4,173 research outputs found

    Throughput Maximization in Multiprocessor Speed-Scaling

    Full text link
    We are given a set of nn jobs that have to be executed on a set of mm speed-scalable machines that can vary their speeds dynamically using the energy model introduced in [Yao et al., FOCS'95]. Every job jj is characterized by its release date rjr_j, its deadline djd_j, its processing volume pi,jp_{i,j} if jj is executed on machine ii and its weight wjw_j. We are also given a budget of energy EE and our objective is to maximize the weighted throughput, i.e. the total weight of jobs that are completed between their respective release dates and deadlines. We propose a polynomial-time approximation algorithm where the preemption of the jobs is allowed but not their migration. Our algorithm uses a primal-dual approach on a linearized version of a convex program with linear constraints. Furthermore, we present two optimal algorithms for the non-preemptive case where the number of machines is bounded by a fixed constant. More specifically, we consider: {\em (a)} the case of identical processing volumes, i.e. pi,j=pp_{i,j}=p for every ii and jj, for which we present a polynomial-time algorithm for the unweighted version, which becomes a pseudopolynomial-time algorithm for the weighted throughput version, and {\em (b)} the case of agreeable instances, i.e. for which rirjr_i \le r_j if and only if didjd_i \le d_j, for which we present a pseudopolynomial-time algorithm. Both algorithms are based on a discretization of the problem and the use of dynamic programming

    Speed-scaling with no Preemptions

    Full text link
    We revisit the non-preemptive speed-scaling problem, in which a set of jobs have to be executed on a single or a set of parallel speed-scalable processor(s) between their release dates and deadlines so that the energy consumption to be minimized. We adopt the speed-scaling mechanism first introduced in [Yao et al., FOCS 1995] according to which the power dissipated is a convex function of the processor's speed. Intuitively, the higher is the speed of a processor, the higher is the energy consumption. For the single-processor case, we improve the best known approximation algorithm by providing a (1+ϵ)αB~α(1+\epsilon)^{\alpha}\tilde{B}_{\alpha}-approximation algorithm, where B~α\tilde{B}_{\alpha} is a generalization of the Bell number. For the multiprocessor case, we present an approximation algorithm of ratio B~α((1+ϵ)(1+wmaxwmin))α\tilde{B}_{\alpha}((1+\epsilon)(1+\frac{w_{\max}}{w_{\min}}))^{\alpha} improving the best known result by a factor of (52)α1(wmaxwmin)α(\frac{5}{2})^{\alpha-1}(\frac{w_{\max}}{w_{\min}})^{\alpha}. Notice that our result holds for the fully heterogeneous environment while the previous known result holds only in the more restricted case of parallel processors with identical power functions

    Complexity results for scheduling tasks in fixed intervals on two types of machines

    Get PDF
    Suppose that nn independent tasks are to be scheduled without preemption on an unlimited number of parallel machines of two types: inexpensive slow machines and expensive fast machines. Each task requires a given processing time on a slow machine or a given smaller processing time on a fast machine. We make two different feasibility assumptions: (a) each task has a specified processing interval, the length of which is equal to the processing time on a slow machine; (b) each task has a specified starting time. For either problem type, we wish to find a feasible schedule of minimum total machine cost. It is shown that both problems are NP-hard in the strong sense. These results are complemented by polynomial algorithms for some special cases

    Solving the Traveling Salesman Problem with release dates via branch and cut

    Get PDF
    In this paper we study the Traveling Salesman Problem with release dates (TSP-rd) and completion time minimization. The TSP-rd considers a single vehicle and a set of customers that must be served exactly once with goods that arrive to the depot over time, during the planning horizon. The time at which each requested good arrives is called release date and it is known in advance. The vehicle can perform multiple routes, however, it cannot depart to serve a customer before the associated release date. Thus, the release date of the customers in each route must not be greater than the starting time of the route. The objective is to determine a set of routes for the vehicle, starting and ending at the depot, where the completion time needed to serve all customers is minimized. We propose a new Integer Linear Programming model and develop a branch and cut algorithm with tailored enhancements to improve its performance. The algorithm proved to be able to significantly reduce the computation times when compared to a compact formulation tackled using a commercial mathematical programming solver, obtaining 24 new optimal solutions on benchmark instances with up to 30 customers within one hour. We further extend the benchmark to instances with up to 50 customers where the algorithm proved to be efficient. Building upon these results, the proposed model is adapted to new TSP-rd variants (Capacitated and Prize-Collecting TSP), with different objectives: completion time minimization and traveling distance minimization. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first in-depth study to report extensive results for the TSP-rd through a branch and cut, establishing a baseline and providing insights for future approaches. Overall, the approach proved to be very effective and gives a flexible framework for several variants, opening the discussion about formulations, algorithms and new benchmark instances

    Energy-efficient algorithms for non-preemptive speed-scaling

    Full text link
    We improve complexity bounds for energy-efficient speed scheduling problems for both the single processor and multi-processor cases. Energy conservation has become a major concern, so revisiting traditional scheduling problems to take into account the energy consumption has been part of the agenda of the scheduling community for the past few years. We consider the energy minimizing speed scaling problem introduced by Yao et al. where we wish to schedule a set of jobs, each with a release date, deadline and work volume, on a set of identical processors. The processors may change speed as a function of time and the energy they consume is the α\alphath power of its speed. The objective is then to find a feasible schedule which minimizes the total energy used. We show that in the setting with an arbitrary number of processors where all work volumes are equal, there is a 2(1+ε)(5(1+ε))α1B~α=Oα(1)2(1+\varepsilon)(5(1+\varepsilon))^{\alpha -1}\tilde{B}_{\alpha}=O_{\alpha}(1) approximation algorithm, where B~α\tilde{B}_{\alpha} is the generalized Bell number. This is the first constant factor algorithm for this problem. This algorithm extends to general unequal processor-dependent work volumes, up to losing a factor of ((1+r)r2)α(\frac{(1+r)r}{2})^{\alpha} in the approximation, where rr is the maximum ratio between two work volumes. We then show this latter problem is APX-hard, even in the special case when all release dates and deadlines are equal and rr is 4. In the single processor case, we introduce a new linear programming formulation of speed scaling and prove that its integrality gap is at most 12α112^{\alpha -1}. As a corollary, we obtain a (12(1+ε))α1(12(1+\varepsilon))^{\alpha -1} approximation algorithm where there is a single processor, improving on the previous best bound of 2α1(1+ε)αB~α2^{\alpha-1}(1+\varepsilon)^{\alpha}\tilde{B}_{\alpha} when α25\alpha \ge 25

    Efficient Heuristics for Scheduling with Release and Delivery Times

    Get PDF
    In this chapter, we describe efficient heuristics for scheduling jobs with release and delivery times with the objective to minimize the maximum job completion time. These heuristics are essentially based on a commonly used scheduling theory in Jackson’s extended heuristic. We present basic structural properties of the solutions delivered by Jackson’s heuristic and then illustrate how one can exploit them to build efficient heuristics

    Mode selection, routing and scheduling for inland container transport

    Get PDF
    corecore