Advanced p-Metric Based Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm

Evolutionary many objective based optimization has been gaining a lot of attention from the evolutionary computation researchers and computational intelligence community. Many of the state-of-the-art multi-objective and many-objective optimization problems (MOPs, MaOPs) are inefficient in maintaining the convergence and diversity performances as the number of objectives increases in the modern-day real-world applications. This phenomenon is obvious indeed as Pareto-dominance based EAs employ non-dominated sorting which fails considerably in providing enough convergent pressure towards the Pareto front (PF). Researchers invested much more time and effort in addressing this issue by improving the scalability in MaOPs and they have come up with non-Pareto-dominance-based EAs such as decomposition-based, indicator-based and reference-based approaches. In addition to that, the algorithm has to account for the additional computational budget. This thesis proposes an advanced polar-metric (p-metric) based Many-objective EA (in short APMOEA) for tackling both MOPs and MaOPs. p-metric, a recently proposed performance based visualization metric, employs an array of uniformly, distributed direction vectors. In APMOEA, a two-phase selection scheme is employed which combines both non-dominated sorting and p-metric. Moreover, this thesis also proposes a modified P-metric methodology in order to adjust the direction vectors dynamically. In the experiments, we compare APMOEA with four state-of-the-art Many-objective EAs under, three performance indicators. According to the empirical results, APMOEA shows much improved performances on most of the test problems, involving both MOPs and MaOPs.Electrical Engineerin

Evolutionary Algorithms for

Many real-world problems involve two types of problem difficulty: i) multiple, conflicting objectives and ii) a highly complex search space. On the one hand, instead of a single optimal solution competing goals give rise to a set of compromise solutions, generally denoted as Pareto-optimal. In the absence of preference information, none of the corresponding trade-offs can be said to be better than the others. On the other hand, the search space can be too large and too complex to be solved by exact methods. Thus, efficient optimization strategies are required that are able to deal with both difficulties. Evolutionary algorithms possess several characteristics that are desirable for this kind of problem and make them preferable to classical optimization methods. In fact, various evolutionary approaches to multiobjective optimization have been proposed since 1985, capable of searching for multiple Paretooptimal solutions concurrently in a single simulation run. However, in spite of this variety, there is a lack of extensive comparative studies in the literature. Therefore, it has remained open up to now

Multi-Objective UAV Mission Planning Using Evolutionary Computation

This investigation purports to develop a new model for multiple autonomous aircraft mission routing. Previous research both related and unrelated to this endeavor have used classic combinatoric problems as models for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) routing and mission planning. This document presents the concept of the Swarm Routing Problem (SRP) as a new combinatorics problem for use in modeling UAV swarm routing, developed as a variant of the Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows (VRPTW). The SRP removes the single vehicle per target restraint and changes the customer satisfaction requirement to one of vehicle on location volume. The impact of these alterations changes the vehicle definitions within the problem model from discrete units to cooperative members within a swarm. This represents a more realistic model for multi-agent routing as a real world mission plan would require the use of all airborne assets across multiple targets, without constraining a single vehicle to a single target. Solutions to the SRP problem model result in route assignments per vehicle that successfully track to all targets, on time, within distance constraints. A complexity analysis and multi-objective formulation of the VRPTW indicates the necessity of a stochastic solution approach leading to the development of a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. This algorithm design is implemented using C++ and an evolutionary algorithm library called Open Beagle. Benchmark problems applied to the VRPTW show the usefulness of this solution approach. A full problem definition of the SRP as well as a multi-objective formulation parallels that of the VRPTW method. Benchmark problems for the VRPTW are modified in order to create SRP benchmarks. These solutions show the SRP solution is comparable or better than the same VRPTW solutions, while also representing a more realistic UAV swarm routing solution

Scalarized Preferences in Multi-objective Optimization

Multikriterielle Optimierungsprobleme verfügen über keine Lösung, die optimal in jeder Zielfunktion ist. Die Schwierigkeit solcher Probleme liegt darin eine Kompromisslösung zu finden, die den Präferenzen des Entscheiders genügen, der den Kompromiss implementiert. Skalarisierung – die Abbildung des Vektors der Zielfunktionswerte auf eine reelle Zahl – identifiziert eine einzige Lösung als globales Präferenzenoptimum um diese Probleme zu lösen. Allerdings generieren Skalarisierungsmethoden keine zusätzlichen Informationen über andere Kompromisslösungen, die die Präferenzen des Entscheiders bezüglich des globalen Optimums verändern könnten. Um dieses Problem anzugehen stellt diese Dissertation eine theoretische und algorithmische Analyse skalarisierter Präferenzen bereit. Die theoretische Analyse besteht aus der Entwicklung eines Ordnungsrahmens, der Präferenzen als Problemtransformationen charakterisiert, die präferierte Untermengen der Paretofront definieren. Skalarisierung wird als Transformation der Zielmenge in diesem Ordnungsrahmen dargestellt. Des Weiteren werden Axiome vorgeschlagen, die wünschenswerte Eigenschaften von Skalarisierungsfunktionen darstellen. Es wird gezeigt unter welchen Bedingungen existierende Skalarisierungsfunktionen diese Axiome erfüllen. Die algorithmische Analyse kennzeichnet Präferenzen anhand des Resultats, das ein Optimierungsalgorithmus generiert. Zwei neue Paradigmen werden innerhalb dieser Analyse identifiziert. Für beide Paradigmen werden Algorithmen entworfen, die skalarisierte Präferenzeninformationen verwenden: Präferenzen-verzerrte Paretofrontapproximationen verteilen Punkte über die gesamte Paretofront, fokussieren aber mehr Punkte in Regionen mit besseren Skalarisierungswerten; multimodale Präferenzenoptima sind Punkte, die lokale Skalarisierungsoptima im Zielraum darstellen. Ein Drei-Stufen-Algorith\-mus wird entwickelt, der lokale Skalarisierungsoptima approximiert und verschiedene Methoden werden für die unterschiedlichen Stufen evaluiert. Zwei Realweltprobleme werden vorgestellt, die die Nützlichkeit der beiden Algorithmen illustrieren. Das erste Problem besteht darin Fahrpläne für ein Blockheizkraftwerk zu finden, die die erzeugte Elektrizität und Wärme maximieren und den Kraftstoffverbrauch minimiert. Präferenzen-verzerrte Approximationen generieren mehr Energie-effiziente Lösungen, unter denen der Entscheider seine favorisierte Lösung auswählen kann, indem er die Konflikte zwischen den drei Zielen abwägt. Das zweite Problem beschäftigt sich mit der Erstellung von Fahrplänen für Geräte in einem Wohngebäude, so dass Energiekosten, Kohlenstoffdioxidemissionen und thermisches Unbehagen minimiert werden. Es wird gezeigt, dass lokale Skalarisierungsoptima Fahrpläne darstellen, die eine gute Balance zwischen den drei Zielen bieten. Die Analyse und die Experimente, die in dieser Arbeit vorgestellt werden, ermöglichen es Entscheidern bessere Entscheidungen zu treffen indem Methoden angewendet werden, die mehr Optionen generieren, die mit den Präferenzen der Entscheider übereinstimmen

Population-based algorithms for improved history matching and uncertainty quantification of Petroleum reservoirs

In modern field management practices, there are two important steps that shed light on a multimillion dollar investment. The first step is history matching where the simulation model is calibrated to reproduce the historical observations from the field. In this inverse problem, different geological and petrophysical properties may provide equally good history matches. Such diverse models are likely to show different production behaviors in future. This ties the history matching with the second step, uncertainty quantification of predictions. Multiple history matched models are essential for a realistic uncertainty estimate of the future field behavior. These two steps facilitate decision making and have a direct impact on technical and financial performance of oil and gas companies. Population-based optimization algorithms have been recently enjoyed growing popularity for solving engineering problems. Population-based systems work with a group of individuals that cooperate and communicate to accomplish a task that is normally beyond the capabilities of each individual. These individuals are deployed with the aim to solve the problem with maximum efficiency. This thesis introduces the application of two novel population-based algorithms for history matching and uncertainty quantification of petroleum reservoir models. Ant colony optimization and differential evolution algorithms are used to search the space of parameters to find multiple history matched models and, using a Bayesian framework, the posterior probability of the models are evaluated for prediction of reservoir performance. It is demonstrated that by bringing latest developments in computer science such as ant colony, differential evolution and multiobjective optimization, we can improve the history matching and uncertainty quantification frameworks. This thesis provides insights into performance of these algorithms in history matching and prediction and develops an understanding of their tuning parameters. The research also brings a comparative study of these methods with a benchmark technique called Neighbourhood Algorithms. This comparison reveals the superiority of the proposed methodologies in various areas such as computational efficiency and match quality

Many-Objective Genetic Programming for Job-Shop Scheduling

The Job Shop Scheduling (JSS) problem is considered to be a challenging one due to practical requirements such as multiple objectives and the complexity of production flows. JSS has received great attention because of its broad applicability in real-world situations. One of the prominent solutions approaches to handling JSS problems is to design effective dispatching rules. Dispatching rules are investigated broadly in both academic and industrial environments because they are easy to implement (by computers and shop floor operators) with a low computational cost. However, the manual development of dispatching rules is time-consuming and requires expert knowledge of the scheduling environment. The hyper-heuristic approach that uses genetic programming (GP) to solve JSS problems is known as GP-based hyper-heuristic (GP-HH). GP-HH is a very useful approach for discovering dispatching rules automatically. Although it is technically simple to consider only a single objective optimization for JSS, it is now widely evidenced in the literature that JSS by nature presents several potentially conflicting objectives, including the maximal flowtime, mean flowtime, and mean tardiness. A few studies in the literature attempt to solve many-objective JSS with more than three objectives, but existing studies have some major limitations. First, many-objective JSS problems have been solved by multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs). However, recent studies have suggested that the performance of conventional MOEAs is prone to the scalability challenge and degrades dramatically with many-objective optimization problems (MaOPs). Many-objective JSS using MOEAs inherit the same challenge as MaOPs. Thus, using MOEAs for many-objective JSS problems often fails to select quality dispatching rules. Second, although the reference points method is one of the most prominent and efficient methods for diversity maintenance in many-objective problems, it uses a uniform distribution of reference points which is only appropriate for a regular Pareto-front. However, JSS problems often have irregular Pareto-front and uniformly distributed reference points do not match well with the irregular Pareto-front. It results in many useless points during evolution. These useless points can significantly affect the performance of the reference points-based algorithms. They cannot help to enhance the solution diversity of evolved Pareto-front in many-objective JSS problems. Third, Pareto Local Search (PLS) is a prominent and effective local search method for handling multi-objective JSS optimization problems but the literature does not discover any existing studies which use PLS in GP-HH. To address these limitations, this thesis's overall goal is to develop GP-HH approaches to evolving effective rules to handle many conflicting objectives simultaneously in JSS problems. To achieve the first goal, this thesis proposes the first many-objective GP-HH method for JSS problems to find the Pareto-fronts of nondominated dispatching rules. Decision-makers can utilize this GP-HH method for selecting appropriate rules based on their preference over multiple conflicting objectives. This study combines GP with the fitness evaluation scheme of a many-objective reference points-based approach. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm significantly outperforms MOEAs such as NSGA-II and SPEA2. To achieve the second goal, this thesis proposes two adaptive reference point approaches (model-free and model-driven). In both approaches, the reference points are generated according to the distribution of the evolved dispatching rules. The model-free reference point adaptation approach is inspired by Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The model-driven approach constructs the density model and estimates the density of solutions from each defined sub-location in a whole objective space. Furthermore, the model-driven approach provides smoothness to the model by applying a Gaussian Process model and calculating the area under the mean function. The mean function area helps to find the required number of the reference points in each mean function. The experimental results demonstrate that both adaptive approaches are significantly better than several state-of-the-art MOEAs. To achieve the third goal, the thesis proposes the first algorithm that combines GP as a global search with PLS as a local search in many-objective JSS. The proposed algorithm introduces an effective fitness-based selection strategy for selecting initial individuals for neighborhood exploration. It defines the GP's proper neighborhood structure and a new selection mechanism for selecting the effective dispatching rules during the local search. The experimental results on the JSS benchmark problem show that the newly proposed algorithm can significantly outperform its baseline algorithm (GP-NSGA-III)

Evolutionary Computation

This book presents several recent advances on Evolutionary Computation, specially evolution-based optimization methods and hybrid algorithms for several applications, from optimization and learning to pattern recognition and bioinformatics. This book also presents new algorithms based on several analogies and metafores, where one of them is based on philosophy, specifically on the philosophy of praxis and dialectics. In this book it is also presented interesting applications on bioinformatics, specially the use of particle swarms to discover gene expression patterns in DNA microarrays. Therefore, this book features representative work on the field of evolutionary computation and applied sciences. The intended audience is graduate, undergraduate, researchers, and anyone who wishes to become familiar with the latest research work on this field