Validity of a Quantitative Clinical Measurement Tool of Trunk Posture in Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN: Concurrent validity between postural indices obtained from digital photographs (two-dimensional [2D]), surface topography imaging (three-dimensional [3D]), and radiographs. OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of a quantitative clinical postural assessment tool of the trunk based on photographs (2D) as compared to a surface topography system (3D) as well as indices calculated from radiographs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To monitor progression of scoliosis or change in posture over time in young persons with idiopathic scoliosis (IS), noninvasive and nonionizing methods are recommended. In a clinical setting, posture can be quite easily assessed by calculating key postural indices from photographs. METHODS: Quantitative postural indices of 70 subjects aged 10 to 20 years old with IS (Cobb angle, 15 degrees -60 degrees) were measured from photographs and from 3D trunk surface images taken in the standing position. Shoulder, scapula, trunk list, pelvis, scoliosis, and waist angles indices were calculated with specially designed software. Frontal and sagittal Cobb angles and trunk list were also calculated on radiographs. The Pearson correlation coefficients (r) was used to estimate concurrent validity of the 2D clinical postural tool of the trunk with indices extracted from the 3D system and with those obtained from radiographs. RESULTS: The correlation between 2D and 3D indices was good to excellent for shoulder, pelvis, trunk list, and thoracic scoliosis (0.81>rr<0.56; P<0.05). The correlation between 2D and radiograph spinal indices was fair to good (-0.33 to -0.80 with Cobb angles and 0.76 for trunk list; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: This tool will facilitate clinical practice by monitoring trunk posture among persons with IS. Further, it may contribute to a reduction in the use of radiographs to monitor scoliosis progression.CIHR / IRS

Clinical methods for quantifying body segment posture: a literature review

Purpose. Clinicians commonly assess posture in persons with musculoskeletal disorders and tend to do so subjectively. Evidence-based practice requires the use of valid, reliable and sensitive tools to monitor treatment effectiveness. The purpose of this article was to determine which methods were used to assess posture quantitatively in a clinical setting and to identify psychometric properties of posture indices measured from these methods or tools. Methods. We conducted a comprehensive literature review. Pertinent databases were used to search for articles on quantitative clinical assessment of posture. Searching keywords were related to posture and assessment, scoliosis, back pain, reliability, validity and different body segments. Results. We identified 65 articles with angle and distance posture indices that corresponded to our search criteria. Several studies showed good intra- and inter-rater reliability for measurements taken directly on the persons (e.g., goniometer, inclinometer, flexible curve and tape measurement) or from photographs, but the validity of these measurements was not always demonstrated. Conclusion. Taking measurements of all body angles directly on the person is a lengthy process and may affect the reliability of the measurements. Measurement of body angles from photographs may be the most accurate and rapid way to assess global posture quantitatively in a clinical setting.CIHR / IRS

Reliability of a quantitative clinical posture assessment tool among persons with idiopathic scoliosis

Objective To determine overall, test–retest and inter-rater reliability of posture indices among persons with idiopathic scoliosis. Design A reliability study using two raters and two test sessions. Setting Tertiary care paediatric centre. Participants Seventy participants aged between 10 and 20 years with different types of idiopathic scoliosis (Cobb angle 15 to 60°) were recruited from the scoliosis clinic. Main outcome measures Based on the XY co-ordinates of natural reference points (e.g. eyes) as well as markers placed on several anatomical landmarks, 32 angular and linear posture indices taken from digital photographs in the standing position were calculated from a specially developed software program. Generalisability theory served to estimate the reliability and standard error of measurement (SEM) for the overall, test–retest and inter-rater designs. Bland and Altman's method was also used to document agreement between sessions and raters. Results In the random design, dependability coefficients demonstrated a moderate level of reliability for six posture indices (ϕ = 0.51 to 0.72) and a good level of reliability for 26 posture indices out of 32 (ϕ ≥ 0.79). Error attributable to marker placement was negligible for most indices. Limits of agreement and SEM values were larger for shoulder protraction, trunk list, Q angle, cervical lordosis and scoliosis angles. The most reproducible indices were waist angles and knee valgus and varus. Conclusions Posture can be assessed in a global fashion from photographs in persons with idiopathic scoliosis. Despite the good reliability of marker placement, other studies are needed to minimise measurement errors in order to provide a suitable tool for monitoring change in posture over time.CIHR / IRS

Posturalna adaptacija idiopatskih adolescentnih skolioza (ias)

Idiopathic adolescent scoliosis (IAS) is a pathologic postural adaptation in 65% of cases of scolioses. The causes of this condition are determined or suggested by a series of scientific studies and clinical experience. The results of the studies imply the correlation of IAS, the pathologic movement pattern and the pathologic postural adaptation which is governed by the central nervous system’s mode of function. The pattern of pathologic postural adaptation has been confirmed by different methods and procedures: a physiological analysis of the soft tissues and of the specific functioning of organs’ systems, a biomechanical analysis of the muscles and joints, an analysis of mobility and the degree of motor function of body segments as well as of the whole body and also by the clinical experience gained from surgical and treatment procedures on children with IAS.Idiopatska adolescentna skolioza patološka je posturalna adaptacija u 65% slučajeva između ostalih skolioza. Uzroci nastanka utvrđeni su ili se pretpostavljaju kroz niz znanstvenih istraživanja i klinička iskustva. Istraživanja ukazuju na povezanost IAS s patološkim obrascem pokretanja i patološkom posturalnom adaptacijom koju uvjetuje način funkcioniranja središnjeg živčanog sustava. Obrazac patološke posturalne adaptacije potvrđen je iz više kutova; fiziološkom analizom mekih tkiva i specifičnosti funkcioniranja organskih sustava, biomehaničkom analizom muskulature i zglobnih sustava, analizom pokretljivosti i stupnja motoričke funkcije segmenata tijela i cijelog tijela te kliničkim iskustvom tijekom operativnih zahvata i terapijskih postupaka kod djece s IAS

Développement et validation d’un outil clinique pour l’analyse quantitative de la posture auprès de personnes atteintes d’une scoliose idiopathique

La scoliose idiopathique (SI) est une déformation tridimensionnelle (3D) de la colonne vertébrale et de la cage thoracique à potentiel évolutif pendant la croissance. Cette déformation 3D entraîne des asymétries de la posture. La correction de la posture est un des objectifs du traitement en physiothérapie chez les jeunes atteints d’une SI afin d’éviter la progression de la scoliose, de réduire les déformations morphologiques et leurs impacts sur la qualité de vie. Les outils cliniques actuels ne permettent pas de quantifier globalement les changements de la posture attribuables à la progression de la scoliose ou à l’efficacité des interventions thérapeutiques. L’objectif de cette thèse consiste donc au développement et à la validation d’un nouvel outil clinique permettant l’analyse quantitative de la posture auprès de personnes atteintes d’une SI. Ce projet vise plus spécifiquement à déterminer la fidélité et la validité des indices de posture (IP) de ce nouvel outil clinique et à vérifier leur capacité à détecter des changements entre les positions debout et assise. Suite à une recension de la littérature, 34 IP représentant l’alignement frontal et sagittal des différents segments corporels ont été sélectionnés. L’outil quantitatif clinique d’évaluation de la posture (outil 2D) construit dans ce projet consiste en un logiciel qui permet de calculer les différents IP (mesures angulaires et linéaires). L’interface graphique de cet outil est conviviale et permet de sélectionner interactivement des marqueurs sur les photographies digitales. Afin de vérifier la fidélité et la validité des IP de cet outil, la posture debout de 70 participants âgés entre 10 et 20 ans atteints d'une SI (angle de Cobb: 15º à 60º) a été évaluée à deux occasions par deux physiothérapeutes. Des marqueurs placés sur plusieurs repères anatomiques, ainsi que des points de référence anatomique (yeux, lobes des oreilles, etc.), ont permis de mesurer les IP 2D en utilisant des photographies. Ces mêmes marqueurs et points de référence ont également servi au calcul d’IP 3D obtenus par des reconstructions du tronc avec un système de topographie de surface. Les angles de Cobb frontaux et sagittaux et le déjettement C7-S1 ont été mesurés sur des radiographies. La théorie de la généralisabilité a été utilisée pour déterminer la fidélité et l’erreur standard de la mesure (ESM) des IP de l’outil 2D. Des coefficients de Pearson ont servi à déterminer la validité concomitante des IP du tronc de l’outil 2D avec les IP 3D et les mesures radiographiques correspondantes. Cinquante participants ont été également évalués en position assise « membres inférieurs allongés » pour l’étude comparative de la posture debout et assise. Des tests de t pour échantillons appariés ont été utilisés pour détecter les différences entre les positions debout et assise. Nos résultats indiquent un bon niveau de fidélité pour la majorité des IP de l’outil 2D. La corrélation entre les IP 2D et 3D est bonne pour les épaules, les omoplates, le déjettement C7-S1, les angles de taille, la scoliose thoracique et le bassin. Elle est faible à modérée pour la cyphose thoracique, la lordose lombaire et la scoliose thoraco-lombaire ou lombaire. La corrélation entre les IP 2D et les mesures radiographiques est bonne pour le déjettement C7-S1, la scoliose et la cyphose thoracique. L’outil est suffisamment discriminant pour détecter des différences entre la posture debout et assise pour dix des treize IP. Certaines recommandations spécifiques résultents de ce projet : la hauteur de la caméra devrait être ajustée en fonction de la taille des personnes; la formation des juges est importante pour maximiser la précision de la pose des marqueurs; et des marqueurs montés sur des tiges devraient faciliter l’évaluation des courbures vertébrales sagittales. En conclusion, l’outil développé dans le cadre de cette thèse possède de bonnes propriétés psychométriques et permet une évaluation globale de la posture. Cet outil devrait contribuer à l’amélioration de la pratique clinique en facilitant l’analyse de la posture debout et assise. Cet outil s’avère une alternative clinique pour suivre l’évolution de la scoliose thoracique et diminuer la fréquence des radiographies au cours du suivi de jeunes atteints d’une SI thoracique. Cet outil pourrait aussi être utile pour vérifier l’efficacité des interventions thérapeutiques sur la posture.Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is characterized by three-dimensional (3D) deformity of the spine and rib cage which can increase during growth. The morphologic changes of the trunk result in posture asymmetries. Correction of posture is an important goal of physiotherapy interventions among persons with IS to prevent scoliosis progression, to reduce morphologic deformities and their impact on quality of life. Currently, there are no tools that globally quantify changes in posture that may be attributable to scoliosis progression or to treatment effectiveness, that are usable in a clinical setting. The objective of this thesis was thus to develop and validate a new clinical quantitative posture assessment tool among persons with IS. More specifically, this project aims to determine reliability and concurrent validity of posture indices (PI) of this new tool and to verify their capacity to detect changes between standing and sitting positions. We conducted a literature review and selected 34 PI representing frontal and sagittal alignment of the different body segments. We constructed a software-based quantitative posture assessment tool to calculate different PI (angular and linear measurements). The software has a user-friendly graphical interface and allows calculation of PI from a set of markers selected interactively on digital photographs. For the reliability and validity studies, standing posture of 70 participants aged 10 to 20 years old with IS (Cobb angle: 15º to 60º) was assessed on two occasions by two physiotherapists. Markers placed on several bony landmarks as well as natural reference points (eyes, ear lobe, etc.) were used to measure the PI from photographs with the 2D tool and to calculate 3D PI obtained from trunk reconstructions with a surface topography system. Frontal and sagittal Cobb angles and trunk list were also calculated on radiographs. The generalizability theory was used to estimate the reliability and standard error of measurement (SEM) of PI of the 2D tool. Pearson correlation coefficients served to estimate concurrent validity of the 2D trunk PI with corresponding 3D PI and with those obtained from radiographs. Fifty participants were assessed for the comparative study between standing and sitting positions. We compared the average values of each PI in standing and long sitting positions using paired t-tests. Our results show a good level of reliability for the majority of PI of the 2D tool. Correlation between 2D and 3D PI was good for shoulder, scapula, trunk list, waist angles, thoracic scoliosis and pelvis but fair to moderate for thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and thoracolumbar or lumbar scoliosis. The correlation between 2D and radiograph measurements was good for trunk list, thoracic scoliosis and thoracic kyphosis. Our tool can detect differences between standing and sitting posture for ten out of thirteen PI. A few recommendations specific to this work are: camera height should be adjusted according to the subject’s height; training of judges is important to maximize accuracy in placement of markers; and measurement of sagittal vertebral curves may be facilitated by using markers mounted on pins. In conclusion, the tool developed in this thesis has good psychometric properties to evaluate posture. This tool should contribute to clinical practice by facilitating the analysis of standing and sitting posture. This tool may also be a good alternative to monitor thoracic scoliosis progression in a clinical setting and may contribute to a reduction in the use of x-rays in the follow-up of youths with thoracic IS. It may also be useful to verify the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions on posture

The Effectiveness of Physical Therapy Intervention Modeled After the Scroth Method and Fits Concept for Treatment of Radicular Symptoms Secondary to Mild Scoliosis in a 16-year old Female.

Background and Purpose. Physical therapy as an intervention for scoliosis typically involves a method-based scoliosis specific approach to treatment that requires extensive training such as the Schroth method or FITS concept. The purpose of this study is to determine if physical therapy treatment alone, when modeled after the Schroth method and FITS concept can be an effective treatment method for lumbar radiculopathy and pain secondary to mild scoliosis. Case Description. The patient featured in this case report is a 16-year-old female with a medical diagnosis of scoliosis and fibro-lipoma on her filum terminal. The patient had a Cobb angle of 17 degrees and experienced lower extremity radicular symptoms. Intervention. Intervention included therapeutic exercise to strengthen abdominal and gluteal musculature, stretching of trunk musculature, neuromuscular reeducation to promote postural alignment and education on scoliosis, vertebral anatomy, postural positioning, and safe lifting techniques. Outcomes. Outcomes were assessed using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), side bend range of motion of the trunk and strength of trunk flexion, trunk rotation, hip abduction and hip flexion. At discharge, the LEFS score improved from 67/80 to 80/80. Side bend range of motion was within 0.5cm bilaterally. Trunk flexion, trunk rotation, hip flexion and hip abduction all measured 5/5 strength. Discussion. The results of this study suggest that physical therapy treatment when modeled after concepts from the Schroth method, FITS concept are an effective intervention for the 16-year-old female featured in this case study

Spinal posture assessment and low back pain

Postural assessment can help doctors and therapists identify risk factors for low back pain and determine appropriate follow-up treatment. Postural alignment is not perfectly symmetrical, and small asymmetries can instead represent norms and criteria for postural evaluation. It is necessary to comprehensively observe patients’ posture in all directions and analyze the factors related to posture evaluation. The results of reliability show that in general intra-rater reliability is higher than inter-rater reliability, and inclinometers are being more reliable than other instrumentations. Some common postural problems can cause lumbar discomfort, and prolonged poor posture is a potential risk factor for lumbar spine injuries. On the basis of previous studies on posture evaluation, a unified standardized method for posture evaluation must be established in future research