2,268 research outputs found
Oink: an Implementation and Evaluation of Modern Parity Game Solvers
Parity games have important practical applications in formal verification and
synthesis, especially to solve the model-checking problem of the modal
mu-calculus. They are also interesting from the theory perspective, as they are
widely believed to admit a polynomial solution, but so far no such algorithm is
known. In recent years, a number of new algorithms and improvements to existing
algorithms have been proposed. We implement a new and easy to extend tool Oink,
which is a high-performance implementation of modern parity game algorithms. We
further present a comprehensive empirical evaluation of modern parity game
algorithms and solvers, both on real world benchmarks and randomly generated
games. Our experiments show that our new tool Oink outperforms the current
state-of-the-art.Comment: Accepted at TACAS 201
Winning Cores in Parity Games
We introduce the novel notion of winning cores in parity games and develop a
deterministic polynomial-time under-approximation algorithm for solving parity
games based on winning core approximation. Underlying this algorithm are a
number properties about winning cores which are interesting in their own right.
In particular, we show that the winning core and the winning region for a
player in a parity game are equivalently empty. Moreover, the winning core
contains all fatal attractors but is not necessarily a dominion itself.
Experimental results are very positive both with respect to quality of
approximation and running time. It outperforms existing state-of-the-art
algorithms significantly on most benchmarks
Symbolic Parity Game Solvers that Yield Winning Strategies
Parity games play an important role for LTL synthesis as evidenced by recent
breakthroughs on LTL synthesis, which rely in part on parity game solving. Yet
state space explosion remains a major issue if we want to scale to larger
systems or specifications. In order to combat this problem, we need to
investigate symbolic methods such as BDDs, which have been successful in the
past to tackle exponentially large systems. It is therefore essential to have
symbolic parity game solving algorithms, operating using BDDs, that are fast
and that can produce the winning strategies used to synthesize the controller
in LTL synthesis.
Current symbolic parity game solving algorithms do not yield winning
strategies. We now propose two symbolic algorithms that yield winning
strategies, based on two recently proposed fixpoint algorithms. We implement
the algorithms and empirically evaluate them using benchmarks obtained from
SYNTCOMP 2020. Our conclusion is that the algorithms are competitive with or
faster than an earlier symbolic implementation of Zielonka's recursive
algorithm, while also providing the winning strategies.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2020, arXiv:2009.0936
Static analysis of parity games: alternating reachability under parity
It is well understood that solving parity games is equivalent, up to polynomial time, to model checking of the modal mu-calculus. It is a long-standing open problem whether solving parity games (or model checking modal mu-calculus formulas) can be done in polynomial time. A recent approach to studying this problem has been the design of partial solvers, algorithms that run in polynomial time and that may only solve parts of a parity game. Although it was shown that such partial solvers can completely solve many practical benchmarks, the design of such partial solvers was somewhat ad hoc, limiting a deeper understanding of the potential of that approach. We here mean to provide such robust foundations for deeper analysis through a new form of game, alternating reachability under parity. We prove the determinacy of these games and use this determinacy to define, for each player, a monotone fixed point over an ordered domain of height linear in the size of the parity game such that all nodes in its greatest fixed point are won by said player in the parity game. We show, through theoretical and experimental work, that such greatest fixed points and their computation leads to partial solvers that run in polynomial time. These partial solvers are based on established principles of static analysis and are more effective than partial solvers studied in extant work
Static Analysis of Parity Games: Alternating Reachability Under Parity
It is well understood that solving parity games is equivalent, up to polynomial time, to model checking of the modal mu-calculus. It is a long-standing open problem whether solving parity games (or model checking modal mu-calculus formulas) can be done in polynomial time. A recent approach to studying this problem has been the design of partial solvers, algorithms that run in polynomial time and that may only solve parts of a parity game. Although it was shown that such partial solvers can completely solve many practical benchmarks, the design of such partial solvers was somewhat ad hoc, limiting a deeper understanding of the potential of that approach. We here mean to provide such robust foundations for deeper analysis through a new form of game, alternating reachability under parity. We prove the determinacy of these games and use this determinacy to define, for each player, a monotone fixed point over an ordered domain of height linear in the size of the parity game such that all nodes in its greatest fixed point are won by said player in the parity game. We show, through theoretical and experimental work, that such greatest fixed points and their computation leads to partial solvers that run in polynomial time. These partial solvers are based on established principles of static analysis and are more effective than partial solvers studied in extant work
- …