1,197 research outputs found
Input-Driven Tissue P Automata
We introduce several variants of input-driven tissue P automata where the
rules to be applied only depend on the input symbol. Both strings and multisets are
considered as input objects; the strings are either read from an input tape or defined
by the sequence of symbols taken in, and the multisets are given in an input cell at the
beginning of a computation, enclosed in a vesicle. Additional symbols generated during a
computation are stored in this vesicle, too. An input is accepted when the vesicle reaches a
final cell and it is empty. The computational power of some variants of input-driven tissue
P automata is illustrated by examples and compared with the power of the input-driven
variants of other automata as register machines and counter automata
Generalizing input-driven languages: theoretical and practical benefits
Regular languages (RL) are the simplest family in Chomsky's hierarchy. Thanks
to their simplicity they enjoy various nice algebraic and logic properties that
have been successfully exploited in many application fields. Practically all of
their related problems are decidable, so that they support automatic
verification algorithms. Also, they can be recognized in real-time.
Context-free languages (CFL) are another major family well-suited to
formalize programming, natural, and many other classes of languages; their
increased generative power w.r.t. RL, however, causes the loss of several
closure properties and of the decidability of important problems; furthermore
they need complex parsing algorithms. Thus, various subclasses thereof have
been defined with different goals, spanning from efficient, deterministic
parsing to closure properties, logic characterization and automatic
verification techniques.
Among CFL subclasses, so-called structured ones, i.e., those where the
typical tree-structure is visible in the sentences, exhibit many of the
algebraic and logic properties of RL, whereas deterministic CFL have been
thoroughly exploited in compiler construction and other application fields.
After surveying and comparing the main properties of those various language
families, we go back to operator precedence languages (OPL), an old family
through which R. Floyd pioneered deterministic parsing, and we show that they
offer unexpected properties in two fields so far investigated in totally
independent ways: they enable parsing parallelization in a more effective way
than traditional sequential parsers, and exhibit the same algebraic and logic
properties so far obtained only for less expressive language families
Streaming Property Testing of Visibly Pushdown Languages
In the context of language recognition, we demonstrate the superiority of
streaming property testers against streaming algorithms and property testers,
when they are not combined. Initiated by Feigenbaum et al., a streaming
property tester is a streaming algorithm recognizing a language under the
property testing approximation: it must distinguish inputs of the language from
those that are -far from it, while using the smallest possible
memory (rather than limiting its number of input queries).
Our main result is a streaming -property tester for visibly
pushdown languages (VPL) with one-sided error using memory space
.
This constructions relies on a (non-streaming) property tester for weighted
regular languages based on a previous tester by Alon et al. We provide a simple
application of this tester for streaming testing special cases of instances of
VPL that are already hard for both streaming algorithms and property testers.
Our main algorithm is a combination of an original simulation of visibly
pushdown automata using a stack with small height but possible items of linear
size. In a second step, those items are replaced by small sketches. Those
sketches relies on a notion of suffix-sampling we introduce. This sampling is
the key idea connecting our streaming tester algorithm to property testers.Comment: 23 pages. Major modifications in the presentatio
Pushdown Control-Flow Analysis of Higher-Order Programs
Context-free approaches to static analysis gain precision over classical
approaches by perfectly matching returns to call sites---a property that
eliminates spurious interprocedural paths. Vardoulakis and Shivers's recent
formulation of CFA2 showed that it is possible (if expensive) to apply
context-free methods to higher-order languages and gain the same boost in
precision achieved over first-order programs.
To this young body of work on context-free analysis of higher-order programs,
we contribute a pushdown control-flow analysis framework, which we derive as an
abstract interpretation of a CESK machine with an unbounded stack. One
instantiation of this framework marks the first polyvariant pushdown analysis
of higher-order programs; another marks the first polynomial-time analysis. In
the end, we arrive at a framework for control-flow analysis that can
efficiently compute pushdown generalizations of classical control-flow
analyses.Comment: The 2010 Workshop on Scheme and Functional Programmin
Algebraic properties of structured context-free languages: old approaches and novel developments
The historical research line on the algebraic properties of structured CF
languages initiated by McNaughton's Parenthesis Languages has recently
attracted much renewed interest with the Balanced Languages, the Visibly
Pushdown Automata languages (VPDA), the Synchronized Languages, and the
Height-deterministic ones. Such families preserve to a varying degree the basic
algebraic properties of Regular languages: boolean closure, closure under
reversal, under concatenation, and Kleene star. We prove that the VPDA family
is strictly contained within the Floyd Grammars (FG) family historically known
as operator precedence. Languages over the same precedence matrix are known to
be closed under boolean operations, and are recognized by a machine whose pop
or push operations on the stack are purely determined by terminal letters. We
characterize VPDA's as the subclass of FG having a peculiarly structured set of
precedence relations, and balanced grammars as a further restricted case. The
non-counting invariance property of FG has a direct implication for VPDA too.Comment: Extended version of paper presented at WORDS2009, Salerno,Italy,
September 200
Defect Particle Kinematics in One-Dimensional Cellular Automata
Let A^Z be the Cantor space of bi-infinite sequences in a finite alphabet A,
and let sigma be the shift map on A^Z. A `cellular automaton' is a continuous,
sigma-commuting self-map Phi of A^Z, and a `Phi-invariant subshift' is a
closed, (Phi,sigma)-invariant subset X of A^Z. Suppose x is a sequence in A^Z
which is X-admissible everywhere except for some small region we call a
`defect'. It has been empirically observed that such defects persist under
iteration of Phi, and often propagate like `particles'. We characterize the
motion of these particles, and show that it falls into several regimes, ranging
from simple deterministic motion, to generalized random walks, to complex
motion emulating Turing machines or pushdown automata. One consequence is that
some questions about defect behaviour are formally undecidable.Comment: 37 pages, 9 figures, 3 table
- …