197 research outputs found

    Multi-frequency and multi-GNSS PPP phase bias estimation and ambiguity resolution

    Get PDF

    Multi-frequency and multi-GNSS PPP phase bias estimation and ambiguity resolution

    Get PDF
    Multi-frequency and multi-GNSS measurements from modernized satellites are properly integrated for PPP with ambiguity resolution to achieve the state-of-the-art fast and accurate positioning, which provides an important contribution to GNSS precise positioning and applications. The multi-frequency and multi-GNSS PPP phase bias estimation and ambiguity resolution, which is accomplished by a unified model based on the uncombined PPP, are thoroughly evaluated with special focus on Galileo and BDS

    Multi-frequency and multi-GNSS PPP phase bias estimation and ambiguity resolution

    Get PDF
    Multi-frequency and multi-GNSS measurements from modernized satellites are properly integrated for PPP with ambiguity resolution to achieve the state-of-the-art fast and accurate positioning, which provides an important contribution to GNSS precise positioning and applications. The multi-frequency and multi-GNSS PPP phase bias estimation and ambiguity resolution, which is accomplished by a unified model based on the uncombined PPP, are thoroughly evaluated with special focus on Galileo and BDS

    Undifferenced and Uncombined GNSS Time Transfer and its Space Applications

    Get PDF
    This thesis presents a framework for developing a state-of-the-art undifferenced and uncombined (UDUC) time transfer technique for space applications. It addresses challenges in GNSS time transfer, such as multi-frequency signal modelling, satellite clock estimation, and hardware delay variations. The thesis introduces the UDUC POD method for GNSS time transfer in space and explores the feasibility of constructing a LEO-based space-time reference. This PhD dissertation is among the first to investigate the UDUC GNSS time transfer

    BDS GNSS for Earth Observation

    Get PDF
    For millennia, human communities have wondered about the possibility of observing phenomena in their surroundings, and in particular those affecting the Earth on which they live. More generally, it can be conceptually defined as Earth observation (EO) and is the collection of information about the biological, chemical and physical systems of planet Earth. It can be undertaken through sensors in direct contact with the ground or airborne platforms (such as weather balloons and stations) or remote-sensing technologies. However, the definition of EO has only become significant in the last 50 years, since it has been possible to send artificial satellites out of Earth’s orbit. Referring strictly to civil applications, satellites of this type were initially designed to provide satellite images; later, their purpose expanded to include the study of information on land characteristics, growing vegetation, crops, and environmental pollution. The data collected are used for several purposes, including the identification of natural resources and the production of accurate cartography. Satellite observations can cover the land, the atmosphere, and the oceans. Remote-sensing satellites may be equipped with passive instrumentation such as infrared or cameras for imaging the visible or active instrumentation such as radar. Generally, such satellites are non-geostationary satellites, i.e., they move at a certain speed along orbits inclined with respect to the Earth’s equatorial plane, often in polar orbit, at low or medium altitude, Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Medium Earth Orbit (MEO), thus covering the entire Earth’s surface in a certain scan time (properly called ’temporal resolution’), i.e., in a certain number of orbits around the Earth. The first remote-sensing satellites were the American NASA/USGS Landsat Program; subsequently, the European: ENVISAT (ENVironmental SATellite), ERS (European Remote-Sensing satellite), RapidEye, the French SPOT (Satellite Pour l’Observation de laTerre), and the Canadian RADARSAT satellites were launched. The IKONOS, QuickBird, and GeoEye-1 satellites were dedicated to cartography. The WorldView-1 and WorldView-2 satellites and the COSMO-SkyMed system are more recent. The latest generation are the low payloads called Small Satellites, e.g., the Chinese BuFeng-1 and Fengyun-3 series. Also, Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) have captured the attention of researchers worldwide for a multitude of Earth monitoring and exploration applications. On the other hand, over the past 40 years, GNSSs have become an essential part of many human activities. As is widely noted, there are currently four fully operational GNSSs; two of these were developed for military purposes (American NAVstar GPS and Russian GLONASS), whilst two others were developed for civil purposes such as the Chinese BeiDou satellite navigation system (BDS) and the European Galileo. In addition, many other regional GNSSs, such as the South Korean Regional Positioning System (KPS), the Japanese quasi-zenital satellite system (QZSS), and the Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS/NavIC), will become available in the next few years, which will have enormous potential for scientific applications and geomatics professionals. In addition to their traditional role of providing global positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) information, GNSS navigation signals are now being used in new and innovative ways. Across the globe, new fields of scientific study are opening up to examine how signals can provide information about the characteristics of the atmosphere and even the surfaces from which they are reflected before being collected by a receiver. EO researchers monitor global environmental systems using in situ and remote monitoring tools. Their findings provide tools to support decision makers in various areas of interest, from security to the natural environment. GNSS signals are considered an important new source of information because they are a free, real-time, and globally available resource for the EO community

    A unified model for multi-frequency PPP ambiguity resolution and test results with Galileo and BeiDou triple-frequency observations

    Get PDF
    With the modernization of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), triple- or multi-frequency signals have become available from more and more GNSS satellites. The additional signals are expected to enhance the performance of precise point positioning (PPP) with ambiguity resolution (AR). To deal with the additional signals, we propose a unified modeling strategy for multi-frequency PPP AR based on raw uncombined observations. Based on the unified model, the fractional cycle biases (FCBs) generated from multi-frequency observations can be flexibly used, such as for dual- or triple- frequency PPP AR. Its efficiency is verified with Galileo and BeiDou triple-frequency observations collected from globally distributed MGEX stations. The estimated FCB are assessed with respect to residual distributions and standard deviations. The obtained results indicate good consistency between the input float ambiguities and the generated FCBs. To assess the performance of the triple-frequency PPP AR, 11 days of MGEX data are processed in three-hour sessions. The positional biases in the ambiguity-fixed solutions are significantly reduced compared with the float solutions. The improvements are 49.2%, 38.3%, and 29.6%, respectively, in east/north/up components for positioning with BDS, while the corresponding improvements are 60.0%, 29.0%, and 21.1% for positioning with Galileo. These results confirm the efficiency of the proposed approach, and that the triple-frequency PPP AR can bring an obvious benefit to the ambiguity-float PPP solution

    Helmert Variance Component Estimation for Multi-GNSS Relative Positioning

    Get PDF
    The Multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite System (Multi-GNSS) has become the standard implementation of high accuracy positioning and navigation applications. It is well known that the noise of code and phase measurements depend on GNSS constellation. Then, Helmert variance component estimation (HVCE) is usually used to adjust the contributions of diÂżerent GNSS constellations by determining their individual variances of unit weight. However, HVCE requires a heavy computation load. In this study, the HVCE posterior weighting was employed to carry out a kinematic relative Multi-GNSS positioning experiment with six short-baselines from day of year (DoY) 171 to 200 in 2019. As a result, the HVCE posterior weighting strategy improved Multi-GNSS positioning accuracy by 20.5%, 15.7% and 13.2% ineast-north-up(ENU) components, compared to an elevation-dependent (ED) priori weighting strategy. We observed that the weight proportion of both code and phase observations for each GNSS constellation were consistent during the entire 30 days, which indicates that the weight proportions of both code and phase observations are stable over a long period of time. It was also found that the quality of a phase observation is almost equivalent in each baseline and GNSS constellation, whereas that of a code observation is different. In order to reduce the time consumption off the HVCE method without sacrificing positioning accuracy, the stable variances of unit weights of both phase and code observations obtained over 30 days were averaged and then frozen as a priori information in the positioning experiment. The result demonstrated similar ENU improvements of 20.0%, 14.1% and 11.1% with respect to the ED method but saving 88% of the computation time of the HCVE strategy. Our study concludes with the observations that the frozen variances of unit weight (FVUW) could be applied to the positioning experiment for the next 30 days, that is, from DoY 201 to 230 in 2019, improving the positioning ENU accuracy of the ED method by 18.1%, 13.2% and 10.6%, indicating the effectiveness of the FVUW.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

    Characterization and Performance Assessment of BeiDou-2 and BeiDou-3 Satellite Group Delays

    Get PDF
    Based on one year of data, a comprehensive assessment of broadcast group delays and differential code biases (DCBs) from network solutions is presented for all open BeiDou signals. Daily DCB estimates exhibit a precision of 0.1 ns, which also places a limit on long-term variations of the satellite group delays. On the other hand, the estimated DCBs show a notable dependence on the employed receivers, which causes inconsistencies at the few-nanosecond level between BeiDou-2 and BeiDou-3 satellites. Systematic satellite-specific offsets can likewise be identified in broadcast group delay values and clock offsets. These constitute the dominant contribution of the signal-in-space range error (SISRE) budget and are a limiting factor for single point positioning and timing. Use of the modernized B1C/B2a signals is therefore recommended instead of B1I/B3I. This offers a SISRE reduction from about 0.6 m to 0.45 m and also improves the consistency of precise clock and bias products derived from heterogeneous receiver networks

    Impact of ambiguity resolution on phase center offsets and hardware delay estimation for BDS-3 inter-satellite links

    Get PDF
    The Chinese BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) has already completed its three phases and developed into a global navigation satellite system for open positioning, navigation, and timing services. The BDS-3 satellites feature the inter-satellite link (ISL). The ISL observation-related error model and ambiguity resolution for L-band observation are the crucial factors in precise data processing. In this study, we present for the first time the impact of ambiguity resolution on phase center offsets (PCOs) and hardware delay estimation of BDS-3 inter-satellite links. Two weeks’ L-band observations from 99 globally distributed ground stations and Ka-band ISL observations are collected for experimental validation and analysis. First, network solutions with and without ISL observations are conducted to investigate the role of ISL observation in ambiguity resolution. Afterward, ISL observation-related errors, mainly PCOs and hardware delays, are estimated by processing L-band with ISL observations with and without ambiguity resolution to analyze the impact of ambiguity resolution on these two factors. Finally, orbit accuracy in the network solution is assessed to further validate the effectiveness of the estimated PCOs and hardware delays in our experiment. The result indicates that introducing the ISL can slightly improve the fixing rate compared to only L-band observations from 83.7% to 84.3%. Furthermore, ambiguity resolution has a positive influence on the stability of estimated PCOs and hardware delays in turn, although the root mean square (RMS) values basically remain unchanged. The standard deviation (STD) of the x-offset is reduced from 0.021 m to 0.012 m, a significant improvement of about 43%, and 0.022 m–0.016 m, with an improvement of about 27%, for the y-offset. There is a slight improvement of about 8% for z-offset. Similarly, around 10% improvement in the STD for hardware delays can be achieved while the RMS values almost stay the same except for C40. Orbit determination from network solutions shows high accuracy compared to the public products for the satellite with good geometry configuration, which further validates our estimates for ISL PCOs and hardware delays
    • …
    corecore