Comparative Analysis of Extreme Verification Latency Learning Algorithms

One of the more challenging real-world problems in computational intelligence is to learn from non-stationary streaming data, also known as concept drift. Perhaps even a more challenging version of this scenario is when -- following a small set of initial labeled data -- the data stream consists of unlabeled data only. Such a scenario is typically referred to as learning in initially labeled nonstationary environment, or simply as extreme verification latency (EVL). Because of the very challenging nature of the problem, very few algorithms have been proposed in the literature up to date. This work is a very first effort to provide a review of some of the existing algorithms (important/prominent) in this field to the research community. More specifically, this paper is a comprehensive survey and comparative analysis of some of the EVL algorithms to point out the weaknesses and strengths of different approaches from three different perspectives: classification accuracy, computational complexity and parameter sensitivity using several synthetic and real world datasets

AMANDA : density-based adaptive model for nonstationary data under extreme verification latency scenarios

Gradual concept-drift refers to a smooth and gradual change in the relations between input and output data in the underlying distribution over time. The problem generates a model obsolescence and consequently a quality decrease in predictions. Besides, there is a challenging task during the stream: The extreme verification latency (EVL) to verify the labels. For batch scenarios, state-of-the-art methods propose an adaptation of a supervised model by using an unconstrained least squares importance fitting (uLSIF) algorithm or a semi-supervised approach along with a core support extraction (CSE) method. However, these methods do not properly tackle the mentioned problems due to their high computational time for large data volumes, lack in representing the right samples of the drift or even for having several parameters for tuning. Therefore, we propose a density-based adaptive model for nonstationary data (AMANDA), which uses a semi-supervised classifier along with a CSE method. AMANDA has two variations: AMANDA with a fixed cutting percentage (AMANDA-FCP); and AMANDA with a dynamic cutting percentage (AMANDADCP). Our results indicate that the two variations of AMANDA outperform the state-of-the-art methods for almost all synthetic datasets and real ones with an improvement up to 27.98% regarding the average error. We have found that the use of AMANDA-FCP improved the results for a gradual concept-drift even with a small size of initial labeled data. Moreover, our results indicate that SSL classifiers are improved when they work along with our static or dynamic CSE methods. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of research directions based on this approach.Concept-drift gradual refere-se à mudança suave e gradual na distribuição dos dados conforme o tempo passa. Este problema causa obsolescência no modelo de aprendizado e queda na qualidade das previsões. Além disso, existe um complicador durante o processamento dos dados: a latência de verificação extrema (LVE) para se verificar os rótulos. Métodos do estado da arte propõem uma adaptação do modelo supervisionado usando uma abordagem de estimação de importância baseado em mínimos quadrados ou usando uma abordagem semi-supervisionada em conjunto com a extração de instâncias centrais, na sigla em inglês (CSE). Entretanto, estes métodos não tratam adequadamente os problemas mencionados devido ao fato de requererem alto tempo computacional para processar grandes volumes de dados, falta de correta seleção das instâncias que representam a mudança da distribuição, ou ainda por demandarem o ajuste de grande quantidade de parâmetros. Portanto, propomos um modelo adaptativo baseado em densidades para dados não-estacionários (AMANDA), que tem como base um classificador semi-supervisionado e um método CSE baseado em densidade. AMANDA tem duas variações: percentual de corte fixo (AMANDAFCP); e percentual de corte dinâmico (AMANDA-DCP). Nossos resultados indicam que as duas variações da proposta superam o estado da arte em quase todas as bases de dados sintéticas e reais em até 27,98% em relação ao erro médio. Concluímos que a aplicação do método AMANDA-FCP faz com que a classificação melhore mesmo quando há uma pequena porção inicial de dados rotulados. Mais ainda, os classificadores semi-supervisionados são melhorados quando trabalham em conjunto com nossos métodos de CSE, estático ou dinâmico

Semi-Supervised Learning for Diagnosing Faults in Electromechanical Systems

Safe and reliable operation of the systems relies on the use of online condition monitoring and diagnostic systems that aim to take immediate actions upon the occurrence of a fault. Machine learning techniques are widely used for designing data-driven diagnostic models. The training procedure of a data-driven model usually requires a large amount of labeled data, which may not be always practical. This problem can be untangled by resorting to semi-supervised learning approaches, which enables the decision making procedure using only a few numbers of labeled samples coupled with a large number of unlabeled samples. Thus, it is crucial to conduct a critical study on the use of semi-supervised learning for the purpose of fault diagnosis. Another issue of concern is fault diagnosis in non-stationary environments, where data streams evolve over time, and as a result, model-based and most of the data-driven models are impractical. In this work, this has been addressed by means of an adaptive data-driven diagnostic model

Request-and-Reverify: Hierarchical Hypothesis Testing for Concept Drift Detection with Expensive Labels

One important assumption underlying common classification models is the stationarity of the data. However, in real-world streaming applications, the data concept indicated by the joint distribution of feature and label is not stationary but drifting over time. Concept drift detection aims to detect such drifts and adapt the model so as to mitigate any deterioration in the model's predictive performance. Unfortunately, most existing concept drift detection methods rely on a strong and over-optimistic condition that the true labels are available immediately for all already classified instances. In this paper, a novel Hierarchical Hypothesis Testing framework with Request-and-Reverify strategy is developed to detect concept drifts by requesting labels only when necessary. Two methods, namely Hierarchical Hypothesis Testing with Classification Uncertainty (HHT-CU) and Hierarchical Hypothesis Testing with Attribute-wise "Goodness-of-fit" (HHT-AG), are proposed respectively under the novel framework. In experiments with benchmark datasets, our methods demonstrate overwhelming advantages over state-of-the-art unsupervised drift detectors. More importantly, our methods even outperform DDM (the widely used supervised drift detector) when we use significantly fewer labels.Comment: Published as a conference paper at IJCAI 201

Online semi-supervised learning in non-stationary environments

Existing Data Stream Mining (DSM) algorithms assume the availability of labelled and balanced data, immediately or after some delay, to extract worthwhile knowledge from the continuous and rapid data streams. However, in many real-world applications such as Robotics, Weather Monitoring, Fraud Detection Systems, Cyber Security, and Computer Network Traffic Flow, an enormous amount of high-speed data is generated by Internet of Things sensors and real-time data on the Internet. Manual labelling of these data streams is not practical due to time consumption and the need for domain expertise. Another challenge is learning under Non-Stationary Environments (NSEs), which occurs due to changes in the data distributions in a set of input variables and/or class labels. The problem of Extreme Verification Latency (EVL) under NSEs is referred to as Initially Labelled Non-Stationary Environment (ILNSE). This is a challenging task because the learning algorithms have no access to the true class labels directly when the concept evolves. Several approaches exist that deal with NSE and EVL in isolation. However, few algorithms address both issues simultaneously. This research directly responds to ILNSE’s challenge in proposing two novel algorithms “Predictor for Streaming Data with Scarce Labels” (PSDSL) and Heterogeneous Dynamic Weighted Majority (HDWM) classifier. PSDSL is an Online Semi-Supervised Learning (OSSL) method for real-time DSM and is closely related to label scarcity issues in online machine learning. The key capabilities of PSDSL include learning from a small amount of labelled data in an incremental or online manner and being available to predict at any time. To achieve this, PSDSL utilises both labelled and unlabelled data to train the prediction models, meaning it continuously learns from incoming data and updates the model as new labelled or unlabelled data becomes available over time. Furthermore, it can predict under NSE conditions under the scarcity of class labels. PSDSL is built on top of the HDWM classifier, which preserves the diversity of the classifiers. PSDSL and HDWM can intelligently switch and adapt to the conditions. The PSDSL adapts to learning states between self-learning, micro-clustering and CGC, whichever approach is beneficial, based on the characteristics of the data stream. HDWM makes use of “seed” learners of different types in an ensemble to maintain its diversity. The ensembles are simply the combination of predictive models grouped to improve the predictive performance of a single classifier. PSDSL is empirically evaluated against COMPOSE, LEVELIW, SCARGC and MClassification on benchmarks, NSE datasets as well as Massive Online Analysis (MOA) data streams and real-world datasets. The results showed that PSDSL performed significantly better than existing approaches on most real-time data streams including randomised data instances. PSDSL performed significantly better than ‘Static’ i.e. the classifier is not updated after it is trained with the first examples in the data streams. When applied to MOA-generated data streams, PSDSL ranked highest (1.5) and thus performed significantly better than SCARGC, while SCARGC performed the same as the Static. PSDSL achieved better average prediction accuracies in a short time than SCARGC. The HDWM algorithm is evaluated on artificial and real-world data streams against existing well-known approaches such as the heterogeneous WMA and the homogeneous Dynamic DWM algorithm. The results showed that HDWM performed significantly better than WMA and DWM. Also, when recurring concept drifts were present, the predictive performance of HDWM showed an improvement over DWM. In both drift and real-world streams, significance tests and post hoc comparisons found significant differences between algorithms, HDWM performed significantly better than DWM and WMA when applied to MOA data streams and 4 real-world datasets Electric, Spam, Sensor and Forest cover. The seeding mechanism and dynamic inclusion of new base learners in the HDWM algorithms benefit from the use of both forgetting and retaining the models. The algorithm also provides the independence of selecting the optimal base classifier in its ensemble depending on the problem. A new approach, Envelope-Clustering is introduced to resolve the cluster overlap conflicts during the cluster labelling process. In this process, PSDSL transforms the centroids’ information of micro-clusters into micro-instances and generates new clusters called Envelopes. The nearest envelope clusters assist the conflicted micro-clusters and successfully guide the cluster labelling process after the concept drifts in the absence of true class labels. PSDSL has been evaluated on real-world problem ‘keystroke dynamics’, and the results show that PSDSL achieved higher prediction accuracy (85.3%) and SCARGC (81.6%), while the Static (49.0%) significantly degrades the performance due to changes in the users typing pattern. Furthermore, the predictive accuracies of SCARGC are found highly fluctuated between (41.1% to 81.6%) based on different values of parameter ‘k’ (number of clusters), while PSDSL automatically determine the best values for this parameter