199 research outputs found
Computational and Information-Theoretic Two-Source (Non-Malleable) Extractors
Two-source non-malleable extractors are pseudorandom objects which extract randomness even when an adversary is allowed to learn the behavior of the extractor on tamperings of the input weak sources, and they have found important applications in non-malleable coding and secret sharing.
We begin by asking how hard it is to improve upon the best known constructions of such objects (Chattopadhyay, Goyal, Li, STOC 2016, and Li, STOC 2017).
We show that even small improvements to these constructions lead to explicit low-error two-source extractors for very low linear min-entropy, a longstanding open problem in pseudorandomness.
Given the result above in the information-theoretic setting, we turn to studying two-source non-malleable extractors in the computational setting, namely in the CRS model first considered in (Garg, Kalai, Khurana, Eurocrypt 2020).
We enforce that both the sampling process for the input sources and the tampering functions must be efficient, but we do not necessarily put such a constraint on the adversary distinguishing the output of the extractor from uniform.
We obtain results about two-source non-malleable extractors in the CRS model under different types of hardness assumptions:
- Under standard assumptions, we show that small improvements upon state-of-the-art statistical two-source non-malleable extractors also yield explicit low-error two-source non-malleable extractors in the CRS model for low min-entropy against computationally unbounded distinguishers. Remarkably, all previous results on computational extractors require much stronger assumptions;
- Under a quasi-polynomial hardness assumption, we give explicit constructions of low-error two-source non-malleable extractors in the CRS model with much lower min-entropy requirements than their best statistical counterparts, against a computationally bounded distinguisher;
- Assuming the existence of nearly optimal collision-resistant hash functions, we give a simple explicit construction of a low-error two-source non-malleable extractors in the CRS model for very low min-entropy, against a computationally unbounded distinguisher
Non-Malleable Codes for Small-Depth Circuits
We construct efficient, unconditional non-malleable codes that are secure
against tampering functions computed by small-depth circuits. For
constant-depth circuits of polynomial size (i.e. tampering
functions), our codes have codeword length for a -bit
message. This is an exponential improvement of the previous best construction
due to Chattopadhyay and Li (STOC 2017), which had codeword length
. Our construction remains efficient for circuit depths as
large as (indeed, our codeword length remains
, and extending our result beyond this would require
separating from .
We obtain our codes via a new efficient non-malleable reduction from
small-depth tampering to split-state tampering. A novel aspect of our work is
the incorporation of techniques from unconditional derandomization into the
framework of non-malleable reductions. In particular, a key ingredient in our
analysis is a recent pseudorandom switching lemma of Trevisan and Xue (CCC
2013), a derandomization of the influential switching lemma from circuit
complexity; the randomness-efficiency of this switching lemma translates into
the rate-efficiency of our codes via our non-malleable reduction.Comment: 26 pages, 4 figure
Improved Computational Extractors and their Applications
Recent exciting breakthroughs, starting with the work of Chattopadhyay and Zuckerman (STOC 2016) have achieved the first two-source extractors that operate in the low min-entropy regime. Unfortunately, these constructions suffer from non-negligible error, and reducing the error to negligible remains an important open problem. In recent work, Garg, Kalai, and Khurana (GKK, Eurocrypt 2020) investigated a meaningful relaxation of this problem to the computational setting, in the presence of a common random string (CRS). In this relaxed model, their work built explicit two-source extractors for a restricted class of unbalanced sources with min-entropy (for some constant ) and negligible error, under the sub-exponential DDH assumption.
In this work, we investigate whether computational extractors in the CRS model be applied to more challenging environments. Specifically, we study network extractor protocols (Kalai et al., FOCS 2008) and extractors for adversarial sources (Chattopadhyay et al., STOC 2020) in the CRS model. We observe that these settings require extractors that work well for balanced sources, making the GKK results inapplicable. We remedy this situation by obtaining the following results, all of which are in the CRS model and assume the sub-exponential hardness of DDH.
- We obtain ``optimal\u27\u27 computational two-source and non-malleable extractors for balanced sources: requiring both sources to have only poly-logarithmic min-entropy, and achieving negligible error. To obtain this result, we perform a tighter and arguably simpler analysis of the GKK extractor.
- We obtain a single-round network extractor protocol for poly-logarithmic min-entropy sources that tolerates an optimal number of adversarial corruptions. Prior work in the information-theoretic setting required sources with high min-entropy rates, and in the computational setting had round complexity that grew with the number of parties, required sources with linear min-entropy, and relied on exponential hardness (albeit without a CRS).
- We obtain an ``optimal\u27\u27 {\em adversarial source extractor} for poly-logarithmic min-entropy sources, where the number of honest sources is only 2 and each corrupted source can depend on either one of the honest sources. Prior work in the information-theoretic setting had to assume a large number of honest sources
Non-Malleable Extractors and Codes, with their Many Tampered Extensions
Randomness extractors and error correcting codes are fundamental objects in
computer science. Recently, there have been several natural generalizations of
these objects, in the context and study of tamper resilient cryptography. These
are seeded non-malleable extractors, introduced in [DW09]; seedless
non-malleable extractors, introduced in [CG14b]; and non-malleable codes,
introduced in [DPW10].
However, explicit constructions of non-malleable extractors appear to be
hard, and the known constructions are far behind their non-tampered
counterparts.
In this paper we make progress towards solving the above problems. Our
contributions are as follows.
(1) We construct an explicit seeded non-malleable extractor for min-entropy
. This dramatically improves all previous results and gives a
simpler 2-round privacy amplification protocol with optimal entropy loss,
matching the best known result in [Li15b].
(2) We construct the first explicit non-malleable two-source extractor for
min-entropy , with output size and
error .
(3) We initiate the study of two natural generalizations of seedless
non-malleable extractors and non-malleable codes, where the sources or the
codeword may be tampered many times. We construct the first explicit
non-malleable two-source extractor with tampering degree up to
, which works for min-entropy , with
output size and error . We show that we can
efficiently sample uniformly from any pre-image. By the connection in [CG14b],
we also obtain the first explicit non-malleable codes with tampering degree
up to , relative rate , and error
.Comment: 50 pages; see paper for full abstrac
Limits to Non-Malleability
There have been many successes in constructing explicit non-malleable codes for various classes of tampering functions in recent years, and strong existential results are also known. In this work we ask the following question:
When can we rule out the existence of a non-malleable code for a tampering class ??
First, we start with some classes where positive results are well-known, and show that when these classes are extended in a natural way, non-malleable codes are no longer possible. Specifically, we show that no non-malleable codes exist for any of the following tampering classes:
- Functions that change d/2 symbols, where d is the distance of the code;
- Functions where each input symbol affects only a single output symbol;
- Functions where each of the n output bits is a function of n-log n input bits.
Furthermore, we rule out constructions of non-malleable codes for certain classes ? via reductions to the assumption that a distributional problem is hard for ?, that make black-box use of the tampering functions in the proof. In particular, this yields concrete obstacles for the construction of efficient codes for NC, even assuming average-case variants of P ? NC
Efficient non-malleable codes and key derivation for poly-size tampering circuits
Non-malleable codes, defined by Dziembowski, Pietrzak, and Wichs (ICS '10), provide roughly the following guarantee: if a codeword c encoding some message x is tampered to c' = f(c) such that c' â c , then the tampered message x' contained in c' reveals no information about x. The non-malleable codes have applications to immunizing cryptosystems against tampering attacks and related-key attacks. One cannot have an efficient non-malleable code that protects against all efficient tampering functions f. However, in this paper we show 'the next best thing': for any polynomial bound s given a-priori, there is an efficient non-malleable code that protects against all tampering functions f computable by a circuit of size s. More generally, for any family of tampering functions F of size F †2s , there is an efficient non-malleable code that protects against all f in F . The rate of our codes, defined as the ratio of message to codeword size, approaches 1. Our results are information-theoretic and our main proof technique relies on a careful probabilistic method argument using limited independence. As a result, we get an efficiently samplable family of efficient codes, such that a random member of the family is non-malleable with overwhelming probability. Alternatively, we can view the result as providing an efficient non-malleable code in the 'common reference string' model. We also introduce a new notion of non-malleable key derivation, which uses randomness x to derive a secret key y = h(x) in such a way that, even if x is tampered to a different value x' = f(x) , the derived key y' = h(x') does not reveal any information about y. Our results for non-malleable key derivation are analogous to those for non-malleable codes. As a useful tool in our analysis, we rely on the notion of 'leakage-resilient storage' of DavĂŹ, Dziembowski, and Venturi (SCN '10), and, as a result of independent interest, we also significantly improve on the parameters of such schemes
Recommended from our members
Complexity Theory
Computational Complexity Theory is the mathematical study of the intrinsic power and limitations of computational resources like time, space, or randomness. The current workshop focused on recent developments in various sub-areas including arithmetic complexity, Boolean complexity, communication complexity, cryptography, probabilistic proof systems, pseudorandomness and randomness extraction. Many of the developments are related to diverse mathematical fields such as algebraic geometry, combinatorial number theory, probability theory, representation theory, and the theory of error-correcting codes
Separation of Reliability and Secrecy in Rate-Limited Secret-Key Generation
For a discrete or a continuous source model, we study the problem of
secret-key generation with one round of rate-limited public communication
between two legitimate users. Although we do not provide new bounds on the
wiretap secret-key (WSK) capacity for the discrete source model, we use an
alternative achievability scheme that may be useful for practical applications.
As a side result, we conveniently extend known bounds to the case of a
continuous source model. Specifically, we consider a sequential key-generation
strategy, that implements a rate-limited reconciliation step to handle
reliability, followed by a privacy amplification step performed with extractors
to handle secrecy. We prove that such a sequential strategy achieves the best
known bounds for the rate-limited WSK capacity (under the assumption of
degraded sources in the case of two-way communication). However, we show that,
unlike the case of rate-unlimited public communication, achieving the
reconciliation capacity in a sequential strategy does not necessarily lead to
achieving the best known bounds for the WSK capacity. Consequently, reliability
and secrecy can be treated successively but not independently, thereby
exhibiting a limitation of sequential strategies for rate-limited public
communication. Nevertheless, we provide scenarios for which reliability and
secrecy can be treated successively and independently, such as the two-way
rate-limited SK capacity, the one-way rate-limited WSK capacity for degraded
binary symmetric sources, and the one-way rate-limited WSK capacity for
Gaussian degraded sources.Comment: 18 pages, two-column, 9 figures, accepted to IEEE Transactions on
Information Theory; corrected typos; updated references; minor change in
titl
- âŠ