Labeled natural deduction for temporal logics

Nonostante la notevole rilevanza delle logiche temporali in molti campi dell'informatica, la loro analisi teorica non è certo da ritenersi conclusa. In particolare, molti sono i punti ancora aperti nell'ambito della teoria della dimostrazione, specialmente se consideriamo le logiche temporali di tipo branching. Il principale contributo di questa tesi consiste nella presentazione di un approccio modulare per la definizione di sistemi di deduzione naturale etichettata per un'ampia gamma di logiche temporali. Viene innanzitutto proposto un sistema per la logica temporale minimale di Prior; si mostra quindi come estenderlo in maniera modulare allo scopo di trattare logiche più complesse, quali ad esempio LTL. Viene infine proposta un'estensione al caso delle logiche branching, concentrando l'attenzione sulle logiche con semantica di tipo Ockhamist e bundled. Per i sistemi proposti, viene condotta una dettagliata analisi dal punto di vista della teoria della dimostrazione. In particolare, nel caso delle logiche del tempo discreto, per le quali si richiedono regole che modellino un principio di induzione, viene definita una procedura di normalizzazione ispirata da quelle dei sistemi per l'Aritmetica di Heyting. Come conseguenza, si ottiene una dimostrazione puramente sintattica della consistenza dei sistemi.Despite the great relevance of temporal logics in many applications of computer science, their theoretical analysis is far from being concluded. In particular, we still lack a satisfactory proof theory for temporal logics and this is especially true in the case of branching-time logics. The main contribution of this thesis consists in presenting a modular approach to the definition of labeled (natural) deduction systems for a large class of temporal logics. We start by proposing a system for the basic Priorean tense logic and show how to modularly enrich it in order to deal with more complex logics, like LTL. We also consider the extension to the branching case, focusing on the Ockhamist branching-time logics with a bundled semantics. A detailed proof-theoretical analysis of the systems is performed. In particular, in the case of discrete-time logics, for which rules modeling an induction principle are required, we define a procedure of normalization inspired to those of systems for Heyting Arithmetic. As a consequence of normalization, we obtain a purely syntactical proof of the consistency of the systems

Studies on modal logics of time and space

This dissertation presents original results in Temporal Logic and Spatial Logic. Part I concerns Branching-Time Logic. Since Prior 1967, two main semantics for Branching-Time Logic have been devised: Peircean and Ockhamist semantics. Zanardo 1998 proposed a general semantics, called Indistinguishability semantics, of which Peircean and Ockhamist semantics are limit cases. We provide a finite axiomatization of the Indistinguishability logic of upward endless bundled trees using a non-standard inference rule, and prove that this logic is strongly complete. In Part II, we study the temporal logic given by the tense operators F for future and P for past together with the derivative operator , interpreted on the real numbers. We prove that this logic is neither strongly nor Kripke complete, it is PSPACE-complete, and it is finitely axiomatizable. In Part III, we study the spatial logic given by the derivative operator and the graded modalities {n | n in N}. We prove that this language, call it L, is as expressive as the first-order language Lt of Flum and Ziegler 1980 when interpreted on T3 topological spaces. Then, we give a general definition of modal operator: essentially, a modal operator will be defined by a formula of Lt with at most one free variable. If a modal operator is defined by a formula predicating only over points, then it is called point-sort operator. We prove that L, even if enriched with all point-sort operators, however enriched with finitely many modal operators predicating also on open sets, cannot express Lt on T2 spaces. Finally, we axiomatize the logic of any class between all T1 and all T3 spaces and prove that it is PSPACE-complete.Open Acces