3,697 research outputs found

    Joint & Progressive Learning from High-Dimensional Data for Multi-Label Classification

    Get PDF
    Despite the fact that nonlinear subspace learning techniques (e.g. manifold learning) have successfully applied to data representation, there is still room for improvement in explainability (explicit mapping), generalization (out-of-samples), and cost-effectiveness (linearization). To this end, a novel linearized subspace learning technique is developed in a joint and progressive way, called \textbf{j}oint and \textbf{p}rogressive \textbf{l}earning str\textbf{a}teg\textbf{y} (J-Play), with its application to multi-label classification. The J-Play learns high-level and semantically meaningful feature representation from high-dimensional data by 1) jointly performing multiple subspace learning and classification to find a latent subspace where samples are expected to be better classified; 2) progressively learning multi-coupled projections to linearly approach the optimal mapping bridging the original space with the most discriminative subspace; 3) locally embedding manifold structure in each learnable latent subspace. Extensive experiments are performed to demonstrate the superiority and effectiveness of the proposed method in comparison with previous state-of-the-art methods.Comment: accepted in ECCV 201

    Matching Image Sets via Adaptive Multi Convex Hull

    Get PDF
    Traditional nearest points methods use all the samples in an image set to construct a single convex or affine hull model for classification. However, strong artificial features and noisy data may be generated from combinations of training samples when significant intra-class variations and/or noise occur in the image set. Existing multi-model approaches extract local models by clustering each image set individually only once, with fixed clusters used for matching with various image sets. This may not be optimal for discrimination, as undesirable environmental conditions (eg. illumination and pose variations) may result in the two closest clusters representing different characteristics of an object (eg. frontal face being compared to non-frontal face). To address the above problem, we propose a novel approach to enhance nearest points based methods by integrating affine/convex hull classification with an adapted multi-model approach. We first extract multiple local convex hulls from a query image set via maximum margin clustering to diminish the artificial variations and constrain the noise in local convex hulls. We then propose adaptive reference clustering (ARC) to constrain the clustering of each gallery image set by forcing the clusters to have resemblance to the clusters in the query image set. By applying ARC, noisy clusters in the query set can be discarded. Experiments on Honda, MoBo and ETH-80 datasets show that the proposed method outperforms single model approaches and other recent techniques, such as Sparse Approximated Nearest Points, Mutual Subspace Method and Manifold Discriminant Analysis.Comment: IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 201

    Comparison between Constrained Mutual Subspace Method and Orthogonal Mutual Subspace Method – From the viewpoint of orthogonalization of subspaces –

    Get PDF
    This paper compares the performances between constrained mutual subspace method (CMSM), orthogonalmutual subspace method (OMSM), and also between their nonlinear extensions, namely kernel CMSM(KCMSM) and kernel OMSM (KOMSM). Although the princeples of the feature extraction in these methods aredifferent, their effectiveness are commonly derived from the orthogonalization of subspace, which is widely used tomeasure the performance of subspace-based methods. CMSM makes the relation between class subspaces similarto orthogonal relation by projecting the class subspaces onto the generalized difference subspaces. KCMSM is alsobased on this projection in the nonlinear feature space. On the other hand, OMSM orthogonalizes class subspacesdirectly by whitening the distribution of the class subspaces. KOMSM also utilizes this orthogonalization method inthe nonlinear feature space. From the experimental results, the performances of both the kernel methods (KCMSMand KOMSM) are found to be very high as compared to their linear methods (CMSM and OMSM) and theirperformances levels are well in the same order in spite of their different principles of orthogonalization

    Privacy-Preserving Distributed Optimization via Subspace Perturbation: A General Framework

    Get PDF
    As the modern world becomes increasingly digitized and interconnected, distributed signal processing has proven to be effective in processing its large volume of data. However, a main challenge limiting the broad use of distributed signal processing techniques is the issue of privacy in handling sensitive data. To address this privacy issue, we propose a novel yet general subspace perturbation method for privacy-preserving distributed optimization, which allows each node to obtain the desired solution while protecting its private data. In particular, we show that the dual variables introduced in each distributed optimizer will not converge in a certain subspace determined by the graph topology. Additionally, the optimization variable is ensured to converge to the desired solution, because it is orthogonal to this non-convergent subspace. We therefore propose to insert noise in the non-convergent subspace through the dual variable such that the private data are protected, and the accuracy of the desired solution is completely unaffected. Moreover, the proposed method is shown to be secure under two widely-used adversary models: passive and eavesdropping. Furthermore, we consider several distributed optimizers such as ADMM and PDMM to demonstrate the general applicability of the proposed method. Finally, we test the performance through a set of applications. Numerical tests indicate that the proposed method is superior to existing methods in terms of several parameters like estimated accuracy, privacy level, communication cost and convergence rate
    corecore