1,698 research outputs found
Logic Programming as Constructivism
The features of logic programming that
seem unconventional from the viewpoint of classical logic
can be explained in terms of constructivistic logic. We
motivate and propose a constructivistic proof theory of
non-Horn logic programming. Then, we apply this formalization
for establishing results of practical interest.
First, we show that 'stratification can be motivated in a
simple and intuitive way. Relying on similar motivations,
we introduce the larger classes of 'loosely stratified' and
'constructively consistent' programs. Second, we give a
formal basis for introducing quantifiers into queries and
logic programs by defining 'constructively domain
independent* formulas. Third, we extend the Generalized
Magic Sets procedure to loosely stratified and constructively
consistent programs, by relying on a 'conditional
fixpoini procedure
Trustworthy Refactoring via Decomposition and Schemes: A Complex Case Study
Widely used complex code refactoring tools lack a solid reasoning about the
correctness of the transformations they implement, whilst interest in proven
correct refactoring is ever increasing as only formal verification can provide
true confidence in applying tool-automated refactoring to industrial-scale
code. By using our strategic rewriting based refactoring specification
language, we present the decomposition of a complex transformation into smaller
steps that can be expressed as instances of refactoring schemes, then we
demonstrate the semi-automatic formal verification of the components based on a
theoretical understanding of the semantics of the programming language. The
extensible and verifiable refactoring definitions can be executed in our
interpreter built on top of a static analyser framework.Comment: In Proceedings VPT 2017, arXiv:1708.0688
The Joys of Graph Transformation
We believe that the technique of graph transformation offers a very natural way to specify semantics for languages that have dynamic allocation and linking structure; for instance, object-oriented programming languages, but also languages for mobility. In this note we expose, on a rather informal level, the reasons for this belief. Our hope in doing this is to raise interest in this technique and so generate more interest in the fascinating possibilities and open questions of this area.\u
Event-driven grammars: Relating abstract and concrete levels of visual languages
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-007-0051-2In this work we introduce event-driven grammars, a kind of graph grammars that are especially suited for visual modelling environments generated by meta-modelling. Rules in these grammars may be triggered by user actions (such as creating, editing or connecting elements) and in their turn may trigger other user-interface events. Their combination with triple graph transformation systems allows constructing and checking the consistency of the abstract syntax graph while the user is building the concrete syntax model, as well as managing the layout of the concrete syntax representation. As an example of these concepts, we show the definition of a modelling environment for UML sequence diagrams. A discussion is also presented of methodological aspects for the generation of environments for visual languages with multiple views, its connection with triple graph grammars, the formalization of the latter in the double pushout approach and its extension with an inheritance concept.This work has been partially sponsored by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science with projects MOSAIC (TSI2005-08225-C07-06) and MODUWEB (TIN 2006-09678)
A Systematic Approach to Constructing Incremental Topology Control Algorithms Using Graph Transformation
Communication networks form the backbone of our society. Topology control
algorithms optimize the topology of such communication networks. Due to the
importance of communication networks, a topology control algorithm should
guarantee certain required consistency properties (e.g., connectivity of the
topology), while achieving desired optimization properties (e.g., a bounded
number of neighbors). Real-world topologies are dynamic (e.g., because nodes
join, leave, or move within the network), which requires topology control
algorithms to operate in an incremental way, i.e., based on the recently
introduced modifications of a topology. Visual programming and specification
languages are a proven means for specifying the structure as well as
consistency and optimization properties of topologies. In this paper, we
present a novel methodology, based on a visual graph transformation and graph
constraint language, for developing incremental topology control algorithms
that are guaranteed to fulfill a set of specified consistency and optimization
constraints. More specifically, we model the possible modifications of a
topology control algorithm and the environment using graph transformation
rules, and we describe consistency and optimization properties using graph
constraints. On this basis, we apply and extend a well-known constructive
approach to derive refined graph transformation rules that preserve these graph
constraints. We apply our methodology to re-engineer an established topology
control algorithm, kTC, and evaluate it in a network simulation study to show
the practical applicability of our approachComment: This document corresponds to the accepted manuscript of the
referenced journal articl
From LCF to Isabelle/HOL
Interactive theorem provers have developed dramatically over the past four
decades, from primitive beginnings to today's powerful systems. Here, we focus
on Isabelle/HOL and its distinctive strengths. They include automatic proof
search, borrowing techniques from the world of first order theorem proving, but
also the automatic search for counterexamples. They include a highly readable
structured language of proofs and a unique interactive development environment
for editing live proof documents. Everything rests on the foundation conceived
by Robin Milner for Edinburgh LCF: a proof kernel, using abstract types to
ensure soundness and eliminate the need to store proofs. Compared with the
research prototypes of the 1970s, Isabelle is a practical and versatile tool.
It is used by system designers, mathematicians and many others
Specifying Graph Languages with Type Graphs
We investigate three formalisms to specify graph languages, i.e. sets of
graphs, based on type graphs. First, we are interested in (pure) type graphs,
where the corresponding language consists of all graphs that can be mapped
homomorphically to a given type graph. In this context, we also study languages
specified by restriction graphs and their relation to type graphs. Second, we
extend this basic approach to a type graph logic and, third, to type graphs
with annotations. We present decidability results and closure properties for
each of the formalisms.Comment: (v2): -Fixed some typos -Added more reference
Classes of Terminating Logic Programs
Termination of logic programs depends critically on the selection rule, i.e.
the rule that determines which atom is selected in each resolution step. In
this article, we classify programs (and queries) according to the selection
rules for which they terminate. This is a survey and unified view on different
approaches in the literature. For each class, we present a sufficient, for most
classes even necessary, criterion for determining that a program is in that
class. We study six classes: a program strongly terminates if it terminates for
all selection rules; a program input terminates if it terminates for selection
rules which only select atoms that are sufficiently instantiated in their input
positions, so that these arguments do not get instantiated any further by the
unification; a program local delay terminates if it terminates for local
selection rules which only select atoms that are bounded w.r.t. an appropriate
level mapping; a program left-terminates if it terminates for the usual
left-to-right selection rule; a program exists-terminates if there exists a
selection rule for which it terminates; finally, a program has bounded
nondeterminism if it only has finitely many refutations. We propose a
semantics-preserving transformation from programs with bounded nondeterminism
into strongly terminating programs. Moreover, by unifying different formalisms
and making appropriate assumptions, we are able to establish a formal hierarchy
between the different classes.Comment: 50 pages. The following mistake was corrected: In figure 5, the first
clause for insert was insert([],X,[X]
- …