Randomized algorithms for fully online multiprocessor scheduling with testing

We contribute the first randomized algorithm that is an integration of arbitrarily many deterministic algorithms for the fully online multiprocessor scheduling with testing problem. When there are two machines, we show that with two component algorithms its expected competitive ratio is already strictly smaller than the best proven deterministic competitive ratio lower bound. Such algorithmic results are rarely seen in the literature. Multiprocessor scheduling is one of the first combinatorial optimization problems that have received numerous studies. Recently, several research groups examined its testing variant, in which each job $J_j$ arrives with an upper bound $u_j$ on the processing time and a testing operation of length $t_j$; one can choose to execute $J_j$ for $u_j$ time, or to test $J_j$ for $t_j$ time to obtain the exact processing time $p_j$ followed by immediately executing the job for $p_j$ time. Our target problem is the fully online version, in which the jobs arrive in sequence so that the testing decision needs to be made at the job arrival as well as the designated machine. We propose an expected $(\sqrt{\varphi + 3} + 1) (\approx 3.1490)$-competitive randomized algorithm as a non-uniform probability distribution over arbitrarily many deterministic algorithms, where $\varphi = \frac {\sqrt{5} + 1}2$ is the Golden ratio. When there are two machines, we show that our randomized algorithm based on two deterministic algorithms is already expected $\frac {3 \varphi + 3 \sqrt{13 - 7\varphi}}4 (\approx 2.1839)$-competitive. Besides, we use Yao's principle to prove lower bounds of $1.6682$ and $1.6522$ on the expected competitive ratio for any randomized algorithm at the presence of at least three machines and only two machines, respectively, and prove a lower bound of $2.2117$ on the competitive ratio for any deterministic algorithm when there are only two machines.Comment: 21 pages with 1 plot; an extended abstract to be submitte

Online Algorithms with Randomly Infused Advice

We introduce a novel method for the rigorous quantitative evaluation of online algorithms that relaxes the "radical worst-case" perspective of classic competitive analysis. In contrast to prior work, our method, referred to as randomly infused advice (RIA), does not make any assumptions about the input sequence and does not rely on the development of designated online algorithms. Rather, it can be applied to existing online randomized algorithms, introducing a means to evaluate their performance in scenarios that lie outside the radical worst-case regime. More concretely, an online algorithm ALG with RIA benefits from pieces of advice generated by an omniscient but not entirely reliable oracle. The crux of the new method is that the advice is provided to ALG by writing it into the buffer ? from which ALG normally reads its random bits, hence allowing us to augment it through a very simple and non-intrusive interface. The (un)reliability of the oracle is captured via a parameter 0 ? ? ? 1 that determines the probability (per round) that the advice is successfully infused by the oracle; if the advice is not infused, which occurs with probability 1 - ?, then the buffer ? contains fresh random bits (as in the classic online setting). The applicability of the new RIA method is demonstrated by applying it to three extensively studied online problems: paging, uniform metrical task systems, and online set cover. For these problems, we establish new upper bounds on the competitive ratio of classic online algorithms that improve as the infusion parameter ? increases. These are complemented with (often tight) lower bounds on the competitive ratio of online algorithms with RIA for the three problems

Ramsey-type theorems for metric spaces with applications to online problems

A nearly logarithmic lower bound on the randomized competitive ratio for the metrical task systems problem is presented. This implies a similar lower bound for the extensively studied k-server problem. The proof is based on Ramsey-type theorems for metric spaces, that state that every metric space contains a large subspace which is approximately a hierarchically well-separated tree (and in particular an ultrametric). These Ramsey-type theorems may be of independent interest.Comment: Fix an error in the metadata. 31 pages, 0 figures. Preliminary version in FOCS '01. To be published in J. Comput. System Sc

Metrical Service Systems with Multiple Servers

We study the problem of metrical service systems with multiple servers (MSSMS), which generalizes two well-known problems -- the $k$-server problem, and metrical service systems. The MSSMS problem is to service requests, each of which is an $l$-point subset of a metric space, using $k$ servers, with the objective of minimizing the total distance traveled by the servers. Feuerstein initiated a study of this problem by proving upper and lower bounds on the deterministic competitive ratio for uniform metric spaces. We improve Feuerstein's analysis of the upper bound and prove that his algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of $k({{k+l}\choose{l}}-1)$. In the randomized online setting, for uniform metric spaces, we give an algorithm which achieves a competitive ratio $\mathcal{O}(k^3\log l)$, beating the deterministic lower bound of ${{k+l}\choose{l}}-1$. We prove that any randomized algorithm for MSSMS on uniform metric spaces must be $\Omega(\log kl)$-competitive. We then prove an improved lower bound of ${{k+2l-1}\choose{k}}-{{k+l-1}\choose{k}}$ on the competitive ratio of any deterministic algorithm for $(k,l)$-MSSMS, on general metric spaces. In the offline setting, we give a pseudo-approximation algorithm for $(k,l)$-MSSMS on general metric spaces, which achieves an approximation ratio of $l$ using $kl$ servers. We also prove a matching hardness result, that a pseudo-approximation with less than $kl$ servers is unlikely, even for uniform metric spaces. For general metric spaces, we highlight the limitations of a few popular techniques, that have been used in algorithm design for the $k$-server problem and metrical service systems.Comment: 18 pages; accepted for publication at COCOON 201

Online Service with Delay

In this paper, we introduce the online service with delay problem. In this problem, there are $n$ points in a metric space that issue service requests over time, and a server that serves these requests. The goal is to minimize the sum of distance traveled by the server and the total delay in serving the requests. This problem models the fundamental tradeoff between batching requests to improve locality and reducing delay to improve response time, that has many applications in operations management, operating systems, logistics, supply chain management, and scheduling. Our main result is to show a poly-logarithmic competitive ratio for the online service with delay problem. This result is obtained by an algorithm that we call the preemptive service algorithm. The salient feature of this algorithm is a process called preemptive service, which uses a novel combination of (recursive) time forwarding and spatial exploration on a metric space. We hope this technique will be useful for related problems such as reordering buffer management, online TSP, vehicle routing, etc. We also generalize our results to $k > 1$ servers.Comment: 30 pages, 11 figures, Appeared in 49th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 201

On Randomized Memoryless Algorithms for the Weighted kk-server Problem

The weighted $k$-server problem is a generalization of the $k$-server problem in which the cost of moving a server of weight $\beta_i$ through a distance $d$ is $\beta_i\cdot d$. The weighted server problem on uniform spaces models caching where caches have different write costs. We prove tight bounds on the performance of randomized memoryless algorithms for this problem on uniform metric spaces. We prove that there is an $\alpha_k$-competitive memoryless algorithm for this problem, where $\alpha_k=\alpha_{k-1}^2+3\alpha_{k-1}+1$; $\alpha_1=1$. On the other hand we also prove that no randomized memoryless algorithm can have competitive ratio better than $\alpha_k$. To prove the upper bound of $\alpha_k$ we develop a framework to bound from above the competitive ratio of any randomized memoryless algorithm for this problem. The key technical contribution is a method for working with potential functions defined implicitly as the solution of a linear system. The result is robust in the sense that a small change in the probabilities used by the algorithm results in a small change in the upper bound on the competitive ratio. The above result has two important implications. Firstly this yields an $\alpha_k$-competitive memoryless algorithm for the weighted $k$-server problem on uniform spaces. This is the first competitive algorithm for $k>2$ which is memoryless. Secondly, this helps us prove that the Harmonic algorithm, which chooses probabilities in inverse proportion to weights, has a competitive ratio of $k\alpha_k$.Comment: Published at the 54th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2013