745 research outputs found
Constrained Geodesic Centers of a Simple Polygon
For any two points in a simple polygon P, the geodesic distance between them is the length of the shortest path contained in P that connects them. A geodesic center of a set S of sites (points) with respect to P is a point in P that minimizes the geodesic distance to its farthest site. In many realistic facility location problems, however, the facilities are constrained to lie in feasible regions. In this paper, we show how to compute the geodesic centers constrained to a set of line segments or simple polygonal regions contained in P. Our results provide substantial improvements over previous algorithms
Fault-tolerant additive weighted geometric spanners
Let S be a set of n points and let w be a function that assigns non-negative
weights to points in S. The additive weighted distance d_w(p, q) between two
points p,q belonging to S is defined as w(p) + d(p, q) + w(q) if p \ne q and it
is zero if p = q. Here, d(p, q) denotes the (geodesic) Euclidean distance
between p and q. A graph G(S, E) is called a t-spanner for the additive
weighted set S of points if for any two points p and q in S the distance
between p and q in graph G is at most t.d_w(p, q) for a real number t > 1.
Here, d_w(p,q) is the additive weighted distance between p and q. For some
integer k \geq 1, a t-spanner G for the set S is a (k, t)-vertex fault-tolerant
additive weighted spanner, denoted with (k, t)-VFTAWS, if for any set S'
\subset S with cardinality at most k, the graph G \ S' is a t-spanner for the
points in S \ S'. For any given real number \epsilon > 0, we obtain the
following results:
- When the points in S belong to Euclidean space R^d, an algorithm to compute
a (k,(2 + \epsilon))-VFTAWS with O(kn) edges for the metric space (S, d_w).
Here, for any two points p, q \in S, d(p, q) is the Euclidean distance between
p and q in R^d.
- When the points in S belong to a simple polygon P, for the metric space (S,
d_w), one algorithm to compute a geodesic (k, (2 + \epsilon))-VFTAWS with
O(\frac{k n}{\epsilon^{2}}\lg{n}) edges and another algorithm to compute a
geodesic (k, (\sqrt{10} + \epsilon))-VFTAWS with O(kn(\lg{n})^2) edges. Here,
for any two points p, q \in S, d(p, q) is the geodesic Euclidean distance along
the shortest path between p and q in P.
- When the points in lie on a terrain T, an algorithm to compute a
geodesic (k, (2 + \epsilon))-VFTAWS with O(\frac{k n}{\epsilon^{2}}\lg{n})
edges.Comment: a few update
Gap Processing for Adaptive Maximal Poisson-Disk Sampling
In this paper, we study the generation of maximal Poisson-disk sets with
varying radii. First, we present a geometric analysis of gaps in such disk
sets. This analysis is the basis for maximal and adaptive sampling in Euclidean
space and on manifolds. Second, we propose efficient algorithms and data
structures to detect gaps and update gaps when disks are inserted, deleted,
moved, or have their radius changed. We build on the concepts of the regular
triangulation and the power diagram. Third, we will show how our analysis can
make a contribution to the state-of-the-art in surface remeshing.Comment: 16 pages. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 201
Computing the L1 Geodesic Diameter and Center of a Polygonal Domain
For a polygonal domain with h holes and a total of n vertices, we present algorithms that compute the L_1 geodesic diameter in O(n^2+h^4) time and the L_1 geodesic center in O((n^4+n^2 h^4)*alpha(n)) time, where alpha(.) denotes the inverse Ackermann function. No algorithms were known for these problems before. For the Euclidean counterpart, the best algorithms compute the geodesic diameter in O(n^{7.73}) or O(n^7(h+log(n))) time, and compute the geodesic center in O(n^{12+epsilon}) time. Therefore, our algorithms are much faster than the algorithms for the Euclidean problems. Our algorithms are based on several interesting observations on L_1 shortest paths in polygonal domains
- …