Enhancing automatic closed-loop glucose control in type 1 diabetes with an adaptive meal bolus calculator - in silico evaluation under intra- day variability

[EN] Background and Objective: Current prototypes of closed-loop systems for glucose control in type 1 diabetes mellitus, also referred to as artificial pancreas systems, require a pre-meal insulin bolus to compensate for delays in subcutaneous insulin absorption in order to avoid initial post-prandial hyperglycemia. Computing such a meal bolus is a challenging task due to the high intra-subject variability of insulin requirements. Most closed-loop systems compute this pre-meal insulin dose by a standard bolus calculation, as is commonly found in insulin pumps. However, the performance of these calculators is limited due to a lack of adaptiveness in front of dynamic changes in insulin requirements. Despite some initial attempts to include adaptation within these calculators, challenges remain. Methods: In this paper we present a new technique to automatically adapt the meal-priming bolus within an artificial pancreas. The technique consists of using a novel adaptive bolus calculator based on Case-Based Reasoning and Run-To-Run control, within a closed-loop controller. Coordination between the adaptive bolus calculator and the controller was required to achieve the desired performance. For testing purposes, the clinically validated Imperial College Artificial Pancreas controller was employed. The proposed system was evaluated against itself but without bolus adaptation. The UVa-Padova T1DM v3.2 system was used to carry out a three-month in silico study on 11 adult and 11 adolescent virtual subjects taking into account inter-and intra-subject variability of insulin requirements and uncertainty on carbohydrate intake. Results: Overall, the closed-loop controller enhanced by an adaptive bolus calculator improves glycemic control when compared to its non-adaptive counterpart. In particular, the following statistically significant improvements were found (non-adaptive vs. adaptive). Adults: mean glucose 142.2 ± 9.4 vs. 131.8 ± 4.2 mg/dl; percentage time in target [70, 180] mg/dl, 82.0 ± 7.0 vs. 89.5 ± 4.2; percentage time above target 17.7 ± 7.0 vs. 10.2 ± 4.1. Adolescents: mean glucose 158.2 ± 21.4 vs. 140.5 ± 13.0 mg/dl; percentage time in target, 65.9 ± 12.9 vs. 77.5 ± 12.2; percentage time above target, 31.7 ± 13.1 vs. 19.8 ± 10.2. Note that no increase in percentage time in hypoglycemia was observed.This project has been funded by the Welcome Trust.Herrero, P.; Bondía Company, J.; Adewuji, O.; Pesl, P.; El-Sharkawy, M.; Reddy, M.; Toumazou, C.... (2017). Enhancing automatic closed-loop glucose control in type 1 diabetes with an adaptive meal bolus calculator - in silico evaluation under intra- day variability. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 146:125-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.05.010S12513114

The bio-inspired artificial pancreas for type 1 diabetes control in the home: System architecture and preliminary results

BACKGROUND: Artificial pancreas (AP) technology has been proven to improve glucose and patient-centered outcomes for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Several approaches to implement the AP have been described, clinically evaluated, and in one case, commercialized. However, none of these approaches has shown a clear superiority with respect to others. In addition, several challenges still need to be solved before achieving a fully automated AP that fulfills the users' expectations. We have introduced the Bio-inspired Artificial Pancreas (BiAP), a hybrid adaptive closed-loop control system based on beta-cell physiology and implemented directly in hardware to provide an embedded low-power solution in a dedicated handheld device. In coordination with the closed-loop controller, the BiAP system incorporates a novel adaptive bolus calculator which aims at improving postprandial glycemic control. This paper focuses on the latest developments of the BiAP system for its utilization in the home environment. METHODS: The hardware and software architectures of the BiAP system designed to be used in the home environment are described. Then, the clinical trial design proposed to evaluate the BiAP system in an ambulatory setting is introduced. Finally, preliminary results corresponding to two participants enrolled in the trial are presented. RESULTS: Apart from minor technical issues, mainly due to wireless communications between devices, the BiAP system performed well (~88% of the time in closed-loop) during the clinical trials conducted so far. Preliminary results show that the BiAP system might achieve comparable glycemic outcomes to the existing AP systems (~73% time in target range 70-180 mg/dL). CONCLUSION: The BiAP system is a viable platform to conduct ambulatory clinical trials and a potential solution for people with T1D to control their glucose control in a home environment

A dual mode adaptive basal-bolus advisor based on reinforcement learning

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) are commonly used by type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients to measure glucose concentrations. The proposed adaptive basal-bolus algorithm (ABBA) supports inputs from either SMBG or CGM devices to provide personalised suggestions for the daily basal rate and prandial insulin doses on the basis of the patients' glucose level on the previous day. The ABBA is based on reinforcement learning (RL), a type of artificial intelligence, and was validated in silico with an FDA-accepted population of 100 adults under different realistic scenarios lasting three simulated months. The scenarios involve three main meals and one bedtime snack per day, along with different variabilities and uncertainties for insulin sensitivity, mealtime, carbohydrate amount, and glucose measurement time. The results indicate that the proposed approach achieves comparable performance with CGM or SMBG as input signals, without influencing the total daily insulin dose. The results are a promising indication that AI algorithmic approaches can provide personalised adaptive insulin optimisation and achieve glucose control - independently of the type of glucose monitoring technology.Comment: 9 pages, 8 figures, accepted by Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics in December 201

Clinical evaluation of a novel adaptive bolus calculator and safety system in Type 1 diabetes

Bolus calculators are considered state-of-the-art for insulin dosing decision support for people with Type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, they all lack the ability to automatically adapt in real-time to respond to an individual’s needs or changes in insulin sensitivity. A novel insulin recommender system based on artificial intelligence has been developed to provide personalised bolus advice, namely the Patient Empowerment through Predictive Personalised Decision Support (PEPPER) system. Besides adaptive bolus advice, the decision support system is coupled with a safety system which includes alarms, predictive glucose alerts, predictive low glucose suspend for insulin pump users, personalised carbohydrate recommendations and dynamic bolus insulin constraint. This thesis outlines the clinical evaluation of the PEPPER system in adults with T1D on multiple daily injections (MDI) and insulin pump therapy. The hypothesis was that the PEPPER system is safe, feasible and effective for use in people with TID using MDI or pump therapy. Safety and feasibility of the safety system was initially evaluated in the first phase, with the second phase evaluating feasibility of the complete system (safety system and adaptive bolus advisor). Finally, the whole system was clinically evaluated in a randomised crossover trial with 58 participants. No significant differences were observed for percentage times in range between the PEPPER and Control groups. For quality of life, participants reported higher perceived hypoglycaemia with the PEPPER system despite no objective difference in time spent in hypoglycaemia. Overall, the studies demonstrated that the PEPPER system is safe and feasible for use when compared to conventional therapy (continuous glucose monitoring and standard bolus calculator). Further studies are required to confirm overall effectiveness.Open Acces