Proceedings of Sixth International Workshop on Unification

Swiss National Science Foundation; Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 314); Christ Church, Oxford; Oxford University Computing Laborator

Pseudo-contractions as Gentle Repairs

Updating a knowledge base to remove an unwanted consequence is a challenging task. Some of the original sentences must be either deleted or weakened in such a way that the sentence to be removed is no longer entailed by the resulting set. On the other hand, it is desirable that the existing knowledge be preserved as much as possible, minimising the loss of information. Several approaches to this problem can be found in the literature. In particular, when the knowledge is represented by an ontology, two different families of frameworks have been developed in the literature in the past decades with numerous ideas in common but with little interaction between the communities: applications of AGM-like Belief Change and justification-based Ontology Repair. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between pseudo-contraction operations and gentle repairs. Both aim to avoid the complete deletion of sentences when replacing them with weaker versions is enough to prevent the entailment of the unwanted formula. We show the correspondence between concepts on both sides and investigate under which conditions they are equivalent. Furthermore, we propose a unified notation for the two approaches, which might contribute to the integration of the two areas

Mechanised Uniform Interpolation for Modal Logics K, GL, and iSL

The uniform interpolation property in a given logic can be understood as the definability of propositional quantifiers. We mechanise the computation of these quantifiers and prove correctness in the Coq proof assistant for three modal logics, namely: (1) the modal logic K, for which a pen-and-paper proof exists; (2) Gödel-Löb logic GL, for which our formalisation clarifies an important point in an existing, but incomplete, sequent-style proof; and (3) intuitionistic strong Löb logic iSL, for which this is the first proof-theoretic construction of uniform interpolants. Our work also yields verified programs that allow one to compute the propositional quantifiers on any formula in this logic

Mechanised Uniform Interpolation for Modal Logics K, GL, and iSL

The uniform interpolation property in a given logic can be understood as the definability of propositional quantifiers. We mechanise the computation of these quantifiers and prove correctness in the Coq proof assistant for three modal logics, namely: (1) the modal logic K, for which a pen-and-paper proof exists; (2) Gödel-Löb logic GL, for which our formalisation clarifies an important point in an existing, but incomplete, sequent-style proof; and (3) intuitionistic strong Löb logic iSL, for which this is the first proof-theoretic construction of uniform interpolants. Our work also yields verified programs that allow one to compute the propositional quantifiers on any formula in this logic

Proceedings of the Workshop on the lambda-Prolog Programming Language

The expressiveness of logic programs can be greatly increased over first-order Horn clauses through a stronger emphasis on logical connectives and by admitting various forms of higher-order quantification. The logic of hereditary Harrop formulas and the notion of uniform proof have been developed to provide a foundation for more expressive logic programming languages. The λ-Prolog language is actively being developed on top of these foundational considerations. The rich logical foundations of λ-Prolog provides it with declarative approaches to modular programming, hypothetical reasoning, higher-order programming, polymorphic typing, and meta-programming. These aspects of λ-Prolog have made it valuable as a higher-level language for the specification and implementation of programs in numerous areas, including natural language, automated reasoning, program transformation, and databases

Direct and Expressive Type Inference for the Rank 2 Fragment of System F

This thesis develops a semiunification-based type inference procedure for the rank 2 fragment of System F, with an emphasis on practical considerations for the adoption of such a procedure into existing programming languages. Current semiunification-based rank 2 inference procedures (notably that of Kfoury and Wells) are limited in several ways, which hinder their use in real-world settings. First of all, the translation from an instance of the type inference problem to an instance of the semiunification problem (SUP) is indirect; in particular, because of a series of source-level transformations that take place before translation, the translation is not syntax-directed. As a result, type errors discovered during the semiunification process cannot be cleanly translated back to specific subexpressions of the source program that caused the error. Also, because the rank 2 fragment of System F lacks a principal types property, an inference procedure cannot output a single type that encompasses all of a given term's derivable types. The procedure must therefore either rely on user assistance to produce the right type, or simply choose arbitrarily one of the given term's possible types. The algorithm of Kfoury and Wells in particular makes degenerate type assumptions in the absence of user assistance, and consequently produces types that are of no practical use. We build up our system in stages; we begin by improving the SUP translation. Whereas termination for the Kfoury-Wells rank 2 inference procedure is assured by translating terms into instances of the acyclic semiunification problem (a decidable subset of SUP, which is undecidable in general), we formulate and target the R-acyclic semiunification problem---a larger decidable subset of SUP that facilitates a more concise translation from source terms. We next eliminate the source-level transformation of terms, in order to formulate a truly syntax-directed translation from a source term to a set of SUP-like constraints. In doing so, we find that even the full SUP itself is not sufficiently equipped to support such a translation. We formulate USUP, a superset of SUP that incorporates a new class of identifier we call an unknown. We formulate decidable subsets of USUP, and then formulate a truly syntax-directed translation from source terms into USUP, with guaranteed termination. Finally, to address the principal types problem, we introduce a notation for types in which we allow a particular class of variable to stand for type constructors, rather than ordinary types (an idea based on the so-called third-order lambda-calculus). We show that, with third-order types we can not only output large sets of useful types for a given term, without programmer assistance, but the types we output also generalize over more System F types than any type within System F itself can do, and still be a valid type for the source term. Thus, our system increases opportunities for separate compilation and code reuse beyond any existing system of which we are aware. Our system is sound, though incomplete in certain well-characterized ways, despite which our system performs exactly as one would hope on a variety of examples, which we illustrate in this thesis