36,756 research outputs found

    A geometric characterization of cc-optimal designs for heteroscedastic regression

    Get PDF
    We consider the common nonlinear regression model where the variance, as well as the mean, is a parametric function of the explanatory variables. The cc-optimal design problem is investigated in the case when the parameters of both the mean and the variance function are of interest. A geometric characterization of cc-optimal designs in this context is presented, which generalizes the classical result of Elfving [Ann. Math. Statist. 23 (1952) 255--262] for cc-optimal designs. As in Elfving's famous characterization, cc-optimal designs can be described as representations of boundary points of a convex set. However, in the case where there appear parameters of interest in the variance, the structure of the Elfving set is different. Roughly speaking, the Elfving set corresponding to a heteroscedastic regression model is the convex hull of a set of ellipsoids induced by the underlying model and indexed by the design space. The cc-optimal designs are characterized as representations of the points where the line in direction of the vector cc intersects the boundary of the new Elfving set. The theory is illustrated in several examples including pharmacokinetic models with random effects.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/09-AOS708 the Annals of Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aos/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

    (Dt,C) Optimal run orders.

    Get PDF
    Cost considerations have rarely been taken into account in optimum design theory. A few authors consider measurement costs, i.e. the costs associated with a particular factor level combination. A second cost approach results from the fact that it is often expensive to change factor levels from one observation to another. We refer to these costs as transition costs. In view of cost minimization, one should minimize the number of factor level changes. However, there is a substantial likelihood that there is some time order dependence in the results. Consequently, when considering both time order dependence and transition costs, an optimal ordering is not easy to find. There is precious little in the literature on how to select good time order sequences for arbitrary design problems and up to now, no thorough analysis of both costs is found in the literature. For arbitrary design problems, our proposed design algorithm incorporates cost considerations in optimum design construction and enables one to compute cost-efficient run orders that are optimally balanced for time trends. The results show that cost considerations in the construction of trend-resistant run orders entail considerable reductions in the total cost of an experiment and imply a large increase in the amount of information per unit cost.Optimal; Run orders;

    Design Issues for Generalized Linear Models: A Review

    Full text link
    Generalized linear models (GLMs) have been used quite effectively in the modeling of a mean response under nonstandard conditions, where discrete as well as continuous data distributions can be accommodated. The choice of design for a GLM is a very important task in the development and building of an adequate model. However, one major problem that handicaps the construction of a GLM design is its dependence on the unknown parameters of the fitted model. Several approaches have been proposed in the past 25 years to solve this problem. These approaches, however, have provided only partial solutions that apply in only some special cases, and the problem, in general, remains largely unresolved. The purpose of this article is to focus attention on the aforementioned dependence problem. We provide a survey of various existing techniques dealing with the dependence problem. This survey includes discussions concerning locally optimal designs, sequential designs, Bayesian designs and the quantile dispersion graph approach for comparing designs for GLMs.Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/088342306000000105 in the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
    • …
    corecore