13 research outputs found
Refinement of solutions to the linear complimentarity problem
Nash equilibrium;game theaory;matrices
Unsupervised Domain Adaptation using Graph Transduction Games
Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) amounts to assigning class labels to the
unlabeled instances of a dataset from a target domain, using labeled instances
of a dataset from a related source domain. In this paper, we propose to cast
this problem in a game-theoretic setting as a non-cooperative game and
introduce a fully automatized iterative algorithm for UDA based on graph
transduction games (GTG). The main advantages of this approach are its
principled foundation, guaranteed termination of the iterative algorithms to a
Nash equilibrium (which corresponds to a consistent labeling condition) and
soft labels quantifying the uncertainty of the label assignment process. We
also investigate the beneficial effect of using pseudo-labels from linear
classifiers to initialize the iterative process. The performance of the
resulting methods is assessed on publicly available object recognition
benchmark datasets involving both shallow and deep features. Results of
experiments demonstrate the suitability of the proposed game-theoretic approach
for solving UDA tasks.Comment: Oral IJCNN 201
Ancient Coin Classification Using Graph Transduction Games
Recognizing the type of an ancient coin requires theoretical expertise and
years of experience in the field of numismatics. Our goal in this work is
automatizing this time consuming and demanding task by a visual classification
framework. Specifically, we propose to model ancient coin image classification
using Graph Transduction Games (GTG). GTG casts the classification problem as a
non-cooperative game where the players (the coin images) decide their
strategies (class labels) according to the choices made by the others, which
results with a global consensus at the final labeling. Experiments are
conducted on the only publicly available dataset which is composed of 180
images of 60 types of Roman coins. We demonstrate that our approach outperforms
the literature work on the same dataset with the classification accuracy of
73.6% and 87.3% when there are one and two images per class in the training
set, respectively
Constrained Pure Nash Equilibria in Polymatrix Games
We study the problem of checking for the existence of constrained pure Nash
equilibria in a subclass of polymatrix games defined on weighted directed
graphs. The payoff of a player is defined as the sum of nonnegative rational
weights on incoming edges from players who picked the same strategy augmented
by a fixed integer bonus for picking a given strategy. These games capture the
idea of coordination within a local neighbourhood in the absence of globally
common strategies. We study the decision problem of checking whether a given
set of strategy choices for a subset of the players is consistent with some
pure Nash equilibrium or, alternatively, with all pure Nash equilibria. We
identify the most natural tractable cases and show NP or coNP-completness of
these problems already for unweighted DAGs.Comment: Extended version of a paper accepted to AAAI1
An Empirical Study on Computation of Exact and Approximate Equilibria
The computation of Nash equilibria is one of the central topics in game theory, which has received much attention from a theoretical point of view. Studies have shown that the problem of finding a Nash equilibrium is PPAD-complete, which implies that we are unlikely to find a polynomial-time algorithm for this problem. Naturally, this has led to a line of work studying the complexity of finding approximate Nash equilibria. This thesis examines the computation of such approximate Nash equilibria within several classes of games from an empirical perspective. In this thesis, we address the computation of approximate Nash equilibria in bimatrix and polymatrix games. For both of these game classes, we provide a library of implementations of algorithms for the computation of exact and approximate Nash equilibria, as well as a suite of game generators which were used as a base for our empirical analysis of the algorithms. We investigate the trade-off between quality of approximation produced by the algorithms and the expected runtime. We provide some insight into the inner workings of the state-of-the-art algorithm for computing ε-Nash equilibria, presenting worst-case examples found for our provided suite of game generators. We then show lower bounds on these algorithms. In the case of polymatrix games, we generate this lower bound from a real-world application of game theory. For bimatrix games, we provide a robust means of generating lower bounds for approximation algorithms with the use of genetic algorithms