Methods for protein complex prediction and their contributions towards understanding the organization, function and dynamics of complexes

Complexes of physically interacting proteins constitute fundamental functional units responsible for driving biological processes within cells. A faithful reconstruction of the entire set of complexes is therefore essential to understand the functional organization of cells. In this review, we discuss the key contributions of computational methods developed till date (approximately between 2003 and 2015) for identifying complexes from the network of interacting proteins (PPI network). We evaluate in depth the performance of these methods on PPI datasets from yeast, and highlight challenges faced by these methods, in particular detection of sparse and small or sub- complexes and discerning of overlapping complexes. We describe methods for integrating diverse information including expression profiles and 3D structures of proteins with PPI networks to understand the dynamics of complex formation, for instance, of time-based assembly of complex subunits and formation of fuzzy complexes from intrinsically disordered proteins. Finally, we discuss methods for identifying dysfunctional complexes in human diseases, an application that is proving invaluable to understand disease mechanisms and to discover novel therapeutic targets. We hope this review aptly commemorates a decade of research on computational prediction of complexes and constitutes a valuable reference for further advancements in this exciting area.Comment: 1 Tabl

Markov clustering versus affinity propagation for the partitioning of protein interaction graphs

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Genome scale data on protein interactions are generally represented as large networks, or graphs, where hundreds or thousands of proteins are linked to one another. Since proteins tend to function in groups, or complexes, an important goal has been to reliably identify protein complexes from these graphs. This task is commonly executed using clustering procedures, which aim at detecting densely connected regions within the interaction graphs. There exists a wealth of clustering algorithms, some of which have been applied to this problem. One of the most successful clustering procedures in this context has been the Markov Cluster algorithm (MCL), which was recently shown to outperform a number of other procedures, some of which were specifically designed for partitioning protein interactions graphs. A novel promising clustering procedure termed Affinity Propagation (AP) was recently shown to be particularly effective, and much faster than other methods for a variety of problems, but has not yet been applied to partition protein interaction graphs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In this work we compare the performance of the Affinity Propagation (AP) and Markov Clustering (MCL) procedures. To this end we derive an unweighted network of protein-protein interactions from a set of 408 protein complexes from <it>S. cervisiae </it>hand curated in-house, and evaluate the performance of the two clustering algorithms in recalling the annotated complexes. In doing so the parameter space of each algorithm is sampled in order to select optimal values for these parameters, and the robustness of the algorithms is assessed by quantifying the level of complex recall as interactions are randomly added or removed to the network to simulate noise. To evaluate the performance on a weighted protein interaction graph, we also apply the two algorithms to the consolidated protein interaction network of <it>S. cerevisiae</it>, derived from genome scale purification experiments and to versions of this network in which varying proportions of the links have been randomly shuffled.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our analysis shows that the MCL procedure is significantly more tolerant to noise and behaves more robustly than the AP algorithm. The advantage of MCL over AP is dramatic for unweighted protein interaction graphs, as AP displays severe convergence problems on the majority of the unweighted graph versions that we tested, whereas MCL continues to identify meaningful clusters, albeit fewer of them, as the level of noise in the graph increases. MCL thus remains the method of choice for identifying protein complexes from binary interaction networks.</p

Recent advances in clustering methods for protein interaction networks

The increasing availability of large-scale protein-protein interaction data has made it possible to understand the basic components and organization of cell machinery from the network level. The arising challenge is how to analyze such complex interacting data to reveal the principles of cellular organization, processes and functions. Many studies have shown that clustering protein interaction network is an effective approach for identifying protein complexes or functional modules, which has become a major research topic in systems biology. In this review, recent advances in clustering methods for protein interaction networks will be presented in detail. The predictions of protein functions and interactions based on modules will be covered. Finally, the performance of different clustering methods will be compared and the directions for future research will be discussed

A Special Structural Based Weighted Network Approach for the Analysis of Protein Complexes

The detection and analysis of protein complexes is essential for understanding the functional mechanism and cellular integrity. Recently, several techniques for detecting and analysing protein complexes from Protein–Protein Interaction (PPI) dataset have been developed. Most of those techniques are inefficient in terms of detecting, overlapping complexes, exclusion of attachment protein in complex core, inability to detect inherent structures of underlying complexes, have high false-positive rates and an enrichment analysis. To address these limitations, we introduce a special structural-based weighted network approach for the analysis of protein complexes based on a Weighted Edge, Core-Attachment and Local Modularity structures (WECALM). Experimental results indicate that WECALM performs relatively better than existing algorithms in terms of accuracy, computational time, and p-value. A functional enrichment analysis also shows that WECALM is able to identify a large number of biologically significant protein complexes. Overall, WECALM outperforms other approaches by striking a better balance of accuracy and efficiency in the detection of protein complexes

clusterMaker: a multi-algorithm clustering plugin for Cytoscape

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In the post-genomic era, the rapid increase in high-throughput data calls for computational tools capable of integrating data of diverse types and facilitating recognition of biologically meaningful patterns within them. For example, protein-protein interaction data sets have been clustered to identify stable complexes, but scientists lack easily accessible tools to facilitate combined analyses of multiple data sets from different types of experiments. Here we present <it>clusterMaker</it>, a Cytoscape plugin that implements several clustering algorithms and provides network, dendrogram, and heat map views of the results. The Cytoscape network is linked to all of the other views, so that a selection in one is immediately reflected in the others. <it>clusterMaker </it>is the first Cytoscape plugin to implement such a wide variety of clustering algorithms and visualizations, including the only implementations of hierarchical clustering, dendrogram plus heat map visualization (tree view), k-means, k-medoid, SCPS, AutoSOME, and native (Java) MCL.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Results are presented in the form of three scenarios of use: analysis of protein expression data using a recently published mouse interactome and a mouse microarray data set of nearly one hundred diverse cell/tissue types; the identification of protein complexes in the yeast <it>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</it>; and the cluster analysis of the vicinal oxygen chelate (VOC) enzyme superfamily. For scenario one, we explore functionally enriched mouse interactomes specific to particular cellular phenotypes and apply fuzzy clustering. For scenario two, we explore the prefoldin complex in detail using both physical and genetic interaction clusters. For scenario three, we explore the possible annotation of a protein as a methylmalonyl-CoA epimerase within the VOC superfamily. Cytoscape session files for all three scenarios are provided in the Additional Files section.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The Cytoscape plugin <it>clusterMaker </it>provides a number of clustering algorithms and visualizations that can be used independently or in combination for analysis and visualization of biological data sets, and for confirming or generating hypotheses about biological function. Several of these visualizations and algorithms are only available to Cytoscape users through the <it>clusterMaker </it>plugin. <it>clusterMaker </it>is available via the Cytoscape plugin manager.</p

Mining Biological Networks towards Protein complex Detection and Gene-Disease Association

Large amounts of biological data are continuously generated nowadays, thanks to the advancements of high-throughput experimental techniques. Mining valuable knowledge from such data still motivates the design of suitable computational methods, to complement the experimental work which is often bound by considerable time and cost requirements. Protein complexes or groups of interacting proteins, are key players in most cellular events. The identification of complexes not only allows to better understand normal biological processes but also to uncover Disease-triggering malfunctions. Ultimately, findings in this research branch can highly enhance the design of effective medical treatments. The aim of this research is to detect protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks and to associate the detected entities to diseases. The work is divided into three main objectives: first, develop a suitable method for the identification of protein complexes in static interaction networks; second, model the dynamic aspect of protein interaction networks and detect complexes accordingly; and third, design a learning model to link proteins, and subsequently protein complexes, to diseases. In response to these objectives, we present, ProRank+, a novel complex-detection approach based on a ranking algorithm and a merging procedure. Then, we introduce DyCluster, which uses gene expression data, to model the dynamics of the interaction networks, and we adapt the detection algorithm accordingly. Finally, we integrate network topology attributes and several biological features of proteins to form a classification model for gene-disease association. The reliability of the proposed methods is supported by various experimental studies conducted to compare them with existing approaches. Pro Rank+ detects more protein complexes than other state-of-the-art methods. DyCluster goes a step further and achieves a better performance than similar techniques. Then, our learning model shows that combining topological and biological features can greatly enhance the gene-disease association process. Finally, we present a comprehensive case study of breast cancer in which we pinpoint disease genes using our learning model; subsequently, we detect favorable groupings of those genes in a protein interaction network using the Pro-rank+ algorithm