Bounded variability of metric temporal logic

Deciding validity of Metric Temporal Logic (MTL) formulas is generally very complex and even undecidable over dense time domains; bounded variability is one of the several restrictions that have been proposed to bring decidability back. A temporal model has bounded variability if no more than v events occur over any time interval of length V, for constant parameters v and V. Previous work has shown that MTL validity over models with bounded variability is less complex—and often decidable—than MTL validity over unconstrained models. This paper studies the related problem of deciding whether an MTL formula has intrinsic bounded variability, that is whether it is satisfied only by models with bounded variability. The results of the paper are mainly negative: over dense time domains, the problem is mostly undecidable (even if with an undecidability degree that is typically lower than deciding validity); over discrete time domains, it is decidable with the same complexity as deciding validity. As a partial complement to these negative results, the paper also identifies MTL fragments where deciding bounded variability is simpler than validity, which may provide for a reduction in complexity in some practical cases

Guest Editorial: Temporal representation and reasoning

In this editorial I introduce the main topics of papers in the special issue

Bounded variability of metric temporal logic

Deciding validity of Metric Temporal Logic (MTL) formulas is generally very complex and even undecidable over dense time domains; bounded variability is one of the several restrictions that have been proposed to bring decidability back. A temporal model has bounded variability if no more than v events occur over any time interval of length V, for constant parameters v and V. Previous work has shown that MTL validity over models with bounded variability is less complex—and often decidable—than MTL validity over unconstrained models. This paper studies the related problem of deciding whether an MTL formula has intrinsic bounded variability, that is whether it is satisfied only by models with bounded variability. The results of the paper are mainly negative: over dense time domains, the problem is mostly undecidable (even if with an undecidability degree that is typically lower than deciding validity); over discrete time domains, it is decidable with the same complexity as deciding validity. As a partial complement to these negative results, the paper also identifies MTL fragments where deciding bounded variability is simpler than validity, which may provide for a reduction in complexity in some practical cases

Bounded Variability of Metric Temporal Logic

Previous work has shown that reasoning with real-time temporal logics is often simpler when restricted to models with bounded variability—where no more than v events may occur every V time units, for given v, V. When reasoning about formulas with intrinsic bounded variability, one can employ the simpler techniques that rely on bounded variability, without any loss of generality. What is then the complexity of algorithmically deciding which formulas have intrinsic bounded variability? In this paper, we study the problem with reference to Metric Temporal Logic (MTL). We prove that deciding bounded variability of MTL formulas is undecidable over dense-time models, but with a undecidability degree lower than generic dense-time MTL satisfiability. Over discretetime models, instead, deciding MTL bounded variability has the same exponential-space complexity as satisfiability. To complement these negative results, we also discuss fragments of MTL that are more amenable to reasoning about bounded variability, again both for discrete- and for dense-time models. 1 The Benefits of Bounding Variability In yet another instance of the principle that “there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch”, expressiveness of formal languages comes with a significant cost to pay in terms of complexity—and possibly undecidability—of algorithmic analysis. The trade-off between expressiveness and complexity is particularly critical for the real-time temporal logics, which dwell on the border of intractability. A chief research challenge is, therefore, identifying expressive temporal logic fragments without letting the “dark side ” of undecidability [6] prevail and abate practical usability