IoTDM4BPMN: An IoT-Enhanced Decision Making Framework for BPMN 2.0

The relevance of the Internet of Things (IoT) for Business Process Management (BPM) support is increasing. IoT devices enable the collection and exchange of data over the Internet, whereby each physical device is uniquely identifiable through its embedded computing system. BPM, in turn, is concerned with analyzing, discovering, modeling, executing, and monitoring (digitized) business processes. By enhancing BPM systems with IoT capabilities, real-world data can be gathered and considered during process execution to enhance process monitoring as well as IoT-driven decision making. In this context, the aggregation of low-level IoT data into high-level process-relevant data constitutes a fundamental step towards IoT-driven decisions in business processes. This paper presents IoT Decision Making for Business Process Model and Notation (IoTDM4BPMN) a webbased framework for modeling, executing, and monitoring IoTdriven decisions in real-time. We give insights into the design and implementation of IoTDM4BPMN and provide a case study as a first validation that applies IoTDM4BPMN to the modeling, executing, and monitoring of a real-world IoT-driven decision process

Goal-based Workflow Adaptation for Role-based Resources in the Internet of Things

In recent years, the Internet of Things (IoT) has increasingly received attention from the Business Process Management (BPM) community. The integration of sensors and actuators into Process-Aware Information Systems (PAIS) enables the collection of real-time data about physical properties and the direct manipulation of real-world objects. In a broader sense, IoT-aware workflows provide means for context-aware workflow execution involving virtual and physical entities. However, IoT-aware workflow management imposes new requirements on workflow modeling and execution that are outside the scope of current modeling languages and workflow management systems. Things in the IoT may vanish, appear or stay unknown during workflow execution, which renders their allocation as workflow resources infeasible at design time. Besides, capabilities of Things are often intended to be available only in a particular real-world context at runtime, e.g., a service robot inside a smart home should only operate at full speed, if there are no residents in direct proximity. Such contextual restrictions for the dynamic exposure of resource capabilities are not considered by current approaches in IoT resource management that use services for exposing device functionalities. With this work, we aim at providing the modeling and runtime support for defining such restrictions on workflow resources at design time and enabling the dynamic and context-sensitive runtime allocation of Things as workflow resources. To achieve this goal, we propose contributions to the fields of resource management, i.e., resource perspective, and workflow management in the Internet of Things (IoT), divided into the user perspective representing the workflow modeling phase and the workflow perspective representing the runtime resource allocation phase. In the resource perspective, we propose an ontology for the modeling of Things, Roles, capabilities, physical entities, and their context-sensitive interrelations. The concept of Role is used to define non-exclusive subsets of capabilities of Things. A Thing can play a certain Role only under certain contextual restrictions defined by Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) rules. At runtime, the existing relations between the individuals of the ontology represent the current state of interactions between the physical and the cyber world. Through the dynamic activation and deactivation of Roles at runtime, the behavior of a Thing can be adapted to the current physical context. In the user perspective, we allow workflow modelers to define the goal of a workflow activity either by using semantic queries or by specifying high-level goals from a Tropos goal model. The goal-based modeling of workflow activities provides the most flexibility regarding the resource allocation as several leaf goals may fulfill the user specified activity goal. Furthermore, the goal model can include additional Quality of Service (QoS) parameters and the positive or negative contribution of goals towards these parameters. The workflow perspective includes the Semantic Access Layer (SAL) middleware to enable the transformation of activity goals into semantic queries as well as their execution on the ontology for role-based Things. The SAL enables the discovery of fitting Things, their allocation as workflow resources, the invocation of referenced IoT services, and the continuous monitoring of the allocated Things as part of the ontology. We show the feasibility and added value of this work in relation to related approaches by evaluation within several application scenarios in a smart home setting. We compare the fulfillment of quantified criteria for IoT-aware workflow management based on requirements extracted from related research. The evaluation shows, that our approach enables an increase in the context-aware modeling of Things as workflow resources, in the query support for workflow resource allocation, and in the modeling support of activities using Things as workflow resources.:1 Introduction 15 1.1 Background 17 1.2 Motivation 17 1.3 Aim and Objective 19 1.3.1 Research Questions and Scope 19 1.3.2 Research Goals 20 1.4 Contribution 20 1.5 Outline 21 2 Background for Workflows in the IoT 23 2.1 Resource Perspective 24 2.1.1 Internet of Things 24 2.1.2 Context and Role Modeling 27 2.2 User Perspective 37 2.2.1 Goal Modeling 38 2.2.2 Tropos Goal Modeling Language 38 2.3 Workflow Perspective 39 2.3.1 Workflow Concepts 39 2.3.2 Workflow Modeling 40 2.3.3 Internet of Things-aware Workflow Management 43 2.4 Summary 44 3 Requirements Analysis and Approach 45 3.1 Requirements 45 3.1.1 IoT Resource Perspective 46 3.1.2 Workflow Resource Perspective 50 3.1.3 Relation to Research Questions 51 3.2 State of the Art Analysis 53 3.2.1 Fulfillment Criteria 54 3.2.2 IoT-aware workflow management 56 3.3 Discussion 65 3.4 Approach 70 3.4.1 Contribution to IoT-aware workflow management 71 3.5 Summary 73 4 Concept for Adaptive Workflow Activities in the IoT 75 4.1 Resource Perspective 75 4.1.1 Role-based Things 75 4.1.2 Semantic Modeling Concepts 79 4.1.3 SWRL Modeling Concepts 81 4.2 User Perspective 81 4.2.1 Semantic Queries in Workflow Activites 81 4.2.2 Goals for Workflow Activites 81 4.2.3 Mapping from Goals to Semantic Queries 82 4.3 Workflow Perspective 83 4.3.1 Workflow metamodel Extensions 83 4.3.2 Middleware for Dynamic Resource Discovery and Allocation 85 4.4 Summary 86 5 Modeling Adaptive Workflow Activities in the IoT 87 5.1 Resource Perspective 87 5.1.1 Role-based Modeling of Context-sensitive Things 87 5.1.2 Ontology Classes 90 5.1.3 Ontology Object properties 93 5.1.4 Ontology Data properties 99 5.1.5 DL-safe SWRL Rules 100 5.2 Discussion of Role Modeling Features 101 5.3 Example Application Scenario Modeling 102 5.3.1 Resource Perspective 102 5.3.2 User Perspective 105 5.3.3 Workflow Perspective 109 5.4 Summary 113 6 Architecture for Adaptive Workflow Activities in the IoT 115 6.1 Overview of the System Architecture 115 6.2 Specification of System Components 117 6.2.1 Resource Perspective 118 6.2.2 User Perspective 118 6.2.3 Workflow Perspective 118 6.3 Summary 123 7 Implementation of Adaptive Workflow Activities in the IoT 125 7.1 Resource Perspective 125 7.2 Workflow Perspective 125 7.2.1 PROtEUS 125 7.2.2 Semantic Access Layer 127 7.3 User Perspective 128 7.4 Summary 128 8 Evaluation 129 8.1 Goal and Evaluation Approach 129 8.1.1 Definition of Test Cases 130 8.2 Scenario Evaluation 134 8.2.1 Ambient Assisted Living Setting 135 8.2.2 Resource Perspective 135 8.2.3 User Perspective 137 8.2.4 Workflow Perspective 138 8.2.5 Execution of Test Cases 139 8.2.6 Discussion of Results 146 8.3 Performance Evaluation 148 8.3.1 Experimental Setup 148 8.3.2 Discussion of Results 151 8.4 Summary 152 9 Discussion 153 9.1 Comparison of Solution to Research Questions 153 9.2 Extendability of the Solutions 155 9.3 Limitations 156 10 Summary and Future Work 157 10.1 Summary of the Thesis 157 10.2 Future Work 159 Appendix 161 Example Semantic Context Model for IoT-Things 171 T-Box of Ontology for Role-based Things in the IoT 178 A-Box for Example Scenario Model 201 A-Box for Extended Example Scenario Model 21

The Internet-of-Things Meets Business Process Management: Mutual Benefits and Challenges

The Internet of Things (IoT) refers to a network of connected devices collecting and exchanging data over the Internet. These things can be artificial or natural, and interact as autonomous agents forming a complex system. In turn, Business Process Management (BPM) was established to analyze, discover, design, implement, execute, monitor and evolve collaborative business processes within and across organizations. While the IoT and BPM have been regarded as separate topics in research and practice, we strongly believe that the management of IoT applications will strongly benefit from BPM concepts, methods and technologies on the one hand; on the other one, the IoT poses challenges that will require enhancements and extensions of the current state-of-the-art in the BPM field. In this paper, we question to what extent these two paradigms can be combined and we discuss the emerging challenges

Modeling IoT-aware Business Processes - A State of the Art Report

This research report presents an analysis of the state of the art of modeling Internet of Things (IoT)-aware business processes. IOT links the physical world to the digital world. Traditionally, we would find information about events and processes in the physical world in the digital world entered by humans and humans using this information to control the physical world. In the IoT paradigm, the physical world is equipped with sensors and actuators to create a direct link with the digital world. Business processes are used to coordinate a complex environment including multiple actors for a common goal, typically in the context of administrative work. In the past few years, we have seen research efforts on the possibilities to model IoT- aware business processes, extending process coordination to real world entities directly. This set of research efforts is relatively small when compared to the overall research effort into the IoT and much of the work is still in the early research stage. To create a basis for a bridge between IoT and BPM, the goal of this report is to collect and analyze the state of the art of existing frameworks for modeling IoT-aware business processes.Comment: 42 page

Federated Embedded Systems – a review of the literature in related fields

This report is concerned with the vision of smart interconnected objects, a vision that has attracted much attention lately. In this paper, embedded, interconnected, open, and heterogeneous control systems are in focus, formally referred to as Federated Embedded Systems. To place FES into a context, a review of some related research directions is presented. This review includes such concepts as systems of systems, cyber-physical systems, ubiquitous computing, internet of things, and multi-agent systems. Interestingly, the reviewed fields seem to overlap with each other in an increasing number of ways

Big Data and the Internet of Things

Advances in sensing and computing capabilities are making it possible to embed increasing computing power in small devices. This has enabled the sensing devices not just to passively capture data at very high resolution but also to take sophisticated actions in response. Combined with advances in communication, this is resulting in an ecosystem of highly interconnected devices referred to as the Internet of Things - IoT. In conjunction, the advances in machine learning have allowed building models on this ever increasing amounts of data. Consequently, devices all the way from heavy assets such as aircraft engines to wearables such as health monitors can all now not only generate massive amounts of data but can draw back on aggregate analytics to "improve" their performance over time. Big data analytics has been identified as a key enabler for the IoT. In this chapter, we discuss various avenues of the IoT where big data analytics either is already making a significant impact or is on the cusp of doing so. We also discuss social implications and areas of concern.Comment: 33 pages. draft of upcoming book chapter in Japkowicz and Stefanowski (eds.) Big Data Analysis: New algorithms for a new society, Springer Series on Studies in Big Data, to appea

Philosophy of Blockchain Technology - Ontologies

About the necessity and usefulness of developing a philosophy specific to the blockchain technology, emphasizing on the ontological aspects. After an Introduction that highlights the main philosophical directions for this emerging technology, in Blockchain Technology I explain the way the blockchain works, discussing ontological development directions of this technology in Designing and Modeling. The next section is dedicated to the main application of blockchain technology, Bitcoin, with the social implications of this cryptocurrency. There follows a section of Philosophy in which I identify the blockchain technology with the concept of heterotopia developed by Michel Foucault and I interpret it in the light of the notational technology developed by Nelson Goodman as a notational system. In the Ontology section, I present two developmental paths that I consider important: Narrative Ontology, based on the idea of order and structure of history transmitted through Paul Ricoeur's narrative history, and the Enterprise Ontology system based on concepts and models of an enterprise, specific to the semantic web, and which I consider to be the most well developed and which will probably become the formal ontological system, at least in terms of the economic and legal aspects of blockchain technology. In Conclusions I am talking about the future directions of developing the blockchain technology philosophy in general as an explanatory and robust theory from a phenomenologically consistent point of view, which allows testability and ontologies in particular, arguing for the need of a global adoption of an ontological system for develop cross-cutting solutions and to make this technology profitable. CONTENTS: Abstract Introducere Tehnologia blockchain - Proiectare - Modele Bitcoin Filosofia Ontologii - Ontologii narative - Ontologii de intreprindere Concluzii Note Bibliografie DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24510.3360

Domain Objects and Microservices for Systems Development: a roadmap

This paper discusses a roadmap to investigate Domain Objects being an adequate formalism to capture the peculiarity of microservice architecture, and to support Software development since the early stages. It provides a survey of both Microservices and Domain Objects, and it discusses plans and reflections on how to investigate whether a modeling approach suited to adaptable service-based components can also be applied with success to the microservice scenario