ENABLING EHEALTH IN TRADITIONAL MEDICINE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS INTEGRATION REQUIREMENTS

This paper shall investigate the information systems integration needs towards eHealth implementation in Traditional Medicine. This review seeks to answer questions related to the locations of the integration points for integrated systems for the accessibility of electronic health records in both Traditional Medicine and modern medicine to identify of the most suitable health information systems model and the selection of the concrete integration technologies and standards to be implemented. A systematic literature review was conducted to select the relevant studies. A total of 11 articles were finally included for assessment. The findings of this review revealed that data integration is considered the most important precondition for the basis of further integration and is the backbone or starting point of a successful integration project. Other information systems integration needs are information model, interoperability standards, workflow or process integration and access to multiple repositories from different platforms. Establishment of Traditional Medicine databases of medications, procedures, information and diseases is crucial to ensure a generic and extensible information model can be designed so that new data sources can be integrated without major changes to the data schema

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationBiomedical data are a rich source of information and knowledge. Not only are they useful for direct patient care, but they may also offer answers to important population-based questions. Creating an environment where advanced analytics can be performed against biomedical data is nontrivial, however. Biomedical data are currently scattered across multiple systems with heterogeneous data, and integrating these data is a bigger task than humans can realistically do by hand; therefore, automatic biomedical data integration is highly desirable but has never been fully achieved. This dissertation introduces new algorithms that were devised to support automatic and semiautomatic integration of heterogeneous biomedical data. The new algorithms incorporate both data mining and biomedical informatics techniques to create "concept bags" that are used to compute similarity between data elements in the same way that "word bags" are compared in data mining. Concept bags are composed of controlled medical vocabulary concept codes that are extracted from text using named-entity recognition software. To test the new algorithm, three biomedical text similarity use cases were examined: automatically aligning data elements between heterogeneous data sets, determining degrees of similarity between medical terms using a published benchmark, and determining similarity between ICU discharge summaries. The method is highly configurable and 5 different versions were tested. The concept bag method performed particularly well aligning data elements and outperformed the compared algorithms by iv more than 5%. Another configuration that included hierarchical semantics performed particularly well at matching medical terms, meeting or exceeding 30 of 31 other published results using the same benchmark. Results for the third scenario of computing ICU discharge summary similarity were less successful. Correlations between multiple methods were low, including between terminologists. The concept bag algorithms performed consistently and comparatively well and appear to be viable options for multiple scenarios. New applications of the method and ideas for improving the algorithm are being discussed for future work, including several performance enhancements, configuration-based enhancements, and concept vector weighting using the TF-IDF formulas

Secondary use of Structured Electronic Health Records Data: From Observational Studies to Deep Learning-based Predictive Modeling

With the wide adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), researchers, as well as large healthcare organizations, governmental institutions, insurance, and pharmaceutical companies have been interested in leveraging this rich clinical data source to extract clinical evidence and develop predictive algorithms. Large vendors have been able to compile structured EHR data from sites all over the United States, de-identify these data, and make them available to data science researchers in a more usable format. For this dissertation, we leveraged one of the earliest and largest secondary EHR data sources and conducted three studies of increasing scope. In the first study, which was of limited scope, we conducted a retrospective observational study to compare the effect of three drugs on a specific population of approximately 3,000 patients. Using a novel statistical method, we found evidence that the selection of phenylephrine as the primary vasopressor to induce hypertension for the management of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage is associated with better outcomes as compared to selecting norepinephrine or dopamine. In the second study, we widened our scope, using a cohort of more than 100,000 patients to train generalizable models for the risk prediction of specific clinical events, such as heart failure in diabetes patients or pancreatic cancer. In this study, we found that recurrent neural network-based predictive models trained on expressive terminologies, which preserve a high level of granularity, are associated with better prediction performance as compared with other baseline methods, such as logistic regression. Finally, we widened our scope again, to train Med-BERT, a foundation model, on more than 20 million patients’ diagnosis data. Med-BERT was found to improve the prediction performance of downstream tasks that have a small sample size, which otherwise would limit the ability of the model to learn good representation. In conclusion, we found that we can extract useful information and train helpful deep learning-based predictive models. Given the limitations of secondary EHR data and taking into consideration that the data were originally collected for administrative and not research purposes, however, the findings need clinical validation. Therefore, clinical trials are warranted to further validate any new evidence extracted from such data sources before updating clinical practice guidelines. The implementability of the developed predictive models, which are in an early development phase, also warrants further evaluation