111 research outputs found

    On the expected number of perfect matchings in cubic planar graphs

    Get PDF
    A well-known conjecture by Lov\'asz and Plummer from the 1970s asserted that a bridgeless cubic graph has exponentially many perfect matchings. It was solved in the affirmative by Esperet et al. (Adv. Math. 2011). On the other hand, Chudnovsky and Seymour (Combinatorica 2012) proved the conjecture in the special case of cubic planar graphs. In our work we consider random bridgeless cubic planar graphs with the uniform distribution on graphs with nn vertices. Under this model we show that the expected number of perfect matchings in labeled bridgeless cubic planar graphs is asymptotically cγnc\gamma^n, where c>0c>0 and γ1.14196\gamma \sim 1.14196 is an explicit algebraic number. We also compute the expected number of perfect matchings in (non necessarily bridgeless) cubic planar graphs and provide lower bounds for unlabeled graphs. Our starting point is a correspondence between counting perfect matchings in rooted cubic planar maps and the partition function of the Ising model in rooted triangulations.Comment: 19 pages, 4 figure

    On the expected number of perfect matchings in cubic planar graphs

    Get PDF
    A well-known conjecture by Lov'asz and Plummer from the 1970s asserted that a bridgeless cubic graph has exponentially many perfect matchings. It was solved in the affirmative by Esperet et al. ([13]). On the other hand, Chudnovsky and Seymour ([8]) proved the conjecture in the special case of cubic planar graphs. In our work we consider random bridgeless cubic planar graphs with the uniform distribution on graphs with n vertices. Under this model we show that the expected number of perfect matchings in labeled bridgeless cubic planar graphs is asymptotically cγn, where c > 0 and γ ∼ 1.14196 is an explicit algebraic number. We also compute the expected number of perfect matchings in (not necessarily bridgeless) cubic planar graphs and provide lower bounds for unlabeled graphs. Our starting point is a correspondence between counting perfect matchings in rooted cubic planar maps and the partition function of the Ising model in rooted triangulations

    Monochromatic Equilateral Triangles in the Unit Distance Graph

    Full text link
    Let χΔ(Rn)\chi_{\Delta}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) denote the minimum number of colors needed to color Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} so that there will not be a monochromatic equilateral triangle with side length 11. Using the slice rank method, we reprove a result of Frankl and Rodl, and show that χΔ(Rn)\chi_{\Delta}\left(\mathbb{R}^{n}\right) grows exponentially with nn. This technique substantially improves upon the best known quantitative lower bounds for χΔ(Rn)\chi_{\Delta}\left(\mathbb{R}^{n}\right), and we obtain χΔ(Rn)>(1.01446+o(1))n. \chi_{\Delta}\left(\mathbb{R}^{n}\right)>(1.01446+o(1))^{n}. Comment: 4 page

    3‐Color bipartite Ramsey number of cycles and paths

    Get PDF
    The k-colour bipartite Ramsey number of a bipartite graph H is the least integer n for which every k-edge-coloured complete bipartite graph Kn,n contains a monochromatic copy of H. The study of bipartite Ramsey numbers was initiated, over 40 years ago, by Faudree and Schelp and, independently, by Gy´arf´as and Lehel, who determined the 2-colour Ramsey number of paths. In this paper we determine asymptotically the 3-colour bipartite Ramsey number of paths and (even) cycles

    Random sampling of lattice configurations using local Markov chains

    Get PDF
    Algorithms based on Markov chains are ubiquitous across scientific disciplines, as they provide a method for extracting statistical information about large, complicated systems. Although these algorithms may be applied to arbitrary graphs, many physical applications are more naturally studied under the restriction to regular lattices. We study several local Markov chains on lattices, exploring how small changes to some parameters can greatly influence efficiency of the algorithms. We begin by examining a natural Markov Chain that arises in the context of "monotonic surfaces", where some point on a surface is sightly raised or lowered each step, but with a greater rate of raising than lowering. We show that this chain is rapidly mixing (converges quickly to the equilibrium) using a coupling argument; the novelty of our proof is that it requires defining an exponentially increasing distance function on pairs of surfaces, allowing us to derive near optimal results in many settings. Next, we present new methods for lower bounding the time local chains may take to converge to equilibrium. For many models that we study, there seems to be a phase transition as a parameter is changed, so that the chain is rapidly mixing above a critical point and slow mixing below it. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to make this intuition rigorous. We present the first proofs of slow mixing for three sampling problems motivated by statistical physics and nanotechnology: independent sets on the triangular lattice (the hard-core lattice gas model), weighted even orientations of the two-dimensional Cartesian lattice (the 8-vertex model), and non-saturated Ising (tile-based self-assembly). Previous proofs of slow mixing for other models have been based on contour arguments that allow us prove that a bottleneck in the state space constricts the mixing. The standard contour arguments do not seem to apply to these problems, so we modify this approach by introducing the notion of "fat contours" that can have nontrivial area. We use these to prove that the local chains defined for these models are slow mixing. Finally, we study another important issue that arises in the context of phase transitions in physical systems, namely how the boundary of a lattice can affect the efficiency of the Markov chain. We examine a local chain on the perfect and near-perfect matchings of the square-octagon lattice, and show for one boundary condition the chain will mix in polynomial time, while for another it will mix exponentially slowly. Strikingly, the two boundary conditions only differ at four vertices. These are the first rigorous proofs of such a phenomenon on lattice graphs.Ph.D.Committee Chair: Randall, Dana; Committee Member: Heitsch, Christine; Committee Member: Mihail, Milena; Committee Member: Trotter, Tom; Committee Member: Vigoda, Eri
    corecore