10,680 research outputs found
Decomposition Strategies for Constructive Preference Elicitation
We tackle the problem of constructive preference elicitation, that is the
problem of learning user preferences over very large decision problems,
involving a combinatorial space of possible outcomes. In this setting, the
suggested configuration is synthesized on-the-fly by solving a constrained
optimization problem, while the preferences are learned itera tively by
interacting with the user. Previous work has shown that Coactive Learning is a
suitable method for learning user preferences in constructive scenarios. In
Coactive Learning the user provides feedback to the algorithm in the form of an
improvement to a suggested configuration. When the problem involves many
decision variables and constraints, this type of interaction poses a
significant cognitive burden on the user. We propose a decomposition technique
for large preference-based decision problems relying exclusively on inference
and feedback over partial configurations. This has the clear advantage of
drastically reducing the user cognitive load. Additionally, part-wise inference
can be (up to exponentially) less computationally demanding than inference over
full configurations. We discuss the theoretical implications of working with
parts and present promising empirical results on one synthetic and two
realistic constructive problems.Comment: Accepted at the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial
Intelligence (AAAI-18
Constructive Preference Elicitation over Hybrid Combinatorial Spaces
Preference elicitation is the task of suggesting a highly preferred
configuration to a decision maker. The preferences are typically learned by
querying the user for choice feedback over pairs or sets of objects. In its
constructive variant, new objects are synthesized "from scratch" by maximizing
an estimate of the user utility over a combinatorial (possibly infinite) space
of candidates. In the constructive setting, most existing elicitation
techniques fail because they rely on exhaustive enumeration of the candidates.
A previous solution explicitly designed for constructive tasks comes with no
formal performance guarantees, and can be very expensive in (or unapplicable
to) problems with non-Boolean attributes. We propose the Choice Perceptron, a
Perceptron-like algorithm for learning user preferences from set-wise choice
feedback over constructive domains and hybrid Boolean-numeric feature spaces.
We provide a theoretical analysis on the attained regret that holds for a large
class of query selection strategies, and devise a heuristic strategy that aims
at optimizing the regret in practice. Finally, we demonstrate its effectiveness
by empirical evaluation against existing competitors on constructive scenarios
of increasing complexity.Comment: AAAI 2018, computing methodologies, machine learning, learning
paradigms, supervised learning, structured output
Universal Voting Protocol Tweaks to Make Manipulation Hard
Voting is a general method for preference aggregation in multiagent settings,
but seminal results have shown that all (nondictatorial) voting protocols are
manipulable. One could try to avoid manipulation by using voting protocols
where determining a beneficial manipulation is hard computationally. A number
of recent papers study the complexity of manipulating existing protocols. This
paper is the first work to take the next step of designing new protocols that
are especially hard to manipulate. Rather than designing these new protocols
from scratch, we instead show how to tweak existing protocols to make
manipulation hard, while leaving much of the original nature of the protocol
intact. The tweak studied consists of adding one elimination preround to the
election. Surprisingly, this extremely simple and universal tweak makes typical
protocols hard to manipulate! The protocols become NP-hard, #P-hard, or
PSPACE-hard to manipulate, depending on whether the schedule of the preround is
determined before the votes are collected, after the votes are collected, or
the scheduling and the vote collecting are interleaved, respectively. We prove
general sufficient conditions on the protocols for this tweak to introduce the
hardness, and show that the most common voting protocols satisfy those
conditions. These are the first results in voting settings where manipulation
is in a higher complexity class than NP (presuming PSPACE NP)
The Shield that Never Was: Societies with Single-Peaked Preferences are More Open to Manipulation and Control
Much work has been devoted, during the past twenty years, to using complexity
to protect elections from manipulation and control. Many results have been
obtained showing NP-hardness shields, and recently there has been much focus on
whether such worst-case hardness protections can be bypassed by frequently
correct heuristics or by approximations. This paper takes a very different
approach: We argue that when electorates follow the canonical political science
model of societal preferences the complexity shield never existed in the first
place. In particular, we show that for electorates having single-peaked
preferences, many existing NP-hardness results on manipulation and control
evaporate.Comment: 38 pages, 2 figure
Incorporating stakeholders’ knowledge in group decision-making
International audienc
Bipolar and bivariate models in multi-criteria decision analysis: descriptive and constructive approaches
Multi-criteria decision analysis studies decision problems in which the alternatives are evaluated on several dimensions or viewpoints. In the problems we consider in this paper, the scales used for assessing the alternatives with respect to a viewpoint are bipolar and univariate or unipolar and bivariate. In the former case, the scale is divided in two zones by a neutral point; a positive feeling is associated to the zone above the neutral point and a negative feeling to the zone below this point. On unipolar bivariate scales, an alternative can receive both a positive and a negative evaluation, reflecting contradictory feelings or stimuli. The paper discusses procedures and models that have been proposed to aggregate multi-criteria evaluations when the scale of each criterion is of one of the two types above. We present both a constructive and a descriptive view on this question; the descriptive approach is concerned with characterizations of models of preference, while the constructive approach aims at building preferences by questioning the decision maker. We show that these views are complementary.Multiple criteria, Decision analysis, Preference, Bipolarmodels, Choquet integral
- …