A Novel Locality Algorithm and Peer-to-Peer Communication Infrastructure for Optimizing Network Performance in Smart Microgrids

[EN] Peer-to-Peer (P2P) overlay communications networks have emerged as a new paradigm for implementing distributed services in microgrids due to their potential benefits: they are robust, scalable, fault-tolerant, and they can route messages even with a large number of nodes which are frequently entering or leaving from the network. However, current P2P systems have been mainly developed for file sharing or cycle sharing applications where the processes of searching and managing resources are not optimized. Locality algorithms have gained a lot of attention due to their potential to provide an optimized path to groups with similar interests for routing messages in order to get better network performance. This paper develops a fully functional decentralized communication architecture with a new P2P locality algorithm and a specific protocol for monitoring and control of microgrids. Experimental results show that the proposed locality algorithm reduces the number of lookup messages and the lookup delay time. Moreover, the proposed communication architecture heavily depends of the lookup used algorithm as well as the placement of the communication layers within the architecture. Experimental results will show that the proposed techniques meet the network requirements of smart microgrids even with a large number of nodes on stream.This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Grant ENE2015-64087-C2-2R. This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) under BES-2013-064539.Marzal-Romeu, S.; González-Medina, R.; Salas-Puente, RA.; Figueres Amorós, E.; Garcerá, G. (2017). A Novel Locality Algorithm and Peer-to-Peer Communication Infrastructure for Optimizing Network Performance in Smart Microgrids. Energies. 10(9):1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091275S125109Khan, R. H., & Khan, J. Y. (2013). A comprehensive review of the application characteristics and traffic requirements of a smart grid communications network. Computer Networks, 57(3), 825-845. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.11.002Dada, J. O. (2014). Towards understanding the benefits and challenges of Smart/Micro-Grid for electricity supply system in Nigeria. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 1003-1014. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.077Lidula, N. W. A., & Rajapakse, A. D. (2011). Microgrids research: A review of experimental microgrids and test systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 186-202. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.041Hussain, A., Arif, S. M., Aslam, M., & Shah, S. D. A. (2017). Optimal siting and sizing of tri-generation equipment for developing an autonomous community microgrid considering uncertainties. Sustainable Cities and Society, 32, 318-330. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.004Dehghanpour, K., Colson, C., & Nehrir, H. (2017). A Survey on Smart Agent-Based Microgrids for Resilient/Self-Healing Grids. Energies, 10(5), 620. doi:10.3390/en10050620Palizban, O., Kauhaniemi, K., & Guerrero, J. M. (2014). Microgrids in active network management – part II: System operation, power quality and protection. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 36, 440-451. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.048Shi, W., Li, N., Chu, C.-C., & Gadh, R. (2017). Real-Time Energy Management in Microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(1), 228-238. doi:10.1109/tsg.2015.2462294Deng, R., Yang, Z., Chow, M.-Y., & Chen, J. (2015). A Survey on Demand Response in Smart Grids: Mathematical Models and Approaches. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 11(3), 570-582. doi:10.1109/tii.2015.2414719Moazami Goodarzi, H., & Kazemi, M. (2017). A Novel Optimal Control Method for Islanded Microgrids Based on Droop Control Using the ICA-GA Algorithm. Energies, 10(4), 485. doi:10.3390/en10040485Erol-Kantarci, M., Kantarci, B., & Mouftah, H. (2011). Reliable overlay topology design for the smart microgrid network. IEEE Network, 25(5), 38-43. doi:10.1109/mnet.2011.6033034Hassan Youssef, K. (2016). Optimal management of unbalanced smart microgrids for scheduled and unscheduled multiple transitions between grid-connected and islanded modes. Electric Power Systems Research, 141, 104-113. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2016.07.015Giotitsas, C., Pazaitis, A., & Kostakis, V. (2015). A peer-to-peer approach to energy production. Technology in Society, 42, 28-38. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.02.002Kazmi, S. A. A., Shahzad, M. K., Khan, A. Z., & Shin, D. R. (2017). Smart Distribution Networks: A Review of Modern Distribution Concepts from a Planning Perspective. Energies, 10(4), 501. doi:10.3390/en10040501Werth, A., Andre, A., Kawamoto, D., Morita, T., Tajima, S., Tokoro, M., … Tanaka, K. (2018). Peer-to-Peer Control System for DC Microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9(4), 3667-3675. doi:10.1109/tsg.2016.2638462Deconinck, G., Vanthournout, K., Beitollahi, H., Qui, Z., Duan, R., Nauwelaers, B., … Belmans, R. (2008). A Robust Semantic Overlay Network for Microgrid Control Applications. Architecting Dependable Systems V, 101-123. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85571-2_5Bandara, H. M. N. D., & Jayasumana, A. P. (2012). Collaborative applications over peer-to-peer systems–challenges and solutions. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 6(3), 257-276. doi:10.1007/s12083-012-0157-3Palizban, O., & Kauhaniemi, K. (2015). Hierarchical control structure in microgrids with distributed generation: Island and grid-connected mode. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 797-813. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.008Khatibzadeh, A., Besmi, M., Mahabadi, A., & Reza Haghifam, M. (2017). Multi-Agent-Based Controller for Voltage Enhancement in AC/DC Hybrid Microgrid Using Energy Storages. Energies, 10(2), 169. doi:10.3390/en10020169Planas, E., Gil-de-Muro, A., Andreu, J., Kortabarria, I., & Martínez de Alegría, I. (2013). General aspects, hierarchical controls and droop methods in microgrids: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 17, 147-159. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.032Olivares, D. E., Mehrizi-Sani, A., Etemadi, A. H., Canizares, C. A., Iravani, R., Kazerani, M., … Hatziargyriou, N. D. (2014). Trends in Microgrid Control. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 5(4), 1905-1919. doi:10.1109/tsg.2013.2295514Vandoorn, T. L., Vasquez, J. C., De Kooning, J., Guerrero, J. M., & Vandevelde, L. (2013). Microgrids: Hierarchical Control and an Overview of the Control and Reserve Management Strategies. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 7(4), 42-55. doi:10.1109/mie.2013.2279306Zhou, B., Li, W., Chan, K. W., Cao, Y., Kuang, Y., Liu, X., & Wang, X. (2016). Smart home energy management systems: Concept, configurations, and scheduling strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 61, 30-40. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.047Ancillotti, E., Bruno, R., & Conti, M. (2013). The role of communication systems in smart grids: Architectures, technical solutions and research challenges. Computer Communications, 36(17-18), 1665-1697. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2013.09.004Llaria, A., Terrasson, G., Curea, O., & Jiménez, J. (2016). Application of Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks to Achieve Intelligent Microgrids: A Promising Approach towards a Global Smart Grid Deployment. Applied Sciences, 6(3), 61. doi:10.3390/app6030061Luna, A. C., Diaz, N. L., Graells, M., Vasquez, J. C., & Guerrero, J. M. (2016). Cooperative energy management for a cluster of households prosumers. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 62(3), 235-242. doi:10.1109/tce.2016.7613189Gungor, V. C., Lu, B., & Hancke, G. P. (2010). Opportunities and Challenges of Wireless Sensor Networks in Smart Grid. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 57(10), 3557-3564. doi:10.1109/tie.2009.2039455Zhao, C., He, J., Cheng, P., & Chen, J. (2017). Consensus-Based Energy Management in Smart Grid With Transmission Losses and Directed Communication. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(5), 2049-2061. doi:10.1109/tsg.2015.2513772Lo, C.-H., & Ansari, N. (2013). Decentralized Controls and Communications for Autonomous Distribution Networks in Smart Grid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 4(1), 66-77. doi:10.1109/tsg.2012.2228282Li, C., Savaghebi, M., Guerrero, J., Coelho, E., & Vasquez, J. (2016). Operation Cost Minimization of Droop-Controlled AC Microgrids Using Multiagent-Based Distributed Control. Energies, 9(9), 717. doi:10.3390/en9090717Wu, X., Jiang, P., & Lu, J. (2014). Multiagent-Based Distributed Load Shedding for Islanded Microgrids. Energies, 7(9), 6050-6062. doi:10.3390/en7096050Kantamneni, A., Brown, L. E., Parker, G., & Weaver, W. W. (2015). Survey of multi-agent systems for microgrid control. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 45, 192-203. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2015.07.005Lopes, A. L., & Botelho, L. M. (2008). Improving Multi-Agent Based Resource Coordination in Peer-to-Peer Networks. Journal of Networks, 3(2). doi:10.4304/jnw.3.2.38-47Cameron, A., Stumptner, M., Nandagopal, N., Mayer, W., & Mansell, T. (2015). Rule-based peer-to-peer framework for decentralised real-time service oriented architectures. Science of Computer Programming, 97, 202-234. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.06.005Zhang, C., Wu, J., Cheng, M., Zhou, Y., & Long, C. (2016). A Bidding System for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in a Grid-connected Microgrid. Energy Procedia, 103, 147-152. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.264Malatras, A. (2015). State-of-the-art survey on P2P overlay networks in pervasive computing environments. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 55, 1-23. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2015.04.014Eng Keong Lua, Crowcroft, J., Pias, M., Sharma, R., & Lim, S. (2005). A survey and comparison of peer-to-peer overlay network schemes. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 7(2), 72-93. doi:10.1109/comst.2005.1610546Xu, J., Kumar, A., & Yu, X. (2004). On the Fundamental Tradeoffs Between Routing Table Size and Network Diameter in Peer-to-Peer Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 22(1), 151-163. doi:10.1109/jsac.2003.818805Stoica, I., Morris, R., Karger, D., Kaashoek, M. F., & Balakrishnan, H. (2001). Chord. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 31(4), 149-160. doi:10.1145/964723.383071Rowstron, A., & Druschel, P. (2001). Pastry: Scalable, Decentralized Object Location, and Routing for Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 329-350. doi:10.1007/3-540-45518-3_18Yuh-Jzer Joung, Li-Wei Yang, & Chien-Tse Fang. (2007). Keyword search in DHT-based peer-to-peer networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 25(1), 46-61. doi:10.1109/jsac.2007.070106Stoica, I., Morris, R., Liben-Nowell, D., Karger, D. R., Kaashoek, M. F., Dabek, F., & Balakrishnan, H. (2003). Chord: a scalable peer-to-peer lookup protocol for internet applications. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 11(1), 17-32. doi:10.1109/tnet.2002.808407Gottron, C., König, A., & Steinmetz, R. (2010). A Survey on Security in Mobile Peer-to-Peer Architectures—Overlay-Based vs. Underlay-Based Approaches. Future Internet, 2(4), 505-532. doi:10.3390/fi2040505Seyedi, Y., Karimi, H., & Guerrero, J. M. (2017). Centralized Disturbance Detection in Smart Microgrids With Noisy and Intermittent Synchrophasor Data. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(6), 2775-2783. doi:10.1109/tsg.2016.2539947Youssef, T., Elsayed, A., & Mohammed, O. (2016). Data Distribution Service-Based Interoperability Framework for Smart Grid Testbed Infrastructure. Energies, 9(3), 150. doi:10.3390/en9030150Liu, X., Xia, H., & Chien, A. A. (2004). Validating and Scaling the MicroGrid: A Scientific Instrument for Grid Dynamics. Journal of Grid Computing, 2(2), 141-161. doi:10.1007/s10723-004-4200-3Kansal, P., & Bose, A. (2012). Bandwidth and Latency Requirements for Smart Transmission Grid Applications. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3(3), 1344-1352. doi:10.1109/tsg.2012.2197229Kuo, M.-T., & Lu, S.-D. (2013). Design and Implementation of Real-Time Intelligent Control and Structure Based on Multi-Agent Systems in Microgrids. Energies, 6(11), 6045-6059. doi:10.3390/en6116045Del Val, E., Rebollo, M., & Botti, V. (2012). Enhancing decentralized service discovery in open service-oriented multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 28(1), 1-30. doi:10.1007/s10458-012-9210-0Howell, S., Rezgui, Y., Hippolyte, J.-L., Jayan, B., & Li, H. (2017). Towards the next generation of smart grids: Semantic and holonic multi-agent management of distributed energy resources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 193-214. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.107Frey, S., Diaconescu, A., Menga, D., & Demeure, I. (2015). A Generic Holonic Control Architecture for Heterogeneous Multiscale and Multiobjective Smart Microgrids. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, 10(2), 1-21. doi:10.1145/2700326Miers, C., Simplicio, M., Gallo, D., Carvalho, T., Bressan, G., Souza, V., … Damola, A. (2010). A Taxonomy for Locality Algorithms on Peer-to-Peer Networks. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 8(4), 323-331. doi:10.1109/tla.2010.5595121Porsinger, T., Janik, P., Leonowicz, Z., & Gono, R. (2017). Modelling and Optimization in Microgrids. Energies, 10(4), 523. doi:10.3390/en10040523Ali, M., Zakariya, M., Asif, M., & Ullah, A. (2012). TCP/IP Based Intelligent Load Management System in Micro-Grids Network Using MATLAB/Simulink. Energy and Power Engineering, 04(04), 283-289. doi:10.4236/epe.2012.44038Shin, I.-J., Song, B.-K., & Eom, D.-S. (2017). International Electronical Committee (IEC) 61850 Mapping with Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) in Smart Grids Based European Telecommunications Standard Institute Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Environment. Energies, 10(3), 393. doi:10.3390/en10030393Loh, P. C., Li, D., Chai, Y. K., & Blaabjerg, F. (2013). Autonomous Operation of Hybrid Microgrid With AC and DC Subgrids. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 28(5), 2214-2223. doi:10.1109/tpel.2012.2214792Overlay networks for smart gridshttp://users.atlantis.ugent.be/cdvelder/papers/2013/wauters2013sgv.pdfEugster, P. T., Felber, P. A., Guerraoui, R., & Kermarrec, A.-M. (2003). The many faces of publish/subscribe. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(2), 114-131. doi:10.1145/857076.857078Ali, I. (2012). High-speed Peer-to-peer Communication based Protection Scheme Implementation and Testing in Laboratory. International Journal of Computer Applications, 38(4), 16-24. doi:10.5120/4596-6793Yoo, B.-K., Yang, S.-H., Yang, H.-S., Kim, W.-Y., Jeong, Y.-S., Han, B.-M., & Jang, K.-S. (2011). Communication Architecture of the IEC 61850-based Micro Grid System. Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, 6(5), 605-612. doi:10.5370/jeet.2011.6.5.605Dou, X., Quan, X., Wu, Z., Hu, M., Yang, K., Yuan, J., & Wang, M. (2014). Hybrid Multi-Agent Control in Microgrids: Framework, Models and Implementations Based on IEC 61850. Energies, 8(1), 31-58. doi:10.3390/en801003

Utility-Based Mechanism for Structural Self-Organization in Service-Oriented MAS

Structural relations established among agents influence the performance of decentralized service discovery process in multiagent systems. Moreover, distributed systems should be able to adapt their structural relations to changes in environmental conditions. In this article, we present a service-oriented multiagent systems, where agents initially self-organize their structural relations based on the similarity of their services. During the service discovery process, agents integrate a mechanism that facilitates the self-organization of their structural relations to adapt the structure of the system to the service demand. This mechanism facilitates the task of decentralized service discovery and improves its performance. Each agent has local knowledge about its direct neighbors and the queries received during discovery processes. With this information, an agent is able to analyze its structural relations and decide when it is more appropriate to modify its direct neighbors and select the most suitable acquaintances to replace them. The experimental evaluation shows how this self-organization mechanism improves the overall performance of the service discovery process in the system when the service demand changesThis work is partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through grants CSD2007-0022 (CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010), TIN2012-36586-C03-01, TIN2012-36586-C03-01, TIN2012-36586-C03-02, PROMETEOII/2013/019, and FPU grant AP-2008-00601 awarded to E. Del Val.Del Val Noguera, E.; Rebollo Pedruelo, M.; Vasirani, M.; Fernández, A. (2014). Utility-Based Mechanism for Structural Self-Organization in Service-Oriented MAS. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems. 9(3):1-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2651423S12493Sherief Abdallah and Victor Lesser. 2007. Multiagent reinforcement learning and self-organization in a network of agents. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 172--179.Lada A. Adamic and Bernardo A. Huberman. 2002. Zipf’s law and the Internet. Glottometrics 3, 143--150.Muntasir Al-Asfoor, Brendan Neville, and Maria Fasli. 2012. Heuristic resource search in a self-organised distributed multi agent system. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Self-Organizing Systems. 84--89.Mathieu Aquin, Salman Elahi, and Enrico Motta. 2010. Personal monitoring of Web information exchange: Towards Web lifelogging. In Proceedings of the Web Science Conference.Ulrich Basters and Matthias Klusch. 2006. RS2D: Fast adaptive search for semantic Web services in unstructured p2p networks. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. 87--100.Umesh Bellur and Roshan Kulkarni. 2007. Improved matchmaking algorithm for semantic Web services based on bipartite graph matching. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference. 86--93.Devis Bianchini, Valeria De Antonellis, and Michele Melchiori. 2009. Service-based semantic search in p2p systems. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Web Services. 7--16.Bartosz Biskupski, Jim Dowling, and Jan Sacha. 2007. Properties and mechanisms of self-organizing MANET and P2P systems. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems 2, 1, 1--34.Alberto Blanc, Yi-Kai Liu, and Amin Vahdat. 2005. Designing incentives for peer-to-peer routing. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. 374--385.Michael Bowling and Manuela Veloso. 2002. Multiagent learning using a variable learning rate. Artificial Intelligence 136, 215--250.Frances M. T. Brazier, Jeffrey O. Kephart, H. Van Dyke Parunak, and Michael N. Huhns. 2009. Agents and service-oriented computing for autonomic computing: A research agenda. IEEE Internet Computing 13, 3, 82--87.Tyson Condie, Sepandar D. Kamvar, and Hector Garcia-Molina. 2004. Adaptive peer-to-peer topologies. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing. 53--62.Arturo Crespo and Hector Garcia-Molina. 2002. Routing indices for peer-to-peer systems. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. 23--32.Elena Del Val, Natalia Criado, Carlos Carrascosa, Vicente Julian, Miguel Rebollo, Estefania Argente, and Vicente Botti. 2010. THOMAS: A service-oriented framework for virtual organizations. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’10). 1631--1632.Elena Del Val, Miguel Rebollo, and Vicente Botti. 2011. Introducing homophily to improve semantic service search in a self-adaptive system. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 1241--1242.Elena Del Val, Miguel Rebollo, and Vicente Botti. 2012a. Enhancing decentralized service discovery in open service-oriented multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 28, 1, 1--30.Elena Del Val, Miguel Rebollo, and Vicente Botti. 2012b. Promoting cooperation in service-oriented MAS through social plasticity and incentives. Journal of Systems and Software 86, 2, 520--537.Gianni Di Caro, Frederick Ducatelle, and Luca Maria Gambardella. 2005. AntHocNet: An adaptive nature-inspired algorithm for routing in mobile ad hoc networks. European Transactions on Telecommunications 16, 443--455.Ding Ding, Lei Liu, and Hartmut Schmeck. 2010. Service discovery in self-organizing service-oriented environments. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference. 717--724.Sergey N. Dorogovtsev and Jose F. F. Mendes. 2003. Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW. Oxford University Press.Giovanna Di Marzo Serugendo, Marie-Pierre Gleizes, and Anthony Karageorgos. 2011. Self-Organizing Software: From Natural to Artificial Adaptation. Natural Computing Series.Erik Einhorn and Andreas Mitschele-Thiel. 2008. RLTE: Reinforcement learning for traffic-engineering. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Infrastructure, Management, and Security. 120--133.Nelson Fernandez, Carlos Maldonado, and Carlos Gershenson. 2014. Information measures of complexity, emergence, self-organization, homeostasis, and autopoiesis. In Guided Self-Organization: Inception. Emergence, Complexity and Computation, Vol. 9. Springer, 19--51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53734-9_2Jose Luis Fernandez-Marquez, Josep Lluis Arcos, and Giovanna Di Marzo Serugendo. 2012. A decentralized approach for detecting dynamically changing diffuse event sources in noisy WSN environments. Applied Artificial Intelligence 26, 4, 376--397. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2012.653659Agostino Forestiero, Carlo Mastroianni, and Michela Meo. 2009. Self-Chord: A bio-inspired algorithm for structured P2P systems. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud, and Grid Computing. 44--51.Matthew E. Gaston and Marie des Jardins. 2005. Agent-organized networks for multi-agent production and exchange. In Proceedings of the 20th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 77--82.Nathan Griffiths and Michael Luck. 2010. Changing neighbours: Improving tag-based cooperation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 249--256.Peter Haase, Ronny Siebes, and Frank van Harmelen. 2008. Expertise-based peer selection in peer-to-peer networks. Knowledge and Information Systems 15, 1, 75--107.Philip N. Howard, Lee Rainee, and Steve Jones. 2001. Days and nights on the Internet. American Behavioural Scientist, 383--404.Bernardo A. Huberman and Lada A. Adamic. 2000. The nature of markets in the WWW. Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce 1, 5--12.Michael N. Huhns et al. 2005. Research directions for service-oriented multiagent systems. IEEE Internet Computing 9, 6, 65--70.Tomoko Itao, Tatsuya Suda, Tetsuya Nakamura, Miyuki Imada, Masato Matsuo, and Tomonori Aoyama. 2001. Jack-in-the-Net: Adaptive networking architecture for service emergence. In Proceedings of the Asian-Pacific Conference on Communications. 9.Emily M. Jin, Michelle Girvan, and Mark E. J. Newman. 2001. Structure of growing social networks. Physical Review E 64, 4, 046132.Sachin Kamboj and Keith S. Decker. 2007. Organizational self-design in semi-dynamic environments. In Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 335--337.Rahamatullah Khondoker, S. M. Taslim Arif, Nathan Kerr, and Dennis Schwerdel. 2011. Self-organizing communication services in future network architectures. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Self-Organizing Systems.Matthias Klusch, Benedikt Fries, and Katia Sycara. 2009. OWLS-MX: A hybrid Semantic Web service matchmaker for OWL-S services. Web Semantics Science Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 7, 2, 121--133.Dionisis Kontominas, Paraskevi Raftopoulou, Christos Tryfonopoulos, and Euripides G. M. Petrakis. 2013. DS4: A distributed social and semantic search system. Advances in Information Retrieval 7814, 832--836.Ramachandra Kota, Nicholas Gibbins, and Nicholas R. Jennings. 2012. Decentralized approaches for self-adaptation in agent organizations. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems 7, 1, Article No. 1.Paul Lazarsfeld. 1954. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In Freedom and Control in Modern Society. Van Nostrand, New York, NY.Paulo Leito. 2013. Towards self-organized service-oriented multi-agent systems. In Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi Agent Manufacturing and Robotics. Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 472. Springer, 41--56.W. Sabrina Lin, Hong Vikcy Zhao, and K. J. Ray Liu. 2009. Incentive cooperation strategies for peer-to-peer live multimedia streaming social networks. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 11, 3, 396--412.Sheila A. McIlraith, Tran Cao Son, and Honglei Zeng. 2001. Semantic Web services. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16, 2, 46--53.Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27, 415--444.Vivek Nallur and Rami Bahsoon. 2012. A decentralized self-adaptation mechanism for service-based applications in the cloud. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 99, 591--612.Aris Ouksel, Yair Babad, and Thomas Tesch. 2004. Matchmaking software agents in B2B markets. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1--9.Massimo Paolucci, Takahiro Kawamura, Terry R. Payne, and Katia P. Sycara. 2002. Semantic matching of Web services capabilities. In Proceedings of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference. 333--347.Leonid Peshkin and Virginia Savova. 2002. Reinforcement learning for adaptive routing. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN’02). 1825--1830.Paraskevi Raftopoulou and Euripides G. M. Petrakis. 2008. iCluster: A self-organizing overlay network for P2P information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR’08). 65--76.Sharmila Savarimuthu, Maryam Purvis, Martin Purvis, and Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu. 2011. Mechanisms for the self-organization of peer groups in agent societies. In Multi-Agent-Based Simulation XI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6532. Springer, 93--107.Giovanna Di Marzo Serugendo, Marie-Pierre Gleizes, and Anthony Karageorgos. 2005. Self-organization in multi-agent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review 20, 2, 165--189.Abdul Khalique Shaikh, Saadat M. Alhashmi, and Rajendran Parthiban. 2012. A semantic impact in decentralized resource discovery mechanism for grid computing environments. In Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7440. Springer, 206--216.Qixiang Sun and Hector Garcia-Molina. 2004. SLIC: A selfish link-based incentive mechanism for unstructured peer-to-peer networks. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS’04). 506--515.Mirko Viroli and Franco Zambonelli. 2010. A biochemical approach to adaptive service ecosystems. Information Sciences 180, 10, 1876--1892. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.11.021Li Wang. 2011. SoFA: An expert-driven, self-organization peer-to-peer semantic communities for network resource management. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 1, 94--105.Kevin Werbach. 2000. Syndication—the emerging model for business in the Internet era. Harvard Business Review 78, 3, 84--93, 214.Tom Wolf and Tom Holvoet. 2005. Emergence versus self-organisation: Different concepts but promising when combined. In Engineering Self-Organising Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3464. Springer, 1--15.Haizheng Zhang, W. Bruce Croft, Brian Levine, and Victor Lesser. 2004. A multi-agent approach for peer-to-peer based information retrieval system. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Vol. 1. 456--463.Ming Zhong. 2006. Popularity-biased random walks for peer-to-peer search under the square-root principle. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems

Advances in infrastructures and tools for multiagent systems

In the last few years, information system technologies have focused on solving challenges in order to develop distributed applications. Distributed systems can be viewed as collections of service-provider and ser vice-consumer components interlinked by dynamically defined workflows (Luck and McBurney 2008).Alberola Oltra, JM.; Botti Navarro, VJ.; Such Aparicio, JM. (2014). Advances in infrastructures and tools for multiagent systems. Information Systems Frontiers. 16:163-167. doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9493-6S16316716Alberola, J. M., Búrdalo, L., Julián, V., Terrasa, A., & García-Fornes, A. (2014). An adaptive framework for monitoring agent organizations. Information Systems Frontiers, 16(2). doi: 10.1007/s10796-013-9478-x .Alfonso, B., Botti, V., Garrido, A., & Giret, A. (2014). A MAS-based infrastructure for negotiation and its application to a water-right market. Information Systems Frontiers, 16(2). doi: 10.1007/s10796-013-9443-8 .Andrighetto, G., Castelfranchi, C., Mayor, E., McBreen, J., López-Sánchez, M., & Parsons, S. (2013). (Social) norm dynamics. In G. Andrighetto, G. Governatori, P. Noriega, & L. W. van der Torre (Eds.), Normative multi-agent systems (pp. 135–170). Dagstuhl: Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik.Baarslag, T., Fujita, K., Gerding, E. H., Hindriks, K., Ito, T., Jennings, N. R., et al. (2013). Evaluating practical negotiating agents: results and analysis of the 2011 international competition. Artificial Intelligence, 198, 73–103.Boissier, O., Bordini, R. H., Hübner, J. F., Ricci, A., & Santi, A. (2013). Multi-agent oriented programming with JaCaMo. Science of Computer Programming, 78(6), 747–761.Campos, J., Esteva, M., López-Sánchez, M., Morales, J., & Salamó, M. (2011). Organisational adaptation of multi-agent systems in a peer-to-peer scenario. Computing, 91(2), 169–215.Carrera, A., Iglesias, C. A., & Garijo, M. (2014). Beast methodology: an agile testing methodology for multi-agent systems based on behaviour driven development. Information Systems Frontiers, 16(2). doi: 10.1007/s10796-013-9438-5 .Criado, N., Such, J. M., & Botti, V. (2014). Norm reasoning services. Information Systems Frontiers, 16(2). doi: 10.1007/s10796-013-9444-7 .Del Val, E., Rebollo, M., & Botti, V. (2014). Enhancing decentralized service discovery in open service-oriented multi-agent systems. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 28(1), 1–30.Denti, E., Omicini, A., & Ricci, A. (2002). Coordination tools for MAS development and deployment. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 16(9–10), 721–752.Dignum, V., & Dignum, F. (2012). A logic of agent organizations. Logic Journal of IGPL, 20(1), 283–316.Ferber, J., & Gutknecht, O. (1998). A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agent systems. In Multi agent systems. Proceedings. International Conference on (pp. 128–135). IEEE.Fogués, R. L., Such, J. M., Espinosa, A., & Garcia-Fornes, A. (2014). BFF: a tool for eliciting tie strength and user communities in social networking services. Information Systems Frontiers, 16(2). doi: 10.1007/s10796-013-9453-6 .Garcia, E., Giret, A., & Botti, V. (2011). Evaluating software engineering techniques for developing complex systems with multiagent approaches. Information and Software Technology, 53(5), 494–506.Garcia-Fornes, A., Hübner, J., Omicini, A., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J., & Botti, V. (2011). Infrastructures and tools for multiagent systems for the new generation of distributed systems. Engineering Applications of Articial Intelligence, 24(7), 1095–1097.Jennings, N., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., & Wooldridge, M. (2001). Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(2), 199–215.Jung, Y., Kim, M., Masoumzadeh, A., & Joshi, J. B. (2012). A survey of security issue in multi-agent systems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 37(3), 239–260.Kota, R., Gibbins, N., & Jennings, N. R. (2012). Decentralized approaches for self-adaptation in agent organizations. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS), 7(1), 1.Kraus, S. (1997). Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments. Artificial Intelligence, 94(1), 79–97.Lin, Y. I., Chou, Y. W., Shiau, J. Y., & Chu, C. H. (2013). Multi-agent negotiation based on price schedules algorithm for distributed collaborative design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(3), 545–557.Luck, M., & McBurney, P. (2008). Computing as interaction: agent and agreement technologies.Luck, M., McBurney, P., Shehory, O., & Willmott, S. (2005). Agent technology: Computing as interaction (A roadmap for agent based computing). AgentLink.Ossowski, S., & Menezes, R. (2006). On coordination and its significance to distributed and multiagent systems. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 18(4), 359–370.Ossowski, S., Sierra, C., & Botti. (2013). Agreement technologies: A computing perspective. In Agreement Technologies (pp. 3–16). Springer Netherlands.Pinyol, I., & Sabater-Mir, J. (2013). Computational trust and reputation models for open multi-agent systems: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 40(1), 1–25.Ricci, A., Piunti, M., & Viroli, M. (2011). Environment programming in multi-agent systems: an artifact-based perspective. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 23(2), 158–192.Sierra, C., & Debenham, J. (2006). Trust and honour in information-based agency. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on autonomous agents and multi agent systems, (p. 1225–1232). New York: ACM.Sierra, C., Botti, V., & Ossowski, S. (2011). Agreement computing. KI-Knstliche Intelligenz, 25(1), 57–61.Vasconcelos, W., García-Camino, A., Gaertner, D., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J. A., & Noriega, P. (2012). Distributed norm management for multi-agent systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 5990–5999.Wooldridge, M. (2002). An introduction to multiagent systems. New York: Wiley.Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995). Intelligent agents: theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), 115–152

MACS: Multi-agent COTR system for Defense Contracting

The field of intelligent multi-agent systems has expanded rapidly in the recent past. Multi-agent architectures and systems are being investigated and continue to develop. To date, little has been accomplished in applying multi-agent systems to the defense acquisition domain. This paper describes the design, development, and related considerations of a multi-agent system in the area of procurement and contracting for the defense acquisition community

The simplicity project: easing the burden of using complex and heterogeneous ICT devices and services

As of today, to exploit the variety of different "services", users need to configure each of their devices by using different procedures and need to explicitly select among heterogeneous access technologies and protocols. In addition to that, users are authenticated and charged by different means. The lack of implicit human computer interaction, context-awareness and standardisation places an enormous burden of complexity on the shoulders of the final users. The IST-Simplicity project aims at leveraging such problems by: i) automatically creating and customizing a user communication space; ii) adapting services to user terminal characteristics and to users preferences; iii) orchestrating network capabilities. The aim of this paper is to present the technical framework of the IST-Simplicity project. This paper is a thorough analysis and qualitative evaluation of the different technologies, standards and works presented in the literature related to the Simplicity system to be developed