Continuous Glucose Monitors and Automated Insulin Dosing Systems in the Hospital Consensus Guideline.

This article is the work product of the Continuous Glucose Monitor and Automated Insulin Dosing Systems in the Hospital Consensus Guideline Panel, which was organized by Diabetes Technology Society and met virtually on April 23, 2020. The guideline panel consisted of 24 international experts in the use of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and automated insulin dosing (AID) systems representing adult endocrinology, pediatric endocrinology, obstetrics and gynecology, advanced practice nursing, diabetes care and education, clinical chemistry, bioengineering, and product liability law. The panelists reviewed the medical literature pertaining to five topics: (1) continuation of home CGMs after hospitalization, (2) initiation of CGMs in the hospital, (3) continuation of AID systems in the hospital, (4) logistics and hands-on care of hospitalized patients using CGMs and AID systems, and (5) data management of CGMs and AID systems in the hospital. The panelists then developed three types of recommendations for each topic, including clinical practice (to use the technology optimally), research (to improve the safety and effectiveness of the technology), and hospital policies (to build an environment for facilitating use of these devices) for each of the five topics. The panelists voted on 78 proposed recommendations. Based on the panel vote, 77 recommendations were classified as either strong or mild. One recommendation failed to reach consensus. Additional research is needed on CGMs and AID systems in the hospital setting regarding device accuracy, practices for deployment, data management, and achievable outcomes. This guideline is intended to support these technologies for the management of hospitalized patients with diabetes

Integral-based filtering of continuous glucose sensor measurements for glycaemic control in critical care

Hyperglycaemia is prevalent in critical illness and increases the risk of further complications and mortality, while tight control can reduce mortality up to 43%. Adaptive control methods are capable of highly accurate, targeted blood glucose regulation using limited numbers of manual measurements due to patient discomfort and labour intensity. Therefore, the option to obtain greater data density using emerging continuous glucose sensing devices is attractive. However, the few such systems currently available can have errors in excess of 20-30%. In contrast, typical bedside testing kits have errors of approximately 7-10%. Despite greater measurement frequency larger errors significantly impact the resulting glucose and patient specific parameter estimates, and thus the control actions determined creating an important safety and performance issue. This paper models the impact of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS, Medtronic, Northridge, CA) on model-based parameter identification and glucose prediction. An integral-based fitting and filtering method is developed to reduce the effect of these errors. A noise model is developed based on CGMS data reported in the literature, and is slightly conservative with a mean Clarke Error Grid (CEG) correlation of R=0.81 (range: 0.68-0.88) as compared to a reported value of R=0.82 in a critical care study. Using 17 virtual patient profiles developed from retrospective clinical data, this noise model was used to test the methods developed. Monte-Carlo simulation for each patient resulted in an average absolute one-hour glucose prediction error of 6.20% (range: 4.97-8.06%) with an average standard deviation per patient of 5.22% (range: 3.26-8.55%). Note that all the methods and results are generalisable to similar applications outside of critical care, such as less acute wards and eventually ambulatory individuals. Clinically, the results show one possible computational method for managing the larger errors encountered in emerging continuous blood glucose sensors, thus enabling their more effective use in clinical glucose regulation studies

In silico evaluation of a control system and algorithm for automated insulin infusion in the ICU setting

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It is known that tight control of glucose in the Intensive Care Unit reduces morbidity and mortality not only in diabetic patients but also in those non-diabetics who become transiently hyperglycemic. Taking advantage of a recently marketed subcutaneous glucose sensor we designed an <it>Automatic Insulin Infusion System </it>(AIIS) for inpatient treatment, and tested its stability under simulated clinical conditions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The system included: reference glucose, glucose sensor, insulin and glucose infusion controllers and emergency infusion logic. We carried out computer simulations using Matlab/Simulink^®, in both common and worst-case conditions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The system was capable of controlling glucose levels without entering in a phase of catastrophic instability, even under severe simulated challenges. Care was taken to include in all simulations the 5-10 minute delay of the subcutaneous glucose signal when compared to the real-time serum glucose signal, a well-known characteristic of all subcutaneous glucose sensors.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>When tested <it>in-Silico</it>, a commercially available subcutaneous glucose sensor allowed the stable functioning of a proportional-derivative Automatic Insulin Infusion System, which was able to maintain glucose within acceptable limits when using a well-established glucose response model simulating a patient. Testing of the system <it>in vivo </it>using animal models is now warranted.</p

Model-Based Closed-Loop Glucose Control in Critical Illness

Stress hyperglycemia is a common complication in critically ill patients and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Tight glucose control (TGC) has shown promise in reducing mean glucose levels in critically ill patients and may mitigate the harmful repercussions of stress hyperglycemia. Despite the promise of TGC, care must be taken to avoid hypoglycemia, which has been implicated in the failure of some previous clinical attempts at TGC using intensive insulin therapies. In fact, a single hypoglycemic event has been shown to result in worsened patient outcomes. The nature of tight glucose regulation lends itself to automatic monitoring and control, thereby reducing the burden on clinical staff. A blood glucose target range of 110-130 mg/dL has been identified in the High-Density Intensive Care (HIDENIC) database at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). A control framework comprised of a zone model predictive controller (zMPC) with moving horizon estimation (MHE) is proposed to maintain euglycemia in critically ill patients. Using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) the proposed control scheme calculates optimized insulin and glucose infusion to maintain blood glucose concentrations within the target zone. Results from an observational study employing continuous glucose monitors at UPMC are used to reconstruct blood glucose from noisy CGM data, identify a model of CGM error in critically ill patients, and develop an in silico virtual patient cohort. The virtual patient cohort recapitulates expected physiologic trends with respect to insulin sensitivity and glycemic variability. Furthermore, a mechanism is introduced utilizing proportional-integral-derivative (PID) to modulate basal pancreatic insulin secretion rates in virtual patients. The result is virtual patients who behave realistically in simulated oral glucose tolerance tests and insulin tolerance tests and match clinically observed responses. Finally, in silico trials are used to simulate clinical conditions and test the developed control system under realistic conditions. Under normal conditions the control system is able to tightly control glucose concentrations within the target zone while avoiding hypoglycemia. To safely counteract the effect of faulty CGMs a system to detect sensor error and request CGM recalibration is introduced. Simulated in silico tests of this system results in accurate detection of excessive error leading to higher quality control and hypoglycemia reduction

The development of a glucose prediction model in critically ill patients

Purpose: The aim of the current study is to develop a prediction model for glucose levels applicable for all patients admitted to the ICU with an expected ICU stay of at least 24 h. This model will be incorporated in a closed-loop glucose system to continuously and automatically control glucose values. Methods: Data from a previous single-center randomized controlled study was used. All patients received a FreeStyle Navigator II subcutaneous CGM system from Abbott during their ICU stay. The total dataset was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set. A glucose prediction model was developed based on historical glucose data. Accuracy of the prediction model was determined using the Mean Squared Difference (MSD), the Mean Absolute Difference (MAD) and a Clarke Error Grid (CEG). Results: The dataset included 94 ICU patients with a total of 134,673 glucose measurements points that were used for modelling. MSD was 0.410 +/- 0.495 for the model, the MAD was 5.19 +/- 2.63 and in the CEG 99.8% of the data points were in the clinically acceptable regions. Conclusion: In this study a glucose prediction model for ICU patients is developed. This study shows that it is possible to accurately predict a patient's glucose 30 min ahead based on historical glucose data. This is the first step in the development of a closed-loop glucose system. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

The Impact of Parameter Identification Methods on Drug Therapy Control in an Intensive Care Unit

This paper investigates the impact of fast parameter identification methods, which do not require any forward simulations, on model-based glucose control, using retrospective data in the Christchurch Hospital Intensive Care Unit. The integral-based identification method has been previously clinically validated and extensively applied in a number of biomedical applications; and is a crucial element in the presented model-based therapeutics approach. Common non-linear regression and gradient descent approaches are too computationally intense and not suitable for the glucose control applications presented. The main focus in this paper is on better characterizing and understanding the importance of the integral in the formulation and the effect it has on model-based drug therapy control. As a comparison, a potentially more natural derivative formulation which has the same computation speed advantages is investigated, and is shown to go unstable with respect to modelling error which is always present clinically. The integral method remains robust

The use of continuous glucose monitoring combined with computer-based eMPC algorithm for tight glucose control in cardiosurgical ICU.

AIM: In postcardiac surgery patients, we assessed the performance of a system for intensive intravenous insulin therapy using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and enhanced model predictive control (eMPC) algorithm. METHODS: Glucose control in eMPC-CGM group (n = 12) was compared with a control (C) group (n = 12) treated by intravenous insulin infusion adjusted according to eMPC protocol with a variable sampling interval alone. In the eMPC-CGM group glucose measured with a REAL-Time CGM system (Guardian RT) served as input for the eMPC adjusting insulin infusion every 15 minutes. The accuracy of CGM was evaluated hourly using reference arterial glucose and Clarke error-grid analysis (C-EGA). Target glucose range was 4.4-6.1 mmol/L. RESULTS: Of the 277 paired CGM-reference glycemic values, 270 (97.5%) were in clinically acceptable zones of C-EGA and only 7 (2.5%) were in unacceptable D zone. Glucose control in eMPC-CGM group was comparable to C group in all measured values (average glycemia, percentage of time above, within, and below target range,). No episode of hypoglycemia (<2.9 mmol) occurred in eMPC-CGM group compared to 2 in C group. CONCLUSION: Our data show that the combination of eMPC algorithm with CGM is reliable and accurate enough to test this approach in a larger study population.Peer Reviewe