136,206 research outputs found
Relative Entailment Among Probabilistic Implications
We study a natural variant of the implicational fragment of propositional
logic. Its formulas are pairs of conjunctions of positive literals, related
together by an implicational-like connective; the semantics of this sort of
implication is defined in terms of a threshold on a conditional probability of
the consequent, given the antecedent: we are dealing with what the data
analysis community calls confidence of partial implications or association
rules. Existing studies of redundancy among these partial implications have
characterized so far only entailment from one premise and entailment from two
premises, both in the stand-alone case and in the case of presence of
additional classical implications (this is what we call "relative entailment").
By exploiting a previously noted alternative view of the entailment in terms of
linear programming duality, we characterize exactly the cases of entailment
from arbitrary numbers of premises, again both in the stand-alone case and in
the case of presence of additional classical implications. As a result, we
obtain decision algorithms of better complexity; additionally, for each
potential case of entailment, we identify a critical confidence threshold and
show that it is, actually, intrinsic to each set of premises and antecedent of
the conclusion
Linear Types, Protocols, and Processes in Classical F°
Session types and typestate both promise a type system that can reason about protocol
adherence. The complexity budgets of most programming languages, however, do not
allow for new forms of types aimed at specific problem domains--even domains as broad
as these.
Classical F◦ --read F-pop --is a typed λ-calculus based on classical (i.e., full) linear
logic, wherein session types arise naturally from the interaction between the usual sums,
products, and implications of linear logic and a simple process model, with the dualizing
negation of classical logic naturally accounting for how a protocol is seen by each of a
channel\u27s endpoints. Classical Fâ—¦ expressions evaluate to processes, reminiscent of those
in the π-calculus, that communicate over channels, but source expressions, rather than
including processes and channels, employ only two novel control operators that account
for process creation and communication.
Fâ—¦ is introduced by way of its intuitionistic fragment, which even on its own can account
for typestate: the combination of linearity and polymorphism leads to natural encodings
of many programmer-specified protocols. In fact, any protocol expressible as a regular
language can be encoded in an intuitionistic Fâ—¦ type. Fâ—¦ distinguishes between linear
and unrestricted types by using kinds together with a notion of subkinding, avoiding
the pitfalls of approaches based on type qualifiers or modalities; kinds are related by a
subkinding order that allows unrestricted types to be treated as though they were linear.
Soundness for intuitionistic and classical Fâ—¦ is proved both in the standard operational
sense of preservation and progress and for an augmented semantics that shows more
directly that the expected properties of linearity are preserved. This establishes the absence
of deadlocks in closed, well-typed Fâ—¦ programs; it also guarantees that such programs will
not leak processes as long as their result types are unrestricted
Classical BI: Its Semantics and Proof Theory
We present Classical BI (CBI), a new addition to the family of bunched logics
which originates in O'Hearn and Pym's logic of bunched implications BI. CBI
differs from existing bunched logics in that its multiplicative connectives
behave classically rather than intuitionistically (including in particular a
multiplicative version of classical negation). At the semantic level,
CBI-formulas have the normal bunched logic reading as declarative statements
about resources, but its resource models necessarily feature more structure
than those for other bunched logics; principally, they satisfy the requirement
that every resource has a unique dual. At the proof-theoretic level, a very
natural formalism for CBI is provided by a display calculus \`a la Belnap,
which can be seen as a generalisation of the bunched sequent calculus for BI.
In this paper we formulate the aforementioned model theory and proof theory for
CBI, and prove some fundamental results about the logic, most notably
completeness of the proof theory with respect to the semantics.Comment: 42 pages, 8 figure
Non-normal modalities in variants of Linear Logic
This article presents modal versions of resource-conscious logics. We
concentrate on extensions of variants of Linear Logic with one minimal
non-normal modality. In earlier work, where we investigated agency in
multi-agent systems, we have shown that the results scale up to logics with
multiple non-minimal modalities. Here, we start with the language of
propositional intuitionistic Linear Logic without the additive disjunction, to
which we add a modality. We provide an interpretation of this language on a
class of Kripke resource models extended with a neighbourhood function: modal
Kripke resource models. We propose a Hilbert-style axiomatization and a
Gentzen-style sequent calculus. We show that the proof theories are sound and
complete with respect to the class of modal Kripke resource models. We show
that the sequent calculus admits cut elimination and that proof-search is in
PSPACE. We then show how to extend the results when non-commutative connectives
are added to the language. Finally, we put the logical framework to use by
instantiating it as logics of agency. In particular, we propose a logic to
reason about the resource-sensitive use of artefacts and illustrate it with a
variety of examples
On Various Negative Translations
Several proof translations of classical mathematics into intuitionistic
mathematics have been proposed in the literature over the past century. These
are normally referred to as negative translations or double-negation
translations. Among those, the most commonly cited are translations due to
Kolmogorov, Godel, Gentzen, Kuroda and Krivine (in chronological order). In
this paper we propose a framework for explaining how these different
translations are related to each other. More precisely, we define a notion of a
(modular) simplification starting from Kolmogorov translation, which leads to a
partial order between different negative translations. In this derived
ordering, Kuroda and Krivine are minimal elements. Two new minimal translations
are introduced, with Godel and Gentzen translations sitting in between
Kolmogorov and one of these new translations.Comment: In Proceedings CL&C 2010, arXiv:1101.520
Logical operators for ontological modeling
We show that logic has more to offer to ontologists than standard first order
and modal operators. We first describe some operators of linear logic which we
believe are particularly suitable for ontological modeling, and suggest how to interpret
them within an ontological framework. After showing how they can coexist
with those of classical logic, we analyze three notions of artifact from the literature
to conclude that these linear operators allow for reducing the ontological commitment
needed for their formalization, and even simplify their logical formulation
Buying Logical Principles with Ontological Coin: The Metaphysical Lessons of Adding epsilon to Intuitionistic Logic
We discuss the philosophical implications of formal results showing the con-
sequences of adding the epsilon operator to intuitionistic predicate logic. These
results are related to Diaconescu’s theorem, a result originating in topos theory
that, translated to constructive set theory, says that the axiom of choice (an
“existence principle”) implies the law of excluded middle (which purports to be
a logical principle). As a logical choice principle, epsilon allows us to translate
that result to a logical setting, where one can get an analogue of Diaconescu’s
result, but also can disentangle the roles of certain other assumptions that are
hidden in mathematical presentations. It is our view that these results have not
received the attention they deserve: logicians are unlikely to read a discussion
because the results considered are “already well known,” while the results are
simultaneously unknown to philosophers who do not specialize in what most
philosophers will regard as esoteric logics. This is a problem, since these results
have important implications for and promise signif i cant illumination of contem-
porary debates in metaphysics. The point of this paper is to make the nature
of the results clear in a way accessible to philosophers who do not specialize in
logic, and in a way that makes clear their implications for contemporary philo-
sophical discussions. To make the latter point, we will focus on Dummettian discussions of realism and anti-realism.
Keywords: epsilon, axiom of choice, metaphysics, intuitionistic logic, Dummett,
realism, antirealis
A Galois connection between classical and intuitionistic logics. II: Semantics
Three classes of models of QHC, the joint logic of problems and propositions,
are constructed, including a class of subset/sheaf-valued models that is
related to solutions of some actual problems (such as solutions of algebraic
equations) and combines the familiar Leibniz-Euler-Venn semantics of classical
logic with a BHK-type semantics of intuitionistic logic.
To test the models, we consider a number of principles and rules, which
empirically appear to cover all "sufficiently simple" natural conjectures about
the behaviour of the operators ! and ?, and include two hypotheses put forward
by Hilbert and Kolmogorov, as formalized in the language of QHC. Each of these
turns out to be either derivable in QHC or equivalent to one of only 13
principles and 1 rule, of which 10 principles and 1 rule are conservative over
classical and intuitionistic logics. The three classes of models together
suffice to confirm the independence of these 10 principles and 1 rule, and to
determine the full lattice of implications between them, apart from one
potential implication.Comment: 35 pages. v4: Section 4.6 "Summary" is added at the end of the paper.
v3: Major revision of a half of v2. The results are improved and rewritten in
terms of the meta-logic. The other half of v2 (Euclid's Elements as a theory
over QHC) is expected to make part III after a revisio
- …