Recent trends, technical concepts and components of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery systems: A comprehensive review

Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) systems have become one of the most important and challenging types of system in clinical orthopedics, as they enable precise treatment of musculoskeletal diseases, employing modern clinical navigation systems and surgical tools. This paper brings a comprehensive review of recent trends and possibilities of CAOS systems. There are three types of the surgical planning systems, including: systems based on the volumetric images (computer tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound images), further systems utilize either 2D or 3D fluoroscopic images, and the last one utilizes the kinetic information about the joints and morphological information about the target bones. This complex review is focused on three fundamental aspects of CAOS systems: their essential components, types of CAOS systems, and mechanical tools used in CAOS systems. In this review, we also outline the possibilities for using ultrasound computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (UCAOS) systems as an alternative to conventionally used CAOS systems.Web of Science1923art. no. 519

Robotic-Assisted Systems for Spinal Surgery

Robotic-assisted spinal surgery is in its infancy. It aims to improve the accuracy of screw placement, lower the risk of surgical complications, and reduce radiation exposure to the patient and the surgical team. The present chapter attempts to provide an overview of the evolution of robotic-assisted spinal surgery and highlights different commercially available spine robotic systems in present use. The review concludes with future applications of robotics in spinal surgery

Augmented Reality: Mapping Methods and Tools for Enhancing the Human Role in Healthcare HMI

Background: Augmented Reality (AR) represents an innovative technology to improve data visualization and strengthen the human perception. Among Human–Machine Interaction (HMI), medicine can benefit most from the adoption of these digital technologies. In this perspective, the literature on orthopedic surgery techniques based on AR was evaluated, focusing on identifying the limitations and challenges of AR-based healthcare applications, to support the research and the development of further studies. Methods: Studies published from January 2018 to December 2021 were analyzed after a comprehensive search on PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Science Direct, and Wiley Online Library databases. In order to improve the review reporting, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Results: Authors selected sixty-two articles meeting the inclusion criteria, which were categorized according to the purpose of the study (intraoperative, training, rehabilitation) and according to the surgical procedure used. Conclusions: AR has the potential to improve orthopedic training and practice by providing an increasingly human-centered clinical approach. Further research can be addressed by this review to cover problems related to hardware limitations, lack of accurate registration and tracking systems, and absence of security protocols

Augmented navigation

Spinal fixation procedures have the inherent risk of causing damage to vulnerable anatomical structures such as the spinal cord, nerve roots, and blood vessels. To prevent complications, several technological aids have been introduced. Surgical navigation is the most widely used, and guides the surgeon by providing the position of the surgical instruments and implants in relation to the patient anatomy based on radiographic images. Navigation can be extended by the addition of a robotic arm to replace the surgeon’s hand to increase accuracy. Another line of surgical aids is tissue sensing equipment, that recognizes different tissue types and provides a warning system built into surgical instruments. All these technologies are under continuous development and the optimal solution is yet to be found. The aim of this thesis was to study the use of Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and tissue sensing technology in spinal navigation to improve precision and prevent surgical errors. The aim of Paper I was to develop and validate an algorithm for automatizing the intraoperative planning of pedicle screws. An AI algorithm for automatic segmentation of the spine, and screw path suggestion was developed and evaluated. In a clinical study of advanced deformity cases, the algorithm could provide correct suggestions for 86% of all pedicles—or 95%, when cases with extremely altered anatomy were excluded. Paper II evaluated the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using a novel augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) system, harboring the above-developed algorithm. Twenty consecutively enrolled patients, eligible for deformity correction surgery in the thoracolumbar region, were operated on using the ARSN system. In this cohort, we found a pedicle screw placement accuracy of 94%, as measured according to the Gertzbein grading scale. The primary goal of Paper III was to validate an extension of the ARSN system for placing pedicle screws using instrument tracking and VR. In a porcine cadaver model, it was demonstrated that VR instrument tracking could successfully be integrated with the ARSN system, resulting in pedicle devices placed within 1.7 ± 1.0 mm of the planed path. Paper IV examined the feasibility of a robot-guided system for semi-automated, minimally invasive, pedicle screw placement in a cadaveric model. Using the robotic arm, pedicle devices were placed within 0.94 ± 0.59 mm of the planned path. The use of a semi-automated surgical robot was feasible, providing a higher technical accuracy compared to non-robotic solutions. Paper V investigated the use of a tissue sensing technology, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), for detecting the cortical bone boundary in vertebrae during pedicle screw insertions. The technology could accurately differentiate between cancellous and cortical bone and warn the surgeon before a cortical breach. Using machine learning models, the technology demonstrated a sensitivity of 98% [range: 94-100%] and a specificity of 98% [range: 91-100%]. In conclusion, several technological aids can be used to improve accuracy during spinal fixation procedures. In this thesis, the advantages of adding AR, VR, AI and tissue sensing technology to conventional navigation solutions were studied

Technical Approaches toComputer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery

Abstract : Surgical navigation systems and medical robotic devices are increasingly being used during trauma and orthopedic surgery. This article tries to present the underlying technology of these devices and to describe different approaches to the various aspects of the methods. To structure the variety of available products and presented research modules, a new categorization for these approaches is proposed. Examples of pre- or intraoperative imaging modalities, of trackers for navigation systems, of different surgical robots, and of methods for registration as well as referencing are discussed. Many applications that have been realized for numerous surgical procedures will be presented and their advantages, disadvantages, and possible implications will be elucidate

ADVANCED INTRAOPERATIVE IMAGE REGISTRATION FOR PLANNING AND GUIDANCE OF ROBOT-ASSISTED SURGERY

Robot-assisted surgery offers improved accuracy, precision, safety, and workflow for a variety of surgical procedures spanning different surgical contexts (e.g., neurosurgery, pulmonary interventions, orthopaedics). These systems can assist with implant placement, drilling, bone resection, and biopsy while reducing human errors (e.g., hand tremors and limited dexterity) and easing the workflow of such tasks. Furthermore, such systems can reduce radiation dose to the clinician in fluoroscopically-guided procedures since many robots can perform their task in the imaging field-of-view (FOV) without the surgeon. Robot-assisted surgery requires (1) a preoperative plan defined relative to the patient that instructs the robot to perform a task, (2) intraoperative registration of the patient to transform the planning data into the intraoperative space, and (3) intraoperative registration of the robot to the patient to guide the robot to execute the plan. However, despite the operational improvements achieved using robot-assisted surgery, there are geometric inaccuracies and significant challenges to workflow associated with (1-3) that impact widespread adoption. This thesis aims to address these challenges by using image registration to plan and guide robot- assisted surgical (RAS) systems to encourage greater adoption of robotic-assistance across surgical contexts (in this work, spinal neurosurgery, pulmonary interventions, and orthopaedic trauma). The proposed methods will also be compatible with diverse imaging and robotic platforms (including low-cost systems) to improve the accessibility of RAS systems for a wide range of hospital and use settings. This dissertation advances important components of image-guided, robot-assisted surgery, including: (1) automatic target planning using statistical models and surgeon-specific atlases for application in spinal neurosurgery; (2) intraoperative registration and guidance of a robot to the planning data using 3D-2D image registration (i.e., an “image-guided robot”) for assisting pelvic orthopaedic trauma; (3) advanced methods for intraoperative registration of planning data in deformable anatomy for guiding pulmonary interventions; and (4) extension of image-guided robotics in a piecewise rigid, multi-body context in which the robot directly manipulates anatomy for assisting ankle orthopaedic trauma

Robotics in neurosurgery: A literature review

Robotic surgery has been the forte of minimally invasive stereo-tactic procedures for some decades now. Ongoing advancements and evolutionary developments require substantial evidence to build the consensus about its efficacy in the field of neurosurgery. Main obstacle in obtaining successful results in neurosurgery is fine neural structures and other anatomical limitations. Currently, human rationalisation and robotic precision works in symbiosis to provide improved results. We reviewed the current data about recent interventions. Robots are capable of providing virtual data, superior spatial resolution and geometric accuracy, superior dexterity, faster manoeuvring and non-fatigability with steady motion. Robotic surgery also allows simulation of virtual procedures which turn out to be of great succour for young apprentice surgeons to practise their surgical skills in a safe environment. It also allows senior professionals to rehearse difficult cases before involving into considerable risky procedures

Augmented and virtual reality in spine surgery, current applications and future potentials

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The field of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly advancing, especially with recent improvements in deep learning (DL) techniques. Augmented (AR) and virtual reality (VR) are finding their place in healthcare, and spine surgery is no exception. The unique capabilities and advantages of AR and VR devices include their low cost, flexible integration with other technologies, user-friendly features and their application in navigation systems, which makes them beneficial across different aspects of spine surgery. Despite the use of AR for pedicle screw placement, targeted cervical foraminotomy, bone biopsy, osteotomy planning, and percutaneous intervention, the current applications of AR and VR in spine surgery remain limited. PURPOSE: The primary goal of this study was to provide the spine surgeons and clinical researchers with the general information about the current applications, future potentials, and accessibility of AR and VR systems in spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: We reviewed titles of more than 250 journal papers from google scholar and PubMed with search words: augmented reality, virtual reality, spine surgery, and orthopaedic, out of which 89 related papers were selected for abstract review. Finally, full text of 67 papers were analyzed and reviewed. METHODS: The papers were divided into four groups: technological papers, applications in surgery, applications in spine education and training, and general application in orthopaedic. A team of two reviewers performed paper reviews and a thorough web search to ensure the most updated state of the art in each of four group is captured in the review. RESULTS: In this review we discuss the current state of the art in AR and VR hardware, their preoperative applications and surgical applications in spine surgery. Finally, we discuss the future potentials of AR and VR and their integration with AI, robotic surgery, gaming, and wearables. CONCLUSIONS: AR and VR are promising technologies that will soon become part of standard of care in spine surgery. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc