Tactics for Reasoning modulo AC in Coq

We present a set of tools for rewriting modulo associativity and commutativity (AC) in Coq, solving a long-standing practical problem. We use two building blocks: first, an extensible reflexive decision procedure for equality modulo AC; second, an OCaml plug-in for pattern matching modulo AC. We handle associative only operations, neutral elements, uninterpreted function symbols, and user-defined equivalence relations. By relying on type-classes for the reification phase, we can infer these properties automatically, so that end-users do not need to specify which operation is A or AC, or which constant is a neutral element.Comment: 16

Models and termination of proof reduction in the λ\lambdaΠ\Pi-calculus modulo theory

We define a notion of model for the $\lambda$$\Pi$-calculus modulo theory and prove a soundness theorem. We then define a notion of super-consistency and prove that proof reduction terminates in the $\lambda$$\Pi$-calculus modulo any super-consistent theory. We prove this way the termination of proof reduction in several theories including Simple type theory and the Calculus of constructions

Principles of Superdeduction

International audienceIn predicate logic, the proof that a theorem P holds in a theory Th is typically conducted in natural deduction or in the sequent calculus using all the information contained in the theory in a uniform way. Introduced ten years ago, Deduction modulo allows us to make use of the computational part of the theory Th for true computations modulo which deductions are performed. Focussing on the sequent calculus, this paper presents and studies the dual concept where the theory is used to enrich the deduction system with new deduction rules in a systematic, correct and complete way. We call such a new deduction system "superdeduction''. We introduce a proof-term language and a cut-elimination procedure both based on Christian Urban's work on classical sequent calculus. Strong normalisation is proven under appropriate and natural hypothesis, therefore ensuring the consistency of the embedded theory and of the deduction system. The proofs obtained in such a new system are much closer to the human intuition and practice. We consequently show how superdeduction along with deduction modulo can be used to ground the formal foundations of new extendible proof assistants. We finally present lemuridae, our current implementation of superdeduction modulo

Models and termination of proof reduction in the λΠ-calculus modulo theory

We define a notion of model for the λΠ-calculus modulo theory and prove a soundness theorem. We then define a notion of super-consistency and prove that proof reduction terminates in the λΠ-calculus modulo any super-consistent theory. We prove this way the termination of proof reduction in several theories including Simple type theory and the Calculus of constructions

External Rewriting for Skeptical Proof Assistants

This paper presents the design, the implementation and experiments of the integration of syntactic, conditional possibly associative-commutative term rewriting into proof assistants based on constructive type theory. Our approach is called external since it consists in performing term rewriting in a speci c and ecient environment and to check the computations later in a proof assistant

Twenty years of rewriting logic

AbstractRewriting logic is a simple computational logic that can naturally express both concurrent computation and logical deduction with great generality. This paper provides a gentle, intuitive introduction to its main ideas, as well as a survey of the work that many researchers have carried out over the last twenty years in advancing: (i) its foundations; (ii) its semantic framework and logical framework uses; (iii) its language implementations and its formal tools; and (iv) its many applications to automated deduction, software and hardware specification and verification, security, real-time and cyber-physical systems, probabilistic systems, bioinformatics and chemical systems

External rewriting for skeptical proof assistants (extended version)

Rapport interne.This paper presents the design, the implementation and experiments of the integration of syntactic, conditional possibly associative-commutative term rewriting into proof assistants based on constructive type theory. Our approach is called external since it consists in performing term rewriting in a specific and efficient environment and to check the computations later in a proof assistant. Two typical systems are considered in this work, \elan, based on the rewriting calculus, as the term rewriting based environment, and \coq, based on the calculus of inductive constructions as the proof assistant. We first formalize the proof terms for deduction by rewriting and strategies in \elan\ using the rewriting calculus with explicit substitutions. We then show how these proof terms can soundly be translated into \coq-syntax where they can be directly type checked. For the method to be applicable for proving equalities modulo an equational theory that contains associativity and commutativity, we provide an effective method to prove equalities modulo associativity and commutativity in \coq\ using \elan. These results have been integrated into an {\elan} based rewriting tactic in \coq