Statistical Function Tagging and Grammatical Relations of Myanmar Sentences

This paper describes a context free grammar (CFG) based grammatical relations for Myanmar sentences which combine corpus-based function tagging system. Part of the challenge of statistical function tagging for Myanmar sentences comes from the fact that Myanmar has free-phrase-order and a complex morphological system. Function tagging is a pre-processing step to show grammatical relations of Myanmar sentences. In the task of function tagging, which tags the function of Myanmar sentences with correct segmentation, POS (part-of-speech) tagging and chunking information, we use Naive Bayesian theory to disambiguate the possible function tags of a word. We apply context free grammar (CFG) to find out the grammatical relations of the function tags. We also create a functional annotated tagged corpus for Myanmar and propose the grammar rules for Myanmar sentences. Experiments show that our analysis achieves a good result with simple sentences and complex sentences.Comment: 16 pages, 7 figures, 8 tables, AIAA-2011 (India). arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:0912.1820 by other author

An Unsolicited Soliloquy on Dependency Parsing

Programa Oficial de Doutoramento en Computación . 5009V01[Abstract] This thesis presents work on dependency parsing covering two distinct lines of research. The first aims to develop efficient parsers so that they can be fast enough to parse large amounts of data while still maintaining decent accuracy. We investigate two techniques to achieve this. The first is a cognitively-inspired method and the second uses a model distillation method. The first technique proved to be utterly dismal, while the second was somewhat of a success. The second line of research presented in this thesis evaluates parsers. This is also done in two ways. We aim to evaluate what causes variation in parsing performance for different algorithms and also different treebanks. This evaluation is grounded in dependency displacements (the directed distance between a dependent and its head) and the subsequent distributions associated with algorithms and the distributions found in treebanks. This work sheds some light on the variation in performance for both different algorithms and different treebanks. And the second part of this area focuses on the utility of part-of-speech tags when used with parsing systems and questions the standard position of assuming that they might help but they certainly won’t hurt.[Resumen] Esta tesis presenta trabajo sobre análisis de dependencias que cubre dos líneas de investigación distintas. La primera tiene como objetivo desarrollar analizadores eficientes, de modo que sean suficientemente rápidos como para analizar grandes volúmenes de datos y, al mismo tiempo, sean suficientemente precisos. Investigamos dos métodos. El primero se basa en teorías cognitivas y el segundo usa una técnica de destilación. La primera técnica resultó un enorme fracaso, mientras que la segunda fue en cierto modo un ´éxito. La otra línea evalúa los analizadores sintácticos. Esto también se hace de dos maneras. Evaluamos la causa de la variación en el rendimiento de los analizadores para distintos algoritmos y corpus. Esta evaluación utiliza la diferencia entre las distribuciones del desplazamiento de arista (la distancia dirigida de las aristas) correspondientes a cada algoritmo y corpus. También evalúa la diferencia entre las distribuciones del desplazamiento de arista en los datos de entrenamiento y prueba. Este trabajo esclarece las variaciones en el rendimiento para algoritmos y corpus diferentes. La segunda parte de esta línea investiga la utilidad de las etiquetas gramaticales para los analizadores sintácticos.[Resumo] Esta tese presenta traballo sobre análise sintáctica, cubrindo dúas liñas de investigación. A primeira aspira a desenvolver analizadores eficientes, de maneira que sexan suficientemente rápidos para procesar grandes volumes de datos e á vez sexan precisos. Investigamos dous métodos. O primeiro baséase nunha teoría cognitiva, e o segundo usa unha técnica de destilación. O primeiro método foi un enorme fracaso, mentres que o segundo foi en certo modo un éxito. A outra liña avalúa os analizadores sintácticos. Esto tamén se fai de dúas maneiras. Avaliamos a causa da variación no rendemento dos analizadores para distintos algoritmos e corpus. Esta avaliaci´on usa a diferencia entre as distribucións do desprazamento de arista (a distancia dirixida das aristas) correspondentes aos algoritmos e aos corpus. Tamén avalía a diferencia entre as distribucións do desprazamento de arista nos datos de adestramento e proba. Este traballo esclarece as variacións no rendemento para algoritmos e corpus diferentes. A segunda parte desta liña investiga a utilidade das etiquetas gramaticais para os analizadores sintácticos.This work has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (FASTPARSE, grant agreement No 714150) and from the Centro de Investigación de Galicia (CITIC) which is funded by the Xunta de Galicia and the European Union (ERDF - Galicia 2014-2020 Program) by grant ED431G 2019/01.Xunta de Galicia; ED431G 2019/0

Ranking for Scalable Information Extraction

Information extraction systems are complex software tools that discover structured information in natural language text. For instance, an information extraction system trained to extract tuples for an Occurs-in(Natural Disaster, Location) relation may extract the tuple from the sentence: "A tsunami swept the coast of Hawaii." Having information in structured form enables more sophisticated querying and data mining than what is possible over the natural language text. Unfortunately, information extraction is a time-consuming task. For example, a state-of-the-art information extraction system to extract Occurs-in tuples may take up to two hours to process only 1,000 text documents. Since document collections routinely contain millions of documents or more, improving the efficiency and scalability of the information extraction process over these collections is critical. As a significant step towards this goal, this dissertation presents approaches for (i) enabling the deployment of efficient information extraction systems and (ii) scaling the information extraction process to large volumes of text. To enable the deployment of efficient information extraction systems, we have developed two crucial building blocks for this task. As a first contribution, we have created REEL, a toolkit to easily implement, evaluate, and deploy full-fledged relation extraction systems. REEL, in contrast to existing toolkits, effectively modularizes the key components involved in relation extraction systems and can integrate other long-established text processing and machine learning toolkits. To define a relation extraction system for a new relation and text collection, users only need to specify the desired configuration, which makes REEL a powerful framework for both research and application building. As a second contribution, we have addressed the problem of building representative extraction task-specific document samples from collections, a step often required by approaches for efficient information extraction. Specifically, we devised fully automatic document sampling techniques for information extraction that can produce better-quality document samples than the state-of-the-art sampling strategies; furthermore, our techniques are substantially more efficient than the existing alternative approaches. To scale the information extraction process to large volumes of text, we have developed approaches that address the efficiency and scalability of the extraction process by focusing the extraction effort on the collections, documents, and sentences worth processing for a given extraction task. For collections, we have studied both (adaptations of) state-of-the art approaches for estimating the number of documents in a collection that lead to the extraction of tuples as well as information extraction-specific approaches. Using these estimations we can identify the collections worth processing and ignore the rest, for efficiency. For documents, we have developed an adaptive document ranking approach that relies on learning-to-rank techniques to prioritize the documents that are likely to produce tuples for an extraction task of choice. Our approach revises the (learned) ranking decisions periodically as the extraction process progresses and new characteristics of the useful documents are revealed. Finally, for sentences, we have developed an approach based on the sparse group selection problem that identifies sentences|modeled as groups of words|that best characterize the extraction task. Beyond identifying sentences worth processing, our approach aims at selecting sentences that lead to the extraction of unseen, novel tuples. Our approaches are lightweight and efficient, and dramatically improve the efficiency and scalability of the information extraction process. We can often complete the extraction task by focusing on just a very small fraction of the available text, namely, the text that contains relevant information for the extraction task at hand. Our approaches therefore constitute a substantial step towards efficient and scalable information extraction over large volumes of text

Chunk Parsing Revisited

Chunk parsing is conceptually appealing but its performance has not been satisfactory for practical use. In this paper we show that chunk parsing can perform significantly better than previously reported by using a simple slidingwindow method and maximum entropy classifiers for phrase recognition in each level of chunking. Experimental results with the Penn Treebank corpus show that our chunk parser can give high-precision parsing outputs with very high speed (14 msec/sentence). We also present a parsing method for searching the best parse by considering the probabilities output by the maximum entropy classifiers, and show that the search method can further improve the parsing accuracy