4 research outputs found
Constrained regular expressions for answering RDF-path queries modulo RDFS
alkhateeb2014aInternational audienceThe standard SPARQL query language is currently defined for querying RDF graphs without RDFS semantics. Several extensions of SPARQL to RDFS semantics have been proposed. In this paper, we discuss extensions of SPARQL that use regular expressions to navigate RDF graphs and may be used to answer queries considering RDFS semantics. In particular, we present and compare nSPARQL and our proposal CPSPARQL. We show that CPSPARQL is expressive enough to answer full SPARQL queries modulo RDFS. Finally, we compare the expressiveness and complexity of both nSPARQL and the corresponding frag- ment of CPSPARQL, that we call cpSPARQL. We show that both languages have the same complexity through cpSPARQL, being a proper extension of SPARQL graph patterns, is more expressive than nSPARQL
Context-Free Path Queries on RDF Graphs
Navigational graph queries are an important class of queries that canextract
implicit binary relations over the nodes of input graphs. Most of the
navigational query languages used in the RDF community, e.g. property paths in
W3C SPARQL 1.1 and nested regular expressions in nSPARQL, are based on the
regular expressions. It is known that regular expressions have limited
expressivity; for instance, some natural queries, like same generation-queries,
are not expressible with regular expressions. To overcome this limitation, in
this paper, we present cfSPARQL, an extension of SPARQL query language equipped
with context-free grammars. The cfSPARQL language is strictly more expressive
than property paths and nested expressions. The additional expressivity can be
used for modelling graph similarities, graph summarization and ontology
alignment. Despite the increasing expressivity, we show that cfSPARQL still
enjoys a low computational complexity and can be evaluated efficiently.Comment: 25 page
Answering SPARQL queries modulo RDF Schema with paths
SPARQL is the standard query language for RDF graphs. In its strict
instantiation, it only offers querying according to the RDF semantics and would
thus ignore the semantics of data expressed with respect to (RDF) schemas or
(OWL) ontologies. Several extensions to SPARQL have been proposed to query RDF
data modulo RDFS, i.e., interpreting the query with RDFS semantics and/or
considering external ontologies. We introduce a general framework which allows
for expressing query answering modulo a particular semantics in an homogeneous
way. In this paper, we discuss extensions of SPARQL that use regular
expressions to navigate RDF graphs and may be used to answer queries
considering RDFS semantics. We also consider their embedding as extensions of
SPARQL. These SPARQL extensions are interpreted within the proposed framework
and their drawbacks are presented. In particular, we show that the PSPARQL
query language, a strict extension of SPARQL offering transitive closure,
allows for answering SPARQL queries modulo RDFS graphs with the same complexity
as SPARQL through a simple transformation of the queries. We also consider
languages which, in addition to paths, provide constraints. In particular, we
present and compare nSPARQL and our proposal CPSPARQL. We show that CPSPARQL is
expressive enough to answer full SPARQL queries modulo RDFS. Finally, we
compare the expressiveness and complexity of both nSPARQL and the corresponding
fragment of CPSPARQL, that we call cpSPARQL. We show that both languages have
the same complexity through cpSPARQL, being a proper extension of SPARQL graph
patterns, is more expressive than nSPARQL.Comment: RR-8394; alkhateeb2003