778 research outputs found

    Subcarrier and Power Allocation in WiMAX

    Get PDF
    Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) is one of the latest technologies for providing Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) in a metropolitan area. The use of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) transmissions has been proposed in WiMAX to mitigate the complications which are associated with frequency selective channels. In addition, the multiple access is achieved by using orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) scheme which has several advantages such as flexible resource allocation, relatively simple transceivers, and high spectrum efficient. In OFDMA the controllable resources are the subcarriers and the allocated power per subband. Moreover, adaptive subcarrier and power allocation techniques have been selected to exploit the natural multiuser diversity. This leads to an improvement of the performance by assigning the proper subcarriers to the user according to their channel quality and the power is allocated based on water-filling algorithm. One simple method is to allocate subcarriers and powers equally likely between all users. It is well known that this method reduces the spectral efficiency of the system, hence, it is not preferred unless in some applications. In order to handle the spectral efficiency problem, in this thesis we discuss three novel resources allocation algorithms for the downlink of a multiuser OFDM system and analyze the algorithm performances based on capacity and fairness measurement. Our intensive simulations validate the algorithm performances.fi=Opinnรคytetyรถ kokotekstinรค PDF-muodossa.|en=Thesis fulltext in PDF format.|sv=Lรคrdomsprov tillgรคngligt som fulltext i PDF-format

    The WiMAX PHY Layer

    Get PDF

    A Multi-Service Oriented Multiple-Access Scheme for Next-Generation Mobile Networks

    Full text link
    One of the key requirements for fifth-generation (5G) cellular networks is their ability to handle densely connected devices with different quality of service (QoS) requirements. In this article, we present multi-service oriented multiple access (MOMA), an integrated access scheme for massive connections with diverse QoS profiles and/or traffic patterns originating from both handheld devices and machine-to-machine (M2M) transmissions. MOMA is based on a) stablishing separate classes of users based on relevant criteria that go beyond the simple handheld/M2M split, b) class dependent hierarchical spreading of the data signal and c) a mix of multiuser and single-user detection schemes at the receiver. Practical implementations of the MOMA principle are provided for base stations (BSs) that are equipped with a large number of antenna elements. Finally, it is shown that such a massive-multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) scenario enables the achievement of all the benefits of MOMA even with a simple receiver structure that allows to concentrate the receiver complexity where effectively needed.Comment: 6 pages, 3 figures, accepted to the European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC 2016

    Data Provenance and Management in Radio Astronomy: A Stream Computing Approach

    Get PDF
    New approaches for data provenance and data management (DPDM) are required for mega science projects like the Square Kilometer Array, characterized by extremely large data volume and intense data rates, therefore demanding innovative and highly efficient computational paradigms. In this context, we explore a stream-computing approach with the emphasis on the use of accelerators. In particular, we make use of a new generation of high performance stream-based parallelization middleware known as InfoSphere Streams. Its viability for managing and ensuring interoperability and integrity of signal processing data pipelines is demonstrated in radio astronomy. IBM InfoSphere Streams embraces the stream-computing paradigm. It is a shift from conventional data mining techniques (involving analysis of existing data from databases) towards real-time analytic processing. We discuss using InfoSphere Streams for effective DPDM in radio astronomy and propose a way in which InfoSphere Streams can be utilized for large antennae arrays. We present a case-study: the InfoSphere Streams implementation of an autocorrelating spectrometer, and using this example we discuss the advantages of the stream-computing approach and the utilization of hardware accelerators

    Bandwidth allocation for wireless multimedia systems.

    Get PDF
    Chen Chung-Shue.Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2001.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 100-102).Abstracts in English and Chinese.Chapter 1. --- Introduction --- p.1Chapter 1.1 --- Evolution to 3G Mobile --- p.2Chapter 1.1.1 --- First Generation --- p.2Chapter 1.1.2 --- Second Generation --- p.3Chapter 1.1.3 --- Third Generation --- p.3Chapter 1.2 --- UTRA Framework --- p.5Chapter 1.2.1 --- FDD and TDD --- p.6Chapter 1.2.2 --- Channel Spreading --- p.6Chapter 1.2.3 --- OVSF Code Tree --- p.8Chapter 1.3 --- Cellular Concepts --- p.10Chapter 1.3.1 --- System Capacity --- p.10Chapter 1.3.2 --- Multiple Access --- p.11Chapter 1.3.3 --- Resource Management --- p.15Chapter 1.4 --- Organization of the Thesis --- p.16Chapter 2. --- Analysis on Multi-rate Operations --- p.18Chapter 2.1 --- Related Works in Multi-rate Operations --- p.18Chapter 2.1.1 --- Variable Spreading Factor --- p.19Chapter 2.1.2 --- Data Time-multiplexing --- p.20Chapter 2.1.3 --- Multi-carrier Transmission --- p.21Chapter 2.1.4 --- Hybrid TDMA/CDMA --- p.23Chapter 2.2 --- Problems in Multi-rate Operations --- p.24Chapter 2.2.1 --- Conventional CDMA --- p.24Chapter 2.2.2 --- Data Time-multiplexing --- p.25Chapter 2.2.3 --- MC-CDMA --- p.25Chapter 2.2.4 --- TD-CDMA --- p.27Chapter 2.3 --- Multi-user multi-rate Operations --- p.28Chapter 3. --- Bandwidth Allocation --- p.29Chapter 3.1 --- Most Regular Binary Sequence --- p.30Chapter 3.1.1 --- Properties of MRBS --- p.31Chapter 3.1.2 --- Construction of MRCS --- p.32Chapter 3.1.3 --- Zero-one Sequence under MRBS --- p.33Chapter 3.2 --- MRBS in TD-CDMA --- p.35Chapter 3.2.1 --- Time Slot Optimization --- p.36Chapter 3.2.2 --- Sequence Generator --- p.37Chapter 3.3 --- Most Regular Code Sequence --- p.38Chapter 3.3.1 --- Properties of MRCS --- p.38Chapter 3.2.2 --- Construction of MRCS --- p.41Chapter 3.3.3 --- Fraction-valued Sequence under MRCS --- p.42Chapter 3.3.4 --- LCC and UCC --- p.45Chapter 3.4 --- MRCS in WCDMA --- p.46Chapter 3.4.1 --- Spreading Factor Optimization --- p.46Chapter 3.4.2 --- Code Generator --- p.48Chapter 3.4.3 --- Uplink and Downlink --- p.50Chapter 4. --- Multi-access Control --- p.52Chapter 4.1 --- Conflict and Resolution --- p.53Chapter 4.1.1 --- Conflicts in MRBS and MRCS --- p.53Chapter 4.1.2 --- Resolution with Buffering --- p.55Chapter 4.2 --- MRBS Transmission Scheduling --- p.56Chapter 4.2.1 --- Slot Scheduling on MRBS --- p.56Chapter 4.2.2 --- Properties of Scheduling Algorithm --- p.59Chapter 4.2.3 --- Scheduled MRBS --- p.71Chapter 4.3 --- MRCS Transmission Scheduling --- p.73Chapter 4.3.1 --- Slot Scheduling on MRCS --- p.73Chapter 4.3.2 --- Properties of Scheduling Algorithm --- p.75Chapter 4.3.3 --- Scheduled MRBS --- p.76Chapter 4.4 --- Performance Evaluation --- p.78Chapter 4.4.1 --- Simulation on Algorithm --- p.78Chapter 4.4.2 --- Resource Utilization and Delay Bound --- p.79Chapter 4.4.3 --- Blocking Model and System Capacity --- p.80Chapter 4.4.4 --- Numerical Analysis --- p.86Chapter 5. --- Conclusions and Future works --- p.92Appendix A --- p.94Appendix B --- p.98Bibliography --- p.10

    Medium access control in wireless network-on-chip: a context analysis

    Get PDF
    ยฉ 2018 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes,creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.Wireless on-chip communication is a promising candidate to address the performance and efficiency issues that arise when scaling current NoC techniques to manycore processors. A WNoC can serve global and broadcast traffic with ultra-low latency even in thousand-core chips, thus acting as a natural complement to conventional and throughput-oriented wireline NoCs. However, the development of MAC strategies needed to efficiently share the wireless medium among the increasing number of cores remains a considerable challenge given the singularities of the environment and the novelty of the research area. In this position article, we present a context analysis describing the physical constraints, performance objectives, and traffic characteristics of the on-chip communication paradigm. We summarize the main differences with respect to traditional wireless scenarios, and then discuss their implications on the design of MAC protocols for manycore WNoC, with the ultimate goal of kickstarting this arguably unexplored research area.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    IEEE 802.11 ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ Enterprise ๋ฌด์„  LAN์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ž์› ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2019. 2. ์ „ํ™”์ˆ™.IEEE 802.11์ด ๋ฌด์„  LAN (wireless local area network, WLAN)์˜ ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์ธ ํ‘œ์ค€์ด ๋จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ˆ˜ ๋งŽ์€ ์—‘์„ธ์Šค ํฌ์ธํŠธ(access points, APs)๊ฐ€ ๋ฐฐ์น˜๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ WLAN ๋ฐ€์ง‘ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ด ์กฐ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ๋Š”, ์ด์›ƒํ•œ AP๋“ค์— ๋™์ผํ•œ ์ฑ„๋„์„ ํ• ๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ”ผํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ํ•ด๋‹น AP๋“ค์ด ๊ฐ™์€ ์ฑ„๋„์„ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๊ฐ„์„ญ์„ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ„์„ญ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฑ„๋„ ํ• ๋‹น(channelization) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํ•œ ์กฐ์ง์ด ํŠน์ • ์ง€์—ญ์— ๋ฐ€์ง‘ ๋ฐฐ์น˜๋œ AP๋“ค์„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ํŠน์ • ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋ฅผ ์„œ๋น„์Šคํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” AP๊ฐ€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฟ์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ ‘์†(user association, UA) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด ์ค€์ •์ (quasi-static) ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นœ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฐ€์ง‘ ๋ฐฐ์น˜๋œ WLAN ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด(WiFi) ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฑ„๋„ ํ• ๋‹น ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ AP์— ์ฑ„๋„์„ ํ• ๋‹นํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฐ„์„ญ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„(interference graph)๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ฑ„๋„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ(channel bonding)์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ, ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ์ฑ„๋„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•ด๋‹น AP๊ฐ€ ๋™์  ์ฑ„๋„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ์—ฌ๋ถ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ฃผ ์ฑ„๋„(primary channel)์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ, ์ค€์ •์  ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ์˜ UA ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์†Œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ UA ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ค€์ •์  ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ์˜ UA ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์บ์ŠคํŠธ ์ „์†ก, ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž MIMO (multi-user multiple input multiple output), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  AP ์ˆ˜๋ฉด๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ AP๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ถ€ํ•˜ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ(load balancing)๊ณผ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ ˆ์•ฝ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์—์„œ UA ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ชฉ์ ํ•จ์ˆ˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ ์ •์‹ํ™”ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๊ทธ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ์˜ UA ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ ํ•ธ๋“œ์˜ค๋ฒ„(handover, HO) ์Šค์ผ€์ค„ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ ๊ท€๊ฒฐ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋„๋กœ์˜ ์ง€ํ˜•์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๊ฐ€ ์ ‘์†ํ•  AP๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” HO ์Šค์ผ€์ค„ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋Š” ๋‹จ์ง€ ๋‹ค์Œ AP๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ ๋งบ์„ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋งŒ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ์˜ ๋งค์šฐ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ HO ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•(graph modeling technique)์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋„๋กœ๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ฐฐ์น˜๋œ AP์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์‹ค์ ์ธ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ง์„  ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„, ์šฐํšŒ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„, ๊ต์ฐจ๋กœ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์œ ํ„ด ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„ ๋“ฑ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋„๋กœ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋„๋กœ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์ด๋™ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ทธ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ๋ณ„ HO์˜ ๋ชฉ์  AP ์ง‘ํ•ฉ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” HO ์Šค์ผ€์ค„ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ชฉ์ ์€ HO ์ง€์—ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์˜ ํ•ฉ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ AP์—์„œ ํ•ด๋‹น ์ฑ„๋„์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๋ฉด์„œ WiFi ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ค€์ •์  ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์ฑ„๋„ ํ• ๋‹น ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๊ณผ UA ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์˜ ํ˜„์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ์ฆ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹œํ—˜๋Œ€(testbed)๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ค€์ •์  ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณผ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.As the IEEE 802.11 (WiFi) becomes the defacto global standard for wireless local area network (WLAN), a huge number of WiFi access points (APs) are deployed. This condition leads to a densely deployed WLANs. In such environment, the conflicting channel allocation between the neighboring access points (APs) is unavoidable, which causes the channel sharing and interference between APs. Thus, the channel allocation (channelization) scheme has a critical role to tackle this issue. In addition, when densely-deployed APs covering a certain area are managed by a single organization, there can exist multiple candidate APs for serving a user. In this case, the user association (UA), i.e., the selection of serving AP, holds a key role in the network performance both in quasi-static and vehicular environments. To improve the performance of WiFi in a densely deployed WLANs environment, we propose a channelization scheme. The proposed channelization scheme utilizes the interference graph to assign the channel for each AP and considers channel bonding. Then, given the channel bonding assignment, the primary channel location for each AP is determined by observing whether the AP supports the static or dynamic channel bonding. Meanwhile, the UA problem in the quasi-static and vehicular environments are slightly different. Thus, we devise UA schemes both for quasi-static and vehicular environments. The UA schemes for quasi-static environment takes account the load balancing among APs and energy saving, considering various techniques for performance improvement, such as multicast transmission, multi-user MIMO, and AP sleeping, together. Then, we formulate the problem into a multi-objective optimization and get the solution as the UA scheme. On the other hand, the UA scheme in the vehicular environment is realized through handover (HO) scheduling mechanism. Specifically, we propose a HO scheduling scheme running on a server, which determines the AP to which a user will be handed over, considering the road topology. Since a user only needs to decide when to initiate the connection to the next AP, a very fast and efficient HO in the vehicular environment can be realized. For this purpose, we utilize the graph modeling technique to map the relation between APs within the road. We consider a practical scenario where the structure of the road is complex, which includes straight, curve, intersection, and u-turn area. Then, the set of target APs for HO are selected for each user moving on a particular road based-on its moving path which is predicted considering the road topology. The design objective of the proposed HO scheduling is to maximize the connection time on WiFi while minimizing the total HO latency and reducing the number of users which contend for the channel within an AP. Finally, we develop a WLAN testbed to demonstrate the practicality and feasibility of the proposed channelization and UA scheme in a quasi-static environment. Furthermore, through extensive simulations, we compare the performance of the proposed schemes with the existing schemes both in quasi-static and vehicular environments.1 Introduction 1.1 Background and Motivation 1.2 Related Works 1.3 Research Scope and Proposed Schemes 1.3.1 Centralized Channelization Scheme for Wireless LANs Exploiting Channel Bonding 1.3.2 User Association for Load Balancing and Energy Saving in Enterprise WLAN 1.3.3 A Graph-Based Handover Scheduling for Heterogenous Vehicular Networks 1.4 Organization 2 Centralized Channelization Scheme for Wireless LANs Exploiting Channel Bonding 2.1 System Model 2.2 Channel Sharing and Bonding 2.2.1 Interference between APs 2.2.2 Channel Sharing 2.2.3 Channel Bonding 2.3 Channelization Scheme 2.3.1 Building Interference Graph 2.3.2 Channel Allocation 2.3.3 Primary Channel Selection 2.4 Implementation 3 User Association for Load Balancing and Energy Saving in Enterprise Wireless LANs 3.1 System Model 3.1.1 IEEE 802.11 ESS-based Enterprise WLAN 3.1.2 Downlink Achievable Rate for MU-MIMO Groups 3.1.3 Candidate MU-MIMO Groups 3.2 User Association Problem 3.2.1 Factors of UA Objective 3.2.2 Problem Formulation 3.3 User Association Scheme 3.3.1 Equivalent Linear Problem 3.3.2 Solution Algorithm 3.3.3 Computational Complexity (Execution Time) 3.4 Implementation 4 A Graph-Based Handover Scheduling for Heterogenous Vehicular Networks 4.1 System Model 4.2 Graph-Based Modeling 4.2.1 Division of Road Portion into Road Segments 4.2.2 Relation between PoAs on a Road Segment 4.2.3 Directed Graph Representation 4.3 Handover Scheduling Problem 4.3.1 Problem Formulation 4.3.2 Weight of Edge 4.3.3 HO Scheduling Algorithm 4.4 Handover Scheduling Operation 4.4.1 HO Schedule Delivery 4.4.2 HO Triggering and Execution 4.4.3 Communication Overhead 5 Performance Evaluation 5.1 CentralizedChannelizationSchemeforWirelessLANsExploitingChannel Bonding 5.1.1 Experiment Settings 5.1.2 Comparison Schemes 5.1.3 Preliminary Experiment for Building Interference Graph 5.1.4 Experiment Results 5.2 User Association for Load Balancing and Energy Saving in Enterprise Wireless LANs 5.2.1 Performance Metrics 5.2.2 Experiment Settings 5.2.3 Experiment Results 5.2.4 Simulation Settings 5.2.5 Comparison Schemes 5.2.6 Simulation Results 5.2.7 Simulation for MU-MIMO System 5.3 A Graph-BasedHandover Scheduling for Heterogenous Vehicular Networks 5.3.1 Performance Metrics 5.3.2 Simulation Settings 5.3.3 Simulation Results 6 Conculsion Bibliography AcknowledgementsDocto
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore