CAPT를 위한 발음 변이 분석 및 CycleGAN 기반 피드백 생성

학위논문(박사)--서울대학교 대학원 :인문대학 협동과정 인지과학전공,2020. 2. 정민화.Despite the growing popularity in learning Korean as a foreign language and the rapid development in language learning applications, the existing computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) systems in Korean do not utilize linguistic characteristics of non-native Korean speech. Pronunciation variations in non-native speech are far more diverse than those observed in native speech, which may pose a difficulty in combining such knowledge in an automatic system. Moreover, most of the existing methods rely on feature extraction results from signal processing, prosodic analysis, and natural language processing techniques. Such methods entail limitations since they necessarily depend on finding the right features for the task and the extraction accuracies. This thesis presents a new approach for corrective feedback generation in a CAPT system, in which pronunciation variation patterns and linguistic correlates with accentedness are analyzed and combined with a deep neural network approach, so that feature engineering efforts are minimized while maintaining the linguistically important factors for the corrective feedback generation task. Investigations on non-native Korean speech characteristics in contrast with those of native speakers, and their correlation with accentedness judgement show that both segmental and prosodic variations are important factors in a Korean CAPT system. The present thesis argues that the feedback generation task can be interpreted as a style transfer problem, and proposes to evaluate the idea using generative adversarial network. A corrective feedback generation model is trained on 65,100 read utterances by 217 non-native speakers of 27 mother tongue backgrounds. The features are automatically learnt in an unsupervised way in an auxiliary classifier CycleGAN setting, in which the generator learns to map a foreign accented speech to native speech distributions. In order to inject linguistic knowledge into the network, an auxiliary classifier is trained so that the feedback also identifies the linguistic error types that were defined in the first half of the thesis. The proposed approach generates a corrected version the speech using the learners own voice, outperforming the conventional Pitch-Synchronous Overlap-and-Add method.외국어로서의 한국어 교육에 대한 관심이 고조되어 한국어 학습자의 수가 크게 증가하고 있으며, 음성언어처리 기술을 적용한 컴퓨터 기반 발음 교육(Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Training; CAPT) 어플리케이션에 대한 연구 또한 적극적으로 이루어지고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 현존하는 한국어 말하기 교육 시스템은 외국인의 한국어에 대한 언어학적 특징을 충분히 활용하지 않고 있으며, 최신 언어처리 기술 또한 적용되지 않고 있는 실정이다. 가능한 원인으로써는 외국인 발화 한국어 현상에 대한 분석이 충분하게 이루어지지 않았다는 점, 그리고 관련 연구가 있어도 이를 자동화된 시스템에 반영하기에는 고도화된 연구가 필요하다는 점이 있다. 뿐만 아니라 CAPT 기술 전반적으로는 신호처리, 운율 분석, 자연어처리 기법과 같은 특징 추출에 의존하고 있어서 적합한 특징을 찾고 이를 정확하게 추출하는 데에 많은 시간과 노력이 필요한 실정이다. 이는 최신 딥러닝 기반 언어처리 기술을 활용함으로써 이 과정 또한 발전의 여지가 많다는 바를 시사한다. 따라서 본 연구는 먼저 CAPT 시스템 개발에 있어 발음 변이 양상과 언어학적 상관관계를 분석하였다. 외국인 화자들의 낭독체 변이 양상과 한국어 원어민 화자들의 낭독체 변이 양상을 대조하고 주요한 변이를 확인한 후, 상관관계 분석을 통하여 의사소통에 영향을 미치는 중요도를 파악하였다. 그 결과, 종성 삭제와 3중 대립의 혼동, 초분절 관련 오류가 발생할 경우 피드백 생성에 우선적으로 반영하는 것이 필요하다는 것이 확인되었다. 교정된 피드백을 자동으로 생성하는 것은 CAPT 시스템의 중요한 과제 중 하나이다. 본 연구는 이 과제가 발화의 스타일 변화의 문제로 해석이 가능하다고 보았으며, 생성적 적대 신경망 (Cycle-consistent Generative Adversarial Network; CycleGAN) 구조에서 모델링하는 것을 제안하였다. GAN 네트워크의 생성모델은 비원어민 발화의 분포와 원어민 발화 분포의 매핑을 학습하며, Cycle consistency 손실함수를 사용함으로써 발화간 전반적인 구조를 유지함과 동시에 과도한 교정을 방지하였다. 별도의 특징 추출 과정이 없이 필요한 특징들이 CycleGAN 프레임워크에서 무감독 방법으로 스스로 학습되는 방법으로, 언어 확장이 용이한 방법이다. 언어학적 분석에서 드러난 주요한 변이들 간의 우선순위는 Auxiliary Classifier CycleGAN 구조에서 모델링하는 것을 제안하였다. 이 방법은 기존의 CycleGAN에 지식을 접목시켜 피드백 음성을 생성함과 동시에 해당 피드백이 어떤 유형의 오류인지 분류하는 문제를 수행한다. 이는 도메인 지식이 교정 피드백 생성 단계까지 유지되고 통제가 가능하다는 장점이 있다는 데에 그 의의가 있다. 본 연구에서 제안한 방법을 평가하기 위해서 27개의 모국어를 갖는 217명의 유의미 어휘 발화 65,100개로 피드백 자동 생성 모델을 훈련하고, 개선 여부 및 정도에 대한 지각 평가를 수행하였다. 제안된 방법을 사용하였을 때 학습자 본인의 목소리를 유지한 채 교정된 발음으로 변환하는 것이 가능하며, 전통적인 방법인 음높이 동기식 중첩가산 (Pitch-Synchronous Overlap-and-Add) 알고리즘을 사용하는 방법에 비해 상대 개선률 16.67%이 확인되었다.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Motivation 1 1.1.1. An Overview of CAPT Systems 3 1.1.2. Survey of existing Korean CAPT Systems 5 1.2. Problem Statement 7 1.3. Thesis Structure 7 Chapter 2. Pronunciation Analysis of Korean Produced by Chinese 9 2.1. Comparison between Korean and Chinese 11 2.1.1. Phonetic and Syllable Structure Comparisons 11 2.1.2. Phonological Comparisons 14 2.2. Related Works 16 2.3. Proposed Analysis Method 19 2.3.1. Corpus 19 2.3.2. Transcribers and Agreement Rates 22 2.4. Salient Pronunciation Variations 22 2.4.1. Segmental Variation Patterns 22 2.4.1.1. Discussions 25 2.4.2. Phonological Variation Patterns 26 2.4.1.2. Discussions 27 2.5. Summary 29 Chapter 3. Correlation Analysis of Pronunciation Variations and Human Evaluation 30 3.1. Related Works 31 3.1.1. Criteria used in L2 Speech 31 3.1.2. Criteria used in L2 Korean Speech 32 3.2. Proposed Human Evaluation Method 36 3.2.1. Reading Prompt Design 36 3.2.2. Evaluation Criteria Design 37 3.2.3. Raters and Agreement Rates 40 3.3. Linguistic Factors Affecting L2 Korean Accentedness 41 3.3.1. Pearsons Correlation Analysis 41 3.3.2. Discussions 42 3.3.3. Implications for Automatic Feedback Generation 44 3.4. Summary 45 Chapter 4. Corrective Feedback Generation for CAPT 46 4.1. Related Works 46 4.1.1. Prosody Transplantation 47 4.1.2. Recent Speech Conversion Methods 49 4.1.3. Evaluation of Corrective Feedback 50 4.2. Proposed Method: Corrective Feedback as a Style Transfer 51 4.2.1. Speech Analysis at Spectral Domain 53 4.2.2. Self-imitative Learning 55 4.2.3. An Analogy: CAPT System and GAN Architecture 57 4.3. Generative Adversarial Networks 59 4.3.1. Conditional GAN 61 4.3.2. CycleGAN 62 4.4. Experiment 63 4.4.1. Corpus 64 4.4.2. Baseline Implementation 65 4.4.3. Adversarial Training Implementation 65 4.4.4. Spectrogram-to-Spectrogram Training 66 4.5. Results and Evaluation 69 4.5.1. Spectrogram Generation Results 69 4.5.2. Perceptual Evaluation 70 4.5.3. Discussions 72 4.6. Summary 74 Chapter 5. Integration of Linguistic Knowledge in an Auxiliary Classifier CycleGAN for Feedback Generation 75 5.1. Linguistic Class Selection 75 5.2. Auxiliary Classifier CycleGAN Design 77 5.3. Experiment and Results 80 5.3.1. Corpus 80 5.3.2. Feature Annotations 81 5.3.3. Experiment Setup 81 5.3.4. Results 82 5.4. Summary 84 Chapter 6. Conclusion 86 6.1. Thesis Results 86 6.2. Thesis Contributions 88 6.3. Recommendations for Future Work 89 Bibliography 91 Appendix 107 Abstract in Korean 117 Acknowledgments 120Docto

Automatic Pronunciation Assessment -- A Review

Pronunciation assessment and its application in computer-aided pronunciation training (CAPT) have seen impressive progress in recent years. With the rapid growth in language processing and deep learning over the past few years, there is a need for an updated review. In this paper, we review methods employed in pronunciation assessment for both phonemic and prosodic. We categorize the main challenges observed in prominent research trends, and highlight existing limitations, and available resources. This is followed by a discussion of the remaining challenges and possible directions for future work.Comment: 9 pages, accepted to EMNLP Finding

Deep Learning for Automatic Assessment and Feedback of Spoken English

Growing global demand for learning a second language (L2), particularly English, has led to considerable interest in automatic spoken language assessment, whether for use in computerassisted language learning (CALL) tools or for grading candidates for formal qualifications. This thesis presents research conducted into the automatic assessment of spontaneous nonnative English speech, with a view to be able to provide meaningful feedback to learners. One of the challenges in automatic spoken language assessment is giving candidates feedback on particular aspects, or views, of their spoken language proficiency, in addition to the overall holistic score normally provided. Another is detecting pronunciation and other types of errors at the word or utterance level and feeding them back to the learner in a useful way. It is usually difficult to obtain accurate training data with separate scores for different views and, as examiners are often trained to give holistic grades, single-view scores can suffer issues of consistency. Conversely, holistic scores are available for various standard assessment tasks such as Linguaskill. An investigation is thus conducted into whether assessment scores linked to particular views of the speaker’s ability can be obtained from systems trained using only holistic scores. End-to-end neural systems are designed with structures and forms of input tuned to single views, specifically each of pronunciation, rhythm, intonation and text. By training each system on large quantities of candidate data, individual-view information should be possible to extract. The relationships between the predictions of each system are evaluated to examine whether they are, in fact, extracting different information about the speaker. Three methods of combining the systems to predict holistic score are investigated, namely averaging their predictions and concatenating and attending over their intermediate representations. The combined graders are compared to each other and to baseline approaches. The tasks of error detection and error tendency diagnosis become particularly challenging when the speech in question is spontaneous and particularly given the challenges posed by the inconsistency of human annotation of pronunciation errors. An approach to these tasks is presented by distinguishing between lexical errors, wherein the speaker does not know how a particular word is pronounced, and accent errors, wherein the candidate’s speech exhibits consistent patterns of phone substitution, deletion and insertion. Three annotated corpora x of non-native English speech by speakers of multiple L1s are analysed, the consistency of human annotation investigated and a method presented for detecting individual accent and lexical errors and diagnosing accent error tendencies at the speaker level

Essential Speech and Language Technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN-programme

Computational Linguistics; Germanic Languages; Artificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics); Computing Methodologie

The Lexicon Graph Model : a generic model for multimodal lexicon development

Trippel T. The Lexicon Graph Model : a generic model for multimodal lexicon development. Bielefeld (Germany): Bielefeld University; 2006.Das Lexicon Graph Model stellt ein Modell für Lexika dar, die korpusbasiert sein können und multimodale Informationen enthalten. Hierbei wird die Perspektive der Lexikontheorie eingenommen, wobei die zugrundeliegenden Datenstrukturen sowohl vom Lexikon als auch von Annotationen betrachtet werden. Letztere fallen dadurch in das Blickfeld, weil sie als Grundlage für die Erstellung von Lexika gesehen werden. Der Begriff des Lexikons bezieht sich hier sowohl auf den Bereich des Wörterbuchs als auch der in elektronischen Applikationen integrierten Lexikondatenbanken. Die existierenden Formalismen und Ansätze der Lexikonentwicklung zeigen verschiedene Probleme im Zusammenhang mit Lexika auf, etwa die Zusammenfassung von existierenden Lexika zu einem, die Disambiguierung von Mehrdeutigkeiten im Lexikon auf verschiedenen lexikalischen Ebenen, die Repräsentation von anderen Modalitäten im Lexikon, die Selektion des lexikalischen Schlüsselbegriffs für Lexikonartikel, etc. Der vorliegende Ansatz geht davon aus, dass sich Lexika zwar in ihrem Inhalt, nicht aber in einer grundlegenden Struktur unterscheiden, so dass verschiedenartige Lexika im Rahmen eines Unifikationsprozesses dublettenfrei miteinander verbunden werden können. Hieraus resultieren deklarative Lexika. Für Lexika können diese Graphen mit dem Lexikongraph-Modell wie hier dargestellt modelliert werden. Dabei sind Lexikongraphen analog den von Bird und Libermann beschriebenen Annotationsgraphen gesehen und können daher auch ähnlich verarbeitet werden. Die Untersuchung des Lexikonformalismus beruht auf vier Schritten. Zunächst werden existierende Lexika analysiert und beschrieben. Danach wird mit dem Lexikongraph-Modell eine generische Darstellung von Lexika vorgestellt, die auch implementiert und getestet wird. Basierend auf diesem Formalismus wird die Beziehung zu Annotationsgraphen hergestellt, wobei auch beschrieben wird, welche Maßstäbe an angemessene Annotationen für die Verwendung zur Lexikonentwicklung angelegt werden müssen.The Lexicon Graph Model provides a model and framework for lexicons that can be corpus based and contain multimodal information. The focus is more from the lexicon theory perspective, looking at the underlying data structures that are part of existing lexicons and corpora. The term lexicon in linguistics and artificial intelligence is used in different ways, including traditional print dictionaries in book form, CD-ROM editions, Web based versions of the same, but also computerized resources of similar structures to be used by applications. These applications cover systems for human-machine communication as well as spell checkers. The term lexicon in this work is used as the most generic term covering all lexical applications. Existing formalisms in lexicon development show different problems with lexicons, for example combining different kinds of lexical resources, disambiguation on different lexical levels, the representation of different modalities in a lexicon. The Lexicon Graph Model presupposes that lexicons can have different structures but have fundamentally a similar structure, making it possible to combine lexicons in a unification process, resulting in a declarative lexicon. The underlying model is a graph, the Lexicon Graph, which is modeled similar to Annotation Graphs as described by Bird and Libermann. The investigation of the lexicon formalism contains four steps, that is the analysis of existing lexicons, the introduction of the Lexicon Graph Model as a generic representation for lexicons, the implementation of the formalism in different contexts and an evaluation of the formalism. It is shown that Annotation Graphs and Lexicon Graphs are indeed related not only in their formalism and it is shown, what standards have to be applied to annotations to be usable for lexicon development

Spoken content retrieval: A survey of techniques and technologies

Speech media, that is, digital audio and video containing spoken content, has blossomed in recent years. Large collections are accruing on the Internet as well as in private and enterprise settings. This growth has motivated extensive research on techniques and technologies that facilitate reliable indexing and retrieval. Spoken content retrieval (SCR) requires the combination of audio and speech processing technologies with methods from information retrieval (IR). SCR research initially investigated planned speech structured in document-like units, but has subsequently shifted focus to more informal spoken content produced spontaneously, outside of the studio and in conversational settings. This survey provides an overview of the field of SCR encompassing component technologies, the relationship of SCR to text IR and automatic speech recognition and user interaction issues. It is aimed at researchers with backgrounds in speech technology or IR who are seeking deeper insight on how these fields are integrated to support research and development, thus addressing the core challenges of SCR