589 research outputs found

    APPRAISE: a framework for managing AI compliance

    Full text link
    As AI systems increasingly impact society, the EU AI Act (AIA) is the first serious attempt to contain its less desired effects. Among others the act proposes audit as a mechanism and compliance products as tools for organizations to demonstrate compliance. In this paper, a framework for managing AI compliance, APPRAISE, is proposed. The framework is built upon the rationale that driving a balance between generating shareholder value through innovation in AI systems and managing compliance through organizational processes will eventually result in value that is responsible. By adhering to AIA compliance products, the framework operationalizes and hence safeguards compliance. Furthermore, a two-phase experiment with a limited scope is presented. The experiment aims to measure the extent to which companies coordinate technical elements of AI systems to ultimately comply with the AIA. In the first phase a survey is conducted and in the second phase the survey results are validated with a couple of respondents to generate additional in-depth insights and root causes

    Banking and Finance

    Get PDF
    The banking and finance industry plays a significant role in the economy of a nation. As such, continuous research and up-to-date feeds are necessary for it to stay competitive and resilient. Due to its revolving and dynamic nature as well as its significance and interlinkages with other industries, a well-functioning banking and finance system is vital in safeguarding the interest of all stakeholders. Banking and Finance covers a wide range of essential topics highlighting major issues related to banking and finance. The book is rich with empirical evidence, scientific researches, best practices, and recommendations, making it a compact yet handy reference for readers, especially those who are in the field of banking and finance

    Recommendations based on social links

    Get PDF
    The goal of this chapter is to give an overview of recent works on the development of social link-based recommender systems and to offer insights on related issues, as well as future directions for research. Among several kinds of social recommendations, this chapter focuses on recommendations, which are based on users’ self-defined (i.e., explicit) social links and suggest items, rather than people of interest. The chapter starts by reviewing the needs for social link-based recommendations and studies that explain the viability of social networks as useful information sources. Following that, the core part of the chapter dissects and examines modern research on social link-based recommendations along several dimensions. It concludes with a discussion of several important issues and future directions for social link-based recommendation research

    the admissibility of AI- generated evidence

    Get PDF
    Durante as duas Ășltimas dĂ©cadas, a InteligĂȘncia Artificial tornou-se uma presença constante nas nossas vidas. Ao impactar setores relevantes da sociedade, tem relevando o seu carĂĄter disruptivo, sendo um dos motores impulsionadores da Quarta Revolução Industrial. A InteligĂȘncia Artificial alĂ©m dos seus presentes benefĂ­cios para a humanidade, promete soluçÔes inovadoras para os problemas que afligem a sociedade contemporĂąnea, porĂ©m a mesma comporta uma duplicidade de efeitos. Os sistemas de InteligĂȘncia Artificial pela sua capacidade de monitorizar o seu ambiente circundante, e autonomamente recolher, processar dados, aprender e agir, podem concretizar riscos para os direitos fundamentais, principalmente no contexto da justiça criminal. Esta anĂĄlise irĂĄ focar-se nas especificidades dos sistemas dotados de InteligĂȘncia Artificial, aprofundando a temĂĄtica da admissibilidade da prova gerada por InteligĂȘncia Artificial no quadro probatĂłrio do Direito Processual Penal PortuguĂȘs Ă  luz dos direitos de defesa do arguido e dos seus princĂ­pios que norteadores.During the last two decades Artificial Intelligence became ubiquitous in our lives. Revealing itself as a disruptive technology, it is already impacting important sectors of society, being a driver of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Artificial Intelligence is benefiting humanity, and promises innovative solutions to modern-life problems, nevertheless it has a twofold effect. Artificial Intelligence as systems that are capable to monitor their surrounding environment, autonomously collect and process data, learn and act, may constitute harm to fundamental rights, mainly when deployed to criminal justice. This analysis will focus on the specificities of Artificial Intelligence systems, delving into the admissibility of AI-generated evidence in the Portuguese criminal evidentiary framework in light of the defence rights and structuring principles of Portuguese criminal procedure

    Deconstructing the right to privacy considering the impact of fashion recommender systems on an individual’s autonomy and identity

    Get PDF
    Computing ‘fashion’ into a system of algorithms that personalise an individual’s shopping journey is not without risks to the way we express, assess, and develop aspects of our identity. This study uses an interdisciplinary research approach to examine how an individual’s interaction with algorithms in the fashion domain shapes our understanding of an individual’s privacy, autonomy, and identity. Using fashion theory and psychology, I make two contributions to the meaning of privacy to protect notions of identity and autonomy, and develop a more nuanced perspective on this concept using ‘fashion identity’. One, a more varied outlook on privacy allows us to examine how algorithmic constructions impose inherent reductions on individual sense-making in developing and reinventing personal fashion choices. A “right to not be reduced” allows us to focus on the individual’s practice of identity and choice with regard to the algorithmic entities incorporating imperfect semblances on the personal and social aspects of fashion. Second, I submit that we need a new perspective on the right to privacy to address the risks of algorithmic personalisation systems in fashion. There are gaps in the law regarding capturing the impact of algorithmic personalisation systems on an individual’s inference of knowledge about fashion, as well as the associations of fashion applied to individual circumstances. Focusing on the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), as well as aspects of EU non-discrimination and consumer law, I underline that we need to develop a proactive approach to the right to privacy entailing the incorporation of new values. I define these values to include an individual’s perception and self-relationality, describing the impact of algorithmic personalisation systems on an individual’s inference of knowledge about fashion, as well as the associations of fashion applied to individual circumstances. The study concludes with recommendations regarding the use of AI techniques in fashion using an international human rights approach. I argue that the “right to not be reduced” requires new interpretative guidance informing international human rights standards, including Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Moreover, I consider that the “right to not be reduced” requires us to consider novel choices that inform the design and deployment of algorithmic personalisation systems in fashion, considering the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the EU Commission’s Proposal for an AI Act

    What is it about humanity that we can't give away to intelligent machines? A European perspective

    Get PDF
    One of the most significant recent technological developments concerns the development and implementation of ‘intelligent machines’ that draw on recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics. However, there are growing tensions between human freedoms and machine controls. This article reports the findings of a workshop that investigated the application of the principles of human freedom throughout intelligent machine develop- ment and use. Forty IS researchers from ten different countries discussed four contemporary AI and humanity issues and the most relevant IS domain challenges. This article summarizes their experiences and opinions regarding four AI and humanity themes: Crime & conflict, Jobs, Attention, and Wellbeing. The outcomes of the workshop discussions identify three attributes of humanity that need preservation: a critique of the design and application of AI, and the intelligent machines it can create; human involvement in the loop of intelligent ma- chine decision-making processes; and the ability to interpret and explain intelligent machine decision-making processes. The article provides an agenda for future AI and humanity researchpublishedVersio

    Developing and Facilitating Temporary Team Mental Models Through an Information-Sharing Recommender System

    Get PDF
    It is well understood that teams are essential and common in many aspects of life, both work and leisure. Due to the importance of teams, much research attention has focused on how to improve team processes and outcomes. Of particular interest are the cognitive aspects of teamwork including team mental models (TMMs). Among many other benefits, TMMs involve team members forming a compatible understanding of the task and team in order to more efficiently make decisions. This understanding is sometimes classified using four TMM domains: equipment (e.g., operating procedures), task (e.g., strategies), team interactions (e.g., interdependencies) and teammates (e.g., tendencies). Of particular interest to this dissertation is accelerating the development of teammate TMMs which include members understanding the knowledge, skills, attitudes, preferences, and tendencies of their teammates. An accurate teammate TMM allows teams to predict and account for the needs and behaviors of their teammates. Although much research has highlighted how the development of the four TMM domains can be supported, promoting the development of teammate TMMs is particularly challenging for a specific type of team: temporary teams. Temporary teams, in contrast to ongoing teams, involve unknown teammates, novel tasks, short task times (alternatively limited interactions), and members disbanding after completing their task. These teams are increasingly used by organizations as they can be agilely formed with individual members selected to accomplish a specific task. Such teams are commonly used in contexts such as film production, the military, emergency response, and software development, just to name a few. Importantly, although these teams benefit greatly from teammate TMMs due to the efficiencies gained in decision making while working under limited deadlines, the literature is severely limited in understanding how to support temporary teams in this way. As prior research has suggested, an opportunity to accelerate teammate TMM development on temporary teams is through the use of technology to selectively share teammate information to support these TMMs. However, this solution poses numerous privacy concerns. This dissertation uses four studies to create a foundational and thorough understanding of how recommender system technology can be used to promote teammate TMMs through information sharing while limiting privacy concerns. Study 1 takes a highly exploratory approach to set a foundation for future dissertation studies. This study investigates what information is perceived to be helpful for promoting teammate TMMs on actual temporary teams. Qualitative data suggests that sharing teammate information related to skills/preferences, conflict management styles, and work ethic/reliability is perceived as beneficial to supporting teammate TMMs. Also, this data provides a foundational understanding for what should be involved in information-sharing recommendations for promoting teammate TMMs. Quantitative results indicate that conflict management data is perceived as more helpful and appropriate to share than personality data. Study 2 investigates the presentation of these recommendations through the factors of anonymity and explanations. Although explanations did not improve trust or satisfaction in the system, providing recommendations associated with a specific teammate name significantly improved several team measures associated with TMMs for actual temporary teams compared to teams who received anonymous recommendations. This study also sheds light on what temporary team members perceive as the benefits to sharing this information and what they perceive as concerns to their privacy. Study 3 investigates how the group/team context and individual differences can influence disclosure behavior when using an information-sharing recommender system. Findings suggest that members of teams who are fully assessed as a team are more willing to unconditionally disclose personal information than members who are assessed as an individual or members who are mixed assessed as an individual and a team. The results also show how different individual differences and different information types are associated with disclosure behavior. Finally, Study 4 investigates how the occurrence and content of explanations can influence disclosure behavior and system perceptions of an information-sharing recommender system. Data from this study highlights how benefit explanations provided during disclosure can increase disclosure and explanations provided during recommendations can influence perceptions of trust competence. Meanwhile, benefit-related explanations can decrease privacy concerns. The aforementioned studies fill numerous research gaps relating to teamwork literature (i.e., TMMs and temporary teams) and recommender system research. In addition to contributions to these fields, this dissertation results in design recommendations that inform both the design of group recommender systems and the novel technology conceptualized through this dissertation, information-sharing recommender systems

    Linking Research and Policy: Assessing a Framework for Organic Agricultural Support in Ireland

    Get PDF
    This paper links social science research and agricultural policy through an analysis of support for organic agriculture and food. Globally, sales of organic food have experienced 20% annual increases for the past two decades, and represent the fastest growing segment of the grocery market. Although consumer interest has increased, farmers are not keeping up with demand. This is partly due to a lack of political support provided to farmers in their transition from conventional to organic production. Support policies vary by country and in some nations, such as the US, vary by state/province. There have been few attempts to document the types of support currently in place. This research draws on an existing Framework tool to investigate regionally specific and relevant policy support available to organic farmers in Ireland. This exploratory study develops a case study of Ireland within the framework of ten key categories of organic agricultural support: leadership, policy, research, technical support, financial support, marketing and promotion, education and information, consumer issues, inter-agency activities, and future developments. Data from the Irish Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, the Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (Teagasc), and other governmental and semi-governmental agencies provide the basis for an assessment of support in each category. Assessments are based on the number of activities, availability of information to farmers, and attention from governmental personnel for each of the ten categories. This policy framework is a valuable tool for farmers, researchers, state agencies, and citizen groups seeking to document existing types of organic agricultural support and discover policy areas which deserve more attention

    Semantic discovery and reuse of business process patterns

    Get PDF
    Patterns currently play an important role in modern information systems (IS) development and their use has mainly been restricted to the design and implementation phases of the development lifecycle. Given the increasing significance of business modelling in IS development, patterns have the potential of providing a viable solution for promoting reusability of recurrent generalized models in the very early stages of development. As a statement of research-in-progress this paper focuses on business process patterns and proposes an initial methodological framework for the discovery and reuse of business process patterns within the IS development lifecycle. The framework borrows ideas from the domain engineering literature and proposes the use of semantics to drive both the discovery of patterns as well as their reuse
    • 

    corecore