396 research outputs found

    VGC 2023 - Unveiling the dynamic Earth with digital methods: 5th Virtual Geoscience Conference: Book of Abstracts

    Get PDF
    Conference proceedings of the 5th Virtual Geoscience Conference, 21-22 September 2023, held in Dresden. The VGC is a multidisciplinary forum for researchers in geoscience, geomatics and related disciplines to share their latest developments and applications.:Short Courses 9 Workshops Stream 1 10 Workshop Stream 2 11 Workshop Stream 3 12 Session 1 โ€“ Point Cloud Processing: Workflows, Geometry & Semantics 14 Session 2 โ€“ Visualisation, communication & Teaching 27 Session 3 โ€“ Applying Machine Learning in Geosciences 36 Session 4 โ€“ Digital Outcrop Characterisation & Analysis 49 Session 5 โ€“ Airborne & Remote Mapping 58 Session 6 โ€“ Recent Developments in Geomorphic Process and Hazard Monitoring 69 Session 7 โ€“ Applications in Hydrology & Ecology 82 Poster Contributions 9

    Using automated vegetation cover estimation from close-range photogrammetric point clouds to compare vegetation location properties in mountain terrain

    Get PDF
    In this paper we present a low-cost approach to mapping vegetation cover by means of high-resolution close-range terrestrial photogrammetry. A total of 249 clusters of nine 1 m2 plots each, arranged in a 3 ร— 3 grid, were set up on 18 summits in Mediterranean mountain regions and in the Alps to capture images for photogrammetric processing and in-situ vegetation cover estimates. This was done with a hand-held pole-mounted digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera. Low-growing vegetation was automatically segmented using high-resolution point clouds. For classifying vegetation we used a two-step semi-supervised Random Forest approach. First, we applied an expert-based rule set using the Excess Green index (ExG) to predefine non-vegetation and vegetation points. Second, we applied a Random Forest classifier to further enhance the classification of vegetation points using selected topographic parameters (elevation, slope, aspect, roughness, potential solar irradiation) and additional vegetation indices (Excess Green Minus Excess Red (ExGR) and the vegetation index VEG). For ground cover estimation the photogrammetric point clouds were meshed using Screened Poisson Reconstruction. The relative influence of the topographic parameters on the vegetation cover was determined with linear mixed-effects models (LMMs). Analysis of the LMMs revealed a high impact of elevation, aspect, solar irradiation, and standard deviation of slope. The presented approach goes beyond vegetation cover values based on conventional orthoimages and in-situ vegetation cover estimates from field surveys in that it is able to differentiate complete 3D surface areas, including overhangs, and can distinguish between vegetation-covered and other surfaces in an automated manner. The results of the Random Forest classification confirmed it as suitable for vegetation classification, but the relative feature importance values indicate that the classifier did not leverage the potential of the included topographic parameters. In contrast, our application of LMMs utilized the topographic parameters and was able to reveal dependencies in the two biomes, such as elevation and aspect, which were able to explain between 87% and 92.5% of variance

    GEOSPATIAL-BASED ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING FOR COASTAL DUNE ZONE MANAGEMENT

    Get PDF
    Tomaintain biodiversity and ecological functionof coastal dune areas, itis important that practical and effective environmentalmanagemental strategies are developed. Advances in geospatial technologies offer a potentially very useful source of data for studies in this environment. This research project aimto developgeospatialdata-basedenvironmentalmodellingforcoastaldunecomplexestocontributetoeffectiveconservationstrategieswithparticularreferencetotheBuckroneydunecomplexinCo.Wicklow,Ireland.Theprojectconducteda general comparison ofdifferent geospatial data collection methodsfor topographic modelling of the Buckroney dune complex. These data collection methodsincludedsmall-scale survey data from aerial photogrammetry, optical satellite imagery, radar and LiDAR data, and ground-based, large-scale survey data from Total Station(TS), Real Time Kinematic (RTK) Global Positioning System(GPS), terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) and Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS).The results identifiedthe advantages and disadvantages of the respective technologies and demonstrated thatspatial data from high-end methods based on LiDAR, TLS and UAS technologiesenabled high-resolution and high-accuracy 3D datasetto be gathered quickly and relatively easily for the Buckroney dune complex. Analysis of the 3D topographic modelling based on LiDAR, TLS and UAS technologieshighlighted the efficacy of UAS technology, in particular,for 3D topographicmodellingof the study site.Theproject then exploredthe application of a UAS-mounted multispectral sensor for 3D vegetation mappingof the site. The Sequoia multispectral sensorused in this researchhas green, red, red-edge and near-infrared(NIR)wavebands, and a normal RGB sensor. The outcomesincludedan orthomosiac model, a 3D surface model and multispectral imageryof the study site. Nineclassification strategies were usedto examine the efficacyof UAS-IVmounted multispectral data for vegetation mapping. These strategies involved different band combinations based on the three multispectral bands from the RGB sensor, the four multispectral bands from the multispectral sensor and sixwidely used vegetation indices. There were 235 sample areas (1 m ร— 1 m) used for anaccuracy assessment of the classification of thevegetation mapping. The results showed vegetation type classification accuracies ranging from 52% to 75%. The resultdemonstrated that the addition of UAS-mounted multispectral data improvedthe classification accuracy of coastal vegetation mapping of the Buckroney dune complex

    Environmental Armed Conflict Assessment Using Satellite Imagery

    Get PDF
    Armed conflicts not only affect human populations but can also cause considerable damage to the environment. Its consequences are as diverse as its causes, including; water pollution from oil spills, land degradation due to the destruction of infrastructure, poisoning of soils and fields, destruction of crops and forests, over-exploitation of natural resources and paradoxically and occasionally reforestation. In this way, the environment in the war can be approached as beneficiary, stage, victim or/and spoil of war. Although there are few papers that assess the use of remote sensing methods in areas affected by warfare, we found a gap in these studies, being both outdated and lacking the correlation of remote sensing analysis with the causes-consequences, biome features and scale. Thus, this paper presents a methodical approach focused on the assessment of the existing datasets and the analysis of the connection between geographical conditions (biomes), drivers and the assessment using remote sensing methods in areas affected by armed conflicts. We aimed to find; weaknesses, tendencies, patterns, points of convergence and divergence. Then we consider variables such as biome, forest cover affectation, scale, and satellite imagery sensors to determine the relationship between warfare drivers with geographical location assessed by remote sensing methods. We collected data from 44 studies from international peer-reviewed journals from 1998 to 2019 that are indexed using scientific search engines. We found that 62% of the studies were focused on the analysis of torrid biomes as; Tropical Rainforest, Monsoon Forest / Dry Forest, Tree Savanna and Grass Savanna, using the 64% Moderate-resolution satellite imagery sensors as; Landsat 4-5 TM and Landsat 7 ETM+. Quantitative analysis of the trends identified within these areas contributes to an understanding of the reasons behind these conflicts

    Sensing Mountains

    Get PDF
    Sensing mountains by close-range and remote techniques is a challenging task. The 4th edition of the international Innsbruck Summer School of Alpine Research 2022 โ€“ Close-range Sensing Techniques in Alpine Terrain brings together early career and experienced scientists from technical-, geo- and environmental-related research fields. The interdisciplinary setting of the summer school creates a creative space for exchanging and learning new concepts and solutions for mapping, monitoring and quantifying mountain environments under ongoing conditions of change

    ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๊ทœ๋ชจ LiDAR ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋„์‹œ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ์กฐ๊ฒฝํ•™, 2021.8. ์†ก์˜๊ทผ.Integrated multiscale light detection and ranging (LiDAR) datasets are required for managing urban ecosystems because 1) LiDAR datasets can represent various spatial structures across the urban landscape and 2) the multitemporal LiDAR approach can derive the changes of urban landscape structures. This dissertation aimed to find the various spatiotemporal availabilities (i.e., from the tree-level spatial scale to the city-level regional scale with the multitemporal approach) of LiDAR or laser scanning (LS) datasets for monitoring urban ecosystems in the following three chapters. Chapter 2: Collecting tree inventory data in urban areas is important for managing green areas. Surveying using airborne laser scanning (ALS) is effective for collecting urban tree structures but less efficient regarding the economic costs and its operation. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), and mobile laser scanning (MLS) datasets could have the potential in complementing those of ALS in the respect to efficiency. However, to the best of my knowledge, there were limited studies for seeking the similarities and variations among the canopy metrics derived from various LiDAR platforms. In Chapter 2, I compared structural canopy metrics among ALS, TLS, and MLS datasets in the urban parks. The purpose of Chapter 2 was to test whether the estimates of tree metrics differed depending on single or clustered trees and to test whether the errors in LiDAR-derived metrics were related to the tree structures. Small, urban parks were selected for surveying trees using the three LiDAR platforms. The ALS datasets were acquired on 14 May, 2017. The TLS and MLS datasets were acquired from 10โ€“11 May, 2017, and 21โ€“25 April, 2020, respectively. The tree point clouds were classified into single and clustered trees. The structural metrics were compared in each pair (i.e., ALS and TLS, ALS and MLS, and TLS and MLS pairs). The heights related metrics (e.g., percentile heights and the distribution of the heights values), the complexity metric (e.g., the Rumple index) and area were calculated for comparisons. The root mean square error (RMSE), bias, and the Pearsonโ€™s correlation coefficient (r) were calculated to evaluate the difference in each metric among the LiDAR platforms. The results showed that ZMAX, max and mean CHM, and area showed good consistencies (RMSE% 0.900). Especially, the biases of CHM-derived metrics did not present significant differences (p > 0.05) regardless of single or clustered trees. Moreover, the biases from the comparisons in each pair showed linear relations with the tree heights and vertical canopy complexity (i.e., Pearsonโ€™s correlation coefficient showed significant; r >0.29, p < 0.05). My results could be references when combining multiple LiDAR systems to estimate the canopy structures of urban park areas. Chapter 3: Understanding forest dynamics is important for assessing the health of urban forests, which experience various disturbances, both natural (e.g., treefall events) and artificial (e.g., making space for agricultural fields). Therefore, quantifying three-dimensional (3D) changes in canopies is a helpful way to manage and understand urban forests better. Multitemporal ALS datasets enable me to quantify the vertical and lateral growth of trees across a landscape scale. The goal of Chapter 3 is to assess the annual changes in the 3-D structures of canopies and forest gaps in an urban forest using annual airborne LiDAR datasets for 2012โ€“2015. The canopies were classified as high canopies and low canopies by a 5 m height threshold. Then, I generated pixel- and plot-level canopy height models and conducted change detection annually. The vertical growth rates and leaf area index showed consistent values year by year in both canopies, while the spatial distributions of the canopy and leaf area profile (e.g., leaf area density) showed inconsistent changes each year in both canopies. In total, high canopies expanded their foliage from 12 m height, while forest gap edge canopies (including low canopies) expanded their canopies from 5 m height. Annual change detection with LiDAR datasets might inform about both steady growth rates and different characteristics in the changes of vertical canopy structures for both high and low canopies in urban forests. Chapter 4: Although many studies have considered urban structure when investigating urban ecological networks, few have considered the 3D structure of buildings as well as urban green spaces. In Chapter 4, I examined an urban ecological network using the 3D structure of both green spaces and buildings. Using breeding-season bird species observations and ALS data collected, I assessed the influence of 3D structural variables on species diversity. I used correlation analyses to determine if vertical distribution, volume, area, and height of both buildings and vegetation were related to bird species diversity. Then I conducted circuit theory-based current flow betweenness centrality (CFBC) analysis using the LiDAR-derived structural variables. I found that the volumes of buildings and 8โ€“10 m vegetation heights were both highly correlated with species richness per unit area. There were significant differences between 2D and 3D connectivity analysis using LiDAR-derived variables among urban forest patches, boulevards, and apartment complexes. Within urban forest patches and parks, 3D CFBC represented canopy structural characteristics well, by showing high variance in spatial distributions. The 3D CFBC results indicated that adjacent high-rise buildings, dense apartment complexes, and densely urbanized areas were isolated, as characterized by low centrality values, but that vegetation planted in open spaces between buildings could improve connectivity by linking isolated areas to core areas. My research highlights the importance of considering 3D structure in planning and managing urban ecological connectivity. In this dissertation, the availability of integrated multiscale LiDAR datasets was found via three standalone studies. It was revealed that 3D information could enhance the quality of urban landscape monitoring and ecological connectivity analysis by elaborately explaining spatial structures. However, the spatiotemporal scales of each standalone study were limited to the city scale and to five years. The recently launched Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) would help to solve these limitations. Furthermore, the GEDI dataset could help researchers understand the relationship between ecosystem structures and their functions.๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์—์„œ ๋„์‹œ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง์„ ์œ„ํ•œ LiDAR ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๊ณผ ์ƒํƒœ์  ์˜๋ฏธ ๋„์ถœ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. LiDAR๋ž€ Light Detection and Ranging์˜ ์•ฝ์–ด๋กœ, LiDAR ์„ผ์„œ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ๋œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ €๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€์ƒ์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•œ ๋’ค ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋˜์–ด ๋Œ์•„์˜ค๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ €์˜ ์„ธ๊ธฐ์™€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€์ƒ์˜ ์œ„์น˜ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ 3์ฐจ์› ์ ๊ตฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•ด์ฃผ๋Š” ๋Šฅ๋™ํ˜• ์›๊ฒฉํƒ์‚ฌ ๋„๊ตฌ์ด๋‹ค. LiDAR ์›๊ฒฉํƒ์‚ฌ ๋„๊ตฌ์˜ ๋“ฑ์žฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ž์—ฐ๊ณผ ๋„์‹œ์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์˜ ์ทจ๋“์ด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅํ•ด์ง์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ์„œ์‹์ง€์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์™€ ์ƒ๋ฌผ ์ข… ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๋„์ถœ, ์‹œ๊ณ„์—ด LiDAR ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋…น์ง€ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋“ฑ์ด ์ด๋ค„์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR(ALS), ์ง€์ƒ LiDAR(TLS), ์ด๋™ํ˜• LiDAR(MLS) ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ชฉ์ ์— ์•Œ๋งž์€ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ทจ๋“ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋„์‹œ๋…น์ง€๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ LiDAR ์›๊ฒฉํƒ์‚ฌ ๋„๊ตฌ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ์ ์šฉ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ, Chapter 2 ํ•ญ๊ณต, ์ง€์ƒ, ์ด๋™ํ˜• LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‚ฌ์ด ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์˜ ์ผ์น˜์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€, Chapter 3 ์‹œ๊ณ„์—ด ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ๋„์‹œ๋…น์ง€ ๋™ํƒœ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง, Chapter 4 ๋„์‹œ์˜ ์ƒํƒœ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Chapter 2: ๋„์‹œ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ทจ๋“ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋„์‹œ๋…น์ง€ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ์žˆ์–ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. LiDAR ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ๋กœ ๋„์‹œ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ทจ๋“ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๋†’์ด์™€ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ์ง€์ƒ ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค๋งค์Šค ๋“ฑ์„ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋กœ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR๋Š” ๋„“์€ ๋ฒ”์œ„์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ง€๋…€ ์‚ฐ๋ฆผ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ํ™œ๋ฐœํžˆ ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์ทจ๋“์€ ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์šด์šฉ๋น„, ์žฅ๋น„๊ด€๋ จ ๋ง‰๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ณ  ์šด์šฉ์— ์žˆ์–ด ์ „๋ฌธ์„ฑ์„ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋Œ€์ƒ์˜ ์ ๊ตฐ๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚ฎ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋‹จ์ ์„ ์ง€๋‹Œ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ์ง€์ƒ LiDAR์™€ ์ด๋™ํ˜• LiDAR๋Š” ์šด์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ํŽธ๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๋†’์€ ์ ๊ตฐ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ์ถœ๋ ฅํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR์˜ ๋‹จ์ ์„ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๋“ฑ์žฅ๊ณผ ์ด๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์‹œ๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ฐ„ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์šด์šฉ๊ณผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๋ณด์™„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ALS, TLS, MLS์˜ 3๊ฐœ์˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ทจ๋“๋œ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์„œ๋กœ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ณ , ์„œ๋กœ ๋Œ€์ฒด๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋งŽ์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋œ ๋ฐ” ์—†๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Chapter 2์—์„œ๋Š” ALS, TLS, MLS ํ†ตํ•ด ์ทจ๋“๋œ ๋„์‹œ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์„œ๋กœ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ผ์น˜์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ , ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ด€๋ จ ์ง€ํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ์„ธ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ๋Œ€์ฒด๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๋ถ€์ ์œผ๋กœ Chapter 2๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ด€๋ จ ์ง€ํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ๋‹จ๋ชฉ์ฐจ์›๊ณผ ๊ตฐ์ง‘์ฐจ์›, ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ALS, TLS, MLS ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š”์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ๋‹ด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒœ์•ˆ์‹œ ๋„์‹œ๊ณต์› 9๊ฐœ์†Œ์—์„œ ALS ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” 2017๋…„ 5์›” 14์ผ, TLS ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” 2017๋…„ 5์›” 10์ผ๊ณผ 11์ผ, MLS ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” 2020๋…„ 4์›” 21์—์„œ 25์ผ ์ทจ๋“๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ทจ๋“๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์€ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์˜ ๊ฒน์นจ ์—ฌ๋ถ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹จ๋ชฉ๊ณผ ๊ตฐ์ง‘์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, 3๊ฐœ์˜ ํŽ˜์–ด(ALS-TLS, MLS-TLS, ALS-MLS)๋กœ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์˜ ํผ์„ผํƒ€์ผ ๋†’์ด, ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋ณต์žก์„ฑ, ๋ฉด์  ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์„ 1:1 ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋„์ถœ๋œ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์„ ์ฐธ์กฐ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ท ์ œ๊ณฑ๊ทผ์˜ค์ฐจ(RMSE), ํŽธํ–ฅ(bias), ํ”ผ์–ด์Šจ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ณ„์ˆ˜(r) ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์„ธ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ผ์น˜์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ZMAX, CHM๊ด€๋ จ ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋†’์ด ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋ฉด์ ์ด ๋†’์€ ์ผ์น˜์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค(RMSE% 0.900). ํŠนํžˆ CHM์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋„์ถœ๋œ ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋†’์ด ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์€ ๋‹จ๋ชฉ๊ณผ ๊ตฐ์ง‘์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ฐœ์˜ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ฐ„ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์ธ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค(p > 0.05). ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ํผ์„ผํƒ€์ผ ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋†’์ด์™€ ํ‰๊ท  ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋†’์ด ๋“ฑ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ผ์น˜์„ฑ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์„ธ ํŽ˜์–ด์—์„œ ๋„์ถœ๋œ ํŽธํ–ฅ์€ ์ˆ˜๊ณ , ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋ณต์žก์„ฑ๊ณผ ์•ฝํ•œ ์„ ํ˜•๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค(r >, p < 0.05). Chapter 3: ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋™ํƒœ๋Š” ์ˆฒ์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์ž์—ฐ์ ยท์ธ์œ„์ ์ธ ๊ต๋ž€์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ ์ˆฒํ‹ˆ์€ ์ˆฒ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์— ๋น›์˜ ํˆฌ๊ณผ์œจ, ์˜จ๋„, ์Šต๋„ ๋“ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ผ์ณ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ˆฒํ‹ˆ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋งํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ˆฒ์˜ ๋™ํƒœ๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์žˆ์–ด ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR ์„ผ์„œ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์œ„์„ฑ์˜์ƒ์ด๋‚˜ ํ•ญ๊ณต์‚ฌ์ง„ ๋“ฑ 2์ฐจ์› ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ์ˆฒํ‹ˆ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ๊ณต๊ฐ„์˜ ํƒ์ง€์™€ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ํ˜•์ƒ์˜ ์ทจ๋“์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค. Chapter 3์—์„œ๋Š” 2012๋…„๋„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2015๋…„๋„ 4๊ฐœ๋…„์˜ ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์—ฐํ˜• ๋„์‹œ๊ณต์›(๋ด‰์„œ์‚ฐ)์˜ ์ˆ˜๊ด€๊ณผ ์ˆฒํ‹ˆ์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ‰์  ์ˆ˜์ง์  ๋ณ€ํ™”์–‘์ƒ์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜๊ด€์€ ๋†’์ด 5m๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์ธต๋ถ€์™€ ํ•˜์ธต๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋†’์ด๋ชจ๋ธ(canopy height model, CHM)์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ๊ฐ„๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ƒ์ธต๋ถ€ ๋ฐ ํ•˜์ธต๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์˜ ์ˆ˜์ง์ƒ์žฅ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์—ฝ๋ฉด์ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ฐ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์–‘์ƒ์„ ๋ณด์ธ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์ˆ˜ํ‰์  ๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ์—ฝ๋ฉด์ ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ๋ถˆ๊ทœ์น™์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๊ฐ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์–‘์ƒ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์ธต๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์€ ๋†’์ด 12m์—์„œ ์ธก๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์ƒ์žฅ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•˜์ธต๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๊ด€ ์ค‘ ์ˆฒํ‹ˆ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋†’์ด 5m์—์„œ ์ธก๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์ƒ์žฅ์ด ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. LiDAR ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฐ„ ๋ณ€ํ™” ํƒ์ง€๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ž์—ฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋œ ์ˆฒํ‹ˆ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ƒ์žฅ๊ณผ ๊ต๋ž€ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋งค์šฐ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•œ ๋™ํƒœ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ์œ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ๊ณต๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์˜ ๋™ํƒœ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค์†Œ ์นจ์ฒด๋จ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Chapter 4๋Š” ๋„์‹œ ๋‚ด ๊ฑด๋ฌผ๊ณผ ๋…น์ง€์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ž…๋ ฅ์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋„์‹œ์˜ ์ƒํƒœ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. ๋„์‹œ ๋‚ด ์ƒํƒœ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ๋„์ถœ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋„์‹œ์™€ ๋…น์ง€์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ ๋“ฑ์„ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง„ํ–‰์ด ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ 3์ฐจ์›์ ์ธ ํŠน์„ฑ์ธ ๋„์‹œ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ, ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ง์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์€ ๋งŽ์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋œ ๋ฐ” ์—†๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ง€๋Š” ์ฒœ์•ˆ์‹œ ์‹œ์ฒญ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœํ•œ 4 km ร— 4 km ์ง€์—ญ์œผ๋กœ, 2015๋…„์— ์ทจ๋“๋œ ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ•ด ์ทจ๋“๋œ ์กฐ๋ฅ˜ ์ข… ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 1)๋„์‹œ ๋‚ด ๊ฑด๋ฌผ๊ณผ ๋…น์ง€์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ์กฐ๋ฅ˜ ์ข… ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ ์‚ฌ์ด ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‚ดํ”ผ๊ณ , 2)์กฐ๋ฅ˜ ์ข… ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „๋ฅ˜ํ๋ฆ„๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋งค๊ฐœ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ฑ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„(CFBC)์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ฑด์ถ•๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ์™€ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๋†’์ด 8-10m์˜ ๋…น์ง€ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๋น„๊ฐ€ ๋ฉด์ ๋‹น ์กฐ๋ฅ˜ ์ข… ํ’๋ถ€๋„์™€ ์Šคํ”ผ์–ด๋งŒ ์ˆœ์œ„์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„์—์„œ ๋†’์€ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„(ฯ> 0.6)๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ž…๋ ฅ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ฐจ์›(2D ๋ฐ 3D)์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๋„์‹œ์ˆฒ, ๋Œ€๋กœ๋ณ€, ์•„ํŒŒํŠธ๋‹จ์ง€๋‚ด ๋…น์ง€ ๋“ฑ์—์„œ 2D ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ CFBC์™€ 3D๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ CFBC๋Š” ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋„์‹œ๋…น์ง€์˜ 3D ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ CFBC์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋…น์ง€ ๋ฉด์ ์ž„์—๋„ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์ธ ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋†’์€ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 3D CFBC ๋ถ„์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ณ ์ธต ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ์ฃผ๋ณ€๋ถ€, ๊ณ ๋ฐ€๋„ ์•„ํŒŒํŠธ๋‹จ์ง€, ๊ณ ๋ฐ€ ์‹œ๊ฐ€ํ™”์ง€์—ญ ๋“ฑ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ ๊ณ ๋ฆฝ์ง€์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ์‚ฌ์ด ๊ณต์ง€ ๋‚ด ์‹์ƒ์€ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์ด ๊ณ ๋ฆฝ๋œ ์ง€์—ญ๊ณผ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ง€์—ญ์„ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹จ๋ชฉ, ๊ฒฝ๊ด€ ์ง€์—ญ๋‹จ์œ„ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์—์„œ์˜ ๋„์‹œ๊ฒฝ๊ด€๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ถ„์„, ๋„์‹œ๋…น์ง€๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ๋“ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์  ๋ณ€ํ™”์–‘์ƒ, ๋„์‹œ๊ฒฝ๊ด€๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ์  ์˜๋ฏธ ๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ–ฅํ›„ Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation(GEDI) ๋ฏธ์…˜์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋Š” ์ง€์—ญ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋‹จ์œ„, ๋Œ€๋ฅ™๋‹จ์œ„ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์žฅํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋„์‹œ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ๊ทธ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋„์›€์„ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1. Background 1 1.1. Urbanization and the importance of urban green spaces 1 1.2. Urban landscape and Light detection and ranging application 1 2. Purpose 6 Chapter 2. Comparing tree structures derived among multiple LiDAR systems in urban parks 10 1. Introduction 10 2. Methods and materials 12 2.1. Study site and tree classification 12 2.2. LiDAR survey and processing 14 2.3. Deriving the structural variables of the parks 17 2.4. Assessing the accuracy of the LiDAR-derived indices 18 3. Results 19 3.1. Comparing height metrics among the three LiDAR systems 19 3.2. Comparing CHM-derived canopy height metrics from each LiDAR systems 22 3.3. Comparing the area and the Rumple index determined using the LiDAR systems 23 4. Discussion 25 4.1. LiDAR configurations and data acquisition time intervals 25 4.2. Uncertainty of the structural indices derived from the three LiDAR systems 28 Chapter 3. Urban forest growth and gap dynamics detected by yearly repeated airborne LiDAR 31 1. Introduction 31 2. Methods and Materials 33 2.1. Field survey 33 2.2. Canopy opening detection 34 2.3. Airborne LiDAR dataset acquisition and registration 35 2.4. Generation of height models and change detection 36 2.5. Gap detection and classification 38 2.6. Estimating changes of vertical canopy distribution and canopy complexity 38 3. Results 39 3.1. Pixel and hexagon height model-based change detection 39 3.2. Continuous one-year vertical growth area 41 3.3. Open canopy change detection 42 3.4. Changes in vertical canopy structures in High Canopy and Open Canopy 43 4. Discussion 45 4.1. What are the differences between the canopy structural changes derived from annual change detections and three-year interval change detection? 45 4.2. What are the characteristics of the structural changes according to the different canopy classes (e.g., high canopies and low canopies) in the urban forest? 46 Chapter 4. LiDAR-derived three-dimensional ecological connectivity mapping 49 1. Introduction 49 2. Materials and Methods 51 2.1. Study area and avian species observation 52 2.2. Airborne LiDAR acquisition, preprocessing and classification and deriving structural variables 53 2.3. Correlation analysis and selection of structural variables 55 2.4. 2D and 3D ecological networks 55 3. Results 56 3.1. Avian species survey 56 3.2. Correlation analyses and variable selection 56 3.3. Connectivity analysis results 58 3.4. Correlation between connectivity results with bird species diversity 59 3.5. Differences between 2D- and 3D-based CFBCs 60 4. Discussion 61 4.1. Vegetation and building structures and bird species diversity 61 4.2. 3D-based connectivity results 62 4.3. Differences between 2D and 3D network analyses 64 4.3.1. Forest and artificial green area 65 4.3.2. Roads and residential areas 66 Appendix 67 Chapter 5. Conclusion 70 1. Combination with multiple LiDAR data for surveying structures of urban green spaces 70 2. Multi-temporal urban forest gap monitoring 71 3. Ecological connectivity analysis using LiDAR 71 4. LiDAR application to Urban ecosystem monitoring 72 5. Expanding spatiotemporal scale and further works 73 Acknowledgments 75 Reference 76 Abstract in Korean 85๋ฐ•

    Calibration of DART Radiative Transfer Model with Satellite Images for Simulating Albedo and Thermal Irradiance Images and 3D Radiative Budget of Urban Environment

    Get PDF
    Remote sensing is increasingly used for managing urban environment. In this context, the H2020 project URBANFLUXES aims to improve our knowledge on urban anthropogenic heat fluxes, with the specific study of three cities: London, Basel and Heraklion. Usually, one expects to derive directly 2 major urban parameters from remote sensing: the albedo and thermal irradiance. However, the determination of these two parameters is seriously hampered by complexity of urban architecture. For example, urban reflectance and brightness temperature are far from isotropic and are spatially heterogeneous. Hence, radiative transfer models that consider the complexity of urban architecture when simulating remote sensing signals are essential tools. Even for these sophisticated models, there is a major constraint for an operational use of remote sensing: the complex 3D distribution of optical properties and temperatures in urban environments. Here, the work is conducted with the DART (Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer) model. It is a comprehensive physically based 3D radiative transfer model that simulates optical signals at the entrance of imaging spectro-radiometers and LiDAR scanners on board of satellites and airplanes, as well as the 3D radiative budget, of urban and natural landscapes for any experimental (atmosphere, topography,โ€ฆ) and instrumental (sensor altitude, spatial resolution, UV to thermal infrared,โ€ฆ) configuration. Paul Sabatier University distributes free licenses for research activities. This paper presents the calibration of DART model with high spatial resolution satellite images (Landsat 8, Sentinel 2, etc.) that are acquired in the visible (VIS) / near infrared (NIR) domain and in the thermal infrared (TIR) domain. Here, the work is conducted with an atmospherically corrected Landsat 8 image and Bale city, with its urban database. The calibration approach in the VIS/IR domain encompasses 5 steps for computing the 2D distribution (image) of urban albedo at satellite spatial resolution. (1) DART simulation of satellite image at very high spatial resolution (e.g., 50cm) per satellite spectral band. Atmosphere conditions are specific to the satellite image acquisition. (2) Spatial resampling of DART image at the coarser spatial resolution of the available satellite image, per spectral band. (3) Iterative derivation of the urban surfaces (roofs, walls, streets, vegetation,โ€ฆ) optical properties as derived from pixel-wise comparison of DART and satellite images, independently per spectral band. (4) Computation of the band albedo image of the city, per spectral band. (5) Computation of the image of the city albedo and VIS/NIR exitance, as an integral over all satellite spectral bands. In order to get a time series of albedo and VIS/NIR exitance, even in the absence of satellite images, ECMWF information about local irradiance and atmosphere conditions are used. A similar approach is used for calculating the city thermal exitance using satellite images acquired in the thermal infrared domain. Finally, DART simulations that are conducted with the optical properties derived from remote sensing images give also the 3D radiative budget of the city at any date including the date of the satellite image acquisition

    Laser vision : lidar as a transformative tool to advance critical zone science

    Get PDF
    ยฉ The Author(s), 2015. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 19 (2015): 2881-2897, doi:10.5194/hess-19-2881-2015.Observation and quantification of the Earth's surface is undergoing a revolutionary change due to the increased spatial resolution and extent afforded by light detection and ranging (lidar) technology. As a consequence, lidar-derived information has led to fundamental discoveries within the individual disciplines of geomorphology, hydrology, and ecology. These disciplines form the cornerstones of critical zone (CZ) science, where researchers study how interactions among the geosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere shape and maintain the "zone of life", which extends from the top of unweathered bedrock to the top of the vegetation canopy. Fundamental to CZ science is the development of transdisciplinary theories and tools that transcend disciplines and inform other's work, capture new levels of complexity, and create new intellectual outcomes and spaces. Researchers are just beginning to use lidar data sets to answer synergistic, transdisciplinary questions in CZ science, such as how CZ processes co-evolve over long timescales and interact over shorter timescales to create thresholds, shifts in states and fluxes of water, energy, and carbon. The objective of this review is to elucidate the transformative potential of lidar for CZ science to simultaneously allow for quantification of topographic, vegetative, and hydrological processes. A review of 147 peer-reviewed lidar studies highlights a lack of lidar applications for CZ studies as 38 % of the studies were focused in geomorphology, 18 % in hydrology, 32 % in ecology, and the remaining 12 % had an interdisciplinary focus. A handful of exemplar transdisciplinary studies demonstrate lidar data sets that are well-integrated with other observations can lead to fundamental advances in CZ science, such as identification of feedbacks between hydrological and ecological processes over hillslope scales and the synergistic co-evolution of landscape-scale CZ structure due to interactions amongst carbon, energy, and water cycles. We propose that using lidar to its full potential will require numerous advances, including new and more powerful open-source processing tools, exploiting new lidar acquisition technologies, and improved integration with physically based models and complementary in situ and remote-sensing observations. We provide a 5-year vision that advocates for the expanded use of lidar data sets and highlights subsequent potential to advance the state of CZ science.The workshop forming the impetus for this paper was funded by the National Science Foundation (EAR 1406031). Additional funding for the workshop and planning was provided to S. W. Lyon by the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT grant no. 2013-5261). A. A. Harpold was supported by an NSF fellowship (EAR 1144894)

    UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE LASER SCANNING FOR EROSION MONITORING IN ALPINE GRASSLAND

    Get PDF
    With this contribution we assess the potential of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) based laser scanning for monitoring shallow erosion in Alpine grassland. A 3D point cloud has been acquired by unmanned aerial vehicle laser scanning (ULS) at a test site in the subalpine/alpine elevation zone of the Dolomites (South Tyrol, Italy). To assess its accuracy, this point cloud is compared with (i) differential global navigation satellite system (GNSS) reference measurements and (ii) a terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) point cloud. The ULS point cloud and an airborne laser scanning (ALS) point cloud are rasterized into digital surface models (DSMs) and, as a proof-of-concept for erosion quantification, we calculate the elevation difference between the ULS DSM from 2018 and the ALS DSM from 2010. For contiguous spatial objects of elevation change, the volumetric difference is calculated and a land cover class (bare earth, grassland, trees), derived from the ULS reflectance and RGB colour, is assigned to each change object. In this test, the accuracy and density of the ALS point cloud is mainly limiting the detection of geomorphological changes. Nevertheless, the plausibility of the results is confirmed by geomorphological interpretation and documentation in the field. A total eroded volume of 672&thinsp;m3 is estimated for the test site (48&thinsp;ha). Such volumetric estimates of erosion over multiple years are a key information for improving sustainable soil management. Based on this proof-of-concept and the accuracy analysis, we conclude that repeated ULS campaigns are a well-suited tool for erosion monitoring in Alpine grassland
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore