On the periodic behavior of real-time schedulers on identical multiprocessor platforms

This paper is proposing a general periodicity result concerning any deterministic and memoryless scheduling algorithm (including non-work-conserving algorithms), for any context, on identical multiprocessor platforms. By context we mean the hardware architecture (uniprocessor, multicore), as well as task constraints like critical sections, precedence constraints, self-suspension, etc. Since the result is based only on the releases and deadlines, it is independent from any other parameter. Note that we do not claim that the given interval is minimal, but it is an upper bound for any cycle of any feasible schedule provided by any deterministic and memoryless scheduler

Schedulability, Response Time Analysis and New Models of P-FRP Systems

Functional Reactive Programming (FRP) is a declarative approach for modeling and building reactive systems. FRP has been shown to be an expressive formalism for building applications of computer graphics, computer vision, robotics, etc. Priority-based FRP (P-FRP) is a formalism that allows preemption of executing programs and guarantees real-time response. Since functional programs cannot maintain state and mutable data, changes made by programs that are preempted have to be rolled back. Hence in P-FRP, a higher priority task can preempt the execution of a lower priority task, but the preempted lower priority task will have to restart after the higher priority task has completed execution. This execution paradigm is called Abort-and-Restart (AR). Current real-time research is focused on preemptive of non-preemptive models of execution and several state-of-the-art methods have been developed to analyze the real-time guarantees of these models. Unfortunately, due to its transactional nature where preempted tasks are aborted and have to restart, the execution semantics of P-FRP does not fit into the standard definitions of preemptive or non-preemptive execution, and the research on the standard preemptive and non-preemptive may not applicable for the P-FRP AR model. Out of many research areas that P-FRP may demands, we focus on task scheduling which includes task and system modeling, priority assignment, schedulability analysis, response time analysis, improved P-FRP AR models, algorithms and corresponding software. In this work, we review existing results on P-FRP task scheduling and then present our research contributions: (1) a tighter feasibility test interval regarding the task release offsets as well as a linked list based algorithm and implementation for scheduling simulation; (2) P-FRP with software transactional memory-lazy conflict detection (STM-LCD); (3) a non-work-conserving scheduling model called Deferred Start; (4) a multi-mode P-FRP task model; (5) SimSo-PFRP, the P-FRP extension of SimSo - a SimPy-based, highly extensible and user friendly task generator and task scheduling simulator.Computer Science, Department o

MCFlow: Middleware for Mixed-Criticality Distributed Real-Time Systems

Traditional fixed-priority scheduling analysis for periodic/sporadic task sets is based on the assumption that all tasks are equally critical to the correct operation of the system. Therefore, every task has to be schedulable under the scheduling policy, and estimates of tasks\u27 worst case execution times must be conservative in case a task runs longer than is usual. To address the significant under-utilization of a system\u27s resources under normal operating conditions that can arise from these assumptions, several \emph{mixed-criticality scheduling} approaches have been proposed. However, to date there has been no quantitative comparison of system schedulability or run-time overhead for the different approaches. In this dissertation, we present what is to our knowledge the first side-by-side implementation and evaluation of those approaches, for periodic and sporadic mixed-criticality tasks on uniprocessor or distributed systems, under a mixed-criticality scheduling model that is common to all these approaches. To make a fair evaluation of mixed-criticality scheduling, we also address some previously open issues and propose modifications to improve schedulability and correctness of particular approaches. To facilitate the development and evaluation of mixed-criticality applications, we have designed and developed a distributed real-time middleware, called MCFlow, for mixed-criticality end-to-end tasks running on multi-core platforms. The research presented in this dissertation provides the following contributions to the state of the art in real-time middleware: (1) an efficient component model through which dependent subtask graphs can be configured flexibly for execution within a single core, across cores of a common host, or spanning multiple hosts; (2) support for optimizations to inter-component communication to reduce data copying without sacrificing the ability to execute subtasks in parallel; (3) a strict separation of timing and functional concerns so that they can be configured independently; (4) an event dispatching architecture that uses lock free algorithms where possible to reduce memory contention, CPU context switching, and priority inversion; and (5) empirical evaluations of MCFlow itself and of different mixed criticality scheduling approaches both with a single host and end-to-end across multiple hosts. The results of our evaluation show that in terms of basic distributed real-time behavior MCFlow performs comparably to the state of the art TAO real-time object request broker when only one core is used and outperforms TAO when multiple cores are involved. We also identify and categorize different use cases under which different mixed criticality scheduling approaches are preferable

Cutting-plane algorithms for preemptive uniprocessor real-time scheduling problems

Fixed-point iteration algorithms like RTA (response time analysis) and QPA (quick processor-demand analysis) are arguably the most popular ways of solving schedulability problems for preemptive uniprocessor FP (fixed-priority) and EDF (earliest-deadline-first) systems. Several IP (integer program) formulations have also been proposed for these problems, but it is unclear whether the algorithms for solving these formulations are related to RTA and QPA. By discovering connections between the problems and the algorithms, we show that RTA and QPA are, in fact, suboptimal cutting-plane algorithms for specific IP formulations of FP and EDF schedulability, where optimality is defined with respect to convergence rate. We propose optimal cutting-plane algorithms for these IP formulations. We compare the new algorithms with RTA and QPA on large collections of synthetic systems to gauge the improvement in convergence rates and running times.Comment: 45 pages, 5 figures. Changes in v2: new terms like CP-KERN are added to explain ideas more clearly; models include release jitter. Changes in v3: typos are fixed; evaluation section is modified so that it is in sync with public code. Changes in v4: algorithm, theoretical and empirical analyses are improved. Changes in v5: minor structural changes, acknowledgements adde

Proceedings Work-In-Progress Session of the 13th Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium

The Work-In-Progress session of the 13th IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS\u2707) presents papers describing contributions both to state of the art and state of the practice in the broad field of real-time and embedded systems. The 17 accepted papers were selected from 19 submissions. This proceedings is also available as Washington University in St. Louis Technical Report WUCSE-2007-17, at http://www.cse.seas.wustl.edu/Research/FileDownload.asp?733. Special thanks go to the General Chairs – Steve Goddard and Steve Liu and Program Chairs - Scott Brandt and Frank Mueller for their support and guidance