8 research outputs found

    Diurnal and Seasonal Solar Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthesis in a Boreal Scots Pine Canopy

    Get PDF
    Solar induced chlorophyll fluorescence has been shown to be increasingly an useful proxy for the estimation of gross primary productivity (GPP), at a range of spatial scales. Here, we explore the seasonality in a continuous time series of canopy solar induced fluorescence (hereafter SiF) and its relation to canopy gross primary production (GPP), canopy light use efficiency (LUE), and direct estimates of leaf level photochemical efficiency in an evergreen canopy. SiF was calculated using infilling in two bands from the incoming and reflected radiance using a pair of Ocean Optics USB2000+ spectrometers operated in a dual field of view mode, sampling at a 30 min time step using custom written automated software, from early spring through until autumn in 2011. The optical system was mounted on a tower of 18 m height adjacent to an eddy covariance system, to observe a boreal forest ecosystem dominated by Scots pine. (Pinus sylvestris) A Walz MONITORING-PAM, multi fluorimeter system, was simultaneously mounted within the canopy adjacent to the footprint sampled by the optical system. Following correction of the SiF data for O2 and structural effects, SiF, SiF yield, LUE, the photochemicsl reflectance index (PRI), and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) exhibited a seasonal pattern that followed GPP sampled by the eddy covariance system. Due to the complexities of solar azimuth and zenith angle (SZA) over the season on the SiF signal, correlations between SiF, SiF yield, GPP, and LUE were assessed on SZ

    On the Functional Relationship Between Fluorescence and Photochemical Yields in Complex Evergreen Needleleaf Canopies

    Get PDF
    Recent advancements in understanding remotely sensed solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence often suggest a linear relationship with gross primary productivity at large spatial scales. However, the quantum yields of fluorescence and photochemistry are not linearly related, and this relationship is largely driven by irradiance. This raises questions about the mechanistic basis of observed linearity from complex canopies that experience heterogeneous irradiance regimes at subcanopy scales. We present empirical data from two evergreen forest sites that demonstrate a nonlinear relationship between needle‐scale observations of steady‐state fluorescence yield and photochemical yield under ambient irradiance. We show that accounting for subcanopy and diurnal patterns of irradiance can help identify the physiological constraints on needle‐scale fluorescence at 70–80% accuracy. Our findings are placed in the context of how solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence observations from spaceborne sensors relate to diurnal variation in canopy‐scale physiology

    The roles of radiative, structural and physiological information of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in predicting gross primary production of a corn crop at various temporal scales

    Get PDF
    Extensive research suggests that sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and gross primary productivity (GPP) have a near-linear relationship, providing a promising avenue for estimating the carbon uptake of ecosystems. However, the factors influencing the relationship are not yet clear. This study examines the roles of SIF's radiative, structural, and physiological information in predicting GPP, based on four years of field observations of a corn canopy at various temporal scales. We quantified SIF's radiative component by measuring the intensity of incident photosynthetically active radiation (iPAR), and separated the structural and physiological components from SIF observations using the fluorescence correction vegetation index (FCVI). Our results show that the R2 values between SIF and GPP, as estimated by linear models, increased from 0.66 at a half-hour resolution to 0.86 at a one-month resolution. In comparison, the product of FCVI and iPAR, representing the non-physiological information of SIF, performed consistently well in predicting GPP with R2&gt;0.84 at various temporal scales, suggesting a limited contribution of the physiological information of SIF for GPP estimation. The results further reveal that SIF's radiative and structural components positively impacted the SIF-GPP linearity, while the physiological component had a negative impact on the linearity for most cases, changing from 0.6 % to -27.5 %. As for the temporal dependency, the controls of the SIF-GPP relationship moved from radiation at diurnal scales to structure at the seasonal scales. The structural contribution changed from 14.8 % at a half-hour resolution to 92.4 % at a one-month resolution, while the radiative contribution decreased from 118.0 % at a half-hour resolution to 11.7 % at a one-month resolution. This study contributes to enhancing our understanding of the physiological information conveyed by SIF and the factors influencing the temporal dependency of the SIF-GPP relationship.</p

    κ·Όμ ‘ ν‘œλ©΄ 원격 μ„Όμ‹± μ‹œμŠ€ν…œλ“€μ„ μ΄μš©ν•œ 지속적 식물 κ³„μ ˆ 및 νƒœμ–‘ μœ λ„ μ—½λ‘μ†Œ ν˜•κ΄‘λ¬Όμ§ˆ κ΄€μΈ‘

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(박사) -- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅λŒ€ν•™μ› : ν™˜κ²½λŒ€ν•™μ› ν˜‘λ™κ³Όμ • μ‘°κ²½ν•™, 2022.2. λ₯˜μ˜λ ¬.Monitoring phenology, physiological and structural changes in vegetation is essential to understand feedbacks of vegetation between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere by influencing the albedo, carbon flux, water flux and energy. To this end, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) from satellite remote sensing have been widely used. However, there are still limitations in satellite remote sensing as 1) satellite imagery could not capture fine-scale spatial resolution of SIF signals, 2) satellite products are strongly influenced by condition of the atmosphere (e.g. clouds), thus it is challenging to know physiological and structural changes in vegetation on cloudy days and 3) satellite imagery captured a mixed signal from over- and understory, thus it is difficult to study the difference between overstory and understory phenology separately. Therefore, in order to more accurately understand the signals observed from the satellite, further studies using near-surface remote sensing system to collect ground-based observed data are needed. The main purpose of this dissertation is continuous observation of vegetation phenology and SIF using near-surface remote sensing system. To achieve the main goal, I set three chapters as 1) developing low-cost filter-based near-surface remote sensing system to monitor SIF continuously, 2) monitoring SIF in a temperate evergreen needleleaf forest continuously, and 3) understanding the relationships between phenology from in-situ multi-layer canopies and satellite products. In Chapter 2, I developed the filter-based smart surface sensing system (4S-SIF) to overcome the technical challenges of monitoring SIF in the field as well as to decrease sensor cost for more comprehensive spatial sampling. I verified the satisfactory spectral performance of the bandpass filters and confirmed that digital numbers (DN) from 4S-SIF exhibited linear relationships with the DN from the hyperspectral spectroradiometer in each band (R2 > 0.99). In addition, we confirmed that 4S-SIF shows relatively low variation of dark current value at various temperatures. Furthermore, the SIF signal from 4S-SIF represents a strong linear relationship with QEpro-SIF either changing the physiological mechanisms of the plant using DCMU (3-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethyurea) treatment. I believe that 4S-SIF will be a useful tool for collecting in-situ data across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Satellite-based SIF provides us with new opportunities to understand the physiological and structural dynamics of vegetation from canopy to global scales. However, the relationships between SIF and gross primary productivity (GPP) are not fully understood, which is mainly due to the challenges of decoupling structural and physiological factors that control the relationships. In Chapter 3, I reported the results of continuous observations of canopy-level SIF, GPP, absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR), and chlorophyll: carotenoid index (CCI) in a temperate evergreen needleleaf forest. To understand the mechanisms underlying the relationship between GPP and SIF, I investigated the relationships of light use efficiency (LUE_p), chlorophyll fluorescence yield (Ξ¦_F), and the fraction of emitted SIF photons escaping from the canopy (f_esc) separately. I found a strongly non-linear relationship between GPP and SIF at diurnal and seasonal time scales (R2 = 0.91 with a hyperbolic regression function, daily). GPP saturated with APAR, while SIF did not. In addition, there were differential responses of LUE_p and Ξ¦_F to air temperature. While LUE_p reached saturation at high air temperatures, Ξ¦_F did not saturate. I also found that the canopy-level chlorophyll: carotenoid index was strongly correlated to canopy-level Ξ¦_F (R2 = 0.84) implying that Ξ¦_F could be more closely related to pigment pool changes rather than LUE_p. In addition, I found that the f_esc contributed to a stronger SIF-GPP relationship by partially capturing the response of LUE_p to diffuse light. These findings can help refine physiological and structural links between canopy-level SIF and GPP in evergreen needleleaf forests. We do not fully understand what satellite NDVI derived leaf-out and full leaf dates actually observe because deciduous broadleaf forest consists of multi-layer canopies typically and mixed-signal from multi-layer canopies could affect satellite observation. Ultimately, we have the following question: What phenology do we actually see from space compared to ground observations on multi-layer canopy phenology? In Chapter 4, I reported the results of 8 years of continuous observations of multi-layer phenology and climate variables in a deciduous broadleaf forest, South Korea. Multi-channel spectrometers installed above and below overstory canopy allowed us to monitor over- and understory canopy phenology separately, continuously. I evaluated the widely used phenology detection methods, curvature change rate and threshold with NDVI observed above top of the canopy and compared leaf-out and full leaf dates from both methods to in-situ observed multi-layer phenology. First, I found that NDVI from the above canopy had a strong linear relationship with satellites NDVI (R2=0.95 for MODIS products and R2= 0.85 for Landsat8). Second, leaf-out dates extracted by the curvature change rate method and 10% threshold were well matched with understory leaf-out dates. Third, the full-leaf dates extracted by the curvature change rate method and 90% threshold were similar to overstory full-leaf dates. Furthermore, I found that overstory leaf-out dates were closely correlated to accumulated growing degree days (AGDD) while understory leaf-out dates were related to AGDD and also sensitive to the number of chill days (NCD). These results suggest that satellite-based leaf-out and full leaf dates represent understory and overstory signals in the deciduous forest site, which requires caution when using satellite-based phenology data into future prediction as overstory and understory canopy show different sensitivities to AGDD and NCD.식물 κ³„μ ˆ 및 μ‹μƒμ˜ 생리학적, ꡬ쑰적인 λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό μ§€μ†μ μœΌλ‘œ λͺ¨λ‹ˆν„°λ§ ν•˜λŠ” 것은 μœ‘μƒμƒνƒœκ³„μ™€ λŒ€κΈ°κΆŒ μ‚¬μ΄μ˜ μ—λ„ˆμ§€, νƒ„μ†Œ μˆœν™˜ λ“±μ˜ ν”Όλ“œλ°±μ„ μ΄ν•΄ν•˜λŠ”λ° ν•„μˆ˜μ μ΄λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό κ΄€μΈ‘ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ μœ„μ„±μ—μ„œ κ΄€μΈ‘λœ μ •κ·œν™” 식생 μ§€μˆ˜ (NDVI) νƒœμ–‘ μœ λ„ μ—½λ‘μ†Œ ν˜•κ΄‘λ¬Όμ§ˆ (SIF)λŠ” λŒ€μ€‘μ μœΌλ‘œ μ‚¬μš©λ˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜, 우주 μœ„μ„± 기반의 μžλ£ŒλŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같은 ν•œκ³„μ λ“€μ΄ μ‘΄μž¬ν•œλ‹€. 1) μ•„μ§κΉŒμ§€ κ³ ν•΄μƒλ„μ˜ μœ„μ„± 기반 SIF μžλ£ŒλŠ” μ—†κ³ , 2) μœ„μ„± μžλ£Œλ“€μ€ λŒ€κΈ°μ˜ 질 (예, ꡬ름)에 영ν–₯을 λ°›μ•„, 흐린 λ‚ μ˜ μ‹μƒμ˜ 생리학적, ꡬ쑰적 λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό νƒμ§€ν•˜κΈ° νž˜λ“€λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ, 3) μœ„μ„± μ΄λ―Έμ§€λŠ” 상뢀 식생과 ν•˜λΆ€ 식생이 ν˜Όν•©λ˜μ–΄ μ„žμΈ μ‹ ν˜Έλ₯Ό νƒμ§€ν•˜κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ—, 각 측의 식물 κ³„μ ˆμ„ 각각 μ—°κ΅¬ν•˜κΈ°μ— 어렀움이 μžˆλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ―€λ‘œ, μœ„μ„±μ—μ„œ νƒμ§€ν•œ μ‹ ν˜Έλ₯Ό ν‰κ°€ν•˜κ³ , μ‹μƒμ˜ 생리학적, ꡬ쑰적 λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό 보닀 μ •ν™•νžˆ μ΄ν•΄ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” κ·Όμ ‘ ν‘œλ©΄ 원격 μ„Όμ‹± μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ„ μ΄μš©ν•œ μ‹€μΈ‘ 자료 기반의 연ꡬ듀이 μš”κ΅¬λœλ‹€. λ³Έ ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έμ˜ μ£Ό λͺ©μ μ€ κ·Όμ ‘ ν‘œλ©΄ 원격 μ„Όμ‹± μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ 식물 κ³„μ ˆ 및 SIFλ₯Ό ν˜„μž₯μ—μ„œ μ§€μ†μ μœΌλ‘œ μ‹€μΈ‘ν•˜κ³ , μœ„μ„± μ˜μƒ 기반의 연ꡬ가 κ°–κ³  μžˆλŠ” ν•œκ³„μ  및 κΆκΈˆμ¦λ“€μ„ ν•΄κ²° 및 λ³΄μ™„ν•˜λŠ” 것이닀. 이 λͺ©μ μ„ λ‹¬μ„±ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•˜μ—¬, μ•„λž˜μ™€ 같은 세가지 Chapter: 1) SIFλ₯Ό κ΄€μΈ‘ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ ν•„ν„° 기반의 μ €λ ΄ν•œ κ·Όμ ‘ ν‘œλ©΄ μ„Όμ‹± μ‹œμŠ€ν…œ 개발, 2)μ˜¨λŒ€ μΉ¨μ—½μˆ˜λ¦Όμ—μ„œμ˜ 연속적인 SIF κ΄€μΈ‘, 3)μœ„μ„± 기반의 식물 κ³„μ ˆκ³Ό μ‹€μΈ‘ν•œ λ‹€μΈ΅ μ‹μƒμ˜ 식물 κ³„μ ˆ λΉ„κ΅λ‘œ κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜κ³ , 이λ₯Ό μ§„ν–‰ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. SIFλŠ” μ‹μƒμ˜ ꡬ쑰적, 생리학적 λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό μ΄ν•΄ν•˜κ³ , μΆ”μ •ν•˜λŠ” 인자둜 μ‚¬μš©λ  수 μžˆμ–΄, SIFλ₯Ό ν˜„μž₯μ—μ„œ κ΄€μΈ‘ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ κ·Όμ ‘ ν‘œλ©΄ 원격 μ„Όμ‹± μ‹œμŠ€ν…œλ“€μ΄ 졜근 μ œμ‹œλ˜μ–΄ 였고 μžˆλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜, μ•„μ§κΉŒμ§€ SIFλ₯Ό κ΄€μΈ‘ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ μƒμ—…μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ ν†΅λ˜λŠ” κ΄€μΈ‘ μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ€ ν˜„μ €νžˆ λΆ€μ‘±ν•˜λ©°, λΆ„κ΄‘κ³„μ˜ ꡬ쑰적 νŠΉμ„±μƒ ν˜„μž₯μ—μ„œ κ΄€μΈ‘ μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ„ 보정 및 κ΄€λ¦¬ν•˜κΈ°κ°€ μ–΄λ €μ›Œ 높은 질의 SIFλ₯Ό μ·¨λ“ν•˜λŠ” 것은 맀우 도전 적인 뢄야이닀. λ³Έ ν•™μœ„ λ…Όλ¬Έμ˜ Chapter 2μ—μ„œλŠ” SIFλ₯Ό ν˜„μž₯μ—μ„œ 보닀 μ†μ‰½κ²Œ κ΄€μΈ‘ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ ν•„ν„° 기반의 κ·Όμ ‘ ν‘œλ©΄ μ„Όμ‹± μ‹œμŠ€ν…œ(Smart Surface Sensing System, 4S-SIF)을 κ°œλ°œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ„Όμ„œλŠ” λŒ€μ—­ ν•„ν„°λ“€κ³Ό ν¬ν† λ‹€μ΄μ˜€λ“œκ°€ κ²°ν•©λ˜μ–΄ 있으며, μ„œλ³΄ λͺ¨ν„°λ₯Ό μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ—¬ λŒ€μ—­ ν•„ν„° 및 κ΄€μΈ‘ λ°©ν–₯을 μžλ™μ μœΌλ‘œ λ³€κ²½ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨, ν•œ 개의 ν¬ν† λ‹€μ΄μ˜€λ“œκ°€ 3개의 파μž₯ λ²”μœ„(757, 760, 770 nm)의 λΉ› 및 νƒœμ–‘μœΌλ‘œλΆ€ν„° μž…μ‚¬λ˜λŠ” κ΄‘λŸ‰κ³Ό μ‹μƒμœΌλ‘œ λ°˜μ‚¬/방좜된 κ΄‘λŸ‰μ„ κ΄€μΈ‘ν•  수 μžˆλ„λ‘ κ³ μ•ˆλ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. ν¬ν† λ‹€μ΄μ˜€λ“œλ‘œλΆ€ν„° μΈμ‹λœ 디지털 수치 값은 μƒμ—…μ μœΌλ‘œ νŒλ§€λ˜λŠ” μ΄ˆκ³ ν•΄μƒλ„ 뢄광계(QE Pro, Ocean Insight)와 λšœλ ·ν•œ μ„ ν˜• 관계λ₯Ό λ³΄μ΄λŠ” 것을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€ (R2 > 0.99). μΆ”κ°€μ μœΌλ‘œ, 4S-SIFμ—μ„œ κ΄€μΈ‘λœ SIF와 μ΄ˆκ³ ν•΄μƒλ„ 뢄광계λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μΆ”μΆœν•œ SIFκ°€ μ„ ν˜•μ μΈ 관계λ₯Ό μ΄λ£¨λŠ” 것을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ‹μƒμ˜ 생리학적 λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό μΌμœΌν‚€λŠ” ν™”ν•™ 물질인 DCMU(3-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethyurea)을 μ²˜λ¦¬ν–ˆμŒμ—λ„ λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³ , μ‚°μΆœλœ SIF듀은 μ„ ν˜• 관계λ₯Ό λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ μ„Όμ„œλŠ” κΈ°μ‘΄ μ‹œμŠ€ν…œλ“€μ— λΉ„ν•΄ μ‚¬μš©ν•˜κΈ° 쉽고 κ°„λ‹¨ν•˜λ©°, μ €λ ΄ν•˜κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ— λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μ‹œκ³΅κ°„μ  μŠ€μΌ€μΌμ˜ SIFλ₯Ό κ΄€μΈ‘ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€λŠ” μž₯점이 μžˆλ‹€. μœ„μ„± 기반의 SIFλ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ 총일차생산성(gross primary productivity, GPP)을 μΆ”μ •ν•˜λŠ” μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 졜근 νƒ„μ†Œ μˆœν™˜ 연ꡬ λΆ„μ•Όμ—μ„œ 각광받고 μžˆλŠ” 연ꡬ μ£Όμ œμ΄λ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜, SIF와 GPP의 κ΄€κ³„λŠ” μ—¬μ „νžˆ λ§Žμ€ λΆˆν™•μ‹€μ„±μ„ μ§€λ‹ˆκ³  μžˆλŠ”λ°, μ΄λŠ” SIF-GPP 관계λ₯Ό μ‘°μ ˆν•˜λŠ” μ‹μƒμ˜ ꡬ쑰적 및 생리학적 μš”μΈμ„ λ”°λ‘œ λΆ„λ¦¬ν•˜μ—¬ κ³ μ°°ν•œ 연ꡬ듀이 λΆ€μ‘±ν•˜κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λ‹€. λ³Έ ν•™μœ„ λ…Όλ¬Έμ˜ Chapter 3μ—μ„œλŠ” μ§€μ†μ μœΌλ‘œ SIF, GPP, 흑수된 κ΄‘ν•©μ„±μœ νš¨λ³΅μ‚¬λŸ‰ (absorbed photosynthetically active radiation, APAR), 그리고 ν΄λ‘œλ‘œν•„κ³Ό μΉ΄λ‘œν‹°λ…Έμ΄λ“œμ˜ λΉ„μœ¨ 인자 (chlorophyll: carotenoid index, CCI)λ₯Ό μ˜¨λŒ€μΉ¨μ—½μˆ˜λ¦Όμ—μ„œ μ—°μ†μ μœΌλ‘œ κ΄€μΈ‘ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. SIF-GPP κ΄€κ³„μ˜ ꡬ체적인 λ©”μ»€λ‹ˆμ¦˜ 관계λ₯Ό 밝히기 μœ„ν•˜μ—¬, κ΄‘ 이용효율 (light use efficiency, LUE_p), μ—½λ‘μ†Œ ν˜•κ΄‘ μˆ˜λ“λ₯  (chlorophyll fluorescence yield, Ξ¦_F) 그리고 SIF κ΄‘μžκ°€ κ΅°λ½μœΌλ‘œλΆ€ν„° λ°©μΆœλ˜λŠ” λΉ„μœ¨ (escape fraction, f_esc)을 각각 λ„μΆœν•˜κ³  νƒκ΅¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. SIF와 GPP의 κ΄€κ³„λŠ” λšœλ ·ν•œ λΉ„ μ„ ν˜•μ μΈ 관계λ₯Ό λ³΄μ΄λŠ” 것을 ν™•μΈν–ˆμœΌλ©°(R2 = 0.91 with a hyperbolic regression function, daily), 일주기 λ‹¨μœ„μ—μ„œ SIFλŠ” APAR에 λŒ€ν•΄ μ„ ν˜•μ μ΄μ—ˆμ§€λ§Œ GPPλŠ” APAR에 λŒ€ν•΄ λšœλ ·ν•œ 포화 관계λ₯Ό λ³΄μ΄λŠ” 것을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μΆ”κ°€μ μœΌλ‘œ LUE_p 와 Ξ¦_F κ°€ λŒ€κΈ° μ˜¨λ„μ— 따라 λ°˜μ‘ν•˜λŠ” 정도가 λ‹€λ₯Έ 것을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. LUE_pλŠ” 높은 μ˜¨λ„μ—μ„œ 포화 λ˜μ—ˆμ§€λ§Œ, Ξ¦_FλŠ” 포화 νŒ¨ν„΄μ„ 확인할 수 μ—†μ—ˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ, ꡰ락 μˆ˜μ€€μ—μ„œμ˜ CCI와 Ξ¦_Fκ°€ λšœλ ·ν•œ 상관 관계λ₯Ό λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€(R2 = 0.84). μ΄λŠ” Ξ¦_Fκ°€ μ—½λ‘μ†Œ μƒ‰μ†Œμ— 영ν–₯을 LUE_p에 λΉ„ν•΄ 더 κ°•ν•œ 관계가 μžˆμ„ 수 μžˆμŒμ„ μ‹œμ‚¬ν•œλ‹€. λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰μœΌλ‘œ, f_escκ°€ νƒœμ–‘κ΄‘μ˜ μ‚°λž€λœ 정도에 따라 λ°˜μ‘μ„ ν•˜μ—¬, Ξ¦_F와 LUE_p의 κ°•ν•œ 상관 관계λ₯Ό ν˜•μ„±ν•˜λŠ”λ° κΈ°μ—¬ν•˜λŠ” 것을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ λ°œκ²¬μ€ μ˜¨λŒ€ μΉ¨μ—½μˆ˜λ¦Όμ—μ„œ ꡰ락 μˆ˜μ€€μ˜ SIF-GPP관계λ₯Ό 생리학적 및 ꡬ쑰적 μΈ‘λ©΄μ—μ„œ μ΄ν•΄ν•˜κ³  규λͺ…ν•˜λŠ”λ° 큰 도움이 될 것이닀. 식물 κ³„μ ˆμ€ 식생이 철을 따라 주기적으둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚΄λŠ” λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό κ΄€μΈ‘ν•˜λŠ” λ°˜μ‘μ΄λ‹€. 식물 κ³„μ ˆμ€ μœ‘μƒμƒνƒœκ³„μ™€ λŒ€κΈ°κΆŒ μ‚¬μ΄μ˜ 물질 μˆœν™˜μ„ μ΄ν•΄ν•˜λŠ”λ° 맀우 μ€‘μš”ν•˜λ‹€. μœ„μ„± 기반의 NDVIλŠ” 식물 κ³„μ ˆμ„ νƒμ§€ν•˜κ³  μ—°κ΅¬ν•˜λŠ”λ° κ°€μž₯ λŒ€μ€‘μ μœΌλ‘œ μ‚¬μš©λœλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜, ν™œμ—½μˆ˜λ¦Όμ—μ„œμ˜ μœ„μ„± NDVI 기반의 κ°œμ—½ μ‹œκΈ° 및 μ„±μˆ™ μ‹œκΈ°κ°€ μ‹€μ œ μ–΄λŠ μ‹œμ μ„ νƒμ§€ν•˜λŠ”μ§€λŠ” λΆˆλΆ„λͺ…ν•˜λ‹€. μ‹€μ œ ν™œμ—½μˆ˜λ¦Όμ€ λ‹€μΈ΅ 식생 ꡬ쑰의 μ‚Όμ°¨μ›μœΌλ‘œ 이루어져 μžˆλŠ” 반면, μœ„μ„± μ˜μƒμ€ λ‹€μΈ΅ μ‹μƒμ˜ μ‹ ν˜Έκ°€ μ„žμ—¬ μžˆλŠ” μ΄μ°¨μ›μ˜ 결과물이기 λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ, μœ„μ„± NDVI 기반의 식물 κ³„μ ˆμ΄ λ‹€μΈ΅ 식생 ꡬ쑰λ₯Ό 이루고 μžˆλŠ” ν™œμ—½μˆ˜λ¦Όμ—μ„œ μ‹€μ œ ν˜„μž₯ κ΄€μΈ‘κ³Ό λΉ„κ΅ν•˜μ˜€μ„ λ•Œ μ–΄λŠ μ‹œμ μ„ νƒμ§€ν•˜λŠ”μ§€μ— λŒ€ν•œ ꢁ금증이 λ‚¨λŠ”λ‹€. λ³Έ ν•™μœ„ λ…Όλ¬Έμ˜ Chapter 4μ—μ„œλŠ” μ§€μ†μ μœΌλ‘œ 8λ…„ λ™μ•ˆ ν™œμ—½μˆ˜λ¦Όλ‚΄μ˜ λ‹€μΈ΅ μ‹μƒμ˜ 식물 κ³„μ ˆμ„ κ·Όμ ‘ ν‘œλ©΄ 원격 μ„Όμ‹± μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ κ΄€μΈ‘ν•˜κ³ , μœ„μ„± NDVI 기반의 식물 κ³„μ ˆκ³Ό λΉ„κ΅ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 닀채널 뢄광계λ₯Ό 상뢀 μ‹μƒμ˜ μœ„μ™€ μ•„λž˜μ— μ„€μΉ˜ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨, 상뢀 식생과 ν•˜λΆ€ μ‹μƒμ˜ 식물 κ³„μ ˆμ„ 각각 μ—°μ†μ μœΌλ‘œ κ΄€μΈ‘ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 식물 κ³„μ ˆμ„ νƒμ§€ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ κ°€μž₯ 많이 μ‚¬μš©λ˜λŠ” 방법인 1) μ—­μΉ˜λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜λŠ” 방법과 2) μ΄κ³„λ„ν•¨μˆ˜λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜λŠ” 방법을 μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ—¬ κ°œμ—½ μ‹œκΈ° 및 μ„±μˆ™ μ‹œκΈ°λ₯Ό κ³„μ‚°ν•˜κ³  이λ₯Ό λ‹€μΈ΅ μ‹μƒμ˜ 식물 κ³„μ ˆκ³Ό λΉ„κ΅ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Ό, 첫번째둜, ꡰ락의 μƒμΈ΅λΆ€μ—μ„œ μ‹€μΈ‘ν•œ NDVI와 μœ„μ„± 기반의 NDVIκ°€ κ°•ν•œ μ„ ν˜• 관계λ₯Ό λ³΄μ΄λŠ” 것을 ν™•μΈν–ˆλ‹€ (R2=0.95 λŠ” MODIS μ˜μƒλ“€ 및 R2= 0.85 λŠ” Landsat8). λ‘λ²ˆμ§Έλ‘œ, μ΄κ³„λ„ν•¨μˆ˜ 방법과 10%의 μ—­μΉ˜ 값을 μ΄μš©ν•œ 방법이 λΉ„μŠ·ν•œ κ°œμ—½ μ‹œκΈ°λ₯Ό μΆ”μ •ν•˜λŠ” 것을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, ν•˜λΆ€ μ‹μƒμ˜ κ°œμ—½ μ‹œκΈ°μ™€ λΉ„μŠ·ν•œ μ‹œκΈ°μž„μ„ ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ„Έλ²ˆμ§Έλ‘œ, μ΄κ³„λ„ν•¨μˆ˜ 방법과 90%의 μ—­μΉ˜ 값을 μ΄μš©ν•œ 방법이 λΉ„μŠ·ν•œ μ„±μˆ™ μ‹œκΈ°λ₯Ό μ‚°μΆœν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, μ΄λŠ” 상뢀 μ‹μƒμ˜ μ„±μˆ™ μ‹œκΈ°μ™€ λΉ„μŠ·ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μΆ”κ°€μ μœΌλ‘œ 상뢀 μ‹μƒμ˜ κ°œμ—½ μ‹œκΈ°μ™€ ν•˜λΆ€ μ‹μƒμ˜ κ°œμ—½ μ‹œκΈ°κ°€ μ˜¨λ„μ™€ λ°˜μ‘ν•˜λŠ” 정도가 λšœλ ·ν•˜κ²Œ 차이가 λ‚˜λŠ” 것을 확인할 수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. 상뢀 μ‹μƒμ˜ κ°œμ—½ μ‹œκΈ°λŠ” 적산 생μž₯ μ˜¨λ„ 일수 (AGDD)와 κ°•ν•œ 상관성을 λ³΄μ˜€κ³ , ν•˜λΆ€ μ‹μƒμ˜ κ°œμ—½ μ‹œκΈ°λŠ” AGDD와 연관성을 κ°–κ³  μžˆμ„ 뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μΆ”μœ„ 일수(NCD)에도 λ―Όκ°ν•˜κ²Œ λ°˜μ‘ν•˜λŠ” 것을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” μœ„μ„± NDVI 기반의 κ°œμ—½ μ‹œκΈ°λŠ” ν•˜λΆ€ μ‹μƒμ˜ κ°œμ—½ μ‹œκΈ°μ™€ 연관성이 λ†’κ³ , μ„±μˆ™ μ‹œκΈ°λŠ” 상뢀 μ‹μƒμ˜ μ„±μˆ™ μ‹œκΈ°μ™€ λΉ„μŠ·ν•˜λ‹€λŠ” 것을 μ˜λ―Έν•œλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ, 상뢀 식생과 ν•˜λΆ€ 식생이 μ˜¨λ„μ— λ‹€λ₯Έ 민감성을 κ°–κ³  μžˆμ–΄, μœ„μ„±μ—μ„œ μ‚°μΆœλœ 식물 κ³„μ ˆμ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ κΈ°ν›„λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό μ΄ν•΄ν•˜κ³ μž ν•  λ•Œ, μ–΄λ–€ 측의 식생이 μœ„μ„± μ˜μƒμ— 주된 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ”μ§€ κ³ λ €ν•΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€λŠ” 것을 μ‹œμ‚¬ν•œλ‹€. μœ„μ„±μ€ 넓은 μ§€μ—­μ˜ λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό μ†μ‰½κ²Œ λͺ¨λ‹ˆν„°λ§ν•  수 μžˆμ–΄ λ§Žμ€ κ°€λŠ₯성을 κ°–κ³  μžˆλŠ” λ„κ΅¬μ΄μ§€λ§Œ, 보닀 μ •ν™•ν•œ μœ„μ„± κ΄€μΈ‘ 값을 μ΄ν•΄ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” ν˜„μž₯μ—μ„œ κ΄€μΈ‘λœ 자료λ₯Ό 기반으둜 ν•œ 검증이 μš”κ΅¬λœλ‹€. λ³Έ ν•™μœ„ λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œλŠ” 1) κ·Όμ ‘ ν‘œλ©΄ μ„Όμ‹± μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ„ 개발, 2) κ·Όμ ‘ ν‘œλ©΄ μ„Όμ‹± μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ„ ν™œμš©ν•œ μ‹μƒμ˜ 생리학적 ꡬ쑰적 λ³€ν™”μ˜ 지속적인 κ΄€μΈ‘, 3) λ‹€μΈ΅ 식생 κ΅¬μ‘°μ—μ„œ κ΄€μΈ‘λ˜λŠ” 식물 κ³„μ ˆ 및 μœ„μ„±μ—μ„œ μΆ”μ •λœ 식물 κ³„μ ˆμ˜ μ—°κ΄€μ„± 평가λ₯Ό μˆ˜ν–‰ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ°œλ°œν•œ κ·Όμ ‘ ν‘œλ©΄ μ„Όμ„œλŠ” 상업 μ„Όμ„œλ“€κ³Ό λΉ„κ΅ν–ˆμ„ λ•Œ, κ°€κ²©μ μœΌλ‘œ μ €λ ΄ν•˜κ³  손 μ‰½κ²Œ μ‚¬μš©ν•  수 μžˆμ—ˆμœΌλ©°, μ„±λŠ₯μ μœΌλ‘œλ„ 뢀쑱함이 μ—†μ—ˆλ‹€. κ·Όμ ‘ ν‘œλ©΄ μ„Όμ‹± μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ SIFλ₯Ό μ˜¨λŒ€ μΉ¨μ—½μˆ˜λ¦Όμ—μ„œ μ§€μ†μ μœΌλ‘œ κ΄€μΈ‘ν•œ κ²°κ³Ό, 총일차생산성과 SIFλŠ” λΉ„μ„ ν˜• 관계λ₯Ό κ°–λŠ” 것을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ΄λŠ” λ§Žμ€ μ„ ν–‰ μ—°κ΅¬λ“€μ—μ„œ λ°œν‘œν•œ μœ„μ„± 기반의 SIF와 GPPκ°€ μ„ ν˜•μ μΈ 관계λ₯Ό λ³΄μΈλ‹€λŠ” κ²ƒκ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€μ†Œ μƒλ°˜λœ 결과이닀. λ‹€μΈ‘ μ‹μƒμ˜ λ΄„μ²  식물 κ³„μ ˆμ„ μ—°μ†μ μœΌλ‘œ κ΄€μΈ‘ν•˜κ³ , μœ„μ„± 기반의 식물 κ³„μ ˆκ³Ό λΉ„κ΅ν‰κ°€ν•œ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” μœ„μ„± 기반의 κ°œμ—½ μ‹œκΈ°λŠ” ν•˜λΆ€ 식생에 영ν–₯을 주둜 λ°›κ³ , μ„±μˆ™ μ‹œκΈ°λŠ” 상뢀 μ‹μƒμ˜ μ‹œκΈ°μ™€ λΉ„μŠ·ν•œ 것을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 즉, κ·Όμ ‘ ν‘œλ©΄ μ„Όμ‹± μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ ν˜„μž₯μ—μ„œ μ‹€μΈ‘ν•œ κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” μœ„μ„± μ˜μƒμ„ ν™œμš©ν•œ μ—°κ΅¬λ“€κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€λ₯Έ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό 보일 μˆ˜λ„ 있으며, μœ„μ„± μ˜μƒμ„ 평가 및 μ΄ν•΄ν•˜λŠ”λ° μ‚¬μš©λ  수 μžˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ, 보닀 μ •ν™•ν•œ μ‹μƒμ˜ ꡬ쑰적, 생리학적 λ©”μ»€λ‹ˆμ¦˜μ„ μ΄ν•΄ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” κ·Όμ ‘ ν‘œλ©΄ 센싱을 ν™œμš©ν•œ ν˜„μž₯μ—μ„œ κ΅¬μΆ•ν•œ 자료 기반의 더 λ§Žμ€ 연ꡬ듀이 ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€λŠ” 것을 μ‹œμ‚¬ν•œλ‹€.Abstract i Chapter 1. Introduction 2 1. Background 2 2. Purpose 5 Chapter 2. Monitoring SIF using a filter-based near surface remote sensing system 9 1. Introduction 9 2. Instrument desing and technical spefications of the filter-based smart surface sensing system (4S-SIF) 12 2.1. Ultra-narrow band pass filter 14 2.2. Calibration of 4S-SIF 15 2.3. Temperature and humidity response 16 2.4. Evaluate SIF quality from 4S-SIF in the field 17 3. Results 20 4. Discussion 23 Chapter 3. SIF is non-linearly related to canopy photosynthesis in a temperate evergreen needleleaf forest during fall transition 27 1. Introduction 27 2. Methods and Materials 31 2.1. Study site 31 2.2. Leaf-level fluorescence measurement 32 2.3. Canopy-level SIF and spectral reflectance measurement 34 2.4. SIF retrieval 37 2.5. Canopy-level photosynthesis estimates 38 2.6. Meteorological variables and APAR 39 2.7. Statistical analysis 40 3. Results 41 4. Discussion 48 4.1. Non-linear relationships between SIF and GPP 49 4.2. Role of f_esc in SIF-GPP relationship 53 4.3. Implications of non-linear SIF-GPP relationship in temperate ENF 54 5. Conclusion 57 6. Appendix 59 Chapter 4. Monitoring spring phenology of multi-layer canopy in a deciduous broadleaf forest: What signal do satellites actually see in space 65 1. Introduction 65 2. Materials and Methods 69 2.1. Study site 69 2.2. Multi-layer spectral reflectance and transmittance measurement 70 2.3. Phenometrics detection 72 2.4. In-situ multi-layer phenology 74 2.5. Satellite remote sensing data 75 2.6. Meteorological variables 75 3. Results 76 3.1. Seasonal to interannual variations of NDVI, 1-transmittance, and air temperature 76 3.2. Inter-annual variation of leaf-out and full-leaf dates 78 3.3. The relationships between dates calculated according tothreshold and in-situ multi-layer phenology 80 3.4. The relationship between multi-layer phenology, AGDD and NCD 81 4. Discussion 82 4.1. How do satellite-based leaf-out and full-leaf dates differ from in-situ multi-layer phenology 83 4.2. Are the 10 % and 90 % thresholds from satellite-basedNDVI always well matched with the leaf-out and full-leaf dates calculated by the curvature change rate 86 4.3. What are the implications of the difference between satellite-based and multi-layer phenology 87 4.4. Limitations and implications for future studies 89 5. Conclusion 91 6. Appendix 92 Chapter 5. Conclusion 114 Abstract in Korean 115λ°•

    Evaluating solar-induced fluorescence across spatial and temporal scales to monitor primary productivity

    Full text link
    Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been widely cited in carbon cycling studies as a proxy for photosynthesis, and SIF data are commonly incorporated into terrestrial primary productivity models. Though satellite-based SIF products show close relationships with gross primary productivity (GPP), this is not universally true at intermediate scales. A meta-analysis of the tower-based and airborne SIF literature revealed that mean SIF retrievals from unstressed vegetation span three orders of magnitude. While reporting on spectrometer calibration procedures, hardware characterizations, and associated corrections is inconsistent, laboratory and field experiments show that these factors may contribute to significant uncertainty in SIF retrievals. Additionally, there remain ongoing questions regarding the interpretation of SIF data made across spatial scales and the link between satellite SIF retrievals and primary productivity on the ground. Chlorophyll fluorescence originates from dynamic energy partitioning at the leaf level and does not exhibit a uniformly linear relationship with photosynthesis at finer scales. As a standalone metric, SIF measured at the tower scale was not found to track changes in carbon assimilation following stomatal closure induced in deciduous woody tree branches. This lack of relationship may be explained by alternative energy partitioning pathways, such as thermal energy dissipation mediated by xanthophyll cycle pigments; the activity of these pigments can be tracked using the photochemical reflectance index (PRI). Gradual, phenological changes in energy partitioning are observed as changes in the slope of the SIF-PRI relationship over the course of a season. Along with high frequency effects such as wind-mediated changes in leaf orientation and reflectance, and rapid changes in sky condition due to clouds, PRI offers crucial insights needed to link SIF to leaf physiology. While SIF offers tremendous promise for improving the characterization of terrestrial carbon exchange, and a fuller understanding of the boundaries on its utility and interpretation as a biophysical phenomenon will help to create more reliable models of global productivity
    corecore