existing fast k-means variants, the proposed algorithm achieves hundreds to thousands times speed-up while maintaining high clustering quality. As it is tested on 10 million 512-dimensional data, it takes only 5.2 hours to produce 1 million clusters. In contrast, to fulfill the same scale of clustering, it would take 3 years for traditional k-means