10,174 research outputs found
Detecting Controversies in Online News Media
This paper sets out to detect controversial news reports using online discussions as a source of information. We define controversy as a public discussion that divides society and demonstrate that a content and stylometric analysis of these debates yields useful signals for extracting disputed news items. Moreover, we argue that a debate-based approach could produce more generic models, since the discussion architectures we exploit to measure controversy occur on many different platforms
Computational Controversy
Climate change, vaccination, abortion, Trump: Many topics are surrounded by
fierce controversies. The nature of such heated debates and their elements have
been studied extensively in the social science literature. More recently,
various computational approaches to controversy analysis have appeared, using
new data sources such as Wikipedia, which help us now better understand these
phenomena. However, compared to what social sciences have discovered about such
debates, the existing computational approaches mostly focus on just a few of
the many important aspects around the concept of controversies. In order to
link the two strands, we provide and evaluate here a controversy model that is
both, rooted in the findings of the social science literature and at the same
time strongly linked to computational methods. We show how this model can lead
to computational controversy analytics that have full coverage over all the
crucial aspects that make up a controversy.Comment: In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social
Informatics (SocInfo) 201
A Motif-based Approach for Identifying Controversy
Among the topics discussed in Social Media, some lead to controversy. A
number of recent studies have focused on the problem of identifying controversy
in social media mostly based on the analysis of textual content or rely on
global network structure. Such approaches have strong limitations due to the
difficulty of understanding natural language, and of investigating the global
network structure. In this work we show that it is possible to detect
controversy in social media by exploiting network motifs, i.e., local patterns
of user interaction. The proposed approach allows for a language-independent
and fine- grained and efficient-to-compute analysis of user discussions and
their evolution over time. The supervised model exploiting motif patterns can
achieve 85% accuracy, with an improvement of 7% compared to baseline
structural, propagation-based and temporal network features
On Measuring Bias in Online Information
Bias in online information has recently become a pressing issue, with search
engines, social networks and recommendation services being accused of
exhibiting some form of bias. In this vision paper, we make the case for a
systematic approach towards measuring bias. To this end, we discuss formal
measures for quantifying the various types of bias, we outline the system
components necessary for realizing them, and we highlight the related research
challenges and open problems.Comment: 6 pages, 1 figur
Events and Controversies: Influences of a Shocking News Event on Information Seeking
It has been suggested that online search and retrieval contributes to the
intellectual isolation of users within their preexisting ideologies, where
people's prior views are strengthened and alternative viewpoints are
infrequently encountered. This so-called "filter bubble" phenomenon has been
called out as especially detrimental when it comes to dialog among people on
controversial, emotionally charged topics, such as the labeling of genetically
modified food, the right to bear arms, the death penalty, and online privacy.
We seek to identify and study information-seeking behavior and access to
alternative versus reinforcing viewpoints following shocking, emotional, and
large-scale news events. We choose for a case study to analyze search and
browsing on gun control/rights, a strongly polarizing topic for both citizens
and leaders of the United States. We study the period of time preceding and
following a mass shooting to understand how its occurrence, follow-on
discussions, and debate may have been linked to changes in the patterns of
searching and browsing. We employ information-theoretic measures to quantify
the diversity of Web domains of interest to users and understand the browsing
patterns of users. We use these measures to characterize the influence of news
events on these web search and browsing patterns
- …