1,513 research outputs found
Generalized Satisfiability Problems via Operator Assignments
Schaefer introduced a framework for generalized satisfiability problems on
the Boolean domain and characterized the computational complexity of such
problems. We investigate an algebraization of Schaefer's framework in which the
Fourier transform is used to represent constraints by multilinear polynomials
in a unique way. The polynomial representation of constraints gives rise to a
relaxation of the notion of satisfiability in which the values to variables are
linear operators on some Hilbert space. For the case of constraints given by a
system of linear equations over the two-element field, this relaxation has
received considerable attention in the foundations of quantum mechanics, where
such constructions as the Mermin-Peres magic square show that there are systems
that have no solutions in the Boolean domain, but have solutions via operator
assignments on some finite-dimensional Hilbert space. We obtain a complete
characterization of the classes of Boolean relations for which there is a gap
between satisfiability in the Boolean domain and the relaxation of
satisfiability via operator assignments. To establish our main result, we adapt
the notion of primitive-positive definability (pp-definability) to our setting,
a notion that has been used extensively in the study of constraint satisfaction
problems. Here, we show that pp-definability gives rise to gadget reductions
that preserve satisfiability gaps. We also present several additional
applications of this method. In particular and perhaps surprisingly, we show
that the relaxed notion of pp-definability in which the quantified variables
are allowed to range over operator assignments gives no additional expressive
power in defining Boolean relations
The complexity of the list homomorphism problem for graphs
We completely classify the computational complexity of the list H-colouring
problem for graphs (with possible loops) in combinatorial and algebraic terms:
for every graph H the problem is either NP-complete, NL-complete, L-complete or
is first-order definable; descriptive complexity equivalents are given as well
via Datalog and its fragments. Our algebraic characterisations match important
conjectures in the study of constraint satisfaction problems.Comment: 12 pages, STACS 201
Order-Invariant MSO is Stronger than Counting MSO in the Finite
We compare the expressiveness of two extensions of monadic second-order logic
(MSO) over the class of finite structures. The first, counting monadic
second-order logic (CMSO), extends MSO with first-order modulo-counting
quantifiers, allowing the expression of queries like ``the number of elements
in the structure is even''. The second extension allows the use of an
additional binary predicate, not contained in the signature of the queried
structure, that must be interpreted as an arbitrary linear order on its
universe, obtaining order-invariant MSO.
While it is straightforward that every CMSO formula can be translated into an
equivalent order-invariant MSO formula, the converse had not yet been settled.
Courcelle showed that for restricted classes of structures both order-invariant
MSO and CMSO are equally expressive, but conjectured that, in general,
order-invariant MSO is stronger than CMSO.
We affirm this conjecture by presenting a class of structures that is
order-invariantly definable in MSO but not definable in CMSO.Comment: Revised version contributed to STACS 200
Defining Recursive Predicates in Graph Orders
We study the first order theory of structures over graphs i.e. structures of
the form () where is the set of all
(isomorphism types of) finite undirected graphs and some vocabulary. We
define the notion of a recursive predicate over graphs using Turing Machine
recognizable string encodings of graphs. We also define the notion of an
arithmetical relation over graphs using a total order on the set
such that () is isomorphic to
().
We introduce the notion of a \textit{capable} structure over graphs, which is
one satisfying the conditions : (1) definability of arithmetic, (2)
definability of cardinality of a graph, and (3) definability of two particular
graph predicates related to vertex labellings of graphs. We then show any
capable structure can define every arithmetical predicate over graphs. As a
corollary, any capable structure also defines every recursive graph relation.
We identify capable structures which are expansions of graph orders, which are
structures of the form () where is a partial order. We
show that the subgraph order i.e. (), induced subgraph
order with one constant i.e. () and an expansion
of the minor order for counting edges i.e. ()
are capable structures. In the course of the proof, we show the definability of
several natural graph theoretic predicates in the subgraph order which may be
of independent interest. We discuss the implications of our results and
connections to Descriptive Complexity
Logics for Unranked Trees: An Overview
Labeled unranked trees are used as a model of XML documents, and logical
languages for them have been studied actively over the past several years. Such
logics have different purposes: some are better suited for extracting data,
some for expressing navigational properties, and some make it easy to relate
complex properties of trees to the existence of tree automata for those
properties. Furthermore, logics differ significantly in their model-checking
properties, their automata models, and their behavior on ordered and unordered
trees. In this paper we present a survey of logics for unranked trees
On Descriptive Complexity, Language Complexity, and GB
We introduce , a monadic second-order language for reasoning about
trees which characterizes the strongly Context-Free Languages in the sense that
a set of finite trees is definable in iff it is (modulo a
projection) a Local Set---the set of derivation trees generated by a CFG. This
provides a flexible approach to establishing language-theoretic complexity
results for formalisms that are based on systems of well-formedness constraints
on trees. We demonstrate this technique by sketching two such results for
Government and Binding Theory. First, we show that {\em free-indexation\/}, the
mechanism assumed to mediate a variety of agreement and binding relationships
in GB, is not definable in and therefore not enforcible by CFGs.
Second, we show how, in spite of this limitation, a reasonably complete GB
account of English can be defined in . Consequently, the language
licensed by that account is strongly context-free. We illustrate some of the
issues involved in establishing this result by looking at the definition, in
, of chains. The limitations of this definition provide some insight
into the types of natural linguistic principles that correspond to higher
levels of language complexity. We close with some speculation on the possible
significance of these results for generative linguistics.Comment: To appear in Specifying Syntactic Structures, papers from the Logic,
Structures, and Syntax workshop, Amsterdam, Sept. 1994. LaTeX source with
nine included postscript figure
- …