5,120 research outputs found
Hipster: Integrating Theory Exploration in a Proof Assistant
This paper describes Hipster, a system integrating theory exploration with
the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL. Theory exploration is a technique for
automatically discovering new interesting lemmas in a given theory development.
Hipster can be used in two main modes. The first is exploratory mode, used for
automatically generating basic lemmas about a given set of datatypes and
functions in a new theory development. The second is proof mode, used in a
particular proof attempt, trying to discover the missing lemmas which would
allow the current goal to be proved. Hipster's proof mode complements and
boosts existing proof automation techniques that rely on automatically
selecting existing lemmas, by inventing new lemmas that need induction to be
proved. We show example uses of both modes
Proof-Pattern Recognition and Lemma Discovery in ACL2
We present a novel technique for combining statistical machine learning for
proof-pattern recognition with symbolic methods for lemma discovery. The
resulting tool, ACL2(ml), gathers proof statistics and uses statistical
pattern-recognition to pre-processes data from libraries, and then suggests
auxiliary lemmas in new proofs by analogy with already seen examples. This
paper presents the implementation of ACL2(ml) alongside theoretical
descriptions of the proof-pattern recognition and lemma discovery methods
involved in it
Metaphysics and Law
The dichotomy between questions of fact and questions of law serves as a starting point for the following discussion of the nature of legal reasoning. In the course of the dialogue the author notes similarities and dissimilarities between legal reasoning and philosophical and mathematical reasoning. In the end we are left with a clearer insight into the distinctive features of the adjudicative process
Non-wellfounded trees in Homotopy Type Theory
We prove a conjecture about the constructibility of coinductive types - in
the principled form of indexed M-types - in Homotopy Type Theory. The
conjecture says that in the presence of inductive types, coinductive types are
derivable. Indeed, in this work, we construct coinductive types in a subsystem
of Homotopy Type Theory; this subsystem is given by Intensional Martin-L\"of
type theory with natural numbers and Voevodsky's Univalence Axiom. Our results
are mechanized in the computer proof assistant Agda.Comment: 14 pages, to be published in proceedings of TLCA 2015; ancillary
files contain Agda files with formalized proof
Metaphysics and Law
The dichotomy between questions of fact and questions of law serves as a starting point for the following discussion of the nature of legal reasoning. In the course of the dialogue the author notes similarities and dissimilarities between legal reasoning and philosophical and mathematical reasoning. In the end we are left with a clearer insight into the distinctive features of the adjudicative process
Mining State-Based Models from Proof Corpora
Interactive theorem provers have been used extensively to reason about
various software/hardware systems and mathematical theorems. The key challenge
when using an interactive prover is finding a suitable sequence of proof steps
that will lead to a successful proof requires a significant amount of human
intervention. This paper presents an automated technique that takes as input
examples of successful proofs and infers an Extended Finite State Machine as
output. This can in turn be used to generate proofs of new conjectures. Our
preliminary experiments show that the inferred models are generally accurate
(contain few false-positive sequences) and that representing existing proofs in
such a way can be very useful when guiding new ones.Comment: To Appear at Conferences on Intelligent Computer Mathematics 201
ACL2(ml):machine-learning for ACL2
ACL2(ml) is an extension for the Emacs interface of ACL2. This tool uses
machine-learning to help the ACL2 user during the proof-development. Namely,
ACL2(ml) gives hints to the user in the form of families of similar theorems,
and generates auxiliary lemmas automatically. In this paper, we present the two
most recent extensions for ACL2(ml). First, ACL2(ml) can suggest now families
of similar function definitions, in addition to the families of similar
theorems. Second, the lemma generation tool implemented in ACL2(ml) has been
improved with a method to generate preconditions using the guard mechanism of
ACL2. The user of ACL2(ml) can also invoke directly the latter extension to
obtain preconditions for his own conjectures.Comment: In Proceedings ACL2 2014, arXiv:1406.123
- …