100 research outputs found

    Total Representations

    Full text link
    Almost all representations considered in computable analysis are partial. We provide arguments in favor of total representations (by elements of the Baire space). Total representations make the well known analogy between numberings and representations closer, unify some terminology, simplify some technical details, suggest interesting open questions and new invariants of topological spaces relevant to computable analysis.Comment: 30 page

    Techniques for approaching the dual Ramsey property in the projective hierarchy

    Full text link
    We define the dualizations of objects and concepts which are essential for investigating the Ramsey property in the first levels of the projective hierarchy, prove a forcing equivalence theorem for dual Mathias forcing and dual Laver forcing, and show that the Harrington-Kechris techniques for proving the Ramsey property from determinacy work in the dualized case as well

    Uniformity, Universality, and Computability Theory

    Full text link
    We prove a number of results motivated by global questions of uniformity in computability theory, and universality of countable Borel equivalence relations. Our main technical tool is a game for constructing functions on free products of countable groups. We begin by investigating the notion of uniform universality, first proposed by Montalb\'an, Reimann and Slaman. This notion is a strengthened form of a countable Borel equivalence relation being universal, which we conjecture is equivalent to the usual notion. With this additional uniformity hypothesis, we can answer many questions concerning how countable groups, probability measures, the subset relation, and increasing unions interact with universality. For many natural classes of countable Borel equivalence relations, we can also classify exactly which are uniformly universal. We also show the existence of refinements of Martin's ultrafilter on Turing invariant Borel sets to the invariant Borel sets of equivalence relations that are much finer than Turing equivalence. For example, we construct such an ultrafilter for the orbit equivalence relation of the shift action of the free group on countably many generators. These ultrafilters imply a number of structural properties for these equivalence relations.Comment: 61 Page

    The Theory of Countable Analytical Sets

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this paper is the study of the structure of countable sets in the various levels of the analytical hierarchy of sets of reals. It is first shown that, assuming projective determinacy, there is for each odd n a largest countable ∏_n^1 set of reals, C_n (this is also true for n even, replacing ∏_n^1 by ÎŁ_n^1 and has been established earlier by Solovay for n = 2 and by Moschovakis and the author for all even n > 2). The internal structure of the sets C_n is then investigated in detail, the point of departure being the fact that each C_n is a set of Δ_n^1-degrees, wellordered under their usual partial ordering. Finally, a number of applications of the preceding theory is presented, covering a variety of topics such as specification of bases, ω-models of analysis, higher-level analogs of the constructible universe, inductive definability, etc

    Forcing the Π31\Pi^1_3-Reduction Property and a Failure of Π31\Pi^1_3-Uniformization

    Full text link
    We force over the constructible universe to obtain a model of the Π31\Pi^1_3-reduction property, thus lowering the best known large cardinal strength from the existence of M1#M_1^{\#} to just ZFC. In this model the Π31\Pi^1_3-uniformization property fails, which separates these two principles for the first time.Comment: 27 page

    Automorphism groups of randomized structures

    Full text link
    We study automorphism groups of randomizations of separable structures, with focus on the â„”0\aleph_0-categorical case. We give a description of the automorphism group of the Borel randomization in terms of the group of the original structure. In the â„”0\aleph_0-categorical context, this provides a new source of Roelcke precompact Polish groups, and we describe the associated Roelcke compactifications. This allows us also to recover and generalize preservation results of stable and NIP formulas previously established in the literature, via a Banach-theoretic translation. Finally, we study and classify the separable models of the theory of beautiful pairs of randomizations, showing in particular that this theory is never â„”0\aleph_0-categorical (except in basic cases).Comment: 28 page

    Logic and C∗\mathrm{C}^*-algebras: set theoretical dichotomies in the theory of continuous quotients

    Get PDF
    Given a nonunital C∗\mathrm{C}^*-algebra AA one constructs its corona algebra M(A)/A\mathcal M(A)/A. This is the noncommutative analog of the \v{C}ech-Stone remainder of a topological space. We analyze the two faces of these algebras: the first one is given assuming CH, and the other one arises when Forcing Axioms are assumed. In their first face, corona C∗\mathrm{C}^*-algebras have a large group of automorphisms that includes nondefinable ones. The second face is the Forcing Axiom one; here the automorphism group of a corona C∗\mathrm{C}^*-algebra is as rigid as possible, including only definable elementsComment: This is the author's Ph.D. thesis, defended in April 2017 at York University, Toront

    Set Theory

    Get PDF

    On what I do not understand (and have something to say): Part I

    Full text link
    This is a non-standard paper, containing some problems in set theory I have in various degrees been interested in. Sometimes with a discussion on what I have to say; sometimes, of what makes them interesting to me, sometimes the problems are presented with a discussion of how I have tried to solve them, and sometimes with failed tries, anecdote and opinion. So the discussion is quite personal, in other words, egocentric and somewhat accidental. As we discuss many problems, history and side references are erratic, usually kept at a minimum (``see ... '' means: see the references there and possibly the paper itself). The base were lectures in Rutgers Fall'97 and reflect my knowledge then. The other half, concentrating on model theory, will subsequently appear
    • 

    corecore