Mechanism Design with Strategic Mediators

We consider the problem of designing mechanisms that interact with strategic agents through strategic intermediaries (or mediators), and investigate the cost to society due to the mediators' strategic behavior. Selfish agents with private information are each associated with exactly one strategic mediator, and can interact with the mechanism exclusively through that mediator. Each mediator aims to optimize the combined utility of his agents, while the mechanism aims to optimize the combined utility of all agents. We focus on the problem of facility location on a metric induced by a publicly known tree. With non-strategic mediators, there is a dominant strategy mechanism that is optimal. We show that when both agents and mediators act strategically, there is no dominant strategy mechanism that achieves any approximation. We, thus, slightly relax the incentive constraints, and define the notion of a two-sided incentive compatible mechanism. We show that the $3$-competitive deterministic mechanism suggested by Procaccia and Tennenholtz (2013) and Dekel et al. (2010) for lines extends naturally to trees, and is still $3$-competitive as well as two-sided incentive compatible. This is essentially the best possible. We then show that by allowing randomization one can construct a $2$-competitive randomized mechanism that is two-sided incentive compatible, and this is also essentially tight. This result also closes a gap left in the work of Procaccia and Tennenholtz (2013) and Lu et al. (2009) for the simpler problem of designing strategy-proof mechanisms for weighted agents with no mediators on a line, while extending to the more general model of trees. We also investigate a further generalization of the above setting where there are multiple levels of mediators.Comment: 46 pages, 1 figure, an extended abstract of this work appeared in ITCS 201

Lagrangian Relaxation and Partial Cover

Lagrangian relaxation has been used extensively in the design of approximation algorithms. This paper studies its strengths and limitations when applied to Partial Cover.Comment: 20 pages, extended abstract appeared in STACS 200

The pp-Center Problem in Tree Networks Revisited

We present two improved algorithms for weighted discrete $p$-center problem for tree networks with $n$ vertices. One of our proposed algorithms runs in $O(n \log n + p \log^2 n \log(n/p))$ time. For all values of $p$, our algorithm thus runs as fast as or faster than the most efficient $O(n\log^2 n)$ time algorithm obtained by applying Cole's speed-up technique [cole1987] to the algorithm due to Megiddo and Tamir [megiddo1983], which has remained unchallenged for nearly 30 years. Our other algorithm, which is more practical, runs in $O(n \log n + p^2 \log^2(n/p))$ time, and when $p=O(\sqrt{n})$ it is faster than Megiddo and Tamir's $O(n \log^2n \log\log n)$ time algorithm [megiddo1983]

Maximum gradient embeddings and monotone clustering

Let (X,d_X) be an n-point metric space. We show that there exists a distribution D over non-contractive embeddings into trees f:X-->T such that for every x in X, the expectation with respect to D of the maximum over y in X of the ratio d_T(f(x),f(y)) / d_X(x,y) is at most C (log n)^2, where C is a universal constant. Conversely we show that the above quadratic dependence on log n cannot be improved in general. Such embeddings, which we call maximum gradient embeddings, yield a framework for the design of approximation algorithms for a wide range of clustering problems with monotone costs, including fault-tolerant versions of k-median and facility location.Comment: 25 pages, 2 figures. Final version, minor revision of the previous one. To appear in "Combinatorica

The Non-Uniform k-Center Problem

In this paper, we introduce and study the Non-Uniform k-Center problem (NUkC). Given a finite metric space $(X,d)$ and a collection of balls of radii $\{r_1\geq \cdots \ge r_k\}$, the NUkC problem is to find a placement of their centers on the metric space and find the minimum dilation $\alpha$, such that the union of balls of radius $\alpha\cdot r_i$ around the $i$th center covers all the points in $X$. This problem naturally arises as a min-max vehicle routing problem with fleets of different speeds. The NUkC problem generalizes the classic $k$-center problem when all the $k$ radii are the same (which can be assumed to be $1$ after scaling). It also generalizes the $k$-center with outliers (kCwO) problem when there are $k$ balls of radius $1$ and $\ell$ balls of radius $0$. There are $2$-approximation and $3$-approximation algorithms known for these problems respectively; the former is best possible unless P=NP and the latter remains unimproved for 15 years. We first observe that no $O(1)$-approximation is to the optimal dilation is possible unless P=NP, implying that the NUkC problem is more non-trivial than the above two problems. Our main algorithmic result is an $(O(1),O(1))$-bi-criteria approximation result: we give an $O(1)$-approximation to the optimal dilation, however, we may open $\Theta(1)$ centers of each radii. Our techniques also allow us to prove a simple (uni-criteria), optimal $2$-approximation to the kCwO problem improving upon the long-standing $3$-factor. Our main technical contribution is a connection between the NUkC problem and the so-called firefighter problems on trees which have been studied recently in the TCS community.Comment: Adjusted the figur

Centrality of Trees for Capacitated k-Center

There is a large discrepancy in our understanding of uncapacitated and capacitated versions of network location problems. This is perhaps best illustrated by the classical k-center problem: there is a simple tight 2-approximation algorithm for the uncapacitated version whereas the first constant factor approximation algorithm for the general version with capacities was only recently obtained by using an intricate rounding algorithm that achieves an approximation guarantee in the hundreds. Our paper aims to bridge this discrepancy. For the capacitated k-center problem, we give a simple algorithm with a clean analysis that allows us to prove an approximation guarantee of 9. It uses the standard LP relaxation and comes close to settling the integrality gap (after necessary preprocessing), which is narrowed down to either 7, 8 or 9. The algorithm proceeds by first reducing to special tree instances, and then solves such instances optimally. Our concept of tree instances is quite versatile, and applies to natural variants of the capacitated k-center problem for which we also obtain improved algorithms. Finally, we give evidence to show that more powerful preprocessing could lead to better algorithms, by giving an approximation algorithm that beats the integrality gap for instances where all non-zero capacities are uniform.Comment: 21 pages, 2 figure